The “holocaust” did occur, to an extent. But the figure of 6 million Jews is arbitrary and completely false.

The fact is that there were countless Jews who died in internment camps, but the myth that these camps used gas chambers to kill millions of Jews is that, a myth.

The camps were not designed as ways of killing people, there are far, far, easier ways of killing people quickly.

The fact that the Germans even had investigators who examined cases of prisoner abuse should be evidence of this.

Two concentration camp commanders were executed for the murder of no more than four Jewish prisoners.

Why, if these camps were indeed “death camps”, would they execute high ranking officials for killing Jews if that is the purpose of these Camps?

One of these men was Judge Konrad Morgen, who sentenced many SS officers to death for their abuse of Jewish prisoners.

You can look up Morgen on Wikipedia if you do not believe this claim.

The “holocaust” did occur, to an extent. But the figure of 6 million Jews is arbitrary and completely false.

The fact is that there were countless Jews who died in internment camps, but the myth that these camps used gas chambers to kill millions of Jews is that, a myth.

The camps were not designed as ways of killing people, there are far, far, easier ways of killing people quickly.

The fact that the Germans even had investigators who examined cases of prisoner abuse should be evidence of this.

Two concentration camp commanders were executed for the murder of no more than four Jewish prisoners.

Why, if these camps were indeed “death camps”, would they execute high ranking officials for killing Jews if that is the purpose of these Camps?

One of these men was Judge Konrad Morgen, who sentenced many SS officers to death for their abuse of Jewish prisoners.

You can look up Morgen on Wikipedia if you do not believe this claim.

I take extreme offense at the classification of anyone taking a critical view of the Holocaust as guilty of “Hate Speech” or racism.

I only care about the truth, I am the type of person who when I hear a politician saying something, and it is accepted by everyone without examination, I become compelled to verify the accuracy of such a claim.

The holocaust is one of the most damning portrayals of human atrocity; with such powerful sentiment being told to us since kindergarden, I felt it important to listen to the criticisms of some of these alleged “racists” and “hate speech” speakers.

The fact is that there were countless Jews who died in internment camps, but the myth that these camps used gas chambers to kill millions of Jews is that, a myth.

The camps were not designed as ways of killing people, there are far, far, easier ways of killing people quickly.

The fact that the Germans even had investigators who examined cases of prisoner abuse should be evidence of this.

Two concentration camp commanders were executed for the murder of no more than four Jewish prisoners.

Why, if these camps were indeed “death camps”, would they execute high ranking officials for killing Jews if that is the purpose of these Camps?

One of these men was Judge Konrad Morgen, who sentenced many SS officers to death for their abuse of Jewish prisoners.

You can look up Morgen on Wikipedia if you do not believe this claim.

I take extreme offense at the classification of anyone taking a critical view of the Holocaust as guilty of “Hate Speech” or racism.

I only care about the truth, I am the type of person who when I hear a politician saying something, and it is accepted by everyone without examination, I become compelled to verify the accuracy of such a claim.

The holocaust is one of the most damning portrayals of human atrocity; with such powerful sentiment being told to us since kindergarden, I felt it important to listen to the criticisms of some of these alleged “racists” and “hate speech” speakers.

There IS an overwhelming amount of evidence that countless Jews, and other miniorities, died at the hands of Nazi captors.

There is NOT real evidence that they ever used “death camps” or gas chambers to kill these prisoners. In fact if you examine the issue, and are willing to hear the other sides points, it is hard to disagree with what they have to say.

The best Holocaust Revisionist Documentary series was created by a JEWISH holocaust revisionist. David Cole, was a man who despite his heritage and indoctrination, valued the truth more than what other people thought of him.

If you wish to watch the factual analysis of Auschwitz, where he interviews the museum curator of the former camp and gives point by point breakdowns of lies and tricks used to exploit human emotions, please view this excellent documentary by the Jewish film-maker:

http://video.go...ohoax&hl=en

Anyways, I am not a racist, nor a hateful person. I simply seek the truth, and I take a critical view of any extraordinary claim.

I thought since childhood that of course everything I had heard about the holocaust was accurate, certainly all my teachers, textbooks, and television were not going off close to zero factual evidence. But they were; most of their evidence came in the form of anecdotal stories from a select number of eye-witnesses. Eye-witnesses are usually an unacceptable form of proof in science as they are notoriously biased and inaccurate.

When a friend of mine told me about a Jewish film maker who campaigned for open discussion of the holocaust, I said what the hell, I’ll see what he has to say.

(By the way, the “hate speech” revisionist Jew, David Cole, has he and his families life threatened, was assaulted, and forced to sign a letter saying he only produced his documentaries out of self hate and because he was unintelligent. It’s sad that you can;t even have a differing opinion without REAL HATE being directed at you)

Throw Robert Scoble off of facebook for hacking the system and he gets to meet with Zuckerberg, but they censor people all the time. the Holocaust denial is just the tip of the iceberg. you get close enough to the SXSW crowd of cowards and traitors and you can do anything on facebook that you want. there is a double standard when it comes to expression. if you hate America’s troops then you have free reign to speak here, but Conservatives they bully. If you support Israel then you are immediately suspect.

I am disappointed that I have not seen any of the people here who claim to be invoking free speech ideas in relation to protecting violence elaborate any of their thoughts on why one is acceptable, but the expression of the body is somehow not? facebook how is this free speech?

if it was illegal in every country then it would be deleted. but at the end of the day the UK allows it, i am a british citizen so let me put my view out there…I AM A HOLOCAUST DENIER!

But people like Dave Willner should not be the authority on what content should be classified as hateful and what poses a threat to the Jewish people. After all, what makes something hateful or threatening? If it affects my physical well-being, is it threatening? Yes. If it affects my psychological well-being? The answer could easily be “yes.”

But for you, Dave, to suggest that Holocaust denial is not threatening is out of your expertise and out of your control. A Holocaust denial group in the U.S. might be all talk, but how about one in Poland? Is it so unlikely that a Facebook group could spur a real life organization of boys who assault Jews, burn down synagogues or deface cemeteries? At what point in the group’s evolution would you pull the plug on it? More importantly, does Facebook even have the infrastructure to deal with such a mass of potentially hateful groups on a day-to-day basis? How many Polish speaking group monitors do you employ?

Point is, without a semantic analysis system that can identify sentiment and intention, you won’t be able to identify actionable information. Instead, you are left with a choice of allowing all speech, or creating a rule that says that Holocaust denial groups have a statistically higher chance of spurring real-life hate or online abuse, and therefore, ban Holocaust denial groups.

But for Dave, or any other Facebook employee, to take definitive policing action based on the belief that Holocaust denial does not represent a threat to personal safety, is not only lacking in insight, but harmful to members of Facebook.

This may be a bit cynical but in my opinion, advertisers who chose to pull their ads from Facebook over this issue are either just being plain disingenuous (willfully undertaking a sham PR exercise) or are too stupid to comprehend what Facebook is about. I doubt if an ad appearing randomly on a hate-group’s Facebook page justifies any more connection between the company and the group than would a billboard at at a crime scene would establish a connection between the advertiser and the criminals.

So much for freedom of speech.

I’m really not understanding what this tokenism is all about.

There are no pictures of women breastfeeding — that’s for sure. On the other hand,a KKK group and anti-Muslim group were just taken down within these last few weeks.

There’s no rhyme or reason whatsoever. There is no logical consistency. Dave W. keeps asking me to advance a logical argument. I haven’t seen any logic at all in the arbitrary inconsistent enforcement of their ToS. It’s all very, very odd indeed.

There needs to be more transparency. There needs to be a system in place with clear criteria of what constitutes a violation of ToS and what does not.

About Freedom of Speech, what about the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy? You can bet that: the Vatican folks that protected the Boston child abusing priests for decades until they got exposed; the religious right wingers — Newt, Larry Craig, Coulter, Palin, Strom Thurmond, etc. have touched themselves just as much as you & I! Darn it… I picked on a dead man, Thurmond!

Suppressing evil minds is nearly impossible and to a certain extent, we ‘all’ have double standard. But it’s crucial that we keep the pressure on private firms like FB (I like your ‘financial’ approach, Michael), and punish criminals like James Von Brunn hard (hmm… never thought those enhanced interrogation techniques were useful on anyone other than Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and a few others…)! Let’s make sure that we don’t ‘intend’ to cause physical damage, death or serious injury! Ya know… we ‘all’ have good intention!

Facebook does not allow comments like “all Jews should die”, but it does allow holocaust denial, as it should.

Facebook does NOT allow comments like “all Jews should die”, but it does allow holocaust denial, as it should.

I like knowing that some corporations will shun the groups, but I also like knowing who will advertise there. I want to know who employs these people and where their children go to school.

I want/need? the opportunity to identify the hate groups and their employers and supporters.

I don’t want to drive them underground.

Do I wish they would change their ways? Naturally I do. Do I believe they will? Sadly no.

Evil exists. Facebook is a corporation, not a government entity they aren’t obliged to offer any one any particular platform. As a for profit group they can offer any skew they want.

Sometimes it makes me hate facebook a little, but then I realize that they’re just a platform, and a transient one at that. I guess I’m grateful to know what groups and businesses in America really don’t want me, my kids or my family, because, really, we’ve had enough. I don’t want to fight with anyone, and I certainly don’t want to support any businesses that would help these terrorist organizations.

Hate against gays without question causes harm — sometimes imminent harm.

“Hate Against Gays and Lesbians can Lead to Murder and Suicide”http://www.suicide.org/memorials/matthew-sheppard-john-french.html

While this is not a a scholarly article, it is very easy to find several that would corroborate these findings. Oy vey. Facebook is a cesspool of hate.

If you instead believe that it fits into a broader category of tragedies that can/should be handle differently, please specify which events and what criteria should be used to select them.”

We would gladly help come up with the criteria if we thought anyone was actually going to take it seriously.

And David A. is right about negative publicity. When there’s enough of a negative spotlight being shined on FB and when enough advertisers pull their ads, FB will change their stance. The key word though is “enough.”

ALERT TO MEMESHOCKERS on facebook: MemeShock is currently inaccessible. I’m unsure why but this is the second time this has happened in a week. Please file a report at: http://htxt.it/qi46 And request that they fix the problem. Also ask if it has been possibly hacked. You will also need a URL, here it is: http://htxt.it/13qA

I have no doubt that facebook leaves a few token “Conservative” groups up, but those of us online hear the stories all the time from Pro Life and Prop8 supporting groups.