<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dotcom Hangover: Amazon Pays $51 Million To End Long-Standing Battle With Toys &#8220;R&#8221; Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:14:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2801565</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2801565</guid>
		<description>$51 mil that&#039;ll help .interestingly 10% of that amount was = to the Toys.com domain purchase made by Toys&#039;R&#039;Us recently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$51 mil that&#8217;ll help .interestingly 10% of that amount was = to the Toys.com domain purchase made by Toys&#8217;R'Us recently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2799876</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2799876</guid>
		<description>Oh, this is like the arrangement Sport Authority has. Some entity has an agreement with Sports Authority to use their name on the web, as Sports Authority really does not have &#039;their own&#039; website, so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, this is like the arrangement Sport Authority has. Some entity has an agreement with Sports Authority to use their name on the web, as Sports Authority really does not have &#8216;their own&#8217; website, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2799874</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2799874</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d watch it if it was centered around Internet-based mistakes, blunders and factoids. Like those who illegally make millions via the stock market, get caught, lose in court and pay a fine, that ends up being a fraction of their ill-gotten gain, only to have already started a VOIP co. Vonage, anyone? Karma is a bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d watch it if it was centered around Internet-based mistakes, blunders and factoids. Like those who illegally make millions via the stock market, get caught, lose in court and pay a fine, that ends up being a fraction of their ill-gotten gain, only to have already started a VOIP co. Vonage, anyone? Karma is a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798998</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798998</guid>
		<description>I did get a free ipod a few years ago by getting a few friends to sign up for crap.   And then they got free ipods.  It prob cost us about $10 each.  neener neener neeener.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did get a free ipod a few years ago by getting a few friends to sign up for crap.   And then they got free ipods.  It prob cost us about $10 each.  neener neener neeener.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798676</guid>
		<description>The thing is Toy&#039;s R Us signed with GSI Commerce to handle it&#039;s web business. Don&#039;t let the &quot;partner&quot; title fool you, typically GSI assumes all the web business and pays the brick and mortar retailer a 15% royalty just for using the brand name. (GSI normally carries it&#039;s own inventory as well). Maybe their agreement is different but this is how GSI typically does deals. Appears Toys R US handed over its destiny again shortly after the Amazon deal. http://gsicommerce.com/index.php/en/ourpartners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is Toy&#8217;s R Us signed with GSI Commerce to handle it&#8217;s web business. Don&#8217;t let the &#8220;partner&#8221; title fool you, typically GSI assumes all the web business and pays the brick and mortar retailer a 15% royalty just for using the brand name. (GSI normally carries it&#8217;s own inventory as well). Maybe their agreement is different but this is how GSI typically does deals. Appears Toys R US handed over its destiny again shortly after the Amazon deal. <a href="http://gsicommerce.com/index.php/en/ourpartners" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://gsicommerce.com/index.php/en/ourpartners'>http://gsicomme.../en/ourpartners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Mendelson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798629</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Mendelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798629</guid>
		<description>Is this the last dot-com bubble mess left?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the last dot-com bubble mess left?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon.com Settles Lawsuit With Toys &#8220;R&#8221; Us For $51 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798617</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon.com Settles Lawsuit With Toys &#8220;R&#8221; Us For $51 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798617</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;On June 11, 2009, Amazon.com entered into a settlement agreement in its lawsuit with Toys “R” Us, Inc., and its affiliates, with terms that include, among other things, (i) a one-time payment from Amazon.com of $51 million in the third quarter 2009, substantially all of which was unanticipated and will be charged to &#8216;Other operating expense&#8217; in the second quarter, (ii) dismissal of all claims and counterclaims, and (iii) mutual releases,&#8221; stated an Amazon.com filing with the SEC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;On June 11, 2009, Amazon.com entered into a settlement agreement in its lawsuit with Toys “R” Us, Inc., and its affiliates, with terms that include, among other things, (i) a one-time payment from Amazon.com of $51 million in the third quarter 2009, substantially all of which was unanticipated and will be charged to &#8216;Other operating expense&#8217; in the second quarter, (ii) dismissal of all claims and counterclaims, and (iii) mutual releases,&#8221; stated an Amazon.com filing with the SEC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bud</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798580</link>
		<dc:creator>bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798580</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty simple really. People shop amazon for a toy they read about.  Toys R Us does not have the toy, nor do they plan to buy it.  Amazon makes it available via another source.  Who is really at fault?

Would Toys R Us buy it just because someone was searching for it?  When is a superstore not a superstore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple really. People shop amazon for a toy they read about.  Toys R Us does not have the toy, nor do they plan to buy it.  Amazon makes it available via another source.  Who is really at fault?</p>
<p>Would Toys R Us buy it just because someone was searching for it?  When is a superstore not a superstore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798486</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798486</guid>
		<description>dude those toys are awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude those toys are awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798451</guid>
		<description>51million is nothing compare to what toyrus could have done with their web operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>51million is nothing compare to what toyrus could have done with their web operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798450</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798450</guid>
		<description>Well there was a spamming link for 30 seconds.. which I made fun of and then TC killed it.. death to the spamming cockroach that was giving free ipods..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there was a spamming link for 30 seconds.. which I made fun of and then TC killed it.. death to the spamming cockroach that was giving free ipods..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798446</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798446</guid>
		<description>O m gosh.. a free ipod.. really.. all I have to do is give you the email addresses of six friends..  wow.. I better sign up fast cause online when companies say it is free they mean it.. and when they say it is not a scam well they mean that too.. TC is a tech website.. since when.. what is this crap.. I thought TC was a drama site. you got amazon paying Toysrus millions.. mikes on going battle royal with Facebook..  

Hurry people sign up for this non scam.  It is true he put like 20 !!! because that makes us believe..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O m gosh.. a free ipod.. really.. all I have to do is give you the email addresses of six friends..  wow.. I better sign up fast cause online when companies say it is free they mean it.. and when they say it is not a scam well they mean that too.. TC is a tech website.. since when.. what is this crap.. I thought TC was a drama site. you got amazon paying Toysrus millions.. mikes on going battle royal with Facebook..  </p>
<p>Hurry people sign up for this non scam.  It is true he put like 20 !!! because that makes us believe..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riffraff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798438</link>
		<dc:creator>riffraff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798438</guid>
		<description>If they finalized the settlement yesterday, why didn&#039;t they file with the SEC yesterday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they finalized the settlement yesterday, why didn&#8217;t they file with the SEC yesterday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjornbjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798435</link>
		<dc:creator>bjornbjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798435</guid>
		<description>A bit more expensive than my sunday mornings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit more expensive than my sunday mornings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798426</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798426</guid>
		<description>Some one really needs to make a TV show with all these fun, fun multimillion dollar cases..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some one really needs to make a TV show with all these fun, fun multimillion dollar cases..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wan-qi Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/12/dotcom-hangover-amazon-pays-51-million-to-end-long-standing-battle-with-toys-r-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2798416</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wan-qi Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=73108#comment-2798416</guid>
		<description>Sobering! Yep. Relationship can really suck. That&#039;s why the smartest guys shave their heads and go live in a mountain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sobering! Yep. Relationship can really suck. That&#8217;s why the smartest guys shave their heads and go live in a mountain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
