<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want Your Service Integrated With TweetDeck?  It&#8217;ll Cost You A Cool $50,000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:01:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seesmic Takes The Lead &#8211; What Will Tweetdeck Do To Catch Up? &#171; Tweetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-2/#comment-3119243</link>
		<dc:creator>Seesmic Takes The Lead &#8211; What Will Tweetdeck Do To Catch Up? &#171; Tweetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-3119243</guid>
		<description>[...] had built closed platforms off the backbone of an open platform. When I mentioned the rumor that Tweetdeck was supposedly charging developers $50,000 to have their application added he just laughed. Of course I understand why these guys didn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had built closed platforms off the backbone of an open platform. When I mentioned the rumor that Tweetdeck was supposedly charging developers $50,000 to have their application added he just laughed. Of course I understand why these guys didn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2860547</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2860547</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re kidding me. You don&#039;t take your stupid feedback forum seriously. You integrate services that we not requested, while neglecting those, which have a strong demand.

seesmic is not a bit better than tweetdeck. At least they&#039;re being honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re kidding me. You don&#8217;t take your stupid feedback forum seriously. You integrate services that we not requested, while neglecting those, which have a strong demand.</p>
<p>seesmic is not a bit better than tweetdeck. At least they&#8217;re being honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-2/#comment-2859268</link>
		<dc:creator>The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2859268</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around ,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around ,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Stoth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2859060</link>
		<dc:creator>The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Stoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2859060</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Spin Valley Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2859022</link>
		<dc:creator>The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Spin Valley Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2859022</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Webbyn.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2858972</link>
		<dc:creator>The Price Of Success: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Webbyn.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2858972</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that&#8230;                &#171; Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that&hellip;                &laquo; Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2858948</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem &#124; Newsfed - Aggregate local and tech stories with related videos and tweets!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2858948</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2858923</link>
		<dc:creator>Pay-To-Play Continues To Shape The Twitter Ecosystem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2858923</guid>
		<description>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big business. Last month we broke the news that TweetDeck was asking some services for around $50,000 to appear in the client. Now we&#8217;ve gotten word that TwitterBerry, one of the most popular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Twitter apps save Seesmic? &#8211; The Next Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2850990</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Twitter apps save Seesmic? &#8211; The Next Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2850990</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch and Mashable point the way to further corporate paintjobs for cash in the future, while there has been talk about Tweetdeck charging web services to be added to the app. These models could be copied by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch and Mashable point the way to further corporate paintjobs for cash in the future, while there has been talk about Tweetdeck charging web services to be added to the app. These models could be copied by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Client Tweetdeck Raises Around $2 Million In Funding</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2848550</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Client Tweetdeck Raises Around $2 Million In Funding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2848550</guid>
		<description>[...] for Mac, Windows and Linux, it just requires Adobe AIR. The company has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity quickly.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Mac, Windows and Linux, it just requires Adobe AIR. The company has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity quickly.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? Then You’ll Love This. &#124; Design Website</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2820478</link>
		<dc:creator>Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? Then You’ll Love This. &#124; Design Website</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2820478</guid>
		<description>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? next You’ll Love that. &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2820431</link>
		<dc:creator>Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? next You’ll Love that. &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2820431</guid>
		<description>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? Then You&#8217;ll Love This.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2820371</link>
		<dc:creator>Like TweetDeck? Like TechCrunch? Then You&#8217;ll Love This.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2820371</guid>
		<description>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adobe AIR. The company, which secured angel funding in January, has been working on getting more services integrated into its client. Last week, it launched an iPhone app that has been gaining popularity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seesmic launches new Desktop update&#8230; but where&#8217;s the video? &#8211; The Next Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2805473</link>
		<dc:creator>Seesmic launches new Desktop update&#8230; but where&#8217;s the video? &#8211; The Next Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2805473</guid>
		<description>[...] may well come with time. It could well be though, that with Tweetdeck developer Iain Dodsworth planning to charge for adding services Loic believes his Desktop app is the real moneyspinner after all. Tweet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may well come with time. It could well be though, that with Tweetdeck developer Iain Dodsworth planning to charge for adding services Loic believes his Desktop app is the real moneyspinner after all. Tweet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh From FriendFeed &#124; Alex's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2782627</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh From FriendFeed &#124; Alex's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2782627</guid>
		<description>[...] http://bit.ly/BU61wWant to integrate your service to TweetDeck? It will only cost you $50k. http://bit.ly/H42Al . Yeah sure&#8230;let me write a chequeIs writing about the OH&amp;S ramifications of balloon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://bit.ly/BU61wWant" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/BU61wWant'>http://bit.ly/BU61wWant</a> to integrate your service to TweetDeck? It will only cost you $50k. <a href="http://bit.ly/H42Al" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/H42Al'>http://bit.ly/H42Al</a> . Yeah sure&#8230;let me write a chequeIs writing about the OH&amp;S ramifications of balloon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweetworks TV Episode 63 &#8211; We Need Your Vote and I Told You So &#171; Tweetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2782206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweetworks TV Episode 63 &#8211; We Need Your Vote and I Told You So &#171; Tweetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2782206</guid>
		<description>[...] to Seesmic Desktop. Loic Le Meur put out the call to Twitter applications in a response to the news that Tweetdeck will now charge $50,000 for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Seesmic Desktop. Loic Le Meur put out the call to Twitter applications in a response to the news that Tweetdeck will now charge $50,000 for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Corral &#8230;. plus a side chuckle — Shooting at Bubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2780095</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Corral &#8230;. plus a side chuckle — Shooting at Bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2780095</guid>
		<description>[...] Want Your Service Integrated With TweetDeck? It’ll Cost You A Cool $50,000 via TechCrunch – Once more we see how companies being built on top of Twitter are finding ways to make money; but $50,000 to have TweetDeck include your service inside of their Twitter client is a bit much. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want Your Service Integrated With TweetDeck? It’ll Cost You A Cool $50,000 via TechCrunch – Once more we see how companies being built on top of Twitter are finding ways to make money; but $50,000 to have TweetDeck include your service inside of their Twitter client is a bit much. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779860</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779860</guid>
		<description>Or, if URL shorteners want so badly to show up in  Tweetdeck, have them conform to a certain spec, leave the marketing to them, and surface an &quot;Add New&quot; option in your UI, to allow users to use whichever service they like -- just as IE, Firefox and Chrome do for their search-providers list.  Which is nice -- it lets me use Chrome, but set Bing as my default search engine.  Everybody wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, if URL shorteners want so badly to show up in  Tweetdeck, have them conform to a certain spec, leave the marketing to them, and surface an &#8220;Add New&#8221; option in your UI, to allow users to use whichever service they like &#8212; just as IE, Firefox and Chrome do for their search-providers list.  Which is nice &#8212; it lets me use Chrome, but set Bing as my default search engine.  Everybody wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779839</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779839</guid>
		<description>This just seems like a colossally bad idea.

Can you imagine Microsoft or Google charging bloggers for the privilege of displaying the contents of their RSS feeds in Outlook or Google Reader?  Erm, no.

You can&#039;t reasonably sell off the eyeballs of the users of an app that couldn&#039;t have taken more than a week or two to build -- not for long, anyway.  News of new stuff travels extraordinarily fast in the Twitterverse.  Eventually, someone else will come along with another nice Twitter client that does everything yours does plus one little thing, and that&#039;s it -- you&#039;re done.

I like Tweetdeck -- it&#039;s a nice little app -- but there are *lots* of problems with it, some today, some that haven&#039;t been imagined yet, and as more and more people start coming on line, to Twitter and Facebook and Flickr and YouTube and all the rest, those problems are only going to get worse.  *That* is the problem to solve.  One of them anyway.  Populating list boxes?  Not the problem to solve.  It&#039;s too easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just seems like a colossally bad idea.</p>
<p>Can you imagine Microsoft or Google charging bloggers for the privilege of displaying the contents of their RSS feeds in Outlook or Google Reader?  Erm, no.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t reasonably sell off the eyeballs of the users of an app that couldn&#8217;t have taken more than a week or two to build &#8212; not for long, anyway.  News of new stuff travels extraordinarily fast in the Twitterverse.  Eventually, someone else will come along with another nice Twitter client that does everything yours does plus one little thing, and that&#8217;s it &#8212; you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>I like Tweetdeck &#8212; it&#8217;s a nice little app &#8212; but there are *lots* of problems with it, some today, some that haven&#8217;t been imagined yet, and as more and more people start coming on line, to Twitter and Facebook and Flickr and YouTube and all the rest, those problems are only going to get worse.  *That* is the problem to solve.  One of them anyway.  Populating list boxes?  Not the problem to solve.  It&#8217;s too easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JillK</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779747</link>
		<dc:creator>JillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779747</guid>
		<description>Given the Twitter Open API&#039;s, when to monetize is critical. Only large media companies that are &quot;must buys&quot; like Yahoo Reader for Twitter, AOL AIM, Glam&#039;s Tinker.com Trends,  Google real time search can sustainably make money today. Jumping into charging too much too early will get other clients like Loic&#039;s Seesmic ahead of you. 

If it is cool for users, you need to add it. If it is not, best not to integrate and find other ways of making money. Twitter is open, and you need to be open too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the Twitter Open API&#8217;s, when to monetize is critical. Only large media companies that are &#8220;must buys&#8221; like Yahoo Reader for Twitter, AOL AIM, Glam&#8217;s Tinker.com Trends,  Google real time search can sustainably make money today. Jumping into charging too much too early will get other clients like Loic&#8217;s Seesmic ahead of you. </p>
<p>If it is cool for users, you need to add it. If it is not, best not to integrate and find other ways of making money. Twitter is open, and you need to be open too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779725</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779725</guid>
		<description>Ian,

You should take a serious look at Tinker.com and add their trends to Tweetdeck. They&#039;ve been reaching out to many Twitter applications, and users like their services. 

They just launched Featured Trends- this should be a standard for Tweetdeck client- gives really useful information on the top topics and events people are Twittering about. 

Don&#039;t know if they will pay you $50K, but Publishers have made a lot of money from Glam in the past. Definitely the leading  Twitter monetization model today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>You should take a serious look at Tinker.com and add their trends to Tweetdeck. They&#8217;ve been reaching out to many Twitter applications, and users like their services. </p>
<p>They just launched Featured Trends- this should be a standard for Tweetdeck client- gives really useful information on the top topics and events people are Twittering about. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if they will pay you $50K, but Publishers have made a lot of money from Glam in the past. Definitely the leading  Twitter monetization model today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: america starts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779658</link>
		<dc:creator>america starts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779658</guid>
		<description>I agree.  why doesn&#039;t twitter just start charging all these services that ride on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  why doesn&#8217;t twitter just start charging all these services that ride on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779633</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779633</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t expect an answer to that question.

It&#039;s surely an interesting business model to charge companies for you to access their API so that you can add value to your app. Twitter has already hinted that they may charge for API access. Tweetdeck purports to flip that model around and charge the service provider for using their service... mostly in a method that dilutes the main business model for said providers: ads served on page displays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t expect an answer to that question.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s surely an interesting business model to charge companies for you to access their API so that you can add value to your app. Twitter has already hinted that they may charge for API access. Tweetdeck purports to flip that model around and charge the service provider for using their service&#8230; mostly in a method that dilutes the main business model for said providers: ads served on page displays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779615</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779615</guid>
		<description>I do not think tweetdeck is on a high-horse either, rather the company is being prudent by exploring revenue opportunities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think tweetdeck is on a high-horse either, rather the company is being prudent by exploring revenue opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Needs to Buy TweetDeck &#124; Stay N' Alive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/01/want-your-service-integrated-with-tweetdeck-itll-cost-you-a-cool-50000/comment-page-1/#comment-2779474</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Needs to Buy TweetDeck &#124; Stay N' Alive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=69808#comment-2779474</guid>
		<description>[...] to a recent TechCrunch article, Iain Dodsworth himself is already looking to monetize via this method.  His method doesn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to a recent TechCrunch article, Iain Dodsworth himself is already looking to monetize via this method.  His method doesn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
