<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URL Shortening Wars: Twitter Ditches TinyURL For bit.ly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:46:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-3084531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-3084531</guid>
		<description>Too many services, which one is the best overall? I&#039;m happy with Tinyurl. Good name, easy service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many services, which one is the best overall? I&#8217;m happy with Tinyurl. Good name, easy service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-3078928</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-3078928</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care man! I love Organic Solutions for Human Issues, that&#039;s what I really care about: http://bit.ly/1QHu2H See for yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care man! I love Organic Solutions for Human Issues, that&#8217;s what I really care about: <a href="http://bit.ly/1QHu2H" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/1QHu2H'>http://bit.ly/1QHu2H</a> See for yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireBrand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-3075727</link>
		<dc:creator>FireBrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-3075727</guid>
		<description>Has anyone considered the impact by google and others now searching Tweets?  It&#039;s giving a huge benefit to bit.ly in search rankings now...  And if you are &quot;advertising&quot; a link, then you lose out.  Not to mention that your site gets ZERO branding when a bit.ly link goes out.


Just a thought.


Wake up and Smell the Coffee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered the impact by google and others now searching Tweets?  It&#8217;s giving a huge benefit to bit.ly in search rankings now&#8230;  And if you are &#8220;advertising&#8221; a link, then you lose out.  Not to mention that your site gets ZERO branding when a bit.ly link goes out.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
<p>Wake up and Smell the Coffee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Paine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-1/#comment-3047793</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-3047793</guid>
		<description>Anton - give it a few weeks til the next shiny thing pops up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anton &#8211; give it a few weeks til the next shiny thing pops up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter&#8217;s Shortened URL Expansion Stopped Working For Bit.ly Links</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-3004361</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter&#8217;s Shortened URL Expansion Stopped Working For Bit.ly Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-3004361</guid>
		<description>[...] it doesn&#8217;t help that Twitter Search now no longer appears to expand Bit.ly URLs, which is the default web address shortener used by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it doesn&#8217;t help that Twitter Search now no longer appears to expand Bit.ly URLs, which is the default web address shortener used by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.mp - Darf's ein bisschen weniger sein? - Twitter, tweet, URL Shortener, bit.ly, TinyURL.com, is.gd - blogwache.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2966292</link>
		<dc:creator>j.mp - Darf's ein bisschen weniger sein? - Twitter, tweet, URL Shortener, bit.ly, TinyURL.com, is.gd - blogwache.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2966292</guid>
		<description>[...] Verkürzungswahn geht in die nächste Runde: der von Twitter bevorzugte URL-Shortener bit.ly bietet nun auch über j.mp seinen Dienst an – aber eben mit zwei Zeichen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Verkürzungswahn geht in die nächste Runde: der von Twitter bevorzugte URL-Shortener bit.ly bietet nun auch über j.mp seinen Dienst an – aber eben mit zwei Zeichen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resources Blog &#187; Update: Free or Cheap Multimedia Software and Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2944647</link>
		<dc:creator>Resources Blog &#187; Update: Free or Cheap Multimedia Software and Websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2944647</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweet? No problem. Several websites offer URL shortening. Tinyurl and bit.ly are two popular sites. Twitter is now using bit.ly as its default URL shortening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweet? No problem. Several websites offer URL shortening. Tinyurl and bit.ly are two popular sites. Twitter is now using bit.ly as its default URL shortening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Workshops and Conferences &#187; Multimedia Boot Camp Links: Free And Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2944571</link>
		<dc:creator>Workshops and Conferences &#187; Multimedia Boot Camp Links: Free And Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2944571</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweet? No problem. Several websites offer URL shortening. Tinyurl and bit.ly are two popular sites. Twitter is now using bit.ly as its default URL shortening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweet? No problem. Several websites offer URL shortening. Tinyurl and bit.ly are two popular sites. Twitter is now using bit.ly as its default URL shortening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Future With Dead URL Links? &#124; Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2927321</link>
		<dc:creator>A Future With Dead URL Links? &#124; Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2927321</guid>
		<description>[...] bit.ly has the most potential to be worth anything given it has raised some venture capital, and it was selected by Twitter to be its default URL-shortener, which makes you think that one day Twitter might use some of its VC dough to acquire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit.ly has the most potential to be worth anything given it has raised some venture capital, and it was selected by Twitter to be its default URL-shortener, which makes you think that one day Twitter might use some of its VC dough to acquire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed -&#62; ApaRece</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2916861</link>
		<dc:creator>Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed -&#62; ApaRece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2916861</guid>
		<description>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm ahead? Death of tr.im raises cloud concerns &#124; csmonitor.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914912</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm ahead? Death of tr.im raises cloud concerns &#124; csmonitor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914912</guid>
		<description>[...] it easier to share long links in Twitter&#8217;s 140-character, um, Twitterverse. But when Twitter made Bit.ly its default URL shortener in May, it pretty much slammed the door on others in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it easier to share long links in Twitter&#8217;s 140-character, um, Twitterverse. But when Twitter made Bit.ly its default URL shortener in May, it pretty much slammed the door on others in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Oversized Ruckus About Tiny Web Addresses: Bit.ly’s Bigfoot Offer to the Rest of the Business [MediaMemo] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914502</link>
		<dc:creator>An Oversized Ruckus About Tiny Web Addresses: Bit.ly’s Bigfoot Offer to the Rest of the Business [MediaMemo] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914502</guid>
		<description>[...] the Google (GOOG) of URL-shortening, and there is some griping that they got that status unfairly, via a deal with Twitter that made them the service&#8217;s default shortener last May (type a long Web address into the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Google (GOOG) of URL-shortening, and there is some griping that they got that status unfairly, via a deal with Twitter that made them the service&#8217;s default shortener last May (type a long Web address into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tr.im URL shortener to shut: is there any profit in contraction? @ Technology News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914490</link>
		<dc:creator>Tr.im URL shortener to shut: is there any profit in contraction? @ Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914490</guid>
		<description>[...] bit.ly has gone to some expense to relocate its servers closer to Twitter&#8217;s (after Twitter stopped using tinyurl as its default shortening service in May), and has suggested that it might be looking to launch a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit.ly has gone to some expense to relocate its servers closer to Twitter&#8217;s (after Twitter stopped using tinyurl as its default shortening service in May), and has suggested that it might be looking to launch a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Oversized Ruckus About Tiny Web Addresses: Bit.ly&#8217;s Bigfoot Offer to the Rest of the Business &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914409</link>
		<dc:creator>An Oversized Ruckus About Tiny Web Addresses: Bit.ly&#8217;s Bigfoot Offer to the Rest of the Business &#124; Peter Kafka &#124; MediaMemo &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914409</guid>
		<description>[...] the Google (GOOG) of URL-shortening, and there is some griping that they got that status unfairly, via a deal with Twitter that made them the service&#8217;s default shortener last May (type a long Web address into the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Google (GOOG) of URL-shortening, and there is some griping that they got that status unfairly, via a deal with Twitter that made them the service&#8217;s default shortener last May (type a long Web address into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr.im Throws In the Towel : The New Dork Times</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914261</link>
		<dc:creator>tr.im Throws In the Towel : The New Dork Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914261</guid>
		<description>[...] for the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter’s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter’s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed &#124; Techdare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914236</link>
		<dc:creator>Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed &#124; Techdare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914236</guid>
		<description>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed &#124; Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914220</link>
		<dc:creator>Despite All The Angst Around Its Demise, Tr.im Will Hardly Be Missed &#124; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914220</guid>
		<description>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around bit.ly, largely thanks to it being the official URL shortener adopted by Twitter (which switched from competitor TinyURL back in May). Currently, bit.ly makes up 79.6 percent of the short URLs on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cause Is The HabitTr.im: the perfect URL shortening brand for Twitter, Bit.ly to buy :: GR8BR&#38;: Holistic Branding</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2914129</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cause Is The HabitTr.im: the perfect URL shortening brand for Twitter, Bit.ly to buy :: GR8BR&#38;: Holistic Branding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2914129</guid>
		<description>[...] of now Twitter has no personal URL shortening service. They made the move from TinyURL to Bit.ly and can just as easily move to their own in-house shortening service. Why is this important? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of now Twitter has no personal URL shortening service. They made the move from TinyURL to Bit.ly and can just as easily move to their own in-house shortening service. Why is this important? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr.im acortador de direccione tira la toalla. &#124; Geek.pe hardware,tecnologia y demas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913970</link>
		<dc:creator>tr.im acortador de direccione tira la toalla. &#124; Geek.pe hardware,tecnologia y demas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913970</guid>
		<description>[...] para el publico deacuerdo a este blog post, la razon de esta es la decision de twitter de usar bit.ly como acortador de url,  y bien el costo de los servers y desarrollo y como ahora hay varias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] para el publico deacuerdo a este blog post, la razon de esta es la decision de twitter de usar bit.ly como acortador de url,  y bien el costo de los servers y desarrollo y como ahora hay varias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The end of tr.im is the beginning of the end of bit.ly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913739</link>
		<dc:creator>The end of tr.im is the beginning of the end of bit.ly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913739</guid>
		<description>[...] for their main competitor to run away with the lions share of the URL shortening market. In May, bit.ly became the default URL shorterner at twitter.com, something which seriously boosted their traffic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for their main competitor to run away with the lions share of the URL shortening market. In May, bit.ly became the default URL shorterner at twitter.com, something which seriously boosted their traffic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ly Technology &#187; tr.im Throws In the Towel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913457</link>
		<dc:creator>Ly Technology &#187; tr.im Throws In the Towel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913457</guid>
		<description>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr.im Throws In the Towel &#124; The IT Chronicle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913433</link>
		<dc:creator>tr.im Throws In the Towel &#124; The IT Chronicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913433</guid>
		<description>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; tr.im Throws In the Towel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913255</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; tr.im Throws In the Towel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913255</guid>
		<description>[...] for the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter’s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter’s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr.im Throws In the Towel &#124; Design Website Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913128</link>
		<dc:creator>tr.im Throws In the Towel &#124; Design Website Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913128</guid>
		<description>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tr.im Throws In the Towel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/06/url-shortening-wars-twitter-ditches-tinyurl-for-bitly/comment-page-3/#comment-2913066</link>
		<dc:creator>tr.im Throws In the Towel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=62295#comment-2913066</guid>
		<description>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public. According to a blog post, the reason behind the decision is Twitter&#8217;s decision to use bit.ly for their URL shortening, as well as the cost for servers and development while there are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
