Did you know the first .com domain name that was ever registered was Symbolics.com, on the 15th of March 1985 by the now defunct Massachusetts-based computer manufacturer Symbolics?
While the first that was created in January of that same year was Nordu.net (used to serve as the identifier of the first root server, nic.nordu.net), symbolics.com was the first domain name to actually be registered through the appropriate DNS process a few months later. This was of course long before there was a WWW, but you already had ‘the Internet’. In fact, the first TCP/IP-based wide-area network had already been operational for two years when nordu.net was created, right around the time the United States’ National Science Foundation (NSF) commissioned the construction of the legendary NSFNET, a university 56 kilobit/second network backbone. Only six companies thought it’d be a good idea to reserve the domain name on the root servers in 1985 (the others were bbn.com, think.com, mcc.com, dec.com and northrop.com). But Symbolics was first to make the move.
Remarkably, Symbolics.com hasn’t changed ownership once during the nearly 25 years that followed its initial registration. Marking an end to that era, domain name investment company XF.com Investments has just purchased the domain name for an undisclosed sum.
Which calls for a bit of history about the original owner:
Symbolics, Inc – a spinoff from the MIT AI Lab – was a computer manufacturer headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts and later in Concord, Massachusetts, that designed and manufactured a line of Lisp machines, single-user computers optimized to run the Lisp programming language. The machines became the first commercially available “general-purpose computers” or “workstations” way before those terms were coined.
The company also offered one of the premier software development environments of the 1980s and 1990s, now sold commercially as Open Genera for Tru64 UNIX on the HP Alpha.
In the late eighties, the company started its slow descent towards bankruptcy and oblivion, neatly chronicled in this blog post by former Symbolics employee Dan Weinreb:
The world changed out from under us very quickly. The new “workstation” category of computer appeared: the Suns and Apollos and so on. New technology for implementing Lisp was invented that allowed good Lisp implementations to run on conventional hardware; not quite as good as ours, but good enough for most purposes. So the real value-added of our special Lisp architecture was suddenly diminished. A large body of useful Unix software came to exist and was portable amongst the Unix workstations: no longer did each vendor have to develop a whole software suite. And the workstation vendors got to piggyback on the ever-faster, ever-cheaper CPU’s being made by Intel and Motorola and IBM, with whom it was hard for Symbolics to keep up. We at Symbolics were slow to acknowledge this. We believed our own “dogma” even as it became less true. It was embedded in our corporate culture. If you disputed it, your co-workers felt that you “just didn’t get it” and weren’t a member of the clan, so to speak. This stifled objective analysis. (This is a very easy problem to fall into — don’t let it happen to you!)
…
Meanwhile, back at Symbolics, there were huge internal management conflicts, leading to the resignation of much of top management, who were replaced by the board of directors with new CEO’s who did not do a good job, and did not have the vision to see what was happening. Symbolics signed long-term leases on big new offices and a new factory, anticipating growth that did not come, and were unable to sublease the properties due to office-space gluts, which drained a great deal of money. There were rounds of layoffs. More and more of us realized what was going on, and that Symbolics was not reacting. Having created an object-oriented database system for Lisp called Statice, I left in 1988 with several co-workers to form Object Design, Inc., to make an object-oriented database system for the brand-new mainstream object-oriented language, C++.
Symbolics still exists as a shell of its former self. But now the very first .com domain name ever registered becomes property of a small domain name investment holding that is so shy about its identity that it doesn’t publish the names of the people involved with the company, let alone a company address, on its website. There’s absolutely no indication of what the future has in store for the historical domain name, apart from the fact XF.com intends to celebrate its 25th birthday next year.
To quote Samwise Gamgee in Lord Of The Rings: “I don’t know why, but it makes me sad.”









I know of the guy at xf.com, not doing anon very well is he?
Aron Meystedt is the name of the CEO, and it’s not that he wants to stay anonymous. I just don’t see why there are no names on the website.
Let’s play: reverse IP on xf.com and find the exact number of TM typos:
A few examples:
addicctingames.com
disneychenel.de
ferienster.com
frieadster.com
googfel.com
googlermaps.com
imgaechef.com
istockphtoto.com
ogogle.co.uk
plentoyoffish.com
weikepedia.org
…
and it’s only a PR5. Sad.
lol. True. You would think that the oldest link would have the most backlinks…right?
Indians are primitive.
More on Aron Meystedt, the CEO of XF.com: http://www.dnjo...ts/20090826.htm
Congrats to Aron. He is a great guy and great businessman. This is a piece of history.
This is interesting to know. Apart from being historical, the domain itself is ugly.
how much did it cost to register a domain at that time?
if you look to the list of the oldest domain name (here for example : http://stephane...oms-de-domaine/) and you’ll be surprise that some of them are offline maybe it will possible to buy one or two among them.
cool nice little tidbit, never knew that
Hello.
Aron w/ XF.com here.
Thanks for the coverage and the tweets!
PS: Those that know our business (and me) know that I’m very accessible.
Just call or email
Thanks again everyone.
Aron
admin@XF.com
(Additional info in on XF.com on a homepage link)
two big stories today and no mention on TC? spotify iphone app approved and yelp AR easter egg!!!
Thanks for a look back at “those were the days” and the wayback machine. Wonder what will be said 25 years from now? Bet you’ll still hear about the internal fights, the CEO who messed up….
I also wonder if people will still use domain names in 25 years… Thoughts?
“Domain name investment company”? Is that the fancy version of “cybersquatter”?
Yes.
Will you do me a favor: Grunt, and bang two rocks together. That way I can get the full feeling of what you are saying.
Thanks!
It’s only cybersquatting if it’s a domain you wanted for yourself but didn’t have the initiative to register first.
I suppose those who call it “cybersquatting” are only jealous because they didn’t think of registering a good domain name first.
There will always be jealous critics. Domain (Virtual Property) owners are investing huge amounts of time in development, partnerships and investments to elevate the value of their holdings in providing valuable services to the public.
Most of my domains that I manage are parked until they are fully developed. By parking a name doesn’t mean your just “waiting for the best deal” or waiting for a big “pay day” but you’ve locked it out so that you can spend the right time to develop it into what it’s meant to be.
Just my 2 cents.
Congrats Aron! It’s quite a milestone and something to say you own the first registered domain name.
What a crock of shit
Is someone who buys a piece of land but never puts a house or business on it a property squatter, nope people call them land or real estate investors. Whats the difference? Is the land investor knocked for having the ability to see the potential of owning the land and acting on it. Nope, they are thought of as smart businessmen or women.
I do not hear people complaining about people buying up foreclosed houses, people call them smart. People confuse people owning trademarked names (now thats a cybersquatter) with people who are intelligent investors that have acquired quality generic Internet real estate.
Calling someone who invests in generic domain names a cybersquatter shows a lack of understanding or want of understanding of business on the Internet.
thanks shane, thanks bruce, where were you two a year and a half ago. this place is filled with cavemen.
http://www.rick...techcrunch.html
You seem not to recognized that there was a perfectly good owner and user of the symbolics.com domain, namely Symbolics, Inc.
What people find objectionable is people who hunt for domains that were being used, but for which the registration expires, then jump on it.
*That* is objectionable. That is squatting; just because a company is not paying close attention to the calendar, they end up being held hostage by someone who does nothing but kidnap domains.
The original “investor” gets kicked off his land without any warning, by someone gaming the system.
I can’t stand guys like you. You’re like the modern day equivalent to a Colony Puritan. Damn dinosaur.
ah…
symbolics lisp machines…
1st wrote lisp code on them back in ‘84 after my grad degree…
seriously good at recursion though!
Symbolics names suggest that it came from symbols and symbols are very important in any freemasonic country i.e. is the world.
Anyways, 25 years without change of power really impressive hardly any company could survive that.
Yeah symbols are quite important in a functional programming language with macros i.e Lisp.
Actually, NORDU.net is the oldest domain – it has a creation date of 1st January 1985, which means it probably was created even before then (in 1984, when the gTLDs themselves were created).
It was the first nameserver on the Internet.
read the article
NSFNET was predominantly T1 (ie., 1Mbit/sec), some T3 (45Mbit/sec), certainly not 56kbit/sec..
“As a result of a November 1987 NSF award to a consortium of universities in Michigan, the original 56- kbit/s links were upgraded to 1.5 Mbit/s by July 1988 and again to 45 Mbit/s in 1991.”
http://en.wikip...ndation_Network
I was there in ‘85-’87, as I remember the main cause of Symbolics demise, was a premature press release by the marketing dept (Howard ??) of a new desktop machine that would replace the it’s best selling machine. The new machine was over 6 months away from production at the time of the press release, resulting in the end of sales for the existing product line. Symbolics wasn’t killed by it’s competition, it was suicide.
Yeah, I was there too… when the AAAI (and IJCAI) briefly turned into commerical conventions selling LISP machines. We set up big booths at UT Austin in ‘84, then even bigger ones at UCLA in ‘85… by the time of AAAI ‘86 in Philly the party was just about over. Symbolics, Texas Instruments, and Xerox all selling LISP machines with graphical, integrated programming environments. Perhaps the saddest part is that when these machines surrendered to the UNIX boxes, these wonderful programming environments died with them.
Weren’t there some .edu domains around early on, too? Some people seem to get a bit fuzzy about the distinction between “the first domain” and “the first .com domain”.
A charming look back into the history of the Net. Perfect for a quiet Friday afternoon.
It’s fun to read Ray Kurzweil and the ramblings of The Singularity Institute, but the transhumanism crowd circa 2009 is further off base than the Symbolics/LMI (LISP Machines, Inc.)/Inference crowd of decades past.
If you want to know about the future, read something about geopolitics (e.g., The Next 100 Years) rather than the drivel of the transhumanism crowd.
And when it comes to technology, it’s all about nano/MEMS, not anything related to so-called “AI”; it’s the nanotechnology crowd (and, to a lesser extent, the MEMS/NEMS crowd) who is truly pioneering technological frontiers.
When it comes to technology, nanotechnology > AI … by a long shot!!
Symbolics deserved to die, as did their brethren. AI was way too much hype — and it still is way too much hype.
I agree about AI. It’s like playing with dolls. Sorry kids, your toys won’t come to life. End of (toy) story.
But I admit reading hundreds of AI posts on Fidonet was fun, when I was 12.
Something to learn from this is: things come, things go. We’ve seen a lot of stuff come and go over that 25 years. Maybe in 2034 you’ll write about the sale of facebook.com and google.com and some ex-staffer will post a rueful memory of how they just got steamrollered …
it wasn’t the first domain! sorry!
on the 1st january 1985, nordu.net went online!
nobody said it was, read the article.
this is the first properly registered domain
m