<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechCrunch &#187; Gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='www.techcrunch.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>A Valleywag Out. Owen Thomas Leaving Gawker.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/01/the-valleywag-out-owen-thomas-leaving-gawker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/01/the-valleywag-out-owen-thomas-leaving-gawker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 19:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0 News & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=61192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/owen_thomas-156x200.jpg" width="156" height="200" /><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/owen-thomas">Owen Thomas</a>, who has run the Silicon Valley gossip rag <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/">Valleywag</a> for the past couple years, is leaving <a href="http://gawker.com">Gawker</a>, the site's parent company, we've learned. This move is a bad blow for the site which significantly cut its workforce a few months ago as it was rolled under the larger Gawker.com umbrella, and made into a column.

Thomas, who was previously an editor with Business 2.0, was <a href="http://gawker.com/tech/housekeeping/owen-thomas-is-the-valleywag-268844.php">brought in</a> to run Valleywag in June 2007, replacing the head of Gawker Media, Nick Denton. Denton's run as the editor of Valleywag came only after he <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/11/14/memo-why-valleywag-sacked-its-editor/">fired</a> Nick Douglas from the same job.

We hear Thomas is going to work for NBC on some kind of site which may or may not be centered around the Valley as well. <em>[Update below, Denton has confirmed Owen's NBC gig.]</em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-61195 alignright" title="owen_thomas" src="http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/owen_thomas.jpg" alt="owen_thomas" width="240" height="307" /><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/owen-thomas">Owen Thomas</a>, who has run the Silicon Valley gossip rag <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/">Valleywag</a> for the past couple years, is leaving <a href="http://gawker.com">Gawker</a>, the site&#8217;s parent company, we&#8217;ve learned. This move is a bad blow for the site which significantly cut its workforce a few months ago as it was rolled under the larger Gawker.com umbrella, and made into a column.</p>
<p>Thomas, who was previously an editor with Business 2.0, was <a href="http://gawker.com/tech/housekeeping/owen-thomas-is-the-valleywag-268844.php">brought in</a> to run Valleywag in June 2007, replacing the head of Gawker Media, <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/nick-denton">Nick Denton</a>. Denton&#8217;s run as the editor of Valleywag came only after he <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/11/14/memo-why-valleywag-sacked-its-editor/">fired</a> Nick Douglas from the same job.</p>
<p>We hear Thomas is going to work for NBC on some kind of site which may or may not be centered around the Valley as well. <em>[Update below, Denton has confirmed Owen's NBC gig.]</em></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve just contacted Thomas who declined to comment at this time.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Gabriel Synder, the editor of Gawker, has confirmed the news and had this to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>While I&#8217;m sorry to see Owen leave, I&#8217;m still committed to keeping Valleywag going as Gawker&#8217;s tech column.</p></blockquote>
<p>Snyder continued that while he couldn&#8217;t say who will be brought in to replace Thomas, there will be a new editor of Valleywag and the site will definitely not be shuttered.</p>
<p>&#8220;Owen&#8217;s been great through this entire transition and has set the template for how coverage of the tech beat can fit into Gawker,&#8221; Snyder went on to say.</p>
<p><strong>Update 2</strong>: Here&#8217;s Gawker founder Nick Denton on the move:</p>
<blockquote><p>Owen has a reputation as a fearsome gossip writer. What&#8217;s less known is his penchant for management. It sounds like this NBC job will give him the responsibility he&#8217;s been craving &#8212; and take him out of the Valleywag firing line! We&#8217;re replacing him internally. More on that later.</p></blockquote>
<p>NBC may be building out a bunch of local sites, Denton says, which Thomas would be a part of.</p>
<p><strong><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-61266 alignright" title="custom_1241212718266_ryantatejpg" src="http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/custom_1241212718266_ryantatejpg-300x399.jpg" alt="custom_1241212718266_ryantatejpg" width="210" height="279" /></strong>Denton went on to say that Gawker&#8217;s Q1 revenue numbers have been strong, up 27% from the year ago period. Of Valleywag specifically, he would only say that it&#8217;s sold under Gawker.com, so it&#8217;s not separated out for things like ad sales anymore, apparently. Gawker is down from 15 to 9 sites now after it shed a bunch last year, but he says the majority of the revenue came from those 9 sites anyway. He adds that they&#8217;ve been growing, even during the downturn.</p>
<p><strong>Update 3</strong>: Gawker has just <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5236440/meet-the-new-valleywag-ryan-tate">confirmed</a> that the new editor of Valleywag will be Ryan Tate (pictured, right). Tate had been serving as Gawker&#8217;s night editor, as well as contributing some of his work to Valleywag. Gawker is now seeking a night editor to replace him.</p>
<p><strong>Update 4</strong>: Beet.TV&#8217;s Andy Plesser has the <a href="http://www.beet.tv/2009/05/owen-thomas-picked-as-managing-editor-of-nbc-bay-area.html">story</a> on Thomas&#8217; new gig. Apparently, he&#8217;ll be the managing editor of <a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/">NBC Bay Area</a>, a news site focused just on the Bay Area that is in beta right now. As Plesser notes, this will make Thomas an employee of GE (which owns NBC).</p>
<p><em>[Owen Thomas photograph by Benjamin Tice Smith]</em></p>
<div class="cbw snap_nopreview">
<div class="cbw_header"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/javascripts/widget.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<div class="cbw_header_text"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crunchbase.com/">CrunchBase Information</a></div>
</div>
<div class="cbw_content">
<div class="cbw_subheader"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/owen-thomas">Owen Thomas</a></div>
<div class="cbw_subcontent"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/cbw/person/owen-thomas.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div class="cbw_subheader"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/company/gawker-media">Gawker Media</a></div>
<div class="cbw_subcontent"><script src="http://www.crunchbase.com/cbw/company/gawker-media.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div class="cbw_footer">Information provided by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.crunchbase.com/">CrunchBase</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p><strong><em>Crunch Network</em></strong>:  <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com">CrunchBase</a><em> </em>the free database of technology companies, people, and investors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/01/the-valleywag-out-owen-thomas-leaving-gawker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker-Yahoo Experiment Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/gawker-yahoo-experiment-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/gawker-yahoo-experiment-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/gawker-yahoo-experiment-ends/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gawker-Yahoo content distribution deal, which allowed Yahoo to post Gawker content on its site, has been terminated. Our original post on the deal, announced in November 2005, is here. Gawker founder Nick Denton&#8217;s post on the termination is here.
Nick suggests that the partnership just sort of petered out. But he also says that Nick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gawker.com"><img style="float: right" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/gawkerlogo.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" /></a>The Gawker-Yahoo content distribution deal, which allowed Yahoo to post Gawker content on its site, has been terminated. Our original post on the deal, announced in November 2005, is <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/">here</a>. Gawker founder Nick Denton&#8217;s post on the termination is <a href="http://www.nickdenton.org/002195.html#2195">here</a>.</p>
<p>Nick suggests that the partnership just sort of petered out. But he also says that Nick Douglas&#8217;s <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/lloyd-braun/">regular attacks</a> at Valleywag (a Gawker blog) on Lloyd Braun, head of Yahoo Media, didn&#8217;t help matters much. I imagine he might be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/gawker-yahoo-experiment-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker Launches New Blog, Consumerist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/07/gawker-launches-new-blog-consumerist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/07/gawker-launches-new-blog-consumerist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/07/gawker-launches-new-blog-consumerist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker continues to drive its busines forward amidst rumors of an acquisition in the works with the New York Times. 
In addition to their recent deal to promote their content within Yahoo, Gawker today announced the launch of its newest blog, The Consumerist, a humorous slant on today&#8217;s consumptive world:
&#8220;We here at Gawker Media love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: left" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/gawkerlogo.jpg'class="shot" alt="" />Gawker continues to drive its busines forward amidst rumors of an acquisition in the works with the <a href="http://www.nypress.com/18/47/news&#038;columns/russsmith.cfm">New York Times</a>. </p>
<p>In addition to their <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/">recent deal</a> to promote their content within Yahoo, Gawker today <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/consumerist/gawker-media-launches-consumerist-141574.php">announced</a> the launch of its newest blog, <a href="http://www.consumerist.com/">The Consumerist</a>, a humorous slant on today&#8217;s consumptive world:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We here at Gawker Media love to spend our money, but we hate being treated like cattle while we do it. And so our big happy family is proud to announce the birth of our latest site: Consumerist, our answer to the utter fuckitude of modern capitalism.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Edited by Joel Johnson, who formerly wrote Gizmodo, The Consumerist is off to a strong start with posts such as &#8220;<a href="http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/freebies/afternoon-freebies-gay-wallet-follies-141629.php">Gay Wallet Follies</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/complaints/consumeristas-speak-lenovos-free-thinkpad-battery-bait-and-switch-141572.php">Lenovo&#8217;s Free Thinkpad Battery Bait and Switch</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>The Consumerist has a full, ad supported <a href="http://www.consumerist.com/index.xml">feed</a> and a partial, no ads<a href="http://www.consumerist.com/excerpts.xml"> feed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/07/gawker-launches-new-blog-consumerist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Gawker-Yahoo Deal Important?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Company & Product Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker, a blog network similar to Weblogs, Inc., and Yahoo announced a syndication deal today that brings Gawker content to Yahoo News. Content from the largest Gawker blogs is already included &#8211; Wonkette, Gizmodo, Defamer, Lifehacker, and Gawker itself. More may be coming. 
The financial terms are undisclosed, but here&#8217;s what is now on Yahoo: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float: left" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/gawkerlogo.jpg'class="shot" alt="" /><a href="http://www.gawker.com/">Gawker</a>, a blog network similar to Weblogs, Inc., and Yahoo <a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&#038;storyID=2005-11-16T052418Z_01_KWA619348_RTRIDST_0_OUKIN-UK-MEDIA-YAHOO-GAWKER.XML">announced</a> a syndication deal today that brings Gawker content to<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/"> Yahoo News</a>. Content from the largest Gawker blogs is already included &#8211; Wonkette, Gizmodo, Defamer, Lifehacker, and Gawker itself. More may be coming. </p>
<p>The financial terms are undisclosed, but here&#8217;s what is now on Yahoo: Gawker brands and content are pushed throughout the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/">news home page</a>. Clicking on associated content pulls up a Yahoo page with the Gawker content (<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/lifehacker/20051117/tc_lifehacker/howtomeditate;_ylt=AseqJYzJDq.ln0QXLpCwx6Ks0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3cjE0b2MwBHNlYwM3Mzg-">example</a>). It does NOT redirect to Gawker. </p>
<p>There is a single link to Gawker on the content page (clicking on the brand name). Otherwise, it&#8217;s an all-Yahoo experience. If I was doing the deal, I&#8217;d expect a revenue split in Yahoo&#8217;s favor on ad revenue generated from the page. Gawker gets that revenue, the branding, and some links directly to the blog. This is purely speculation, but my best guess.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/lifehacker/20051117/tc_lifehacker/howtomeditate;_ylt=AqM72a.1Pdd1eVZOipwXV2qs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3cjE0b2MwBHNlYwM3Mzg-"><img style="float: right" src='http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/gawkeryahoo.jpg'class="shot" alt="" /></a>Is this an important deal? Yes, in that it shows Yahoo embracing blog content. The guy at Yahoo to get to know is clearly Scott Moore, named by Wired in their last print edition as VP Content Operations. Scott is hiring bloggers (such as Kevin Sites) and doing these kinds of deals with Gawker. These are smart deals for Yahoo &#8211; they generate page views where they can put lots of ads. If the deals are revenue share, then it&#8217;s a no lose proposition for Yahoo.</p>
<p>But what Yahoo is noticeably <u>not</u> doing is acquiring Gawker, like <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/05/aol-acquires-weblog-inc/">AOL did with Weblogs, Inc.</a> That means liquidity events for bloggers are limited &#8211; the GYMs (Google-Yahoo-Microsoft) are not yet in content buying moods.</p>
<p>So perhaps the networks and very large blogs can cut deals to increase page views on content and generate revenue. Will this model work for the long or medium tail of blog content? My guess is no&#8230;the GYMs will want to control quality and that doesn&#8217;t scale with more than a small number of blogs. But certainly we&#8217;ll see more deals like this, particularly as long as the advertising market is strong and demand for inventory is outstripping supply. The portals need content, and this is a cheap way to get it.</p>
<p>A lot of people are focusing on the fact that the deal is incorporating  blog content directly into Yahoo news results. While I find this interesting, we&#8217;ve already seen Yahoo experiment with this with their <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/10/yahoo-blog-search/">blog search product</a>. Clearly Yahoo is defining the definition of news to include blogs (as they should), and I applaud this.</p>
<p>But back to the title of this post. Is it an interesting deal? Yes, but mostly because of what the deal <u>isn&#8217;t</u> &#8211; it isn&#8217;t an aquisition of Gawker. </p>
<p>Read more analysis of the deal at <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002942.php">Read/Write Web</a>, <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_11_16.shtml#052417">Paid Content</a> and <a href="http://tech.memeorandum.com/051116/p41#a051116p41">Memeorandum</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
