Friendster, with 19 million worldwide monthly unique visitors (Comscore, August 2009) is no longer a leading social network in the U.S., but it did forge the trail for the MySpace’s and Facebook’s that came later. And they may be gathering IP assets that could provide offensive or defensive tools down the road – patents.
The company has announced four social networking patents between 2006 and 2009. And they’ll be announcing a fifth shortly – No. 7,478,078, titled “Method for sharing relationship information stored in a social network database with third party databases.” It was first filed on June 14, 2004.
The patent describes the sharing of information between users and applications based on relationships between users, as well as other uses. Most social networks today do exactly this, and may violate the patent:
By having a way of obtaining relationship information from an online social network, operators of online services can manage services based on the relationships between their customers. For example, a site offering a directory of members may allow each member to limit who may access his or her member information, or who may communicate with him or her, based on the closeness of the relationship between the requesting member and him or her. In addition, providers of online services may use methods of the present invention to allow users to control the accessibility of personal information maintained in an online environment. Furthermore, operators of existing database are better able to target particular information (e.g. advertisements) to individuals with an interest in receiving it, based on the premise that people closely related to one another in a social network share common interests, goals, lifestyles, and the like.
This patent joins the previous four Friendster patents. From information supplied by the company:
- In July 2006, Friendster was awarded its first U.S. patent describing how people are
connected in the context of an online social network, titled “A System, Method and
Apparatus for Connecting Users in an Online Computer System Based on Their Relationships within Social Networks” (U.S. Patent No. 7,069,308). - Friendster was granted a second U.S. patent in October 2006, which discloses the
process of enriching other users’ profiles with text, video, pictures and additional content,
titled “Method of Inducing Content Uploads in a Social Network” (U.S. Patent No.
7,117,254). - In March 2007, Friendster added another patent to its portfolio, titled “System and
Method for Managing Connections in an Online Social Network” (U.S. Patent No.
7,188,153), which describes a technology that manages connections in a social network and allows members of the social network to add friends, personalize their network through arranging, ordering and classifying their connections, and search and browse profiles of other members of the social network. - In December 2008, Friendster was granted its fourth patent, titled “Compatibility Scoring of Users in a Social Network” (U.S. Patent No. 7,451,161), which discloses a unique methodology used to calculate compatibility based on expressed interests between users of a social network. This includes scoring the compatibility between two members of a social network based on their interests and scoring the correlation between two interests for a given member of a social network.
Wow! Will Facebook and Myspace have to pay? As far back as I can remember they were the first. But I’m not expert. Can patents be backdated?
I see this more as a group of assets that increases the value of Friendster in an eventual acquisition.
I also see it as a way to ward off patent troll’s and other social networks going after them. I firm believer that the patent system needs to be reformed and patents have no place in software. The patent system has been abused over and over by patent trolls and am saddened by the state of our patent system.
I understand they have another patent-pending application called: “A Method for Eviscerating First Mover Advantage, Eroding Shareholder Value and Morphing into an Online Dating Network for Bisexual Filipinos and Non-Monetizable Indonesians and Malays.”
ROTFL!!!!!!
Can this commenter be awarded a TechCrunch t-shirt?
For generalizing Filipinos as bisexual? I don’t think so. Wholeheartedly agree with how Friendster dropped the ball though.
I wish i could look into my crystal ball to see how this plays out in the future. Greed is a path to the darkside. Clouded this future is…
There are a variety of social networking patents held by various parties. Friendster’s patents sound impressive but if it were to attempt to enforce them against major competitors it would likely be confronted with the threat of other patents being deployed against it. Patent enforcement is often a game of mutual destruction. Anyway, the mother of all social networking patents is the one granted to SixDegrees and originally filed I believe in 1999. It is held by Reid Hoffman and Mark Pincus, who acquired it at auction in 2003.
http://www.face...efacebookeffect -site for my upcoming book The Facebook Effect, Simon & Schuster, June 2010
I really do not think that most buyers of Friendster will give a rats ass about their patents should they ever get acquired. Here’s why: they will never really know their true value until or unless tested in some way. To my knowledge Frienster has not tested these in court.
Good for them. It was going to happen eventually anyway, so good for them for being the first. I wouldn’t imagine them suing, but I could see them bought by myspace or facebook very soon.
Great. If you can’t “win” sue the people that are.
maybe they need to integrate it with sociallybuzz.com
absurd..what are they trying todo ? Sue other companies because they failed? Lame.
Compare that to facebook who release awesome technology to the open source scene…
If I understand correctly, this particular patent revolved around the process, not the technology. If that’s the case since last year process-patents will no longer be valid. You can check with USPTO on this.
.
We have filed number of product related patents and process related. The second category is no longer available with USPTO after a few attempts by some imaginative people to file patent on breath, swinging and other day-to-day “processes”
Screw SW patents! Europe has understand that long ago.