<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechCrunch &#187; Spotplex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/spotplex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='www.techcrunch.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Spotplex Suffers Identity Crisis, Stumbles Into DeadPool</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/spotplex-suffers-identity-crisis-stumbles-into-deadpool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/spotplex-suffers-identity-crisis-stumbles-into-deadpool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kincaid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEADPOOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotplex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/spotplex-suffers-identity-crisis-stumbles-into-deadpool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We introduced Spotplex in February 2007 as a potential Digg killer that served up popular stories by monitoring how many people read them.  Somewhere along the way, it also turned into an Alexa-like analytics service.  Unfortunately, neither market worked out for them and they&#8217;ve been forced to shut their doors.
The Digg-style service used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/spotplex"><img src="http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotplexlogo.png" class="shot2"/></a></p>
<p>We <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/">introduced</a> <a href="http://www.spotplex.com/">Spotplex</a> in February 2007 as a potential <a href="http://www.digg.com/">Digg</a> killer that served up popular stories by monitoring how many people read them.  Somewhere along the way, it also turned into an Alexa-like analytics service.  Unfortunately, neither market worked out for them and they&#8217;ve been forced to shut their doors.</p>
<p>The Digg-style service used JavaScript that was embedded on participating pages to track how often posts were read, and top-read posts were featured on Spotplex&#8217;s homepage.  The service set itself apart from Digg by requiring no intervention on the reader&#8217;s part to promote a page.  On the other hand, Spotplex only recorded hits on blogs that had embedded the Javascript snippets, which severely restricted its sources of content.</p>
<p>Spotplex&#8217;s JavaScript embeds were also used to offer an analytics service that was designed to contend with sites like Alexa and Compete.  While the addition of this service marked a shift to a very different market, both of Spotplex&#8217;s services leveraged the same backend.</p>
<p>CEO <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/doyon-kim">Doyon Kim</a> says that the company&#8217;s ultimate failure was due to a lack of adequate funding.  The company underestimated the resources that were required to build and maintain its service, and it neglected to seek venture funding after its $450,000 seed round.  This is surprising given Kim&#8217;s experience in the industry: he co-founded <a href="http://www.DialPad.com">DialPad</a>, which was acquired by Yahoo in 2005.</p>
<p>Spotplex is now in the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/deadpool">TechCrunch Deadpool</a>.</p>
<div class="cbw snap_nopreview">
<div class="cbw_header"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/javascripts/widget.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<div class="cbw_header_text"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/">CrunchBase Information</a></div>
</div>
<div class="cbw_content">
<div class="cbw_subheader"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/spotplex">Spotplex</a></div>
<div class="cbw_subcontent"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/cbw/company/spotplex.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div class="cbw_footer">Information provided by <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/">CrunchBase</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p><strong><em>Crunch Network</em></strong>:  <a href="http://www.crunchboard.com">CrunchBoard</a><em> </em>because it&#8217;s time for you to find a new Job2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/spotplex-suffers-identity-crisis-stumbles-into-deadpool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toward a Better Digg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/16/whos-taking-on-digg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/16/whos-taking-on-digg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clipmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsvine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotplex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/16/whos-taking-on-digg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digg revolutionized social news when it launched in 2004. Since then, it has become the undisputed champ of news link ranking sites. They just recently crossed the million mark. And their influence goes far beyond those user registration numbers.
Tangible evidence of Digg&#8217;s importance: the raw number of clones and Digg gaming schemes out there. We&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg revolutionized social news when it launched in 2004. Since then, it has become the undisputed champ of news link ranking sites. They just recently crossed the <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/07/digg-hits-1-million-registered-users/">million mark</a>. And their influence goes far beyond those user registration numbers.</p>
<p>Tangible evidence of Digg&#8217;s importance: the raw number of clones and Digg gaming schemes out there. We&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/18/spike-the-vote-another-cancer-aimed-at-digg/">rigging</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/01/digg-removes-list-of-top-users/">vote buying</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/30/digg-profile-for-sale-on-ebay/">profile sales</a>, and accusations of <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=39">thug rule</a>. The <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/11/suggestion-if-you-copy-digg-at-least-thank-them/">dozens of clones</a> include a not-bad SourceForge project called <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/pligg/">Pligg</a>, which lets users &#8220;build their own Digg&#8221;.</p>
<p>But Digg&#8217;s ubiquity and influence doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s perfect. A number of startups are tackling the same problem as Digg &#8211; sharing of good content via link submission and some form of voting. One of them, stumbleupon, actually has <a href="http://www.prweb.com//releases/2007/3/prweb511876.htm">more registered users</a> than Digg. For the most part, though, these sites won&#8217;t be able to do much damage to Digg&#8217;s steady growth. But many of them are worth looking at, and they all have individual features that could, if incorporated into Digg, make it a better overall service. </p>
<p><center><img src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/linkrankcomp1.png' alt='linkrankcomp1.png' /></center><br />
<small>*Personalized refers to recommendations uniquely tailored for each user</small></p>
<p><big><strong>BlinkList</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://blinklist.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/blinklist150.png' alt='blinklist150.png' /></a>BlinkList takes a distributed approach to the Digg model. It lets anyone get their own link blog where they can add their favorites. BlinkList then looks across the whole network and ranks the site based on how many other users added the link.</p>
<p><big><strong>ClipMarks</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://clipmarks.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/clipmarks150.png' alt='clipmarks150.png' /></a>Instead of full URLs, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/27/clipmarks-a-highlighter-for-the-web/">Clipmarks</a> lets users share just the best parts of webpages. Using their plugin, you can bundle together your favorite selections of content from a webpage. This includes text as well as pictures and video. Submissions are then &#8220;popped&#8221; by other members of the community, with the most popular at the top. Using the plugin, you can also submit your clips to your blog. Currently, the site&#8217;s two pane page layout gives me the feeling of looking at the net through a steamship porthole.</p>
<p><big><strong>CoRank</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://corank.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/corank150.png' alt='corank150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/08/corank-launches-twist-on-social-bookmarking/">CoRank</a> confronts the mob mentality on Digg. Digg promotes stories to the front page based on the votes of the whole community, resulting in a lot of noise for users with interests different from the crowd. CoRank lets you look at all submitted links or filter out the noise by subscribing links from just the users you choose. Only the highest rated stories from your subscribed sources make your front page.</p>
<p><big><strong>Netscape</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://netscape.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/netscape150.png' alt='netscape150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/14/aol-netscape-launches-massive-digg-like-site/">Netscape</a> has also taken on Digg&#8217;s mob mentality, mixing in their own team of anchors to submit stories and cut out spam. The anchor&#8217;s stories are featured on the front page along with the current top 25 stories. They also got into a little <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/">hot water</a> with their recruitment practices. Netscape has managed a greater variety of content in it&#8217;s front page, pulling 2 stories from each of the top 10 most popular channels and 1 story from each of the next 5 most popular channels.</p>
<p><big><strong>Newsvine</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://newsvine.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/newsvine150.png' alt='newsvine150.png' /></a>Instead of a submission free-for-all, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/09/newvine-to-enter-social-news-ranks/">Newsvine</a> implemented it&#8217;s own form of quality control by only allowing users to vote on content from the Associated Press and other user&#8217;s personal articles. Users are given a live feed of all the latest AP stories, voting on articles and writing their own on their personal column page. Newsvine shares 90% of all revenue generated by advertisements on your column page with the user. Users can also personalize their feed</p>
<p><big><strong>OpenServing</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://openserving.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/openserving150.png' alt='openserving150.png' /></a>OpenServing is a product of Wikia, and the opensource version of BlinkList works for fun or profit. The concept is the same, a personal page of links, democratically ranked by your friends, but it also lets you post your own ads on the site.</p>
<p><big><strong>Reddit</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://reddit.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/reddit150.png' alt='reddit150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/31/interview-with-reddit-founders/">Reddit</a> made headlines when Conde Nast <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/31/breaking-news-conde-nastwired-acquires-reddit/">acquired them</a>. The site is a favorite of mine and is still up and running, with some key differences from Digg. Reddit rankings are based on an absolute vote (+1 for hot, -1 for cold), meaning a story can dance up and down Reddit&#8217;s top page instead of being buried out of existence by a few power users. To see what&#8217;s on top now, there&#8217;s also a &#8220;hot&#8221; list. This type of voting system also means the front page can be stagnant, to the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/12240">chagrin of some users</a>, but it has also avoided Digg&#8217;s payola scandals. Another bigger differentiator for Reddit is their recommended article page, which suggests links based on your voting pattern.</p>
<p><big><strong>Spotback</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://spotback.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotback150.png' alt='spotback150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/11/spotback-launches-their-rate-everything-widget/">Spotback</a> is an automated alternative to Digg, that aims to use personalization to improve the signal to noise ratio of the stories you see. You train Spotback by clicking and voting on the stories it digs up. Voting positively on a story causes Spotback to reveal the next most relevant story. One of the best parts about Spotback is that it doesn&#8217;t even require a registration to get up and running.</p>
<p><big><strong>Spotplex</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://spotplex.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotplex150.png' alt='spotplex150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/">Spotplex</a> is another automated link site that automatically submits stories from blogs carrying its badge. Stories are then ranked on the Spotplex homepage based in part on how many views the article generates (the algorithm is still being tweaked). The site&#8217;s automation and closely controlled blogroll seems has avoided the types of rigging Digg was subjected to, but it lacks the community of commentors that make these social media sites addictive.</p>
<p><big><strong>StumbleUpon</strong></big><br />
<a href="http://stumbleupon.com"><img class="shot2" style="float: right;" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/stumble150.png' alt='stumble150.png' /></a><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/stumbleupon-now-ie-friendly/">StumbleUpon</a> provides a different user experience while discovering and digging up links. You use a tooblar (FF &#038; IE) to tag, submit, and vote for links. While the site does rank links the main experience is by taking a random walk around the internet. It keys in on Diggs greatest strength, an easily accessible constant stream of interesting links. StumbleUpon is definitely catching on, they recently <a href="http://www.prweb.com//releases/2007/3/prweb511876.htm"><strong>surpassed 2 million users</strong></a>.</p>
<p><strong><em>Crunch Network</em></strong>:  <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com">CrunchGear</a><em> </em>drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/16/whos-taking-on-digg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Is Spotplex a Better Digg?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotplex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new site called Spotplex launched today that arguably sorts news in a better way than Digg does. I&#8217;ve been testing the service for the last couple of weeks and like what I&#8217;ve seen.
News stories are not submitted by users, as with Digg. Instead, sites that want to participate include some javascript code on their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spotplex.com"><img style="float: left" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotplexlogo.png'class="shot" alt="" /></a>A new site called <a href="http://www.spotplex.com">Spotplex</a> launched today that arguably sorts news in a better way than Digg does. I&#8217;ve been testing the service for the last couple of weeks and like what I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>News stories are not submitted by users, as with Digg. Instead, sites that want to participate include some javascript code on their site, which monitors what stories/posts are read. The more times a story is read, the higher it appears in Spotplex. Very popular stories will make it to the Spotplex home page.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotplexbig.png"><img style="float: right" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/spotplex275.png'class="shot2" alt="" /></a>The resulting home page on Spotplex looks a lot like Digg, showing very popular content. Popular stories are ranked under the &#8220;popular&#8221; tag. Upcoming stories (the default view) are under the &#8220;latest&#8221; tab. Readers can also view stories based on popular current tags being used by publishers, and can view a ranked list of top publishers <a href="http://www.spotplex.com/blogstanding/">here</a>.</p>
<p>The service is still very much in beta. For now only a handful of blogs have been included. The site itself is open for anyone to read stories, but only a few blogs are included so far. The company will be bleeding in new blogs over time to avoid strain on their servers. <strong>To kick things off they&#8217;ve agreed to allow up to 1,000 blogs in to SpotPlex. If you want to be included, just email &#8220;signup@spotplex.com.&#8221; </strong>The first thousand requests will get in right away.</p>
<p>Can Spotplex become as popular as Digg, or more so? I think it can if it evolves properly. Unlike Digg, Spotplex won&#8217;t have to deal with voting fraud. Spotplex will have their own unique fraud issues to manage, though. Another problem with Spotplex is the fact that large blogs and publications will dominate it to start just because they have large readerships already. To avoid this &#8220;the rich become richer&#8221; problem, I&#8217;ve suggested to Spotplex that the rankings be based on a publication competing with itself &#8211; so only very popular stories on TechCrunch (compared to average TechCrunch traffic) would get to the Spotplex home page. The Spotplex team has said that they&#8217;ll be tweaking their algorithm constantly after launch based on real data they get from the beta. </p>
<p>Spotplex is a spinoff of another startup, Opinity. The founding team includes Doyon Kim and Young Jun Pack.</p>
<p><strong><em>Crunch Network</em></strong>:  <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/">MobileCrunch</a><em> </em>Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/28/exclusive-is-spotplex-a-better-digg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
