<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheat Sheet For GOOG&#8217;s Second Quarter Earnings Later This Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:36:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 20</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2872317</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2872317</guid>
		<description>[...] made its earnings numbers yesterday, actually coming in above expectations. Total revenues were $5.5 billion, 3 percent above the same period last year and flat with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made its earnings numbers yesterday, actually coming in above expectations. Total revenues were $5.5 billion, 3 percent above the same period last year and flat with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Google Made Its Q2 Numbers: Squeezing Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2863306</link>
		<dc:creator>How Google Made Its Q2 Numbers: Squeezing Expenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2863306</guid>
		<description>[...] made its earnings numbers yesterday, actually coming in above expectations.  Total revenues were $5.5 billion, 3 percent above the same period last year and flat with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made its earnings numbers yesterday, actually coming in above expectations.  Total revenues were $5.5 billion, 3 percent above the same period last year and flat with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2861853</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2861853</guid>
		<description>Guess you were wrong, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess you were wrong, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike West</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2858902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2858902</guid>
		<description>I am a nobody but I think these analysts are just guessing when it comes to a business like Google.  Look it is not hard to take the consensus estimate, which is based on what? And set your estimate a little lower because of &quot;overall market conditions&quot;. Consider for a moment that Google, with its historical growth rate, the ongoing growth of the internet, and the shift the slow but broad shift in thinking about where ad spend it most effective, and its new platforms for advertising (cellphones, youtube) that perhaps, just perhaps, the weak economy might already be built into Google&#039;s PE. Furthermore, last quarter, the worst quarter on record, I believe Google&#039;s perf. was additionally masked by some one time charges and it still wasn&#039;t bad.  Me, nobody, predicts that Google destroys these estimates.  But alas I don&#039;t get paid to do this job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a nobody but I think these analysts are just guessing when it comes to a business like Google.  Look it is not hard to take the consensus estimate, which is based on what? And set your estimate a little lower because of &#8220;overall market conditions&#8221;. Consider for a moment that Google, with its historical growth rate, the ongoing growth of the internet, and the shift the slow but broad shift in thinking about where ad spend it most effective, and its new platforms for advertising (cellphones, youtube) that perhaps, just perhaps, the weak economy might already be built into Google&#8217;s PE. Furthermore, last quarter, the worst quarter on record, I believe Google&#8217;s perf. was additionally masked by some one time charges and it still wasn&#8217;t bad.  Me, nobody, predicts that Google destroys these estimates.  But alas I don&#8217;t get paid to do this job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidTan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2858315</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidTan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2858315</guid>
		<description>I wished I bought some on their IPO a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wished I bought some on their IPO a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Riddell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2857459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Riddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2857459</guid>
		<description>These are great stats, thanks. What else does the market know that we don&#039;t? The share price has leapt $20 since Friday [$402 to $424 at last night&#039;s bell] on expectation of these earnings, so could they be ahead of target?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great stats, thanks. What else does the market know that we don&#8217;t? The share price has leapt $20 since Friday [$402 to $424 at last night's bell] on expectation of these earnings, so could they be ahead of target?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginja</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856610</guid>
		<description>Reducing CAPEX wont help you with your P&amp;L numbers.  That will flow into the P&amp;L in subsequent periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reducing CAPEX wont help you with your P&amp;L numbers.  That will flow into the P&amp;L in subsequent periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Cheat Sheet For GOOG&#8217;s Second Quarter Earnings Later This Week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856578</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Cheat Sheet For GOOG&#8217;s Second Quarter Earnings Later This Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856578</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Hostpundit - Hosting and Gadgets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Hostpundit &#8211; Hosting and Gadgets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856322</link>
		<dc:creator>gunit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856322</guid>
		<description>I have known Mark for sometime and with Google he is pretty close....except with that ComScore mess two quarters ago. Also - he is at every search related conference and easy to approach if you should want to have a good conversation about companies he follows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have known Mark for sometime and with Google he is pretty close&#8230;.except with that ComScore mess two quarters ago. Also &#8211; he is at every search related conference and easy to approach if you should want to have a good conversation about companies he follows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supra shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856319</link>
		<dc:creator>supra shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856319</guid>
		<description>This stuff is normally reserved for institutional clients only and do not allow for reproduction...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff is normally reserved for institutional clients only and do not allow for reproduction&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrzod</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856295</link>
		<dc:creator>mrzod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856295</guid>
		<description>Eric, source link pls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, source link pls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Tech Crunch: Cheat Sheet For GOOG’s Second Quarter Earnings Later&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856023</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Tech Crunch: Cheat Sheet For GOOG’s Second Quarter Earnings Later&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856023</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by e-Smart Tech Gadgets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by e-Smart Tech Gadgets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Cheat Sheet For GOOG’s Second Quarter Earnings Later This Week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2856022</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Cheat Sheet For GOOG’s Second Quarter Earnings Later This Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2856022</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by e-Smart Tech Gadgets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by e-Smart Tech Gadgets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logicus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2855890</link>
		<dc:creator>Logicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2855890</guid>
		<description>I think the kudos goes to Mark Mahaney.  This stuff is normally reserved for institutional clients only and do not allow for reproduction ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the kudos goes to Mark Mahaney.  This stuff is normally reserved for institutional clients only and do not allow for reproduction &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="6700850">Simon Chan</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2855812</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="6700850">Simon Chan</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2855812</guid>
		<description>hmmmm.... accurate or not??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm&#8230;. accurate or not??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Pereira</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2855808</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2855808</guid>
		<description>Erick - Do you own any goog stock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick &#8211; Do you own any goog stock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yofrez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/cheat-sheet-for-googs-second-quarter-earnings-later-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-2855783</link>
		<dc:creator>yofrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=83023#comment-2855783</guid>
		<description>This is great! Good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! Good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
