<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Story Of The Government Having Twitter Data Access Is &#8220;Bullshit,&#8221; Says Co-Founder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:07:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2962928</link>
		<dc:creator>jwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2962928</guid>
		<description>guess its not bullshit now! this link seems to be getting hammered so slow. looks like a great work around for obama.

http://nlpc.org/stories/2009/08/31/obama-white-house-has-secret-plan-harvest-personal-data-social-networking-website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess its not bullshit now! this link seems to be getting hammered so slow. looks like a great work around for obama.</p>
<p><a href="http://nlpc.org/stories/2009/08/31/obama-white-house-has-secret-plan-harvest-personal-data-social-networking-website" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://nlpc.org/stories/2009/08/31/obama-white-house-has-secret-plan-harvest-personal-data-social-networking-website'>http://nlpc.org...working-website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B S</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2886029</link>
		<dc:creator>B S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2886029</guid>
		<description>Goog Knows ALL, KEEPS ALL, and GIVES UP ALL to BIG Bro..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goog Knows ALL, KEEPS ALL, and GIVES UP ALL to BIG Bro..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne Lambright</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2870092</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne Lambright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2870092</guid>
		<description>NO, maybe some people give a shit about other in the world unlike you own political agenda &quot;Sara Kristoff&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, maybe some people give a shit about other in the world unlike you own political agenda &#8220;Sara Kristoff&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalada</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2860582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2860582</guid>
		<description>Twitterfall doesn&#039;t have access to the firehose, it just uses the Twitter Search API, which is publicly available (unlike the firehose).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitterfall doesn&#8217;t have access to the firehose, it just uses the Twitter Search API, which is publicly available (unlike the firehose).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodo Kast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2859334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodo Kast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2859334</guid>
		<description>Just because he denies it, doesn&#039;t make it untrue.

Sounds like you struck a nerve.  If twitterfall.com has access, why wouldn&#039;t anyone else?  It&#039;s available, not many protect their updates, so of course it will be spied on.

To think otherwise is naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because he denies it, doesn&#8217;t make it untrue.</p>
<p>Sounds like you struck a nerve.  If twitterfall.com has access, why wouldn&#8217;t anyone else?  It&#8217;s available, not many protect their updates, so of course it will be spied on.</p>
<p>To think otherwise is naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Kristoff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2858693</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Kristoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2858693</guid>
		<description>Why did the U.S. government ask Twitter to stay up during the Iran turmoil? Was it a vehicle of the U.S. government? Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the U.S. government ask Twitter to stay up during the Iran turmoil? Was it a vehicle of the U.S. government? Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yea, Right</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2858417</link>
		<dc:creator>Yea, Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2858417</guid>
		<description>Something doesn&#039;t jive here :
&quot;...The news apparently came from a source who presumably overheard a Twitter employee talking about it at lunch. To categorize that as “flimsy” would be an understatement.&quot;

You&#039;re calling this info as flimsy, yet, when it comes to *stolen* twitter information, Techcrunch views that as valid? Who&#039;s to say the *stolen* information was not altered before it was *leaked*?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something doesn&#8217;t jive here :<br />
&#8220;&#8230;The news apparently came from a source who presumably overheard a Twitter employee talking about it at lunch. To categorize that as “flimsy” would be an understatement.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re calling this info as flimsy, yet, when it comes to *stolen* twitter information, Techcrunch views that as valid? Who&#8217;s to say the *stolen* information was not altered before it was *leaked*?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Blaskie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2858285</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Blaskie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2858285</guid>
		<description>Okay seriously?  The idea that the government has access to DMs and the like is not news, not scary or not anything to be worked up about.  In fact, Twitter shouldn&#039;t have to even comment on this regardless of whether they shared info or not.

Why?

Well, let&#039;s see.  The government has access to everything. They can freeze bank accounts in a moment&#039;s notice, show up at your door and seize assets, find your long-lost relative that even you don&#039;t know about, etc., etc.  To make a big deal out of the government having access to our DMs is absurd.

Here&#039;s my rule of thumb.  Don&#039;t put anything into a DM that you would care about the government reading. If you are plotting a ploy to overhaul a country, don&#039;t do it via Twitter.  In fact, don&#039;t do it online at all. (That&#039;s extreme, hopefully you get the point).

I get that people are all about their privacy and such but then they get on Facebook and Twitter and pretty soon, there isn&#039;t much that a common person can&#039;t learn about them let alone a government body.  So, if you play online, stop complaining or criticizing companies when there is a rumor about them being in partnership with the government.  It&#039;s just annoying, who cares, kind of news.

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay seriously?  The idea that the government has access to DMs and the like is not news, not scary or not anything to be worked up about.  In fact, Twitter shouldn&#8217;t have to even comment on this regardless of whether they shared info or not.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s see.  The government has access to everything. They can freeze bank accounts in a moment&#8217;s notice, show up at your door and seize assets, find your long-lost relative that even you don&#8217;t know about, etc., etc.  To make a big deal out of the government having access to our DMs is absurd.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my rule of thumb.  Don&#8217;t put anything into a DM that you would care about the government reading. If you are plotting a ploy to overhaul a country, don&#8217;t do it via Twitter.  In fact, don&#8217;t do it online at all. (That&#8217;s extreme, hopefully you get the point).</p>
<p>I get that people are all about their privacy and such but then they get on Facebook and Twitter and pretty soon, there isn&#8217;t much that a common person can&#8217;t learn about them let alone a government body.  So, if you play online, stop complaining or criticizing companies when there is a rumor about them being in partnership with the government.  It&#8217;s just annoying, who cares, kind of news.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Story Of The Government Having Twitter Data Access Is &#8220;Bullshit,&#8221; Says Co-Founder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2858088</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Story Of The Government Having Twitter Data Access Is &#8220;Bullshit,&#8221; Says Co-Founder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2858088</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by admin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by admin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857964</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857964</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reaching @Biz for comment, MG. 

I wish we could get the feds to be as forthcoming, but then TechCrunch&#039;s heft doesn&#039;t extend to those agencies that can&#039;t be named. 

It took the Old Grey Lady&#039;s resources/investigative reporting to break the warrantless wiretap story, after all. 

Given public statements regarding the utility of the intelligence coming out of, say, Iran -- and the paucity of same that statements coming out of the White House implied - it&#039;s reasonable to expect that the NSA would be filtering and data mining tweets at some level.

It&#039;s probably time to go back to the TOS and see what privacy users should expect for protected updates and DMs: none.
http://twitter.com/tos

I see plenty on copyright and &quot;content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party&#039;s intellectual property&quot; but nothing about protecting the privacy of individuals or their messages.

Maybe it&#039;s between the lines, like in the Constitution?

Twitter is a profoundly public platform; of course they are scanning it. The heart of the story is that the feds have acceess to the firehose.  Biz has said that they do not. We can learn more over time about the veracity of that claim but in the meantime, thank you for soliciting his position, MG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reaching @Biz for comment, MG. </p>
<p>I wish we could get the feds to be as forthcoming, but then TechCrunch&#8217;s heft doesn&#8217;t extend to those agencies that can&#8217;t be named. </p>
<p>It took the Old Grey Lady&#8217;s resources/investigative reporting to break the warrantless wiretap story, after all. </p>
<p>Given public statements regarding the utility of the intelligence coming out of, say, Iran &#8212; and the paucity of same that statements coming out of the White House implied &#8211; it&#8217;s reasonable to expect that the NSA would be filtering and data mining tweets at some level.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably time to go back to the TOS and see what privacy users should expect for protected updates and DMs: none.<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/tos" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://twitter.com/tos'>http://twitter.com/tos</a></p>
<p>I see plenty on copyright and &#8220;content that we determine in our sole discretion are unlawful, offensive, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene or otherwise objectionable or violates any party&#8217;s intellectual property&#8221; but nothing about protecting the privacy of individuals or their messages.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s between the lines, like in the Constitution?</p>
<p>Twitter is a profoundly public platform; of course they are scanning it. The heart of the story is that the feds have acceess to the firehose.  Biz has said that they do not. We can learn more over time about the veracity of that claim but in the meantime, thank you for soliciting his position, MG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William McNeill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857913</link>
		<dc:creator>William McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857913</guid>
		<description>Agreed. What do you think the NSA does all day? Also, the government is one of the largest users of search software and technology. They use all major search vendors products. They don&#039;t need Twitter&#039;s permission to tap into the datastream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. What do you think the NSA does all day? Also, the government is one of the largest users of search software and technology. They use all major search vendors products. They don&#8217;t need Twitter&#8217;s permission to tap into the datastream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857720</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857720</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857214</guid>
		<description>This is probably a misunderstanding, not having to do with NSA, but with BIS and the US laws on the export of technology. Companies like Twitter, Facebook and Friendfeed are basically breaking US law by exporting software and services to embargoed countries. You can think this is silly, but is about following the law. Either you change the law, or you comply with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably a misunderstanding, not having to do with NSA, but with BIS and the US laws on the export of technology. Companies like Twitter, Facebook and Friendfeed are basically breaking US law by exporting software and services to embargoed countries. You can think this is silly, but is about following the law. Either you change the law, or you comply with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Bhawani</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857102</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Bhawani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857102</guid>
		<description>Basically no one is given access to the data unless its really important for the govt to know about a specific person!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically no one is given access to the data unless its really important for the govt to know about a specific person!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2857084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cuthrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2857084</guid>
		<description>This sounds like confusion to me now.

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/in-our-inbox-hundreds-of-confidential-twitter-documents/

On the one hand interaction with the Feds would be involved if there were computer crime and all manner of forensics would be brought into account.

Perhaps this is simply comments regarding specific  pools of data (corporate) vs. the stream (public).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like confusion to me now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/in-our-inbox-hundreds-of-confidential-twitter-documents/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/in-our-inbox-hundreds-of-confidential-twitter-documents/'>http://www.tech...tter-documents/</a></p>
<p>On the one hand interaction with the Feds would be involved if there were computer crime and all manner of forensics would be brought into account.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is simply comments regarding specific  pools of data (corporate) vs. the stream (public).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856944</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856944</guid>
		<description>I am dead serious.. it sounds funny I know but if I am the CIA or FBI I am scanning everything online.  Didn&#039;t the Bush admin spy on its own people.. and twitters feed is mostly public.. It just makes sense that a govt agency would scan for common keywords and such..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am dead serious.. it sounds funny I know but if I am the CIA or FBI I am scanning everything online.  Didn&#8217;t the Bush admin spy on its own people.. and twitters feed is mostly public.. It just makes sense that a govt agency would scan for common keywords and such..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856904</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856904</guid>
		<description>Correct on the second sentence, but the word &quot;public(ly)&quot; in the third sentence suggests it has an equal opposite. 

There&#039;s a backdoor for everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct on the second sentence, but the word &#8220;public(ly)&#8221; in the third sentence suggests it has an equal opposite. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a backdoor for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856886</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856886</guid>
		<description>I hope that was satire that I just didn&#039;t pick up on. 

We aren&#039;t in a War on Terror, but rather a War of Terror. Watch 7/7 Ripple Effect and pay attention to the tax calculator estimate of the probability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that was satire that I just didn&#8217;t pick up on. </p>
<p>We aren&#8217;t in a War on Terror, but rather a War of Terror. Watch 7/7 Ripple Effect and pay attention to the tax calculator estimate of the probability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856880</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856880</guid>
		<description>OMG, there&#039;s no way the NSA would do that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL-C2a8C-U4

Notice how services like Twitter which are produced internationally are never allowed to become popular in the United States. I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s a bad thing.

Google&#039;s SEO chief Matt Cutts used to work at the NSA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, there&#8217;s no way the NSA would do that?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL-C2a8C-U4" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL-C2a8C-U4'>http://www.yout...h?v=mL-C2a8C-U4</a></p>
<p>Notice how services like Twitter which are produced internationally are never allowed to become popular in the United States. I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s a bad thing.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s SEO chief Matt Cutts used to work at the NSA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mun911</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856870</link>
		<dc:creator>mun911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856870</guid>
		<description>did you know the goverment check your facebook once in i while and there are not on your freinds list. 

How do i know? i work for Facebook ssssssshhhhh dont tell anyone except Valleywag,and Techcrunch facebook PR guy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you know the goverment check your facebook once in i while and there are not on your freinds list. </p>
<p>How do i know? i work for Facebook ssssssshhhhh dont tell anyone except Valleywag,and Techcrunch facebook PR guy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501203508">Drew Olanoff</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856868</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501203508">Drew Olanoff</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856868</guid>
		<description>The Government can have my DM&#039;s, they consist of &quot;dude, do you really have cancer?&quot; and &quot;oh hey, did you send me that thing you said you would?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Government can have my DM&#8217;s, they consist of &#8220;dude, do you really have cancer?&#8221; and &#8220;oh hey, did you send me that thing you said you would?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501203508">Drew Olanoff</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856865</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501203508">Drew Olanoff</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856865</guid>
		<description>Um because crying wolf about the government reading personal stuff could I dono...RUIN A BUSINESS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um because crying wolf about the government reading personal stuff could I dono&#8230;RUIN A BUSINESS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856858</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856858</guid>
		<description>Serious story? So you asked when they&#039;re filing the lawsuit due to Twitter having been &quot;libeled&quot; by VW? Unless they do, this is all just hot air for the TC-Twitter circle-jerk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serious story? So you asked when they&#8217;re filing the lawsuit due to Twitter having been &#8220;libeled&#8221; by VW? Unless they do, this is all just hot air for the TC-Twitter circle-jerk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856846</link>
		<dc:creator>nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856846</guid>
		<description>..what is the Biz all worked up about if it isnt true...and none of that brand integrity bs. anyone w/half a brain knows that the gov&#039;t is monitoring all Internet traffic and can gain access to anyone&#039;s private data at a drop the drop of a hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..what is the Biz all worked up about if it isnt true&#8230;and none of that brand integrity bs. anyone w/half a brain knows that the gov&#8217;t is monitoring all Internet traffic and can gain access to anyone&#8217;s private data at a drop the drop of a hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/story-of-the-government-having-twitter-data-access-is-bullshit-say-co-founder/comment-page-1/#comment-2856836</link>
		<dc:creator>Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83159#comment-2856836</guid>
		<description>It would be more logical for the governent to access Google data - the Goog knows pretty much all about us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be more logical for the governent to access Google data &#8211; the Goog knows pretty much all about us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
