<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spock And Intelius? Uh Oh.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:22:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friendster Partners With Intelius. Let The Scams Begin.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-3012598</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendster Partners With Intelius. Let The Scams Begin.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-3012598</guid>
		<description>[...] The Friendster press release doesn&#8217;t talk about how the service will be monetized, but it looks like the integration may be through a recent Intelius acquisition, Spock. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Friendster press release doesn&#8217;t talk about how the service will be monetized, but it looks like the integration may be through a recent Intelius acquisition, Spock. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2865913</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2865913</guid>
		<description>Joemama, you don&#039;t even care about your own privacy? You&#039;re an idiot!

The &quot;service&quot; that Intelius provides is nothing short of Orwellian. Naveen Jain should go to jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joemama, you don&#8217;t even care about your own privacy? You&#8217;re an idiot!</p>
<p>The &#8220;service&#8221; that Intelius provides is nothing short of Orwellian. Naveen Jain should go to jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confidential</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2732942</link>
		<dc:creator>confidential</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2732942</guid>
		<description>Actually, Arrington is spot on. The employees at Spock are not very happy with the acquisition....from what I heard, they didn&#039;t get anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Arrington is spot on. The employees at Spock are not very happy with the acquisition&#8230;.from what I heard, they didn&#8217;t get anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy Lives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Computerworld: Spock sale sparks privacy concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2731203</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy Lives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Computerworld: Spock sale sparks privacy concerns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2731203</guid>
		<description>[...] background check service has purchased Spock, a people search engine, for an undisclosed amount. Some say there&#8217;s a shady vibe that emanates from Intelius that may not bode well for Spock, but the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] background check service has purchased Spock, a people search engine, for an undisclosed amount. Some say there&#8217;s a shady vibe that emanates from Intelius that may not bode well for Spock, but the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2727870</link>
		<dc:creator>Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2727870</guid>
		<description>Hmm - spock is able to be bought by the top company in there space and all arrington knows to do is tear it down. 

why don&#039;t you give credit for entrepreneurs who were able to get an exit for their VCs, employees and themselves in this shitty economy.

Sincerely
Former Techcrunch Reader</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8211; spock is able to be bought by the top company in there space and all arrington knows to do is tear it down. </p>
<p>why don&#8217;t you give credit for entrepreneurs who were able to get an exit for their VCs, employees and themselves in this shitty economy.</p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Former Techcrunch Reader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajit Jaokar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2727548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajit Jaokar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 08:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2727548</guid>
		<description>I think as you rightly said, this acquisition raises some key points about Web 2.0 itself and the privacy implications of Web 2.0. A longish blog:

Harnessing Digital footprints: The dark side of Web 2.0 - 01 May 2009 was the day I lost faith in Web 2.0(hopefully we don&#039;t make the same mistakes with Mobile Web 2.0 and respect privacy) http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/05/harnessing_digi.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think as you rightly said, this acquisition raises some key points about Web 2.0 itself and the privacy implications of Web 2.0. A longish blog:</p>
<p>Harnessing Digital footprints: The dark side of Web 2.0 &#8211; 01 May 2009 was the day I lost faith in Web 2.0(hopefully we don&#8217;t make the same mistakes with Mobile Web 2.0 and respect privacy) <a href="http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/05/harnessing_digi.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://opengardensblog.futuretext.com/archives/2009/05/harnessing_digi.html'>http://opengard...ssing_digi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2727347</link>
		<dc:creator>Notary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2727347</guid>
		<description>When is the world going to be rid of the scammers at Inelius.  Just how much can they get away with.  How do they do it.  How can they live with themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the world going to be rid of the scammers at Inelius.  Just how much can they get away with.  How do they do it.  How can they live with themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Background Check Company Intelius Buys Spock.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2727038</link>
		<dc:creator>Background Check Company Intelius Buys Spock.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2727038</guid>
		<description>[...] Singh confirmed the deal with VentureBeat and TechCrunch speculated the deal earlier.  Spock raised $8 million around December 2006 from Clearstone and Opus.  Spock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Singh confirmed the deal with VentureBeat and TechCrunch speculated the deal earlier.  Spock raised $8 million around December 2006 from Clearstone and Opus.  Spock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2725198</link>
		<dc:creator>SSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2725198</guid>
		<description>Might want to check this graph out too. Alexa is notoriously bad with traffic analytics. Compete is anecdotally known to be a lot better. 

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/spock.com+kosmix.com+cuil.com/

This data is corroborated on QuantCast as well. http://www.quantcast.com/spock.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to check this graph out too. Alexa is notoriously bad with traffic analytics. Compete is anecdotally known to be a lot better. </p>
<p><a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/spock.com+kosmix.com+cuil.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://siteanalytics.compete.com/spock.com+kosmix.com+cuil.com/'>http://siteanal...x.com+cuil.com/</a></p>
<p>This data is corroborated on QuantCast as well. <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/spock.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.quantcast.com/spock.com'>http://www.quan...t.com/spock.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techeroid &#187; Intelius buys Spock, the people search engine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2725180</link>
		<dc:creator>Techeroid &#187; Intelius buys Spock, the people search engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2725180</guid>
		<description>[...] The deal was signed today, VentureBeat just confirmed with Spock&#8217;s co-founder Jaideep Singh. Unconfirmed rumors of the deal first appeared yesterday on Techcrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The deal was signed today, VentureBeat just confirmed with Spock&#8217;s co-founder Jaideep Singh. Unconfirmed rumors of the deal first appeared yesterday on Techcrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpt kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2724980</link>
		<dc:creator>cpt kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2724980</guid>
		<description>too funny, intelispock, hope spock team knows what will happen next

this is turning into infospace II (ask go2net how deals go with naveen)

type &quot;dot con job&quot; in google for a great story about naveen and his business tactics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too funny, intelispock, hope spock team knows what will happen next</p>
<p>this is turning into infospace II (ask go2net how deals go with naveen)</p>
<p>type &#8220;dot con job&#8221; in google for a great story about naveen and his business tactics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="519733049">Carlton Northern</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2724598</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="519733049">Carlton Northern</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2724598</guid>
		<description>Actually, I dont think people search will be dominated by Facebook and LinkedIn.  Both of these sites are limited by those who choose to use their service.  This leaves out oh only say about 6 billion people.  I think the real people search engine is Google.  Google recently allowed its users to not only create a profile page but to link to their online profiles, thus letting google consolidate public profiles to single identities.  http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/04/google-wants-yo/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I dont think people search will be dominated by Facebook and LinkedIn.  Both of these sites are limited by those who choose to use their service.  This leaves out oh only say about 6 billion people.  I think the real people search engine is Google.  Google recently allowed its users to not only create a profile page but to link to their online profiles, thus letting google consolidate public profiles to single identities.  <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/04/google-wants-yo/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/04/google-wants-yo/'>http://www.wire...oogle-wants-yo/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2724208</link>
		<dc:creator>bigant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2724208</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, do you have any personal stake in WhitePages.com?  If you do, wouldn&#039;t it be good journalism to disclose it?  Either way, you have written more negative articles about their competitors than you have against just about any other company...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, do you have any personal stake in WhitePages.com?  If you do, wouldn&#8217;t it be good journalism to disclose it?  Either way, you have written more negative articles about their competitors than you have against just about any other company&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligulazhang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2723508</link>
		<dc:creator>caligulazhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2723508</guid>
		<description>We provide include: North America (NAFTA), South American countries, the EU 27 countries, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Russia and other 248 countries and regions in a variety of Customs bill of lading data, import and export trade (Statistics) data.  http://www.customs-data.com.cn 
 Competitive Intelligence Global Trade System (GT) data contains a large number of buyers and sellers information such as number of transactions prices, both absolute quality so far on any channel (for example, B2B, event, etc.) suppliers and buyers to study the information and products in the the positioning of the global market to provide authoritative and accurate data and reports!
http://www.customs-data.com.cn/GOOD-HOPE-LA/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We provide include: North America (NAFTA), South American countries, the EU 27 countries, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Russia and other 248 countries and regions in a variety of Customs bill of lading data, import and export trade (Statistics) data.  <a href="http://www.customs-data.com.cn" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.customs-data.com.cn'>http://www.customs-data.com.cn</a><br />
 Competitive Intelligence Global Trade System (GT) data contains a large number of buyers and sellers information such as number of transactions prices, both absolute quality so far on any channel (for example, B2B, event, etc.) suppliers and buyers to study the information and products in the the positioning of the global market to provide authoritative and accurate data and reports!<br />
<a href="http://www.customs-data.com.cn/GOOD-HOPE-LA/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.customs-data.com.cn/GOOD-HOPE-LA/'>http://www.cust...n/GOOD-HOPE-LA/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2723488</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2723488</guid>
		<description>hmm - dont you think you should change your spock traffic spike to be a bit more accurate?  it&#039;s seem to be really bad reporting on your part techcrunch.

take a look at alexa.
http://alexa.com/siteinfo/spock.com+cuil.com+kosmix.com

spock has more traffic then a9, cuil, kosmix, and powerset combined!  

really poor for techcrunch to show &quot;google searches&quot; for the term spock as opposed to traffic metrics like comscore or alexa.  looks like you are trying to mislead users to believe something to not be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm &#8211; dont you think you should change your spock traffic spike to be a bit more accurate?  it&#8217;s seem to be really bad reporting on your part techcrunch.</p>
<p>take a look at alexa.<br />
<a href="http://alexa.com/siteinfo/spock.com+cuil.com+kosmix.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://alexa.com/siteinfo/spock.com+cuil.com+kosmix.com'>http://alexa.co....com+kosmix.com</a></p>
<p>spock has more traffic then a9, cuil, kosmix, and powerset combined!  </p>
<p>really poor for techcrunch to show &#8220;google searches&#8221; for the term spock as opposed to traffic metrics like comscore or alexa.  looks like you are trying to mislead users to believe something to not be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2723471</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2723471</guid>
		<description>They should sell if they can&#039;t sustain the business financially of course. I liked spock, but it seemed just a little dull. There was no difference in reading Donald Trump on spock than on wikipedia. Wikipedia was more personal and up-to-date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should sell if they can&#8217;t sustain the business financially of course. I liked spock, but it seemed just a little dull. There was no difference in reading Donald Trump on spock than on wikipedia. Wikipedia was more personal and up-to-date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfltv.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2723212</link>
		<dc:creator>sfltv.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2723212</guid>
		<description>white pages is alright
but it&#039;s like one big giant ad for premium services, which is somewhat understandable

now, when do we get to delete our own data from these services?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>white pages is alright<br />
but it&#8217;s like one big giant ad for premium services, which is somewhat understandable</p>
<p>now, when do we get to delete our own data from these services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spock To Be Beamed Up By Intelius? ~ Web Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2723202</link>
		<dc:creator>Spock To Be Beamed Up By Intelius? ~ Web Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2723202</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to think so. And because of this, we find that Spock is in a really lousy position. Even if the rumors are true, Intelius does indeed end up buying them up, who cares? I have tested it on a number of times only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to think so. And because of this, we find that Spock is in a really lousy position. Even if the rumors are true, Intelius does indeed end up buying them up, who cares? I have tested it on a number of times only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722897</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722897</guid>
		<description>you left out the part where people don&#039;t use whitepages. seo only counts for search results and 200MM sounds a little to me like you lose on the &quot;opt-in&quot; factor that FB and LI have going for them. frankly, i put whitepages in the &quot;nabble&quot; bucket of meaningless search cruft and therefore plainly look right past them/you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you left out the part where people don&#8217;t use whitepages. seo only counts for search results and 200MM sounds a little to me like you lose on the &#8220;opt-in&#8221; factor that FB and LI have going for them. frankly, i put whitepages in the &#8220;nabble&#8221; bucket of meaningless search cruft and therefore plainly look right past them/you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilywhite</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722860</link>
		<dc:creator>lilywhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722860</guid>
		<description>people don&#039;t really find the whitepages.com site very credible. Whenever I accidentally land on it I jump off as soon as humanly possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people don&#8217;t really find the whitepages.com site very credible. Whenever I accidentally land on it I jump off as soon as humanly possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lusk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722821</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722821</guid>
		<description>&quot;People search, it seems, will be dominated by the likes of LinkedIn and Facebook, who are both now being smart about search engine optimization&quot;

With over 200M people in our database and ridiculous success with our SEO efforts, I&#039;m surprised that WhitePages isn&#039;t mentioned as a potential &#039;dominator&#039; of People Search.  

Sad to see Spock meeting its end.  Smart folks down there who will no doubt make waves in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People search, it seems, will be dominated by the likes of LinkedIn and Facebook, who are both now being smart about search engine optimization&#8221;</p>
<p>With over 200M people in our database and ridiculous success with our SEO efforts, I&#8217;m surprised that WhitePages isn&#8217;t mentioned as a potential &#8216;dominator&#8217; of People Search.  </p>
<p>Sad to see Spock meeting its end.  Smart folks down there who will no doubt make waves in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Meyers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722806</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722806</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t do it Spock. life&#039;s too short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t do it Spock. life&#8217;s too short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joemama</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722728</link>
		<dc:creator>joemama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722728</guid>
		<description>yawn... Mike you&#039;ve seriously got to get a hobby...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawn&#8230; Mike you&#8217;ve seriously got to get a hobby&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Drewry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722644</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Drewry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722644</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s Captain kirk? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s Captain kirk? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/29/spock-and-intelius-uh-oh/comment-page-1/#comment-2722582</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=60432#comment-2722582</guid>
		<description>nice mention of spocksoon ..lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice mention of spocksoon ..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
