Google co-founder Sergey Brin and CEO Eric Schmidt are holding an audience this morning with a roomful of journalists in New York City. They talk about the Google Books settlement, antitrust scrutiny, Android, Chrome, innovations in search and the “evil room.” Below are my live notes (I’ve bolded parts for emphasis).
Sergey Brin: We have had a number of interesting activities. A bunch of you saw the verizon announcement, android, software platform, more enhancements in terms of faster software, better software. A number of devices are coming out as a trickle, many more we expect. Google Books, a hearing today, but generally that is something I am very proud of, to make the world’s books accessible. Have written a little piece I hope comes out as an op-ed.
Eric Schmidt: It seems like Sergey has jumped the gun. We should focus mostly on search, and some of the ideas Sergey has. We are having our global sales meeting here, we brought senior sales executives. The mood was very, very positive. We told them that the worst is behind us and we are clearly seeing aspects of recovery, what is notable is we are seeing aspects of recovery not just in the US but in Europe. I thought it was going to be US first, Europe second, Asia we never saw a hit. We are increasing our hiring rate and investment rate in anticipation of a recovery.
Sergey: There are a bunch of things that have come out recently, you can now get more commercial results or less commercial results. There are other controls that are coming down the pike. I will highlight now, today you can restrict things by date, but that is based on dates mentioned in the text, cannot restrict based on the date the text was authored.
Steven Levy: You have more activity from your competitor in Redmond, rolled out a branded search engine. Historically when one competitor steps up it opens up innovation. Do you feel this increased competition will ramp up your innovation, or is it just business usual?
Sergey: I think it is healthy for the industry to have many competitors. You’ve seen search engines such as Cuil and Powerset that MSFt acquired. MSFT has made its contributions. We are working as hard as we can, but I do think having all of those competitors out there generally helps the health of that industry.
Q: Do you think Bing is something different or a rebranding?
Sergey: I don’t want to speak about our competitors
Schmidt: Better for you to judge. We like to focus on our customers. We have been criticized
Ed Baig; where do you stand with Android?
Sergey Brin: At the outset, we started to focus on Android because phones basically lacked powerful browsers and phones also lacked the ability to easily run applications. I think Android has really addressed that really well, but it has also pushed the rest of the market. I am pretty excited for the future of mobile phones because they are increasingly getting quite capable. You can write an application across five phones, we plan to push the state of the art with Android. I might be overstating it a bit, but having the software platform has freed the hardware makers from software platforms, now they are reinvigorating hardware design
Q: Enterprise market?
Sergey: definitely a market I am very excited about, born from an internal need, being able to handle many hundreds of thousands of emails. At the time that we started and launched in 04, Webmail offerings at the time [were limited] we wanted something that would work in an enterprise, and made it available to consumers, pushed things further [than our competitors].
We feel we are further ahead, for you to judge, in email capability and collaborative document editing. Sites All of those would be available to enterprises and consumers. And I think ultimately the cloud model is a better model.I think this install-less system of the cloud is better.
Stephanie Mehta: can you characterize future investments Google needs to make for medium to larger enterprise?
Ken Auletta: If the judge says why should I not be concerned about your concentration of power, what would you say to him?
Schmidt: It is an error to answer hypothetical questions from a journalist. The question you posed is not actually a question that will occur.. Book search, we thought we were doing something appropriate. We were sued by a bunch of publishers, and now it has come before a judge. We don’t want to change it unless we need to. The hearing is going on right now. My guess is in this hearing there will be a date for another hearing. Does putting the books in the hands of someone like Google who has other strategic resources a problem? It is possible for another company to do what we are doing. And the rights registry, which we would administer is something we would do for the orphan works. The scenario that is in front of us is probably the best outcome for someone who is looking for information that is not otherwise available.
Sergey: regardless of the settlement we want to make more books available online.
Q: You keep adding to Chrome and nobody seems to be paying attention. If that is one of the places where the battle is fought you seem pretty far behind.
Sergey: Perhaps that is true in media . . .
Schmidt: let me, some of your assumptions about Chrome adoption are wrong. The adoption rate of Chrome is [very strong]. We are going to do a better job of getting that message out.
Schonfeld: Steve Ballmer calls it a rounding error, is it?
Schmidt: I don’t respond to Steve Ballmer questions. Next question?
The fundamental aspect of Chrome is speed. People who go to Chrome have a hard time moving back. Two months ago we announced Chrome OS. Everything is linked together, Chrome, Chrome OS, the cloud
Sergey: There is also the security aspect. In a recent hacker competition, Chrome was the only one to escape unscathed in terms of security vulnerabilities. And more stable.
Tom Post, Forbes: Lately there seems to be a revisiting of settlements with core media where you seem to be taking a new approach. Leading question is not is Google too big and mean, rather is Google being nice? Do you have a new product out called Google Remorse?
Schmidt: In many ways we always wanted to be this Google, rather than the one we were perceived of last year. I am really proud about relationship with advertising agencies. In the media industry, the success of YouTube. We have always wanted to have these partnerships. We are learning how to do it in a way that they win too.
Sergey: People have always equated Google with the Internet, which is disrupting businesses.
Schmidt: Google is an innovator, the innovations in the internet are causing collisions. Innovation plus collisions equal opportunity. The fact that Verizon has adopted the open principles we articulated five years ago is shocking. This is Verizon. It happened over time.
AP: AP’s president said that big news sites might be willing to pay for news if they get it as an exclusive for 20 or 30 minutes. How does that sound to you?
Schmidt: We have a contract with the AP. I don’t want to talk about a proposed services where we pay more. We have to be very careful not to favor one publisher over another. We are not trying to get into the content business.
Q: What are the most attractive areas for acquisitions?
Schmidt: we turned off M&A down, we didn’t want an additional expense streams without [additional revenues] We’ve turned it back on again. One day Larry and Sergey bought what became Android, and I didn’t even know about this. They said this is really interesting. I didn’t think about that, but now think about the strategic opportunities that created.
Schonfeld: Would you make a YouTube-sized acquisition again?
The problem at buying at those levels. With a little one you can afford [to make mistakes]. Youtube and Doubleclick those will prove the best spending of money. They are harder. Any large acquisition we do will have a second review. We deal with a different world now than we did a few years ago. We bought that then MSFT has largely got out of that after their acquisition of aQuantive didn’t work out, so there.
Q: FCC?
Schmidt: I just met with the chairman, this broadband plan is what they are really focused on. We are incredibly sensitive to roll out of broadband, the number of searches we get, the revenue, without broadband there is no cloud computing.
Q: So what policy suggestions did you give him?
Schmidt: More broadband. I think we are on our way to getting a national broadband plan for America. It is one of the best things the government can be doing.
Q: Do you ever worry Google is growing too fast?
Schmidt: No.
Q: how do you manage the growth?
Schmidt [jokes}: As you can see, not very well. In technology markets, you either grow or die.
Sergey: hardware is getting incredibly capable. It used to be that most of your money in a computer went to the display. Your costs now are dominated by broadband connection. I think that is an interesting trend. Wide broadband availability, when you think about your phone, you are probably paying $40 to $50 a month for it. Your device cost is negligible compared to your access cost. I think certainly there are changes on the horizon.
Schmidt: we provide the infrastructure below what you are talking about. Think about a Kindle two to three years from now, what will it look like? Better screens, more features, and there will be many Kindles. The iPhone has proven that you can sell a phone with a subscription. The contract cost is greater than the cost of the phone. So what do you think, do those prices remain higher from AT&T and those guys, does the hardware become free?
Sergey: From a consumer point of view, I think it will be better if you end up with devices that are not locked down to a service, like Kindle is locked down to Amazon or iPhone to AT&T. I think it is better if the consumer can pick the devices and services they want.
Danny Sullivan: I can go through and fund really bad results. You seem to be rewarding a site’s authority and a site’s age. Also something Eric has said about signals, like intent to purchase from Google CheckOut. You seem to have data other people cannot get because you give away free tools. other people can tap into Google Analytics to see conversion
Schmidt: every one of these has a competitor. Google is an advertising company, we don’t have cross-subsidization
Danny: There is a closed loop in . . .
Schmidt: Well there is no closed loop, there are competitors and we make it possible for you to get out
Sergey: In analytics, we just noticed that when advertising partners start using analytics they spend more on our site because all of these stats become apparent to them. If I spend $1,000 a month more on Google, I will make X more profit. So we realized that we should make analytics
Q: When the phone companies had to deal with this, maybe the solution is that when a competitor comes into the market they have to lease Checkout data at a reasonable rate?
Schmidt: It is a false analogy. One, antitrust law does not cover it, two?, three the information we make available to consumers.
Segey: You could argue that Paypal and Amazon data is more valuable, so they should make it available first.
Q: coming back to Google book settlement,
Schmidt: In the book settlement, everyone has raised a lot of issues. The question is not whether they are interesting, but whether they have legal standing in the settlement.
Sergey: the companies that are making objections about out of print books are doing nothing for out of print books, MSFT and Amazon. I guess they scanned 15 books. These objections that Google will be the only one.
Schmidt: make an alternative proposal that solves the problem
Schonfeld: Would it be possible to extend the terms of the settlement for orphan works to other companies?
Sergey: It would be legally impossible. You are looking at this as an either/or. Does not preclude other settlements, will make legislation more likely. The companies complaining now, if they were engaged in the digitization process we were doing, digitizing 10 million books, there would be nothing stopping them from achieving the same thing.
Schmidt: the goal is to get all the books available and make sure the authors are compensated. The settlement was not a total solution, it was the best we could do.
Q: How do you plan to promote this in places that don’t have libraries?
Sergey: In respect to the settlement, it can apply to all books in all languages, but unfortunately it only affects U.S. readers which is a really sad thing. One of the great things about the U.S. is the fair use aspect. Which other countries don’t have.
Q: Why is there not a danger you will be bringing consumers into closed loop in the future?
Schmidt: there are many reasons why we will not be like MSFT. The first has to do with the culture and the founders. The other is the ease of moving out of these online services. Having taken such a strong position a a company. If we went into a room and were exposed to evil light and came out and announced evil strategies, we would be destroyed. The trust would be destroyed. Fourth, none of us want to go through the legal proceedings.
We have not yet found the evil room in our campus.
Sergey: Chrome OS, if you want to use it on your Mac, every change is available, all the source code is available.
Schmidt: Today we have zero market share in Chrome OS because it is not shipping. Imagine a scenario where we got to 80% market share with a free product, which I think is unlikely. Let’s say we go into the evil room and decide to start charging. A competitor would be able to take the code that we had and continue to offer our business model, while our new business model runs us into the ground. That is why open source provides a protection.
Peter Kafka: Will you make another stab at moving into other platforms (TV,radio)
Sergey: We are still optimistic on the TV front. Radio and print did not work out as we had hoped,. Television has a lot of similarity to Internet advertising in the sense of its much better measurability via settop boxes. You can see immediately how [many people are watching].
Schonfeld: Is PageRank long in the tooth, are links the still the best metric?
Sergey: No they are not and we decided that in 1999. We use various link algorithms, including what pagerank has evolved to, links are 1%, 100 other factors we look at. Yes,there is spam, and the web changes. We are able to do better and better, can do a much better job ranking than we could a decade ago, if we had rested on our laurels and just stayed with what was in our paper we published in 1998 we would be in pretty bad shape right now.
Yeah. Unless Google is messing with Adsense percentages, it does seem like they’re making a lot more money recently compared to 6 months ago.
Maybe time to buy Google? Especially if they’re positive.
http://www.trad...spx?symbol=goog
Trader Bots: You do realize that making a comment with virtually no worth just so you can provide a link to your site is borderline spam right?
I’ve seen you pull this trick before with techcrunch posts such as the recent freelancer post.
In for three.
“Eric Schmidt: It seems like Sergey has jumped the gun.”
Exactly, sometimes smart people only smart behind the desk and quite difficult to present what his/her perspective.
i’m not convinced he’s a smart one.
Yeah, this whole Google thing was just created by a bunch of dumb monkeys.
One thing I can tell , he does not like Steve Ballmer
In response to Sergey’s comment: “Chrome was the only one to escape unscathed in terms of security vulnerabilities”. The only reason this happened is because there are just not enough users for hackers to care right now. While I very much appreciate Sergey’s input this not a point of differentiation.
It was a hacker marathon. That probably has very little to do with actual market adoption.
Am I missing something?
Actually it was. This was the Pwn2Own Contest.
You should do your research considering you’re a tech sales and marketing executive.
Here’s what Charlie Miller, a previous winner of Pwn2Own said: As for Chrome, he [Charlie] says that he has identified a security bug in Google’s browser but has been unable to exploit it because the browser’s sandboxing feature and the operating system’s security measures together pose a formidable challenge. (Source: Arstechnica)
So even when a security bug was found, this security expert whom we know has the capabilities of exploiting these bugs as shown by his exploits on other browsers, was STILL unable to do the same on Google Chrome.
wow you just got pwnd
Courtney Benson should start revising their resume . . .
Jim – my comment was based on the overall usage of the Chrome browser by the public and how a marketer would use differences to their advantage. While at the time Surge could have used security as a fine point. Today, there are some issues and I was referring to now not months ago. If you are interested in the latest security issues surrounding Chrome I’m happy to bring you up to date.
As of my writing the browser is vulnerable to an open source code issue know as DTOA (converts strings to floating point). Another exploit has to do with a fake Paypal certificate which is out on the net and means that Chrome can establish an SSL connection – this would compromises users.
I’m sure Google is working on these issues.
FAIL
“A conversation with Sergey Brin…and Eric Schmidt”
Insighful conversation.
I look forward to Google unveiling their platform magic in the emerging smartbook sector — mobile tv, apps, games on these cutting edge smartbook devices.
“book sin” – typo or Freudian slip? LOL.
“The evil room we have not yet found in our campus.”
Wow, these guys *actually* believe MSFT to be evil incarnate. So did Scott McNealy. Look what he did to Sun in the process.
Open comment to GOOG: keep your eye on the effin’ ball. As soon as you make it personal, MSFT will have you right where they want you. Don’t be a sucker.
This is a very interesting interview. Google is smart to focus on the analytics market.
Jason
Gsjournal.com
Nice article Erick like always.
Typo : aspects pf
should be aspects of.
remove I from “I not just US but”. I think it should be “not just in US”
thanks, was typing fast. should all be cleaned up now.
GUYS !!!
SPELL CHECK YOUR WORK !!!
PLEASE !!!!!!
I mean this article looks like a 4th grader typed it !!!
He was trying to get this to us as soon as possible, relax…..
What would have been nice was a video, but the fact this conference happened a short while ago and we have the ability to read it know is why small typos get missed!
NERD
Relax man. This is what live blogging is all about. Stop nitpicking.
Сергей,
Все из крупнейших технологических изобретений, созданных человеком – самолет, автомобиль, компьютер, – говорит мало о его интеллект, но многое говорит о его лени.
spell check your shit. you make no sense either.
an interesting conversation
Schmidt: “…The evil room we have not yet found in our campus…”
Evil is in the eyes of beholder. Many in book publishing and digital content industries already perceive Google as bordering on evil. Your argument that “..trust us because we are not evil” doesn’t count much.
yeah i found that to be empty, but this part was a bit better: “Schmidt: the goal is to get all the books available and make sure the authors are compensated. The settlement was not a total solution, it was the best we could do.”
better b/c he they don’t believe in straight stealing without compensation and when you pay someone for their work or rights to their works you are not stealing from them. i personally think the settlement is a lot of money but not enough because as i understand it there are many authors worldwide who will be looking to make money from this just like google is going to benefit from this new venture as well, and based on the number of books google has scanned and will be adding to their database a 100 million doesn’t make the cut. i don’t want to think google is cheating the authors because granted not every book gets read, but i definately feel like there will be some people who will get more than the short end of a stick, but maybe feel that stick up their behind’s like they are not worth goog’s recognition. i believe them when they say they will try their best to pay.
As an atheist, the word evil has no meaning.
How is it evil to scan in out-of-print books when ANY OTHER COMPANY can do the same thing, right now, if they wanted to?
Because no one else wants to does not make Google evil.
Put a red cape and blue costume on em and he very much could pass for Superman. He actually wears this under his street cloths if you look carefully enough.
interesting
thanks for the live notes. i don’t think it was too different from what ms guy was saying the other day. you can be one company and do many thing and be multidimensional. funny he didn’t answer your rounding error question. it’s not that chrome isn’t advertised enough, although it seems the prompts on the main goog page and even in gmail have been minimized, but i haven’t been convinced on why i should switch to chrome. my friend has it on his laptop and so does my teacher and they both love it…i think i’ll have to test it on one of my computers and see how i like it. it does look better and works better than the latest IE.
I think some person at Google should be worry about what the call ”EVIL” reply’s to. Evil has away to change the complete status quo of things.
Google could end wanting something this much to many. Or turn into a big webbased corporation with a revenue driven goal and growth while working keeping the pace on the next thing. (Run forrest run).
Competition is something taken serious and Google should react even to a loud person like Steve Balmer , Face it look at Larry Ellison even he shows some teeths. If these Google guy’s want to be taken serious some teeth showing even if its a little should be there to.
Yeah a little ”Revenge of the Nerds” Dweebs.
am i wrong in saying the guy in the picture looks like JD from scrubs?
rounding error? we don’t do rounding errors.
Note to self: transcribe interview BEFORE lobotomy…
Where is the Youtube video of this?
go gooooooogle!!!1
Interesting.
awesome article. glad you were there and reported it.
am i wrong in coming away thinking that none of that sounded fun?
While reading the article, in your head you heard Sergey talking in a cheap Russian accent like Boris & Natasha, right?