<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Is Now Resorting To Selling Killer Domain Names On The Cheap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:34:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-3006978</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-3006978</guid>
		<description>The sale seems a good move given the upcoming ICANN TLD shake-up. If Yahoo really wants to launch a &#039;contests&#039; website they could spend $185,000 and register the .contests TLD and then launch win.contests.

The days of big money for top .com&#039;s could be coming to a close. Why pay millions for toys.com when you could own the .toys TLD and launch countless toy related websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sale seems a good move given the upcoming ICANN TLD shake-up. If Yahoo really wants to launch a &#8216;contests&#8217; website they could spend $185,000 and register the .contests TLD and then launch win.contests.</p>
<p>The days of big money for top .com&#8217;s could be coming to a close. Why pay millions for toys.com when you could own the .toys TLD and launch countless toy related websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap - BlogAngle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2915938</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap - BlogAngle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2915938</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Design Website Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2915151</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Design Website Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2915151</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also &lt;a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also &lt;a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2914957</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2914957</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It plus sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It plus sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Spin Valley Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2914806</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Spin Valley Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2914806</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Anthonyrobinson.info</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2914690</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap &#124; Anthonyrobinson.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2914690</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2914557</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG Yahoo Gets OMG.com For Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2914557</guid>
		<description>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a history of obtaining good domain names and doing nothing or next to nothing with them. It sold contests.com in June for $380,000 after sitting on it for many years. It also sold WP.com to WordPress parent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2009-06-19 #487 Back in Honolulu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2903195</link>
		<dc:creator>GNC-2009-06-19 #487 Back in Honolulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2903195</guid>
		<description>[...] available via Google. 1.92 Million dollars sheer madness! 500,000 New iPhones to Sell this Weekend! Yahoo selling domain names! Google goes after Bing Digital TV Transition Update. Sweeden wacky IP laws Home Computer to Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] available via Google. 1.92 Million dollars sheer madness! 500,000 New iPhones to Sell this Weekend! Yahoo selling domain names! Google goes after Bing Digital TV Transition Update. Sweeden wacky IP laws Home Computer to Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Server.com Sold For A Solid $770,000 &#124; eMediaOne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2898952</link>
		<dc:creator>Server.com Sold For A Solid $770,000 &#124; eMediaOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2898952</guid>
		<description>[...] professional domainers and regular companies with an attractive portfolio are more willing to sell now that cash is in shorter supply than it was before the economy collapsed, or maybe these are all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] professional domainers and regular companies with an attractive portfolio are more willing to sell now that cash is in shorter supply than it was before the economy collapsed, or maybe these are all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Server.com Sold For A Solid $770,000 &#124; Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2898919</link>
		<dc:creator>Server.com Sold For A Solid $770,000 &#124; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2898919</guid>
		<description>[...] professional domainers and regular companies with an attractive portfolio are more willing to sell now that cash is in shorter supply than it was before the economy collapsed, or maybe these are all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] professional domainers and regular companies with an attractive portfolio are more willing to sell now that cash is in shorter supply than it was before the economy collapsed, or maybe these are all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2839445</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2839445</guid>
		<description>lol why would you do that yahooo??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol why would you do that yahooo??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TopBlogs &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2826137</link>
		<dc:creator>TopBlogs &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2826137</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (yes, &#8220;Flicker&#8221;) Tries to Get Rich Quick With Its Convenient Domain Name &#171; TechWorthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2825844</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (yes, &#8220;Flicker&#8221;) Tries to Get Rich Quick With Its Convenient Domain Name &#171; TechWorthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2825844</guid>
		<description>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (yes, &#8220;Flicker&#8221;) Tries to Get Rich Quick With Its Convient Domain Name &#171; TechWorthy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2825837</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (yes, &#8220;Flicker&#8221;) Tries to Get Rich Quick With Its Convient Domain Name &#171; TechWorthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2825837</guid>
		<description>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo devised a new plan to raise funds in troubled time&#160;&#124;&#160;TechDusts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2825520</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo devised a new plan to raise funds in troubled time&#160;&#124;&#160;TechDusts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2825520</guid>
		<description>[...] Is $380K really going to help Yahoo to sail out from troubled waters? Yahoo, the Internet Giant has auctioned his premium domain name contests.com for a mere $380K. A killer domain name like this would have fetched million of dollars. MG Siegler of  TechCrunch compares this to other domains which got sell off in past year such as Toys.com for $5.1 million and Candy.com $3 million. Looking at these figures I have a right to doubt the business acumen of Yahoo. I am confused and still trying to figure out why there is a need to sell contests.com. May be they needed to make a payroll this friday..LOL&#8230;    Follow-Up  TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is $380K really going to help Yahoo to sail out from troubled waters? Yahoo, the Internet Giant has auctioned his premium domain name contests.com for a mere $380K. A killer domain name like this would have fetched million of dollars. MG Siegler of  TechCrunch compares this to other domains which got sell off in past year such as Toys.com for $5.1 million and Candy.com $3 million. Looking at these figures I have a right to doubt the business acumen of Yahoo. I am confused and still trying to figure out why there is a need to sell contests.com. May be they needed to make a payroll this friday..LOL&#8230;    Follow-Up  TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2825518</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2825518</guid>
		<description>I give Yahoo another year till they are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Yahoo another year till they are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Spin Valley Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824977</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Spin Valley Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824977</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824590</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824590</guid>
		<description>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shouldn’t hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they’re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824493</link>
		<dc:creator>Brig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824493</guid>
		<description>Check out gear.com. Surprise, surprise -- a good domain that isn&#039;t a squatter. We&#039;re a real site with tons gear catalogs and a bunch of gear reviews that our writers review all the time. Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out gear.com. Surprise, surprise &#8212; a good domain that isn&#8217;t a squatter. We&#8217;re a real site with tons gear catalogs and a bunch of gear reviews that our writers review all the time. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824344</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824344</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to manufacture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to manufacture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; ScooperNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824318</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; ScooperNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824318</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techeroid &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824315</link>
		<dc:creator>Techeroid &#187; Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824315</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824280</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824280</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2824222</link>
		<dc:creator>Flicker (No, Not That One) Bares Its Stats In An Attempt To Get Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2824222</guid>
		<description>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hold their breath for Yahoo to buy the domain anytime soon. After all, they&#8217;re busy selling off their own killer domain names on the cheap to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Borgos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/17/yahoo-is-now-resorting-to-selling-killer-domain-names-on-the-cheap/comment-page-2/#comment-2813609</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Borgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=74319#comment-2813609</guid>
		<description>It is hard to compare Contests.com to an ecommerce domain like Candy.com or Toys.com, because I don’t think people who enter contests care that much what domain they are on, assuming they are entering free contests.  I have a bunch of good contest domains like WinContests.com, BigContests.com, and PrizeWinner.com, etc.) and I think those would do just as well for a big contest site.  Contests.com would do better in the search engines and has more built in traffic, but that is only part of the value.  On the other hand Contests.com would be an industry leading domain for a company that provides contest related services, but there are much fewer of those types of companies out there than there are toy or candy companies. Also keep in mind there is a big difference between sweepstakes (like Publishers Clearinghouse) and contests (contests require skill, they don’t just have a random winner). End users usually don’t know the difference or care, but this distinction would be very important to a company buying the domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to compare Contests.com to an ecommerce domain like Candy.com or Toys.com, because I don’t think people who enter contests care that much what domain they are on, assuming they are entering free contests.  I have a bunch of good contest domains like WinContests.com, BigContests.com, and PrizeWinner.com, etc.) and I think those would do just as well for a big contest site.  Contests.com would do better in the search engines and has more built in traffic, but that is only part of the value.  On the other hand Contests.com would be an industry leading domain for a company that provides contest related services, but there are much fewer of those types of companies out there than there are toy or candy companies. Also keep in mind there is a big difference between sweepstakes (like Publishers Clearinghouse) and contests (contests require skill, they don’t just have a random winner). End users usually don’t know the difference or care, but this distinction would be very important to a company buying the domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
