<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:13:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2835140</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2835140</guid>
		<description>It is good to see they have made a lot of good changes to Google Blog Search. However, as you mentioned this is a error they should not have made!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good to see they have made a lot of good changes to Google Blog Search. However, as you mentioned this is a error they should not have made!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BUY DVDS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834896</link>
		<dc:creator>BUY DVDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834896</guid>
		<description>Rss seems a lot of us a lot of convenience. 
All right。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rss seems a lot of us a lot of convenience.<br />
All right。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="648799018">Tekunik Web</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834782</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="648799018">Tekunik Web</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834782</guid>
		<description>One more problem I found is that ,when you are looking for a particular blog type ,say Technology or politics ,It does not change the hot querries and latest  posts accordingly on the right hand side .I would like to see them according to my category .
http://tekunik.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more problem I found is that ,when you are looking for a particular blog type ,say Technology or politics ,It does not change the hot querries and latest  posts accordingly on the right hand side .I would like to see them according to my category .<br />
<a href="http://tekunik.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tekunik.blogspot.com'>http://tekunik.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back &#124; Technology News Update</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834711</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back &#124; Technology News Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834711</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from:  Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from:  Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-02 &#171; 個人的な雑記</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834310</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-02 &#171; 個人的な雑記</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834310</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back (tags: google) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back (tags: google) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834253</link>
		<dc:creator>Lincoln Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834253</guid>
		<description>I wonder theyre going to finally release their people search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder theyre going to finally release their people search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia D</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834238</guid>
		<description>Another drawback is that they only provide RSS feeds for maximum of 100 results. For popular topics, this may be just 1 day or 1hr of data. So even if you put a date range, you may not get all the data if there are over 100 results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another drawback is that they only provide RSS feeds for maximum of 100 results. For popular topics, this may be just 1 day or 1hr of data. So even if you put a date range, you may not get all the data if there are over 100 results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back &#124; Webbyn.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834220</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back &#124; Webbyn.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834220</guid>
		<description>[...]  &#160; Webbyn.com    550+ blogs and news sources are closely tracked, and still counting!    Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back0              [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  &nbsp; Webbyn.com    550+ blogs and news sources are closely tracked, and still counting!    Google Blog Search Takes Two Steps Forward, One Step Back0              [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501026012">Michelle M Mccormack</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834182</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501026012">Michelle M Mccormack</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834182</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t even know they had a blog search... I shouldn&#039;t brag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even know they had a blog search&#8230; I shouldn&#8217;t brag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834176</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834176</guid>
		<description>I noticed that &quot;new jersey transit&quot; has been in the middle of the hot queries list for at least the past couple of hours, but it&#039;s impossible to tell why if you click the link. I had to click over to Google News to figure out that service on NJT&#039;s Gladstone Branch was knocked out during the AM rush because of a fallen tree. None of the Google Blog Search results were of any use. (That is, unless you clicked &quot;Sort by relevance.&quot;  In that case, only the third result out of 10 on the page was related to the outage. Go figure.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that &#8220;new jersey transit&#8221; has been in the middle of the hot queries list for at least the past couple of hours, but it&#8217;s impossible to tell why if you click the link. I had to click over to Google News to figure out that service on NJT&#8217;s Gladstone Branch was knocked out during the AM rush because of a fallen tree. None of the Google Blog Search results were of any use. (That is, unless you clicked &#8220;Sort by relevance.&#8221;  In that case, only the third result out of 10 on the page was related to the outage. Go figure.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dennis Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834153</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dennis Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834153</guid>
		<description>Hm, odd that they wouldn&#039;t have them filtered from the start.

On another note, I expect Hot Queries to fall prey to Google Trends-like gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, odd that they wouldn&#8217;t have them filtered from the start.</p>
<p>On another note, I expect Hot Queries to fall prey to Google Trends-like gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varun Khaneja</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/02/google-blog-search-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2834152</link>
		<dc:creator>Varun Khaneja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78889#comment-2834152</guid>
		<description>Much needed enhancements. I have always found Google Blog Search very useful. These features make it so much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much needed enhancements. I have always found Google Blog Search very useful. These features make it so much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
