<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention Executives: 73% of You Need to Fire Yourselves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:48:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: مركز تحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2965424</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز تحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2965424</guid>
		<description>Twitter is completely overhyped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is completely overhyped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: منتديات</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2965411</link>
		<dc:creator>منتديات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2965411</guid>
		<description>On the subject of Twitter, as long as the platform continues to grow the potential is definitely there for more companies to use it as a source for aggregating feedback about their products and brands and interacting with consumers. Many people still don’t get it but as the service evolves hopefully it will become more clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of Twitter, as long as the platform continues to grow the potential is definitely there for more companies to use it as a source for aggregating feedback about their products and brands and interacting with consumers. Many people still don’t get it but as the service evolves hopefully it will become more clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfmitch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2836740</link>
		<dc:creator>sfmitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2836740</guid>
		<description>Using Dell as an example of the power of Twitter is a bit dubious.  Unless, Dell&#039;s total sales increased or at least Dell believed (or maybe had evidence showing) that it wouldn&#039;t have gotten those sales anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Dell as an example of the power of Twitter is a bit dubious.  Unless, Dell&#8217;s total sales increased or at least Dell believed (or maybe had evidence showing) that it wouldn&#8217;t have gotten those sales anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Advice Awards for Social Software Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2832425</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Advice Awards for Social Software Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2832425</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools are too cheap ....&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools are too cheap &#8230;.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Advice Awards for Social Software Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2832424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Advice Awards for Social Software Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2832424</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools are too cheap ....&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools are too cheap &#8230;.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamairah at Biz360</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2831948</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamairah at Biz360</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2831948</guid>
		<description>We agree that in order for businesses to extract value, filters are absolutely necessary to both measure and monitor what is relevant to the business.   This is true whether they are monitoring themselves, competitors, products, key messages or hot topics.  

The ideal tool is very dependent on the business requirements. In most cases enterprise level businesses need tools that consolidate the vast social media landscape and sources into a single measurement stream, and provide the ability to benchmark and measure across their enterprise - and sometimes globally.  And many of these organizations are new to all of this (evidenced by the study) and require services assistance.  Many of the free or low cost tools may work for small businesses, but are new to the market and have serious limitations for the larger enterprise-wide companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree that in order for businesses to extract value, filters are absolutely necessary to both measure and monitor what is relevant to the business.   This is true whether they are monitoring themselves, competitors, products, key messages or hot topics.  </p>
<p>The ideal tool is very dependent on the business requirements. In most cases enterprise level businesses need tools that consolidate the vast social media landscape and sources into a single measurement stream, and provide the ability to benchmark and measure across their enterprise &#8211; and sometimes globally.  And many of these organizations are new to all of this (evidenced by the study) and require services assistance.  Many of the free or low cost tools may work for small businesses, but are new to the market and have serious limitations for the larger enterprise-wide companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris j.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2831901</link>
		<dc:creator>chris j.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2831901</guid>
		<description>Justin, you missed one part: 
&quot;Only 27% of those between the ages of 18-30 say Twitter is an important rapid-feedback tool for business.&quot;

So a more precise translation might be:

“We think Twitter is important and couldn’t possibly be wrong, therefore everyone running businesses, and everyone those businesses are targeting as customers, is wrong.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, you missed one part:<br />
&#8220;Only 27% of those between the ages of 18-30 say Twitter is an important rapid-feedback tool for business.&#8221;</p>
<p>So a more precise translation might be:</p>
<p>“We think Twitter is important and couldn’t possibly be wrong, therefore everyone running businesses, and everyone those businesses are targeting as customers, is wrong.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Gadgets &#124; Tech Crunch: Attention Executives: 73% of You Need to Fire&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2831826</link>
		<dc:creator>New Gadgets &#124; Tech Crunch: Attention Executives: 73% of You Need to Fire&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2831826</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Hostpundit - Hosting and Gadgets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Hostpundit &#8211; Hosting and Gadgets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2831487</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2831487</guid>
		<description>I, by the power vested in me, hereby announce that anyone who does not see the financial value of Twitter should fire themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, by the power vested in me, hereby announce that anyone who does not see the financial value of Twitter should fire themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 幹部諸君に告ぐ：みなさんの73%は辞めた方がいい</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830865</link>
		<dc:creator>幹部諸君に告ぐ：みなさんの73%は辞めた方がいい</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830865</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830797</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on an app that filters tweets about brands down to a set that is useful for product and brand managers. We filter out roughly 90-98% of tweets that reference a product, company or brand.  Most are retweets of article links and sales promotions.  We also filter out a lot of tweets that fail to indicate whether they love, like or hate the product.

The application will be in private beta later this summer. Wish us luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on an app that filters tweets about brands down to a set that is useful for product and brand managers. We filter out roughly 90-98% of tweets that reference a product, company or brand.  Most are retweets of article links and sales promotions.  We also filter out a lot of tweets that fail to indicate whether they love, like or hate the product.</p>
<p>The application will be in private beta later this summer. Wish us luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0 Software: Commoditization before Monetization &#124; Pretzel Logic - Enterprise 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830791</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise 2.0 Software: Commoditization before Monetization &#124; Pretzel Logic - Enterprise 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830791</guid>
		<description>[...] Sarah Lacy at TechCrunch takes a shot at Enteprise 2.0 stating &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sarah Lacy at TechCrunch takes a shot at Enteprise 2.0 stating &#8220;But I don’t see Enterprise 2.0 becoming a big area of corporate spending. The tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwitterCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830790</link>
		<dc:creator>TwitterCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830790</guid>
		<description>Hardly anyone outside of the valley really uses Twitter. Of all the people I know, only 1 person tweets(and I&#039;m in tech). They don&#039;t even &#039;listen&#039; to the stream. Everyone uses Facebook though.

Execs realize(unlike TechCrunch writers who orgasm when someone mentions Twitter) that Twitter is the most overhyped POS ever. Move on please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly anyone outside of the valley really uses Twitter. Of all the people I know, only 1 person tweets(and I&#8217;m in tech). They don&#8217;t even &#8216;listen&#8217; to the stream. Everyone uses Facebook though.</p>
<p>Execs realize(unlike TechCrunch writers who orgasm when someone mentions Twitter) that Twitter is the most overhyped POS ever. Move on please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collabo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830764</link>
		<dc:creator>Collabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830764</guid>
		<description>Are we talking about Enterprise 2.0 in this article or are we talking about Twitter as a source of real-time feedback? I&#039;m not really sure what you&#039;re trying to get at here. Personally I don&#039;t see anything wrong with the name. When talking about Enterprise and adaptation of Web 2.0 technologies, I see Enterprise 2.0 as a suitable title. I&#039;m not surprised that many executives don&#039;t understand the concepts as of yet. Enterprise 2.0 is still very much a developing idea.

On the subject of Twitter, as long as the platform continues to grow the potential is definitely there for more companies to use it as a source for aggregating feedback about their products and brands and interacting with consumers. Many people still don&#039;t get it but as the service evolves hopefully it will become more clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we talking about Enterprise 2.0 in this article or are we talking about Twitter as a source of real-time feedback? I&#8217;m not really sure what you&#8217;re trying to get at here. Personally I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the name. When talking about Enterprise and adaptation of Web 2.0 technologies, I see Enterprise 2.0 as a suitable title. I&#8217;m not surprised that many executives don&#8217;t understand the concepts as of yet. Enterprise 2.0 is still very much a developing idea.</p>
<p>On the subject of Twitter, as long as the platform continues to grow the potential is definitely there for more companies to use it as a source for aggregating feedback about their products and brands and interacting with consumers. Many people still don&#8217;t get it but as the service evolves hopefully it will become more clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830710</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830710</guid>
		<description>Twitter is completely overhyped. Remember when MySpace was the internet darling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is completely overhyped. Remember when MySpace was the internet darling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kelman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830522</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830522</guid>
		<description>Sarah, why stop at firing the 73% of executives who don&#039;t share your enthusiasm for Twitter? Why not march them to the guillotine?

Redfin pays a lot of attention to Twitter, but I&#039;ve met plenty of amazing execs who have a more balanced view of it.  And I personally worry that I sometimes listen to Twitter users too much:
http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2009/06/do_twitter_users_get_better_service.html

PS I liked the &quot;meh&quot; too. It made me smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, why stop at firing the 73% of executives who don&#8217;t share your enthusiasm for Twitter? Why not march them to the guillotine?</p>
<p>Redfin pays a lot of attention to Twitter, but I&#8217;ve met plenty of amazing execs who have a more balanced view of it.  And I personally worry that I sometimes listen to Twitter users too much:<br />
<a href="http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2009/06/do_twitter_users_get_better_service.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2009/06/do_twitter_users_get_better_service.html'>http://blog.red...er_service.html</a></p>
<p>PS I liked the &#8220;meh&#8221; too. It made me smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam {Qajack}</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830465</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam {Qajack}</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830465</guid>
		<description>Enterprise 2.0 sounds like a UGC Star Trek sequel set in urggh Second Life.

Companies (media companies in London, Soho) get Twitter, to the extent they need to get on it, but don&#039;t get what it can facilitate. Yammer goes some of the way, but it&#039;s interface sucks and now Social Cast has gone freemium so it&#039;s enterprise Twitter war time and Twitter hasn&#039;t shown it&#039;s hand yet.

Lacy, you write well, loved China posts and &#039;meh&#039; is brave terminology for TC, keep up the good work and statistical insight, congrats.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise 2.0 sounds like a UGC Star Trek sequel set in urggh Second Life.</p>
<p>Companies (media companies in London, Soho) get Twitter, to the extent they need to get on it, but don&#8217;t get what it can facilitate. Yammer goes some of the way, but it&#8217;s interface sucks and now Social Cast has gone freemium so it&#8217;s enterprise Twitter war time and Twitter hasn&#8217;t shown it&#8217;s hand yet.</p>
<p>Lacy, you write well, loved China posts and &#8216;meh&#8217; is brave terminology for TC, keep up the good work and statistical insight, congrats.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy B.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830432</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830432</guid>
		<description>Great point. I was thinking while reading this &quot;Sure, it&#039;s a great rapid-feedback tool for my company, but I&#039;d still answer no to that question.&quot;

Then again, what does my opinion matter, because according to Tech Crunch, since I&#039;m over 30, I&#039;m old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point. I was thinking while reading this &#8220;Sure, it&#8217;s a great rapid-feedback tool for my company, but I&#8217;d still answer no to that question.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then again, what does my opinion matter, because according to Tech Crunch, since I&#8217;m over 30, I&#8217;m old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fbmg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830398</link>
		<dc:creator>fbmg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830398</guid>
		<description>totally agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830395</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830395</guid>
		<description>I think twitter can be explained as faster e-mail/IM to businesses.  Rather than send me an e-mail, just send a twitter message from your mobile phone.  IM is a bit too spammy for businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think twitter can be explained as faster e-mail/IM to businesses.  Rather than send me an e-mail, just send a twitter message from your mobile phone.  IM is a bit too spammy for businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TweetThis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830381</link>
		<dc:creator>TweetThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830381</guid>
		<description>99.9% come on.  It&#039;s all BS - 100%.  Just because lots of people use it (including me!) doesn;t mean its not all useless pap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99.9% come on.  It&#8217;s all BS &#8211; 100%.  Just because lots of people use it (including me!) doesn;t mean its not all useless pap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puranjay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830369</link>
		<dc:creator>Puranjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830369</guid>
		<description>Judging by the &quot;reminders&quot; I get from TC about their new posts at Twitter, I would say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the &#8220;reminders&#8221; I get from TC about their new posts at Twitter, I would say yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronson-Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronson-Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830363</guid>
		<description>Twitter won me a free Alienware M17x through their trivia contest on there. (Tis a laptop worth about 4 grand.)

I will put up with all the damn spam from/on/about Twitter from now on without complaint. :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter won me a free Alienware M17x through their trivia contest on there. (Tis a laptop worth about 4 grand.)</p>
<p>I will put up with all the damn spam from/on/about Twitter from now on without complaint. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taf</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830344</link>
		<dc:creator>taf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830344</guid>
		<description>I completely understand excutives not understanding how twitter can be useful. Both examples show how any use of a new channel medium is used. Calling that a success is a huge overstatement (dell could open a short wave radio and it would sell using it)

Twitter is just a cheaper sms service. Any company who needs it to use as communication with customers has got a lot of serious problems with the usual customer service mediums (aka comcast, with such bad call centers anything is a success)

Unless twitter can add value other than another way for customers to communicate, companys will still prefer to be able to interact with customers without having to swim through all the spam (which is pretty much what most tweets still are)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely understand excutives not understanding how twitter can be useful. Both examples show how any use of a new channel medium is used. Calling that a success is a huge overstatement (dell could open a short wave radio and it would sell using it)</p>
<p>Twitter is just a cheaper sms service. Any company who needs it to use as communication with customers has got a lot of serious problems with the usual customer service mediums (aka comcast, with such bad call centers anything is a success)</p>
<p>Unless twitter can add value other than another way for customers to communicate, companys will still prefer to be able to interact with customers without having to swim through all the spam (which is pretty much what most tweets still are)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="500293106">Shawn Rubel</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/30/attention-executives-73-of-you-need-to-fire-yourselves/comment-page-1/#comment-2830317</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="500293106">Shawn Rubel</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=78133#comment-2830317</guid>
		<description>I agree that Twitter can be an important feedback too for SOME businesses, but the term &quot;Business&quot; is a huge blanket statement. 

Twitter probably wouldn&#039;t do much for the Mom &amp; Pop Donut shop down the street because their target demographic is living in the apartments right around the corner.

You&#039;re kind of making it sound like business owners &quot;just don&#039;t get it&quot;. Twitter is awesome, but it&#039;s not for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Twitter can be an important feedback too for SOME businesses, but the term &#8220;Business&#8221; is a huge blanket statement. </p>
<p>Twitter probably wouldn&#8217;t do much for the Mom &amp; Pop Donut shop down the street because their target demographic is living in the apartments right around the corner.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kind of making it sound like business owners &#8220;just don&#8217;t get it&#8221;. Twitter is awesome, but it&#8217;s not for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
