<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M&amp;A Activity Heats Up In July To $9.6 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:18:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amit Mukherjee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2895221</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Mukherjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 22:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2895221</guid>
		<description>Citing median acquisition value does nothing to explain the statement &quot;bargains might not last.&quot; All this tells you are the sizes of the companies being acquired. A $1.1 billion company is cheap if it is truly valued at $2 billion. 

The statistics you should be showing are the changes in comparable multiples, ratios such as enterprise value/revenue, enterprise value over EBITDA, etc. These are the statistics that determine whether or not an acquisition is a good bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citing median acquisition value does nothing to explain the statement &#8220;bargains might not last.&#8221; All this tells you are the sizes of the companies being acquired. A $1.1 billion company is cheap if it is truly valued at $2 billion. </p>
<p>The statistics you should be showing are the changes in comparable multiples, ratios such as enterprise value/revenue, enterprise value over EBITDA, etc. These are the statistics that determine whether or not an acquisition is a good bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weniger davon, mehr von dem anderen&#8230;&#160;&#8226;&#160;Börsennotizbuch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2892940</link>
		<dc:creator>Weniger davon, mehr von dem anderen&#8230;&#160;&#8226;&#160;Börsennotizbuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2892940</guid>
		<description>[...] Die Mergers &amp; Acquisitions melden sich im Mai eindrucksvoll zur&#252;ck; das Transaktionsvolumen steigt stark auf 9,6 Mrd. USD (TechCrunch). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Die Mergers &amp; Acquisitions melden sich im Mai eindrucksvoll zur&#252;ck; das Transaktionsvolumen steigt stark auf 9,6 Mrd. USD (TechCrunch). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tran</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2890868</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2890868</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a survival stage for some Web 2.0 startups that have high burn rates (e.g. SearchMe went bye bye). Thank goodness we don&#039;t and can ride out this wave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a survival stage for some Web 2.0 startups that have high burn rates (e.g. SearchMe went bye bye). Thank goodness we don&#8217;t and can ride out this wave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guias Local</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2890500</link>
		<dc:creator>Guias Local</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2890500</guid>
		<description>Seeing this chart shows promise and hope for the future of the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this chart shows promise and hope for the future of the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2890412</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2890412</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Data are great. Relative to EBIT and Revenue is more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Data are great. Relative to EBIT and Revenue is more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2890368</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2890368</guid>
		<description>Great point.  EV includes all sources of capital, so it&#039;s primarily equity + debt - cash.  I say primarily because you should also add preferred, convertible, minority interest, etc.  It&#039;s basically what you&#039;d have to pay to own the ENTIRE company without obligations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point.  EV includes all sources of capital, so it&#8217;s primarily equity + debt &#8211; cash.  I say primarily because you should also add preferred, convertible, minority interest, etc.  It&#8217;s basically what you&#8217;d have to pay to own the ENTIRE company without obligations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2890298</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2890298</guid>
		<description>How do you calculate EV for a private company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you calculate EV for a private company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-30 &#171; A little Jack with that?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889929</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-30 &#171; A little Jack with that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889929</guid>
		<description>[...] M&amp;A Activity Heats Up In July To $9.6 Billion &gt;&gt; TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] M&amp;A Activity Heats Up In July To $9.6 Billion &gt;&gt; TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889917</link>
		<dc:creator>pj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889917</guid>
		<description>Although M&amp;A groups pitch all the time, there is tons of time pressure on actual M&amp;A transactions because this is the best way to ensure confidentiality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although M&amp;A groups pitch all the time, there is tons of time pressure on actual M&amp;A transactions because this is the best way to ensure confidentiality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akshay Jain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889904</link>
		<dc:creator>Akshay Jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889904</guid>
		<description>For the sake of simplicity we can consider that lets take numbers from the month when the deal was announced. Anyways if you take it over a year or more then the data starts making more sense since a kind of cycle is followed. So if lets assume that typically a deal takes 4 to 6 months then also it will be cyclical in nature and still what we are seeing is a fairly correct assumption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of simplicity we can consider that lets take numbers from the month when the deal was announced. Anyways if you take it over a year or more then the data starts making more sense since a kind of cycle is followed. So if lets assume that typically a deal takes 4 to 6 months then also it will be cyclical in nature and still what we are seeing is a fairly correct assumption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your daily dose of social media required reading &#124; CompareMobiles.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889897</link>
		<dc:creator>Your daily dose of social media required reading &#124; CompareMobiles.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889897</guid>
		<description>[...] • M&amp;A Activity Heats Up In July To $9.6 Billion &gt;&gt; TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • M&amp;A Activity Heats Up In July To $9.6 Billion &gt;&gt; TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889793</link>
		<dc:creator>Gael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889793</guid>
		<description>I think those are great stats but, any merge &amp; acquisition takes a long time before it is made public and/or announced. 

Here we are only seeing the result of all of them, and they happen to be in July.

So I know wonder when those transaction (M&amp;A) started?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think those are great stats but, any merge &amp; acquisition takes a long time before it is made public and/or announced. </p>
<p>Here we are only seeing the result of all of them, and they happen to be in July.</p>
<p>So I know wonder when those transaction (M&amp;A) started?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Downing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889628</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Downing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889628</guid>
		<description>You forgot about Bankrate, purchased by APAX....which is significant because we will likely see PE groups get active as a new class of acquirors, due to the existing amount of funds they have raised and the fact that acquisitions dont require debt (unlike traditional LBO/MBO&#039;s) that they are accustomed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot about Bankrate, purchased by APAX&#8230;.which is significant because we will likely see PE groups get active as a new class of acquirors, due to the existing amount of funds they have raised and the fact that acquisitions dont require debt (unlike traditional LBO/MBO&#8217;s) that they are accustomed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889560</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889560</guid>
		<description>Yeah it seems to ebb and flow - looks like we&#039;re starting on an uptrend. Nice :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it seems to ebb and flow &#8211; looks like we&#8217;re starting on an uptrend. Nice <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889557</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889557</guid>
		<description>Should be noted that because of this M&amp;A activity, there was a 50% reduction in &quot;Why is this news?&quot; comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be noted that because of this M&amp;A activity, there was a 50% reduction in &#8220;Why is this news?&#8221; comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889556</link>
		<dc:creator>yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889556</guid>
		<description>any rumors on what apple might acquire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any rumors on what apple might acquire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889553</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889553</guid>
		<description>Suffice to say, Techcrunch is Techcrunch again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suffice to say, Techcrunch is Techcrunch again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889542</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889542</guid>
		<description>Actually I use R, it goes a long way. I like to support the open-source community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I use R, it goes a long way. I like to support the open-source community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmbl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889534</link>
		<dc:creator>cmbl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889534</guid>
		<description>Just wondering if you are using SPSS for all the statistical calculations  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering if you are using SPSS for all the statistical calculations  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akshay Jain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889520</link>
		<dc:creator>Akshay Jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889520</guid>
		<description>I agree with Kevin above. This is good collection of statistics by TechCrunch and really insightful. Thank you TC

Just wondering if you are using SPSS for all the statistical calculations ;-) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Kevin above. This is good collection of statistics by TechCrunch and really insightful. Thank you TC</p>
<p>Just wondering if you are using SPSS for all the statistical calculations <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogfornoob Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889505</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogfornoob Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889505</guid>
		<description>wow.... ang yaman... heheh thanks for sharing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;. ang yaman&#8230; heheh thanks for sharing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889501</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889501</guid>
		<description>it would be more interesting to see the implied EV/LTM revenue multiples of these transactions.  puts everything on equal footing and prevents one huge transaction from skewing a data set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be more interesting to see the implied EV/LTM revenue multiples of these transactions.  puts everything on equal footing and prevents one huge transaction from skewing a data set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Milden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/29/ma-activity-heats-up-in-july-to-96-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2889465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Milden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=88092#comment-2889465</guid>
		<description>I like that Crunch base actually collects all this data and tells us that the overall things are looking up. Thank you for doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that Crunch base actually collects all this data and tells us that the overall things are looking up. Thank you for doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
