Comments on: Real-Time Search-Off

By: Hot or Not? Real-time search « A playing ground for my thoughts and ideas!

Hot or Not? Real-time search « A playing ground for my thoughts and ideas! — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:52:39 +0000

[...] junk because it might not be really related to the stuff that I’m interested in. Check out this post for an example. That also brings us to another limitation – combating the [...]

By: All About Site Indexation and the Crawl Toward Real-Time Search | Traffficum.com - Traffic for your website

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:15:09 +0000

[...] there has been a lot of buzz about real-time search, but is it necessary? First, let’s look at the current state of search and [...]

By: Real-Time Search Products « Large Neuron Collider

Real-Time Search Products « Large Neuron Collider — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:48:20 +0000

[...] Techcrunch: Real-Time Search-Off [...]

By: wen

wen — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:31:35 +0000

I don’t get the case study in this article. Why would anyone searching for news type “space shuttle” since they wouldn’t know breaking news until it happened. This type of search might be useful for current news where events are unfolding, e.g. Iranian election, Obama healthcare. But I think most people are passive consumers of news information, and when are searching or investigating a new topic, they are not looking for real-time information as much as deeper, more detailed, and contextual information.

By: Widodo

Widodo — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:58:42 +0000

There is certainly value in real-time search but Twitter and Google will still dominate when all is said and done. These other players can only hope to be bought out for the technology they have created.

By: Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | webmarketingexperts.com.au

Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | webmarketingexperts.com.au — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:16:00 +0000

[...] onto the scene. You can find reviews comparing the various search sites across technology news and blog sites. And search marketer David Harry looked at the

By: Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | seo cloak

Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | seo cloak — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:24:24 +0000

[...] onto the scene. You can find reviews comparing the various search sites across technology news and blog sites. And search marketer David Harry looked at the performance of several real-time search [...]

By: Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | feed hat blog

Real-Time Search vs. Traditional Search Basics | feed hat blog — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:12:42 +0000

By: Monika Lorincz

Monika Lorincz — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:10:51 +0000

Real time search is about finding out what people are saying about your topic right now, and that search brings up the latest and not the most relevant. Google is great for historical searches, but there are many real time search engines that are worth looking up.

Monika Lorincz
monika@surchur.com
http://surchur.com/
Blog: http://blog.surchur.com/
Twitter: @surchur

By: The Future of Search @ Brian Stoner

The Future of Search @ Brian Stoner — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:29:56 +0000

[...] Then there’s sites like OneRiot, TweetMeme, and Twitter’s own Search that are focused around the real-time aspect of search, aggregating micro-messages and other social content from the web and present close to real time search results. With more people using mobile devices to connect to the Internet, this type of search could be very useful to help get real time information about what’s happening around you. There’s a good summary of real-time search options here [...]

By: Real-Time: Coming Soon to an Internet Near You | Meetcast Blog

Real-Time: Coming Soon to an Internet Near You | Meetcast Blog — Sat, 30 May 2009 01:25:45 +0000

[...] FriendFeed; now even Google is declaring real-time search the “biggest challenge”. You just can’t get away from [...]

By: Yahoo Search, As We Know It, Is Over | Marketing Internetowy

Yahoo Search, As We Know It, Is Over | Marketing Internetowy — Wed, 20 May 2009 08:15:19 +0000

[...] to real-time search that is undeniable, and that users want. That’s why we’re seeing so many companies working on it right [...]

By: Trade Jim News » Yahoo Search, As We Know It, Is Over

Trade Jim News » Yahoo Search, As We Know It, Is Over — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:43:41 +0000

[...] to real-time search that is undeniable, and that users want. That’s why we’re seeing so many companies working on it right [...]

By: Scott Charles

Scott Charles — Thu, 14 May 2009 16:04:11 +0000

MG: well I like OneRiot, but I’m not sure how to save searches, or create RSS feeds. When I tried to submit feedback, I got a 403 error.

By: Search Advances | b r a n t s

Search Advances | b r a n t s — Thu, 14 May 2009 03:54:56 +0000

[...] To me, real time is only one of the things that makes Twitter’s foray into search interesting. After all, when I search for real time links to a story on Twitter, I don’t think an Ad Sense like mechanism will work for revenue. So it is the combination of semantics, sentiment analysis, and real-time data that makes this Twitter development seem like a huge leap (when it happens). Google seems to be working on making more sense of data, than real time, or semantics. Can that be taken as actually walking the talk when they claim that search is still in its infancy and there’s a lot of room for existing and new players? Twitter and the new services don’t have the scale of indexed pages that Google has, and Google doesn’t have real time. For now, its interesting how all of these services actually work out complementing each other, as shown by the comparison here. [...]

By: javis

javis — Wed, 13 May 2009 23:05:40 +0000

itpints ( http://www.itpints.com ) lets you grab the rss of your search

By: javis

javis — Wed, 13 May 2009 22:51:20 +0000

I think you should give a try at itpints ( http://www.itpints.com ). it’s another real time search engine which have a good quantity of sources

By: Richard Jalichandra

Richard Jalichandra — Wed, 13 May 2009 21:31:38 +0000

Technorati has had the combination of real-time and crawling what people are paying attention to for a long time. Making real-time work is very complex at scale. The volume of data presents a couple challenges: the data becomes nearly irrelevant shortly after it appears (within weeks); it’s much easier to spam; and it’s hard to balance recency and relevancy together.

By: gleek

gleek — Wed, 13 May 2009 19:01:37 +0000

maybe this helps

http://sonicgle.../keepitreal.htm

By: srik

srik — Wed, 13 May 2009 18:37:48 +0000

http://search.y...b-top&sao=1

check out topic suggestions

By: tomtom

tomtom — Wed, 13 May 2009 17:15:41 +0000

That’s absolutely true for Turkey, because meme means “breast or ti*” in Turkish.

By: Some

Some — Wed, 13 May 2009 16:42:36 +0000

I don’t agree with you. We are talking about “Real Time Search.” So, searching for “Space Shuttle” should still lead you to news on the shuttle damage, because that’s the most important current news about any space shuttles.

By: Trey Harvin

Trey Harvin — Wed, 13 May 2009 15:27:59 +0000

I wont be the first to say this, but have not seen it yet here. The value of Tweet search is more akin to Nielsen than to Google. They measure the buzz and interest factor, which would be more useful in the form of stats analysis and would be very useful for businesses measuring effectiveness of campaigns or media measuring penetration in vertical markets (ie whether they vs other outlets are the chief link creator for a story). Otherwise, Iliksute is correct.

That said, most great ideas are not the ones on which the business is founded. They are the ones that are discovered once you get into the market pool and start to swim around. These search engine aggregators are doing just that, and my hope is that they will use their initial platforms to springboard into something more innovative. Smart guys, fast moving development, real market experience = innovation +/- profit (ah, the key!)

By: Brian Ratzker

Wed, 13 May 2009 15:24:41 +0000

By: Real-Time Search-Off at TechBuji.com

Real-Time Search-Off at TechBuji.com — Wed, 13 May 2009 15:21:31 +0000

[...] Read More [...]