<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R.I.P. Good Times: One Year Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:18:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notes from Startup Santa Cruz #2 &#171; Startup Santa Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3055545</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from Startup Santa Cruz #2 &#171; Startup Santa Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3055545</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/ There were 645 venture financing for a total of $7.7 billion in Q3 2009, v. 660 and $7.7 billion in Q3 2008 (basically flat, but not down at all). Acquisitions have become less common, but the average price is way up. There were 231 acquisitions in Q3 2009 for an aggregate of $45.2 billion. In Q3 2008, there were 329 acquisitions for $25.9 billion in aggregate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/'>http://www.tech...one-year-later/</a> There were 645 venture financing for a total of $7.7 billion in Q3 2009, v. 660 and $7.7 billion in Q3 2008 (basically flat, but not down at all). Acquisitions have become less common, but the average price is way up. There were 231 acquisitions in Q3 2009 for an aggregate of $45.2 billion. In Q3 2008, there were 329 acquisitions for $25.9 billion in aggregate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3024433</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3024433</guid>
		<description>sure, whatever... still Roelof is a friend, and i have nothing against them personally.  i just thought that piece wasn&#039;t very helpful (for them, or anyone else other than B round companies that weren&#039;t doing well)

also, i wrote the &lt;a href=&quot;http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2008/10/fear-is-the-min.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Fear is the Mind Killer of the Silicon Valley Entrepreneur&quot;&lt;/a&gt; rebuttal before i joined Founders Fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure, whatever&#8230; still Roelof is a friend, and i have nothing against them personally.  i just thought that piece wasn&#8217;t very helpful (for them, or anyone else other than B round companies that weren&#8217;t doing well)</p>
<p>also, i wrote the <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2008/10/fear-is-the-min.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Fear is the Mind Killer of the Silicon Valley Entrepreneur&#8221;</a> rebuttal before i joined Founders Fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The State of Funding in the Valley &#171; The ANZA Technology Network Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3024244</link>
		<dc:creator>The State of Funding in the Valley &#171; The ANZA Technology Network Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3024244</guid>
		<description>[...] came across this interview with &#8220;the Grandaddy of Silicon Valley,&#8221; bv Mike Arrington at TechCrunch that took place just the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across this interview with &#8220;the Grandaddy of Silicon Valley,&#8221; bv Mike Arrington at TechCrunch that took place just the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3024025</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3024025</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s easy to say that a year later. at the time it was very sound advice. and the steps that startups took helped them anyway. see, for example, http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/17/some-of-these-layoffs-arent-really-layoffs/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s easy to say that a year later. at the time it was very sound advice. and the steps that startups took helped them anyway. see, for example, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/17/some-of-these-layoffs-arent-really-layoffs/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/10/17/some-of-these-layoffs-arent-really-layoffs/'>http://www.tech...really-layoffs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirstBallSix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023928</link>
		<dc:creator>FirstBallSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023928</guid>
		<description>I write this comment even before reading the post - great topic, someone had to write about this. One of those moments I think Techcrunch is so, so good. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write this comment even before reading the post &#8211; great topic, someone had to write about this. One of those moments I think Techcrunch is so, so good. Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guessing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023900</link>
		<dc:creator>guessing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say sequoia got it right - at least for them and their investors. They got their bottom tier companies in their portfolio to cut costs (which probably needed to happen anyway) and give them some chance to survive and produce some sort of return and they got their best companies, the ones they like the most, to panic and raise capital at lower valuations on terms that were much more friendly for investors. Since they were able to whip the whole market into a frenzy, they were also able to exert pressure in new investments as well. Very savvy move from the most savvy group out there - and one I am sure they have used in these moments before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say sequoia got it right &#8211; at least for them and their investors. They got their bottom tier companies in their portfolio to cut costs (which probably needed to happen anyway) and give them some chance to survive and produce some sort of return and they got their best companies, the ones they like the most, to panic and raise capital at lower valuations on terms that were much more friendly for investors. Since they were able to whip the whole market into a frenzy, they were also able to exert pressure in new investments as well. Very savvy move from the most savvy group out there &#8211; and one I am sure they have used in these moments before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023895</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023895</guid>
		<description>I agree with Dave McClure. 

If anything this shows herd mentality prevalent among investors.

It is not leadership to play chicken little and shout sky is falling. Nor is to harp on the latest buzzword real time web.

Tell us something that we don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dave McClure. </p>
<p>If anything this shows herd mentality prevalent among investors.</p>
<p>It is not leadership to play chicken little and shout sky is falling. Nor is to harp on the latest buzzword real time web.</p>
<p>Tell us something that we don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023769</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023769</guid>
		<description>yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: While other German VCs wilt, the Samwer brothers invest and clone like mad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023608</link>
		<dc:creator>While other German VCs wilt, the Samwer brothers invest and clone like mad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023608</guid>
		<description>[...] most prolific startup investors, are on an e-commerce investment spree. While TechCrunch mourns the end of the funding party and 340,000 layoffs in Silicon Valley alone since August 2008, the three brothers with the Midas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most prolific startup investors, are on an e-commerce investment spree. While TechCrunch mourns the end of the funding party and 340,000 layoffs in Silicon Valley alone since August 2008, the three brothers with the Midas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: airterrier</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023426</link>
		<dc:creator>airterrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023426</guid>
		<description>With respect to the citation of Ron Conway: has anyone a good definition on what &quot;real time data startups&quot; are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to the citation of Ron Conway: has anyone a good definition on what &#8220;real time data startups&#8221; are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tolles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023351</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tolles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023351</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bullshit&quot;?  

Hardly.  

The first half of 2009 was pretty rough for a lot of companies, and making some deep cuts initially was definitely the right call for many companies.

It is also pretty clear that Sequoia actually showed quite a bit of leadership here for Silicon Valley.

Far from damaging their brand, this did a lot to show who gets listened to in the Valley.

(And, it&#039;s not the capex that they were telling people to cut, Dave, it was the opex.  30% off of opex is a pretty big deal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bullshit&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Hardly.  </p>
<p>The first half of 2009 was pretty rough for a lot of companies, and making some deep cuts initially was definitely the right call for many companies.</p>
<p>It is also pretty clear that Sequoia actually showed quite a bit of leadership here for Silicon Valley.</p>
<p>Far from damaging their brand, this did a lot to show who gets listened to in the Valley.</p>
<p>(And, it&#8217;s not the capex that they were telling people to cut, Dave, it was the opex.  30% off of opex is a pretty big deal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Reddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023334</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023334</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious to see if there are big changes in how deals are structured TY vs LY, and if there&#039;s a 2009 risk premium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to see if there are big changes in how deals are structured TY vs LY, and if there&#8217;s a 2009 risk premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023326</link>
		<dc:creator>regis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023326</guid>
		<description>[...] iPhone. Too Bad Google Voice Isnâ€™t VoIP. &#187;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; meebo:title=&#8221;R.I.P Good Times &#8211; One Year Later&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone. Too Bad Google Voice Isnâ€™t VoIP. &#187;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; meebo:title=&#8221;R.I.P Good Times &#8211; One Year Later&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023212</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023212</guid>
		<description>Disclosure - you work for Founders Fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclosure &#8211; you work for Founders Fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023138</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023138</guid>
		<description>sorry meant to say @alex for the original dick comment. larry, glad you as always can look at the lighter side of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry meant to say @alex for the original dick comment. larry, glad you as always can look at the lighter side of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023129</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023129</guid>
		<description>@john that is an insensitive comment. talking about vcs being stupid and losing money in stupid investments is one thing, but to trivialize the life of a  young entrepreneur is sick. depression is a serious issue and the story about dan is tragic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@john that is an insensitive comment. talking about vcs being stupid and losing money in stupid investments is one thing, but to trivialize the life of a  young entrepreneur is sick. depression is a serious issue and the story about dan is tragic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023097</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023097</guid>
		<description>bullshit. it&#039;s not a &quot;little of both&quot;.
 
pure &amp; simple: Sequoia overreacted, and damaged their own brand in the process.

Ron at least about-faced quickly, and actually even accelerated his pace of investment.

in the past year, smart investors &amp; entrepreneurs pressed on the accelerator.

the companies that Sequoia got to downsize were largely not working, and cutting capex by 10-30% probably did little to stop the bleeding.

Sequoia got it wrong. or at least their public statements were wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bullshit. it&#8217;s not a &#8220;little of both&#8221;.</p>
<p>pure &amp; simple: Sequoia overreacted, and damaged their own brand in the process.</p>
<p>Ron at least about-faced quickly, and actually even accelerated his pace of investment.</p>
<p>in the past year, smart investors &amp; entrepreneurs pressed on the accelerator.</p>
<p>the companies that Sequoia got to downsize were largely not working, and cutting capex by 10-30% probably did little to stop the bleeding.</p>
<p>Sequoia got it wrong. or at least their public statements were wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023072</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023072</guid>
		<description>This was not a tech recession, as 2001 was.  This was a finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE) recession.  

It makes sense that the implosion has been in finance and real estate, primarily, with collateral damage for the economy and tech.

Learn more here:  http://www.fireeconomy.com/ 

I&#039;m not spamming for the site -- it&#039;s just a very interesting perspective.   One of the originators of the term predicted the 2008 crash in February 2008, in Harper&#039;s magazine:  http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081908</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was not a tech recession, as 2001 was.  This was a finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE) recession.  </p>
<p>It makes sense that the implosion has been in finance and real estate, primarily, with collateral damage for the economy and tech.</p>
<p>Learn more here:  <a href="http://www.fireeconomy.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.fireeconomy.com/'>http://www.fireeconomy.com/</a> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not spamming for the site &#8212; it&#8217;s just a very interesting perspective.   One of the originators of the term predicted the 2008 crash in February 2008, in Harper&#8217;s magazine:  <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081908" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081908'>http://www.harp...2008/02/0081908</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3023039</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3023039</guid>
		<description>CNBC had Patterson, NY&#039;s governor, on yesterday.  According to him, NYC&#039;s official unemployment rate is around 10%, but when you factor in people who are unemployed but quit looking for a job (and are therefore not in the official count), it is more like 17%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC had Patterson, NY&#8217;s governor, on yesterday.  According to him, NYC&#8217;s official unemployment rate is around 10%, but when you factor in people who are unemployed but quit looking for a job (and are therefore not in the official count), it is more like 17%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="589668754">Jason M. Lemkin</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022979</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="589668754">Jason M. Lemkin</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022979</guid>
		<description>Good piece Mike.

It was both.  The VCs way over-reacted.  The Sequoia memo became VC mantra with 24 hours of posting on TechCrunch.  They should have known better -- as we had just had a tech recession 4-5 years before then between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, and huge profits were made by those who invested in the right companies during that transition.

The entrepeneurs in many cases did know what to do.  Many had been there before, and with no portfolio to &#039;manage&#039; and prune -- just one company -- they simply cut back and modulated, and focused on what mattered and stopped what didn&#039;t.  And came out better for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good piece Mike.</p>
<p>It was both.  The VCs way over-reacted.  The Sequoia memo became VC mantra with 24 hours of posting on TechCrunch.  They should have known better &#8212; as we had just had a tech recession 4-5 years before then between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, and huge profits were made by those who invested in the right companies during that transition.</p>
<p>The entrepeneurs in many cases did know what to do.  Many had been there before, and with no portfolio to &#8216;manage&#8217; and prune &#8212; just one company &#8212; they simply cut back and modulated, and focused on what mattered and stopped what didn&#8217;t.  And came out better for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roscoe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022892</link>
		<dc:creator>Roscoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022892</guid>
		<description>Sky isn&#039;t falling, but then we aren&#039;t rebounding much from Q308, either.  And Q308 pretty much sucked.  

It is sad that we are going to blow hundreds of billions on govt spending with only a fraction of that to show in real value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sky isn&#8217;t falling, but then we aren&#8217;t rebounding much from Q308, either.  And Q308 pretty much sucked.  </p>
<p>It is sad that we are going to blow hundreds of billions on govt spending with only a fraction of that to show in real value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hawkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022825</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hawkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022825</guid>
		<description>In the spirit of transparency, &quot;stable&quot; is what we are seeing right now, with perhaps small signs of recovery/growth.  We founded a small family of companies in late 2005 (http://hawkinson.cloudprofile.com/about), did &gt;1M in our first year and then grew by 2-3x in years 2-3.  When the financial market collapsed last fall, we saw a lot of business dry up, with the scariest period being January - March of 2009.  It just seemed like everyone was worried about an apocalypse and was holding off to see what would happen.

During the Spring-Summer 2009, we then saw most core revenue streams stabilize, but actually proactively walked away from some business lines.  The recession had taught us to be more focused.  

Now we&#039;re seeing stability, and each month the numbers are starting to be a little easier to hit.  My gut says growth is returning.

Knock on wood, but I for one am hopeful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the spirit of transparency, &#8220;stable&#8221; is what we are seeing right now, with perhaps small signs of recovery/growth.  We founded a small family of companies in late 2005 (<a href="http://hawkinson.cloudprofile.com/about)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://hawkinson.cloudprofile.com/about'>http://hawkinso...ofile.com/about</a>), did &gt;1M in our first year and then grew by 2-3x in years 2-3.  When the financial market collapsed last fall, we saw a lot of business dry up, with the scariest period being January &#8211; March of 2009.  It just seemed like everyone was worried about an apocalypse and was holding off to see what would happen.</p>
<p>During the Spring-Summer 2009, we then saw most core revenue streams stabilize, but actually proactively walked away from some business lines.  The recession had taught us to be more focused.  </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re seeing stability, and each month the numbers are starting to be a little easier to hit.  My gut says growth is returning.</p>
<p>Knock on wood, but I for one am hopeful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022800</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022800</guid>
		<description>i guess that puts ticket stumbler into the dead pool...literally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess that puts ticket stumbler into the dead pool&#8230;literally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022789</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022789</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s actually http://ticketstumbler.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s actually <a href="http://ticketstumbler.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://ticketstumbler.com/'>http://ticketstumbler.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Chiang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/06/r-i-p-good-times-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-3022786</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Chiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=107434#comment-3022786</guid>
		<description>repping and selling www.ticketStubMler.com would be tough work cuz people would mispell the site all-the-time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>repping and selling <a href="http://www.ticketStubMler.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.ticketStubMler.com'>http://www.ticketStubMler.com</a> would be tough work cuz people would mispell the site all-the-time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
