<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: According To Twitter, Prop 8 Was Overturned Before It Existed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:54:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nieuwsarchieven en de Twitter geruchtenmolen &#124; Weblog Pascal Van Hecke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2944241</link>
		<dc:creator>Nieuwsarchieven en de Twitter geruchtenmolen &#124; Weblog Pascal Van Hecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2944241</guid>
		<description>[...] krijgen we ongetwijfeld meer en meer van dit soort relletjes rond met sexy “breaking” news (een ander gedocumenteerd geval een paar maand geleden was een vals gerucht over Proposition 8 in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] krijgen we ongetwijfeld meer en meer van dit soort relletjes rond met sexy “breaking” news (een ander gedocumenteerd geval een paar maand geleden was een vals gerucht over Proposition 8 in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mainstream Media Still Has Eyes Wide Shut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2823505</link>
		<dc:creator>Mainstream Media Still Has Eyes Wide Shut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2823505</guid>
		<description>[...] that blogs and Twitter had simply been quicker with spreading the facts than they were (and yes, we realize using both as a source for rock-solid news can be quite dangerous too, but that&#8217;s beside the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that blogs and Twitter had simply been quicker with spreading the facts than they were (and yes, we realize using both as a source for rock-solid news can be quite dangerous too, but that&#8217;s beside the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Much For Twitter&#8217;s Trending Topics To Indicate Breaking News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2772475</link>
		<dc:creator>So Much For Twitter&#8217;s Trending Topics To Indicate Breaking News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2772475</guid>
		<description>[...] We already know Twitter can be quite the source for breaking news, but critics have in the past correctly pointed out that one should be aware of the fact that the mob isn&#8217;t always right, and unverified claims on the micro-sharing service - often from a single user or even a single message - can quickly lead to false or incomplete stories circulating rapidly and viciously until the dust settles and the truth surfaces. And even then, it&#8217;s often too late as most people will have probably moved on unless it was a topic they have a continued interest in. Case in point: the Prop8 debacle. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We already know Twitter can be quite the source for breaking news, but critics have in the past correctly pointed out that one should be aware of the fact that the mob isn&#8217;t always right, and unverified claims on the micro-sharing service &#8211; often from a single user or even a single message &#8211; can quickly lead to false or incomplete stories circulating rapidly and viciously until the dust settles and the truth surfaces. And even then, it&#8217;s often too late as most people will have probably moved on unless it was a topic they have a continued interest in. Case in point: the Prop8 debacle. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daleandersen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2759242</link>
		<dc:creator>daleandersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2759242</guid>
		<description>The latest rumor on Prop 8..

http://tinyurl.com/goofy-gavin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest rumor on Prop 8..</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/goofy-gavin" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/goofy-gavin'>http://tinyurl.com/goofy-gavin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2754034</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2754034</guid>
		<description>They should fall on their sword and shut twitter down for good. Yes on proposition TW, ban twitter in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should fall on their sword and shut twitter down for good. Yes on proposition TW, ban twitter in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino Cosme</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2753921</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino Cosme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2753921</guid>
		<description>As gawker says, this is what happens when you communicate 140 characters at a time. Bound to happen - although clearly it proves that this issue is something dear - good or bad - to many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As gawker says, this is what happens when you communicate 140 characters at a time. Bound to happen &#8211; although clearly it proves that this issue is something dear &#8211; good or bad &#8211; to many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Spreads False Rumors &#124; PCauthorities.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2753888</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Spreads False Rumors &#124; PCauthorities.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2753888</guid>
		<description>[...] PC users love Twitter and use Twitter frequently, if not every day. This past Friday though, Twitter was in the news for not such a good reason - rumors were &#8220;re-tweeting&#8221; every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PC users love Twitter and use Twitter frequently, if not every day. This past Friday though, Twitter was in the news for not such a good reason &#8211; rumors were &#8220;re-tweeting&#8221; every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terimoore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2752637</link>
		<dc:creator>terimoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2752637</guid>
		<description>AMEN, Robert. Although it&#039;s the news outlet/journalist responsibility to report accurate news, ultimately, it&#039;s the people who MUST take responsibility in double-checking the source -- whether they like it or not. 

What we have here is a potential &quot;War of the Worlds&quot; redeux (although of course with all of our sources, this would be next to impossible, but with today&#039;s gene pool, you never know). However, back then, there was little one could do to check a story&#039;s source (even if it was a story about aliens from Mars -- really??). Today, there&#039;s NO excuse -- just stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN, Robert. Although it&#8217;s the news outlet/journalist responsibility to report accurate news, ultimately, it&#8217;s the people who MUST take responsibility in double-checking the source &#8212; whether they like it or not. </p>
<p>What we have here is a potential &#8220;War of the Worlds&#8221; redeux (although of course with all of our sources, this would be next to impossible, but with today&#8217;s gene pool, you never know). However, back then, there was little one could do to check a story&#8217;s source (even if it was a story about aliens from Mars &#8212; really??). Today, there&#8217;s NO excuse &#8212; just stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twatter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2752009</link>
		<dc:creator>twatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2752009</guid>
		<description>Twitter... A Thundering Herd of ADD Morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter&#8230; A Thundering Herd of ADD Morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kahn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2752003</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2752003</guid>
		<description>interesting...you know how when coca-cola was introduced, the spokesperson said coke by accident and everyone was convinced that the drink was named coke and not the actual name, coca-cola, so the company started using the the name coke? well twitter could be a total political game changer. EVERYONE retweet tht old dusty article and maybe if all are convinced, california would be forced to overturn prop 8!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting&#8230;you know how when coca-cola was introduced, the spokesperson said coke by accident and everyone was convinced that the drink was named coke and not the actual name, coca-cola, so the company started using the the name coke? well twitter could be a total political game changer. EVERYONE retweet tht old dusty article and maybe if all are convinced, california would be forced to overturn prop 8!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-05-16 &#124; Yostivanich.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751795</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-05-16 &#124; Yostivanich.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751795</guid>
		<description>[...] According To Twitter, Prop 8 Was Overturned Before It Existed Sometimes the Internet is wrong. (tags: internet technology information media journalism twitter) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According To Twitter, Prop 8 Was Overturned Before It Existed Sometimes the Internet is wrong. (tags: internet technology information media journalism twitter) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: how to hack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751670</link>
		<dc:creator>how to hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751670</guid>
		<description>well, twitter is a recent(ish) startup. It&#039;s a massively innovative use of technology, enabling uses that simply weren&#039;t even thought about before twitter, and this story illustrates an interesting social phenomenon. Why&#039;s it not story-worthy? Just because you&#039;re sick of twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, twitter is a recent(ish) startup. It&#8217;s a massively innovative use of technology, enabling uses that simply weren&#8217;t even thought about before twitter, and this story illustrates an interesting social phenomenon. Why&#8217;s it not story-worthy? Just because you&#8217;re sick of twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: how to hack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751669</link>
		<dc:creator>how to hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751669</guid>
		<description>hah, and Ka-Boom the problem with non-expert sourced information blows up again. Now we just need a few of those users to edit wikipedia, and  mainstream news source to check wikipedia and the whole thing will spiral out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hah, and Ka-Boom the problem with non-expert sourced information blows up again. Now we just need a few of those users to edit wikipedia, and  mainstream news source to check wikipedia and the whole thing will spiral out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751557</guid>
		<description>yeah that won&#039;t work. what we need is better tools to sort all this stuff out. people won&#039;t change the way they tweet on a mass scale. won&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah that won&#8217;t work. what we need is better tools to sort all this stuff out. people won&#8217;t change the way they tweet on a mass scale. won&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some New Things That I Love, Lately: &#171; The Result of Perpetual Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751511</link>
		<dc:creator>Some New Things That I Love, Lately: &#171; The Result of Perpetual Motion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 07:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751511</guid>
		<description>[...] means for gathering news that I care about, handing the news to the masses can result in this: The Masses Aren&#8217;t Smart (I fell for this too&#8230;)  Regardless, get a Twitter.  You&#8217;ll have one in a year anyway, and that&#8217;s if your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] means for gathering news that I care about, handing the news to the masses can result in this: The Masses Aren&#8217;t Smart (I fell for this too&#8230;)  Regardless, get a Twitter.  You&#8217;ll have one in a year anyway, and that&#8217;s if your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Envy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751407</link>
		<dc:creator>Envy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 05:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751407</guid>
		<description>what does prop 8 have to do with a TECH Blog that is supposed to focus on start ups????

You can&#039;t not report about twitter in some way can you?  I mean come on,  some one twitter something in acurate and others started re-twitter it...

A TWITTER RUMOR is worthy of a Tech Crunch article????  You TOOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what does prop 8 have to do with a TECH Blog that is supposed to focus on start ups????</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t not report about twitter in some way can you?  I mean come on,  some one twitter something in acurate and others started re-twitter it&#8230;</p>
<p>A TWITTER RUMOR is worthy of a Tech Crunch article????  You TOOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751276</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751276</guid>
		<description>I love how TC and Scoble are all over this like it is the most important thing in the world.  You guys are idiots.  Twitter is a poorly built toy that can be easily gamed by it&#039;s millions of anonymous users.  It has no practical value.  Stop trying to make it something it cannot be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how TC and Scoble are all over this like it is the most important thing in the world.  You guys are idiots.  Twitter is a poorly built toy that can be easily gamed by it&#8217;s millions of anonymous users.  It has no practical value.  Stop trying to make it something it cannot be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751266</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751266</guid>
		<description>nice moniker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice moniker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751264</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751264</guid>
		<description>Well said...that wolfram alpha comments section was the worst read of all time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said&#8230;that wolfram alpha comments section was the worst read of all time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751263</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751263</guid>
		<description>it seems to me that not too long ago everybody on tv was sending people to their myspace page...now it&#039;s Twitter...Will it be twitter in 3 years? probably not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems to me that not too long ago everybody on tv was sending people to their myspace page&#8230;now it&#8217;s Twitter&#8230;Will it be twitter in 3 years? probably not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751261</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751261</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039; t matter who started it...that isn&#039;t the point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217; t matter who started it&#8230;that isn&#8217;t the point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Juice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Juice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751237</guid>
		<description>See this is one of the many problems with Tweaker... it;s like the chain letter from hell... I give it 6 more mos max before people wake up and go &quot;Derrrr... you know what.. I don&#039;t want everyone to know what I&#039;m doing every minute of the day&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this is one of the many problems with Tweaker&#8230; it;s like the chain letter from hell&#8230; I give it 6 more mos max before people wake up and go &#8220;Derrrr&#8230; you know what.. I don&#8217;t want everyone to know what I&#8217;m doing every minute of the day&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: br</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751175</link>
		<dc:creator>br</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751175</guid>
		<description>This is how the morons lost the last 2 election, they believed their fake polls. 1st of all we did not need these last 2 elections because by definition of marriage at the writing of the state constitution it meant only man/woman. These justices never have any legal right to render any decision over-ruling the constitution. And the 18,000 gay marriages were never legal. There are plenty of people not registered and did not vote which are against gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how the morons lost the last 2 election, they believed their fake polls. 1st of all we did not need these last 2 elections because by definition of marriage at the writing of the state constitution it meant only man/woman. These justices never have any legal right to render any decision over-ruling the constitution. And the 18,000 gay marriages were never legal. There are plenty of people not registered and did not vote which are against gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: br</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751171</link>
		<dc:creator>br</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751171</guid>
		<description>This is how the morons lost the last 2 election, they believe their fake polls.  !st of all we did not need these last 2 elections because by definition of marriage at the writting of the state constitution it meant only man/woman.  These justices never have any legal right to render any decision over-rulling the constitution. And the 18,000 gay marriages were never legal.  There are plenty of people not register and did not vote  which are against gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how the morons lost the last 2 election, they believe their fake polls.  !st of all we did not need these last 2 elections because by definition of marriage at the writting of the state constitution it meant only man/woman.  These justices never have any legal right to render any decision over-rulling the constitution. And the 18,000 gay marriages were never legal.  There are plenty of people not register and did not vote  which are against gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/according-to-twitter-prop-8-was-overturned-before-it-existed/comment-page-1/#comment-2751054</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=65282#comment-2751054</guid>
		<description>Hope not... Been to Texas and it sucks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope not&#8230; Been to Texas and it sucks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
