Twine
by Erick Schonfeld on September 18, 2009

Extracting meaning from the Web is huge project that is very difficult to do at large scale. Keyword search only skims the surface of meaning locked in Web pages. Various semantic search technologies try to go deeper by adding structured data to web pages so that the Web can be treated more like a database. But adding semantic metadata to the Web is laborious and time-consuming. Just look at Twine. It’s approach so far has been to add semantic data only to the Web pages members save to the service.

While it appeared like Twine was finally getting some traction earlier this year, it’s fallen by the wayside. Traffic is way down (see chart below), partly because it is no longer buying traffic with ads and partly because of changes to the way Google indexes the site. Bottom line is that is that beyond a hardcore following of about 250,000, Twine does not have broad appeal.

But CEO Nova Spivack and his team at Twine have been busy working on something else entirely, to the point that the current Twine service is pretty much on autopilot. In the video after the jump, Spivack gives a sneak peak at what his team has been working on. Codenamed T2, it is complete departure from the navel-gazing approach of Twine 1.0. It is a big step towards creating a semantic search engine that might eventually scale across the Web—exactly the kind of swing for the fences type of idea we like to see at TechCrunch.

by Erick Schonfeld on July 2, 2009

What is the best way to sift through a stream of information? The list view seems to be the most popular because it is information-dense and easy to scan, but it can be overwhelming. More visually appealing ways to manage data are needed. Twine, a site which lets you collect and subscribe to different interest feeds, just introduced a new way to wade through its streams.

The new Flash visualization presents your stream of shared links as a deck of headlines which you can shuffle through (see video below). A slider along the bottom, lets you cycle through the deck by time, and arrows underneath let you move sequentially, or you can just click on a deck in the background to move it forward. If you want to learn more, you can flip each deck to read a snippet and link to the full detail page. The semantic tags associated with each item also show up on the side and can be clicked on to navigate through the deck.

by Erick Schonfeld on May 25, 2009

What doesn’t kill you will only make you stronger. Adam Lindemann learned that the hard way with iMindi, a startup trying to create a “thought engine” that was skewered by our judges at last year’s TechCrunch50. “It almost destroyed us,” says Lindemann. But he and his team have completely redesigned the product, which creates a mind map of your thoughts based on semantic indexing technology, and lets you “merge” those thought maps with related ones created by other people.

It is still rough around the edges, but is a vast improvement over the original concept. Today, iMindi is launching in private beta, and we have 1,000 invites for TechCrunch readers (sign up here).

The drubbing iMindi received at TechCrunch50 last year was brutal. After Lindemann’s presentation (see video below), Mark Cuban, who was a judge, laid into him:

by Erick Schonfeld on May 22, 2009

It turns out that people are following more than just their friends online. Look at the comScore chart above comparing unique visitors in the U.S. to FriendFeed versus Twine. Yeah, I was shocked to see that Twine has more than three times as many unique monthly visitors as FreindFeed (714,000 vs. 188,000). On a worldwide basis, comScore shows FriendFeed still slightly ahead of Twine. ComScore doesn’t always do a great job with small sites, so I checked Compete, which shows Twine with 2.25 million monthly visitors in April versus 998,000 for FriendFeed (see embed below). Different numbers, same story. While FriendFeed is organized around following feeds of your friends’ activities across the Web, Twine is organized around interest feeds.

by Erick Schonfeld on October 21, 2008

A year after launching its beta, Twine opened up today to the general public with a completely redesigned site. The relaunch got lots of coverage. Maybe you read some of it. Even if you did, you probably still don’t know what Twine does. Some semantic shit, right?

Exactly. Twine’s marketing department made the video above as a joke for their staff meeting today. (Warning: Turn the volume down, NSFW). I think that is the best explanation I’ve heard yet of what Twine does.

Radar Networks Raises $13 Million B Round; Velocity’s Ross Levinsohn Joins Board
11 Comments
by Erick Schonfeld on February 24, 2008

Semantic Web startup Radar Networks raised $13 million in a B round, led by Velocity Interactive Group. Velocity’s Ross Levinsohn will join the board. Other investors include Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Paul Allen’s Vulcan Capital. The company previously raised $5 million from Vulcan, Leapfrog Ventures, Ron Conway, and Peter Rip.

Radar Networks is the company behind Twine, a site in private beta that helps you organize the Web and your personal information by automatically tagging and cataloging everything you save to it. (For more, see our write-up).

Twine Launches A Smarter Way To Organize Your Online Life
42 Comments
by Erick Schonfeld on October 19, 2007

pic13.jpgRadar Networks, the not-so-secret stealth startup, is finally unveiling its site, dubbed Twine. Twine is targeted straight at groupware and knowledge-management apps that have mostly been confined to enterprise installations, and opening that up to a broader base of consumers. The startup has raised $5 million from Paul Allen, Peter Rip, Ron Conway in April, 2006, and has done work for DARPA.

CEO Nova Spivack took me through a demo. On the surface, Twine is a place to organize information you find or create on the Web—bookmarks, notes, videos, photos,contacts, tasks. (A Web browser plug-in makes it easy to save stuff to your Twine wherever you may find it on the Web). twine-tags.pngYou can also share that information with a private group or publicly. Once you ingest in all the information you want to organize, Twine applies a semantic analysis to it that creates tags for each document or video or photo. The tags match up to concepts that Twine’s algorithms associate with each piece of content, regardless of whether that concept is specifically mentioned in the Web page or other content being tagged. For example, you might bookmark this post and Twine would create tags for all the people mentioned in it (Nova Spivack, Paul Allen, Peter Rip, and Ron Conway). It would also create tags for the organizations related to the post, such as Radar Networks and DARPA, but also Paul Allen’s venture firm Vulcan Capital—even if Vulcan was never mentioned in the post.

What Twine does is automatically generate smart tags and connect them together. There is also a social element. If you share a Twine with others, each piece of content that someone brings into that online space is associated with that person. So when you do a search, the results that come back are influenced not just by the tags, but also by who put the information into the Twine in the first place. “It’s the wisdom of crowds plus the wisdom of computers working together,” says Spivack. The more closely related that person is to you, the higher the relevance. At the same time, Twine is creating a very detailed profile of your interests which it hopes to run highly targeted ads against.

Twine is putting structure onto all of this unstructured data that is out there by analyzing it and adding tags to it that are connected together. The network of links between these tags is something that Spivack calls the “semantic graph,” which includes the “social graph” that is made up only of those tags categorized as people. Bu the semantic graph is bigger than that, comprising other tags such as organizations, places, and other categories.

Rather than create a semantic index of the entire Web, which would be a huge undertaking, Spivack is starting with just those parts of the Web people feel are important enough to save in their collections. Then he applies natural language processing and semantic indexing to just that data. “If you just sucked in the whole Web,” he says, “you would get stuff people didn’t want. Here we are looking at who thought it was important and why.” It’s also cheaper to do it this way, since it’s a more limited set of data that needs to be run through Twine’s semantic engine.

Everything in Twine will become widgetizable and exportable elsewhere. There will also be a full set of APIs. All the data will be able to be taken in and out. Other search engines will be able to index anything in a public Twine, along with the smart tags that have been appended to the information there. “When you put stuff into Twine,” says Spivack, “Twine enriches it, but you can take it out.” Of course, all of those enriched tags will point right back to Twine. “We’re the only place that can even see the connections between things,” says Spivack. Well, not quite yet. People have to start using Twine first.
twine-screenshot.png

bugbugbugbug
Techcrunch on Facebook