They haven’t updated it for 2009 yet unfortunately, but you can see that Google was nowhere near being worth 100m last year. Be interesting to see where they think it’ll come this year.

Coca-cola generates almost all of its value through marketing. Google is a company of engineers, and it still seems to me that they don’t really get marketing.

Read the following article to know more in case readers have not read it already:

by Nicholas Deleon on December 9, 2008

—————————————
” The terrorist attacks in Mumbai have once again put Google Earth in an unfavorable light. The one (“baby-faced”) terrorist that police caught has said that the terrorists used Google Earth the help plan the attacks. (That they also used everyday cellphones, GPS and other technologies appears to be lost on the ban happy Indian officials.) In order to prevent future attacks, so the line of thinking goes, officials there want at the very least to force Google to blur our sensitive sites from the software, if not ban it outright.

Let’s also keep in mind that India plans to launch its own version of Google Earth, so to speak.

While it seems an overreaction to me to want to ban what amounts to an electronic map—are we looking to ban regular, paper maps now?—in no way was I affected by the attacks, at least not directly, so it’s hard for me to qualify India’s reaction. It does seem that attacking (banning) tools instead of the idea and forces behind those tools is folly. ”

—————————————-
Above mentioned article is taken from :

http://www.crun...rorist-attacks/

—————————————-

In case Google does not understand the consequences, please feel free to click on:

http://images.g...=1&ct=title

————————————–

To the readers:

Ask yourself why is it acceptable if someone else gets hurt, when even a simple thought or fear of such thing happening with yourself is unacceptable. I did not know Google is a ‘good guy’ after being responsible for such a dreadful thing!

Even after becoming no 1 tech company, can Google stop being so greedy?

—————————————-

Read the following article to know more in case you have not read it already:

by Nicholas Deleon on December 9, 2008

—————————————
” The terrorist attacks in Mumbai have once again put Google Earth in an unfavorable light. The one (“baby-faced”) terrorist that police caught has said that the terrorists used Google Earth the help plan the attacks. (That they also used everyday cellphones, GPS and other technologies appears to be lost on the ban happy Indian officials.) In order to prevent future attacks, so the line of thinking goes, officials there want at the very least to force Google to blur our sensitive sites from the software, if not ban it outright.

Let’s also keep in mind that India plans to launch its own version of Google Earth, so to speak.

While it seems an overreaction to me to want to ban what amounts to an electronic map—are we looking to ban regular, paper maps now?—in no way was I affected by the attacks, at least not directly, so it’s hard for me to qualify India’s reaction. It does seem that attacking (banning) tools instead of the idea and forces behind those tools is folly. ”

—————————————-
Above mentioned article is taken from :

http://www.crun...rorist-attacks/

—————————————-

In case Google does not understand the consequences, please feel free to click on:

http://images.g...=1&ct=title

————————————–

To the readers:

Ask yourself why is it acceptable if someone else gets hurt, when even a simple thought or fear of such thing happening with yourself is unacceptable. I did not know Google is a ‘good guy’ after being responsible for such a dreadful thing!

Even after becoming no 1 tech company, can Google stop being so greedy?

—————————————-

I love it!

it must be true!

I Read It On The Internet!