<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once Again, Twitter Trending Topics Polluted By Spam (Or Not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:02:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: depannage informatique</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3078826</link>
		<dc:creator>depannage informatique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3078826</guid>
		<description>there will always be sensors... you can&#039;t help it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there will always be sensors&#8230; you can&#8217;t help it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assurance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3078822</link>
		<dc:creator>assurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3078822</guid>
		<description>thx Barnaby, interesting link... at least it solves the reflexion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx Barnaby, interesting link&#8230; at least it solves the reflexion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutuelle santé</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-3035025</link>
		<dc:creator>mutuelle santé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3035025</guid>
		<description>sad but funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sad but funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutuelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-3021330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutuelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3021330</guid>
		<description>Yes the book is great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the book is great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutuelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-3015135</link>
		<dc:creator>mutuelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3015135</guid>
		<description>thaks for this post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thaks for this post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutuelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-3012650</link>
		<dc:creator>mutuelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-3012650</guid>
		<description>Yes i&#039;m agree with that : I think the lesson here is – “don’t rely on twitter for everything in the world” – check other sources</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i&#8217;m agree with that : I think the lesson here is – “don’t rely on twitter for everything in the world” – check other sources</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is TrueTwit up to the Task of Reducing Twitter Spam? I don&#8217;t think so! &#124; Thoughtpick Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2940927</link>
		<dc:creator>Is TrueTwit up to the Task of Reducing Twitter Spam? I don&#8217;t think so! &#124; Thoughtpick Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2940927</guid>
		<description>[...] above, but also Twitter bots, numerous fake Twitter accounts as well as spammers trying to use trending topics to gain exposure. I am sure there is more, but these are the examples off the top of my head right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] above, but also Twitter bots, numerous fake Twitter accounts as well as spammers trying to use trending topics to gain exposure. I am sure there is more, but these are the examples off the top of my head right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To: 5 Top Methods &#38; Applications to Reduce Twitter Spam! &#124; Thoughtpick Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2881417</link>
		<dc:creator>How To: 5 Top Methods &#38; Applications to Reduce Twitter Spam! &#124; Thoughtpick Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2881417</guid>
		<description>[...] = &#039;amerkawar&#039;; How much of Twitter&#8217;s trending topics are polluted by spam? How many Twitter verified accounts are there? Have you ever thought of reaching Twitter utopia: a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] = &#8216;amerkawar&#8217;; How much of Twitter&#8217;s trending topics are polluted by spam? How many Twitter verified accounts are there? Have you ever thought of reaching Twitter utopia: a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What The Hashtag: Your Guide To Enigmatic Twitter Hashtags &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2839760</link>
		<dc:creator>What The Hashtag: Your Guide To Enigmatic Twitter Hashtags &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2839760</guid>
		<description>[...] on Twitter. And many of the Trending Topics aren&#8217;t necessarily breaking news and is often polluted by spam. What The Hashtag is a site launched to solve this exact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Twitter. And many of the Trending Topics aren&#8217;t necessarily breaking news and is often polluted by spam. What The Hashtag is a site launched to solve this exact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2836579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2836579</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t watch the show, you won&#039;t get the joke. Unlike the 70s, you apparently can&#039;t go anything today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t watch the show, you won&#8217;t get the joke. Unlike the 70s, you apparently can&#8217;t go anything today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Once Again, Twitter Trending Topics Polluted By Spam (Or Not)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2836376</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Once Again, Twitter Trending Topics Polluted By Spam (Or Not)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2836376</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Hostpundit - Hosting and Gadgets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Hostpundit &#8211; Hosting and Gadgets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2836121</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2836121</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the search term is not offensive, or spam or even banned. Just a twitter bug.  Try searching with just the hashtag removed.  By the way isn&#039;t #moonfruit more spamlike - i.e include #moonfruit in a tweet to win a Macbook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the search term is not offensive, or spam or even banned. Just a twitter bug.  Try searching with just the hashtag removed.  By the way isn&#8217;t #moonfruit more spamlike &#8211; i.e include #moonfruit in a tweet to win a Macbook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anarchyintheuk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2835556</link>
		<dc:creator>anarchyintheuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2835556</guid>
		<description>newbs? what is that meant to mean?

Everyone has a valid comment, or is only stoneage man allowed to make a comment here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>newbs? what is that meant to mean?</p>
<p>Everyone has a valid comment, or is only stoneage man allowed to make a comment here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mutuelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2835291</link>
		<dc:creator>mutuelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2835291</guid>
		<description>I do it. I bought my book at Amazon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do it. I bought my book at Amazon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are you a twit about trends? &#124; Leefe rates the world...</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2835216</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you a twit about trends? &#124; Leefe rates the world...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2835216</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch picked up on this. And, with out doing any due diligence, declaired it as spam. Of course, the general public decided to correct them (and put the boot in at the same time for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch picked up on this. And, with out doing any due diligence, declaired it as spam. Of course, the general public decided to correct them (and put the boot in at the same time for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834650</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834650</guid>
		<description>The maximum hashtag length for search to work is actually 16 characters. You can see for yourself by clicking these two hashtags:

http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashT
http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashTa

You can see here that they have both been twittered:

http://twitter.com/anothertwat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The maximum hashtag length for search to work is actually 16 characters. You can see for yourself by clicking these two hashtags:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashT" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashT'>http://twitter....otEvenThisHashT</a><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashTa" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotEvenThisHashTa'>http://twitter....tEvenThisHashTa</a></p>
<p>You can see here that they have both been twittered:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/anothertwat" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://twitter.com/anothertwat'>http://twitter.com/anothertwat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834563</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834563</guid>
		<description>Robyn, even though it&#039;s pointed out to you numerous times that Twitter hasn&#039;t blocked it (it&#039;s just over 15 characters) you continue to write comments defending Twitter&#039;s non-existant censorship. Why don&#039;t you update your article?

Also, they were using the word &#039;pussy&#039; on a prime-time British sitcom in the 70&#039;s and you still think it&#039;s offensive? What kind of prude are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robyn, even though it&#8217;s pointed out to you numerous times that Twitter hasn&#8217;t blocked it (it&#8217;s just over 15 characters) you continue to write comments defending Twitter&#8217;s non-existant censorship. Why don&#8217;t you update your article?</p>
<p>Also, they were using the word &#8216;pussy&#8217; on a prime-time British sitcom in the 70&#8217;s and you still think it&#8217;s offensive? What kind of prude are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Orliac</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834475</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Orliac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834475</guid>
		<description>Twitter has a real problem here: either filter the tweets and links to avoid spam at the risk of slowing down the real-time process, or do nothing and carry the risk of losing credibility and relevance of the information available on Twitter Search. This topic is very interesting when you think that Facebook is about to launch Facebook Search and the Twitter-like feature on the publisher bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter has a real problem here: either filter the tweets and links to avoid spam at the risk of slowing down the real-time process, or do nothing and carry the risk of losing credibility and relevance of the information available on Twitter Search. This topic is very interesting when you think that Facebook is about to launch Facebook Search and the Twitter-like feature on the publisher bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The old ones are the best &#171; Gary Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834455</link>
		<dc:creator>The old ones are the best &#171; Gary Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834455</guid>
		<description>[...] enough, other countries were a bit puzzled by the trend, so much so that both Techcrunch and Mashable wrote stories complaining that Twitter was getting infected with spam again [2]. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough, other countries were a bit puzzled by the trend, so much so that both Techcrunch and Mashable wrote stories complaining that Twitter was getting infected with spam again [2]. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leefe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834365</link>
		<dc:creator>Leefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834365</guid>
		<description>Ok Rove, Public Enemies say Goodnight at #iranelection to Michael Jackson feeding #moonfruit to #MrsSlocombesPussy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok Rove, Public Enemies say Goodnight at #iranelection to Michael Jackson feeding #moonfruit to #MrsSlocombesPussy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Has Disgraced Mrs. Slocombe&#8217;s Pussy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834328</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Has Disgraced Mrs. Slocombe&#8217;s Pussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834328</guid>
		<description>[...] more disappointing, however, is how US technology gossip blogs TechCrunch and Mashable dealt with this information. They considered it an attempt to poison the trending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more disappointing, however, is how US technology gossip blogs TechCrunch and Mashable dealt with this information. They considered it an attempt to poison the trending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2834203</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834203</guid>
		<description>&quot;#MrsSlocombesPussy, which is just a bit of fun&quot;

Well, only some people - think &quot;Island&quot; - actually knew what the hastag was about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;#MrsSlocombesPussy, which is just a bit of fun&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, only some people &#8211; think &#8220;Island&#8221; &#8211; actually knew what the hastag was about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter S.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2834196</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834196</guid>
		<description>No, he did not. It is the reaction to expect. Without the proper knowledge, this hashtag was likely to be a spam topic. 

Why is this topic considered spam? I have gotten enough e-mails from ex-presidents of Nigeria that want to give me money - and twitter has more and more spam associated with it. 

Is this hashtag appropriate - it is :) It&#039;s pretty funny really, once you watch it. I wish they had links to amazon.com selling the movie, so that people get *served*

#HaveUgottenServed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he did not. It is the reaction to expect. Without the proper knowledge, this hashtag was likely to be a spam topic. </p>
<p>Why is this topic considered spam? I have gotten enough e-mails from ex-presidents of Nigeria that want to give me money &#8211; and twitter has more and more spam associated with it. </p>
<p>Is this hashtag appropriate &#8211; it is <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s pretty funny really, once you watch it. I wish they had links to amazon.com selling the movie, so that people get *served*</p>
<p>#HaveUgottenServed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-2/#comment-2834112</link>
		<dc:creator>Burch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834112</guid>
		<description>hehe, loved Are You being Served in the 70s, I got some of the barely concealed smutty humour, but I was much older when I realised why Mrs Slocombe&#039;s constant reference to her cat made adults laugh.

RIP Molly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, loved Are You being Served in the 70s, I got some of the barely concealed smutty humour, but I was much older when I realised why Mrs Slocombe&#8217;s constant reference to her cat made adults laugh.</p>
<p>RIP Molly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/once-again-twitter-trending-topics-polluted-by-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2834012</link>
		<dc:creator>William Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78791#comment-2834012</guid>
		<description>Does it really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
