<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Reaction To Your Reactions To the Twitter Confidential Documents Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:58:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FrmClub</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-3083687</link>
		<dc:creator>FrmClub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-3083687</guid>
		<description>Michael wouldn’t do it, he will trade with twitter to get more exclusive news later. now he is bluffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael wouldn’t do it, he will trade with twitter to get more exclusive news later. now he is bluffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If You&#8217;re Arrington The Rules Do Not Apply to You &#124; The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-3042201</link>
		<dc:creator>If You&#8217;re Arrington The Rules Do Not Apply to You &#124; The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-3042201</guid>
		<description>[...] journalistic methods, when the latter is the better strategy to defend his case as we learned from Twittergate earlier this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] journalistic methods, when the latter is the better strategy to defend his case as we learned from Twittergate earlier this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process Journalism and Original Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-3026050</link>
		<dc:creator>Process Journalism and Original Reporting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-3026050</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch reacts to readers and Critics, Michael Arrington, July 15 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch reacts to readers and Critics, Michael Arrington, July 15 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anatomy Of The Twitter Attack &#124; the Bezaleel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-3021430</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anatomy Of The Twitter Attack &#124; the Bezaleel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-3021430</guid>
		<description>[...] to know about it. So he sent us all of the documents that he obtained, some 310 of them, and the story developed from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to know about it. So he sent us all of the documents that he obtained, some 310 of them, and the story developed from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bad Week for Social Media Giants</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-3011307</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bad Week for Social Media Giants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-3011307</guid>
		<description>[...] In all, more than 300 confidential company documents had been stolen and disseminated. That dissemination, chiefly the transfer of documents to TechCrunch, has caused quite a stir on its own. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In all, more than 300 confidential company documents had been stolen and disseminated. That dissemination, chiefly the transfer of documents to TechCrunch, has caused quite a stir on its own. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevelopmentCorporate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Meetup Beat Facebook to Profitability?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2987637</link>
		<dc:creator>DevelopmentCorporate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Meetup Beat Facebook to Profitability?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2987637</guid>
		<description>[...] In the past two days there have been about 2,200 blogs and articles about Facebook achieving cash flow break even and Meetup achieving profitability.  The Facebook revelation came from a blog post by Mark Zuckerberg and the Meetup news came from a set of shareholder documents leaked to the team at TechCrunch.  Since 1,300 other people have already commented on the Facebook news, I thought I would spend a little time dissecting the Meetup numbers.  I won’t comment on the ethics of whoever leaked the documents or why TechCrunch seems to be the destination of choice for confidential information from technology startups (remember the infamous leaked Twitter documents?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the past two days there have been about 2,200 blogs and articles about Facebook achieving cash flow break even and Meetup achieving profitability.  The Facebook revelation came from a blog post by Mark Zuckerberg and the Meetup news came from a set of shareholder documents leaked to the team at TechCrunch.  Since 1,300 other people have already commented on the Facebook news, I thought I would spend a little time dissecting the Meetup numbers.  I won’t comment on the ethics of whoever leaked the documents or why TechCrunch seems to be the destination of choice for confidential information from technology startups (remember the infamous leaked Twitter documents?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch, y el Hackeo de Twitter &#124; Blog Ruth Vilar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2983274</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch, y el Hackeo de Twitter &#124; Blog Ruth Vilar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2983274</guid>
		<description>[...] el blog respondió que muchas noticias son filtraciones, y especialmente si alguien no quiere que salga a  la luz, el [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] el blog respondió que muchas noticias son filtraciones, y especialmente si alguien no quiere que salga a  la luz, el [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and &#8220;Hacker Croll&#8221; problems - Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2949234</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and &#8220;Hacker Croll&#8221; problems - Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2949234</guid>
		<description>[...] Croll&#8221; problems      The hacker eventually sent the documents to tech blog TechCrunch, which decided to post some but not all of them. They are online here, here and here. Soon, a debate raged about whether or not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Croll&#8221; problems      The hacker eventually sent the documents to tech blog TechCrunch, which decided to post some but not all of them. They are online here, here and here. Soon, a debate raged about whether or not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billige mobiler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2921415</link>
		<dc:creator>billige mobiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2921415</guid>
		<description>very nice blog.. I like the design, its cool:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice blog.. I like the design, its cool:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s a branded Twtpoll? &#171; twtapps - Simple twitter apps</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2917274</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s a branded Twtpoll? &#171; twtapps - Simple twitter apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2917274</guid>
		<description>[...] poll was retweeted a few times and mentioned in this article onTechCrunch. As you can see, we got 1234 votes before the poll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poll was retweeted a few times and mentioned in this article onTechCrunch. As you can see, we got 1234 votes before the poll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Security Hypocrisy &#124; The Internet Marketing Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2914134</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Security Hypocrisy &#124; The Internet Marketing Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2914134</guid>
		<description>[...] opinion, Techcrunch shouldn&#8217;t publish what they found in Twitter&#8217;s undie drawer&#8230; but only with the provision that they remove the hypocritical viral tell-a-friend, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinion, Techcrunch shouldn&#8217;t publish what they found in Twitter&#8217;s undie drawer&#8230; but only with the provision that they remove the hypocritical viral tell-a-friend, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Security Hypocrisy &#124; The Internet Marketing Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2914133</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Security Hypocrisy &#124; The Internet Marketing Spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2914133</guid>
		<description>[...] opinion, Techcrunch shouldn&#8217;t publish what they found in Twitter&#8217;s undie drawer&#8230; but only with the provision that they remove the hypocritical viral tell-a-friend, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] opinion, Techcrunch shouldn&#8217;t publish what they found in Twitter&#8217;s undie drawer&#8230; but only with the provision that they remove the hypocritical viral tell-a-friend, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter: &#8220;Chamem a segurança&#8221; &#124; Segurança</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2899401</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter: &#8220;Chamem a segurança&#8221; &#124; Segurança</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2899401</guid>
		<description>[...] oficiais do Twitter recebidos por e-mail. Michael Arrington, principal responsável pelo site, chegou a escrever que quem discordasse da publicação dos documentos também discordaria “de toda a história da [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] oficiais do Twitter recebidos por e-mail. Michael Arrington, principal responsável pelo site, chegou a escrever que quem discordasse da publicação dos documentos também discordaria “de toda a história da [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilCozPoetry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2896037</link>
		<dc:creator>evilCozPoetry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2896037</guid>
		<description>F facebook, F myspace, and most of all, F twitter. And just to show that I’m not discriminatory with the angst of all my antisocial social networking F’s, FTW and everyone in it. (Except their Mothers, unless their Mothers are MILF’s) Yes that’s right, F You!

Hey, guess what? 
Boy have I’ve got a social network for you… 
In my pants! 
Oh wait a minute, that’s a social disease.
Never mind.

TechCrunch drools! (drools is my own slobbering idiom for rules)

Was that too many characters for a twit? (Or tweet or whatever the F they call it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F facebook, F myspace, and most of all, F twitter. And just to show that I’m not discriminatory with the angst of all my antisocial social networking F’s, FTW and everyone in it. (Except their Mothers, unless their Mothers are MILF’s) Yes that’s right, F You!</p>
<p>Hey, guess what?<br />
Boy have I’ve got a social network for you…<br />
In my pants!<br />
Oh wait a minute, that’s a social disease.<br />
Never mind.</p>
<p>TechCrunch drools! (drools is my own slobbering idiom for rules)</p>
<p>Was that too many characters for a twit? (Or tweet or whatever the F they call it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Soho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2880473</link>
		<dc:creator>J Soho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2880473</guid>
		<description>This is lame. Last time I&#039;ve visited techcrunch.. just as bad as valleywag. Moving along, goodbye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is lame. Last time I&#8217;ve visited techcrunch.. just as bad as valleywag. Moving along, goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Got Hacked – Kimono Opened by TechCrunch &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2877516</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Got Hacked – Kimono Opened by TechCrunch &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2877516</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch responded to the outcry: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch responded to the outcry: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Vortex: Back from the Dead &#171; The Guidewire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2876779</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vortex: Back from the Dead &#171; The Guidewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2876779</guid>
		<description>[...] big kerfuffle of the past two weeks has been King Arrington vs Twitter. Citing the entire history of the news industry as precedent, he decided that publishing confidential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] big kerfuffle of the past two weeks has been King Arrington vs Twitter. Citing the entire history of the news industry as precedent, he decided that publishing confidential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deal Radar 2009: Confidela &#124; Sramana Mitra on Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2869769</link>
		<dc:creator>Deal Radar 2009: Confidela &#124; Sramana Mitra on Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2869769</guid>
		<description>[...] July 21, 2009  &#124; No comments     As readers descended on TechCrunch last week, weighing in on the blog&#8217;s decision to publish confidential Twitter documents it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] July 21, 2009  | No comments     As readers descended on TechCrunch last week, weighing in on the blog&#8217;s decision to publish confidential Twitter documents it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.benjaminr.info :: Socialmedia Twitter :: Twitter’s Internal Strategy Laid Bare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2869326</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.benjaminr.info :: Socialmedia Twitter :: Twitter’s Internal Strategy Laid Bare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2869326</guid>
		<description>[...] confidential Twitter documents and screenshots landed in our inbox. We said we were going to post a handful of them only, and we’ve spent much of the last 36 hours talking directly to Twitter about the right way to go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confidential Twitter documents and screenshots landed in our inbox. We said we were going to post a handful of them only, and we’ve spent much of the last 36 hours talking directly to Twitter about the right way to go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Google Apps Offer RSA SecurID?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2868597</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Google Apps Offer RSA SecurID?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2868597</guid>
		<description>[...] [Link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch, y el Hackeo de Twitter &#124; Blog Eduardo Collado</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2867296</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch, y el Hackeo de Twitter &#124; Blog Eduardo Collado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2867296</guid>
		<description>[...] el blog respondió que muchas noticias son filtraciones, y especialmente si alguien no quiere que salga a  la luz, el [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] el blog respondió que muchas noticias son filtraciones, y especialmente si alguien no quiere que salga a  la luz, el [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social media articles july 06 &#8211; july 19 2009, twitter, facebook, etc &#171; Stefanm, my link collection</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2867171</link>
		<dc:creator>social media articles july 06 &#8211; july 19 2009, twitter, facebook, etc &#171; Stefanm, my link collection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2867171</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch Reaction To Your Reactions To the Twitter Confidential Documents Post; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch Reaction To Your Reactions To the Twitter Confidential Documents Post; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OOTheLibrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-4/#comment-2867094</link>
		<dc:creator>OOTheLibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2867094</guid>
		<description>Your reasoning skills know no peer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reasoning skills know no peer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shweta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2867074</link>
		<dc:creator>Shweta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2867074</guid>
		<description>These shouldnt be posted. Period. No matter what tech crunch says to make it sound ethical, it is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These shouldnt be posted. Period. No matter what tech crunch says to make it sound ethical, it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch publica documentos privados de Twitter &#124; Uberblogged.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/15/our-reaction-to-your-reactions-on-the-twitter-confidential-documents-post/comment-page-6/#comment-2866782</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch publica documentos privados de Twitter &#124; Uberblogged.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83221#comment-2866782</guid>
		<description>[...] de manifiesto acerca de por qué ellos consideran que ésta información debe ser publicada. La excusa, bastante bien elaborada por cierto, se basa en justificar que sólo están haciendo la labor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de manifiesto acerca de por qué ellos consideran que ésta información debe ser publicada. La excusa, bastante bien elaborada por cierto, se basa en justificar que sólo están haciendo la labor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
