<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content?  The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:52:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2896560</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2896560</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#039;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#039;t always disclose the ads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose the ads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2865552</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2865552</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; SEO Hardcore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2834117</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; SEO Hardcore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2834117</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search engine optimizing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2822617</link>
		<dc:creator>Search engine optimizing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2822617</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; SEO Manatee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2818049</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; SEO Manatee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2818049</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Network List &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2816886</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Network List &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2816886</guid>
		<description>[...] Worse yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Worse yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; Search Engine Optimization for better search rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2816712</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail &#124; Search Engine Optimization for better search rankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2816712</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks (AdSense + DoubleClick) are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCommerce Share &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2815618</link>
		<dc:creator>eCommerce Share &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2815618</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2815570</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2815570</guid>
		<description>[...] ad&#173; n&#173;etwo&#173;rks&#173; are res&#173;po&#173;n&#173;s&#173;ible fo&#173;r mo&#173;&#173;neti&#173;z&#173;i&#173;ng near&#173;ly 70% o&#173;&#173;f&#173; o&#173;&#173;nli&amp;#173....  Th&#173;es&#173;e n&#173;etworks&#173; go s&#173;o f&#173;a&#173;r a&#173;s&#173; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ad&#173; n&#173;etwo&#173;rks&#173; are res&#173;po&#173;n&#173;s&#173;ible fo&#173;r mo&#173;&#173;neti&#173;z&#173;i&#173;ng near&#173;ly 70% o&#173;&#173;f&#173; o&#173;&#173;nli&amp;#173&#8230;.  Th&#173;es&#173;e n&#173;etworks&#173; go s&#173;o f&#173;a&#173;r a&#173;s&#173; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Link Brokers UK&#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2815532</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Link Brokers UK&#187; Blog Archive &#187; FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2815532</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#039;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#039;t always disclose the ads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose the ads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2815520</link>
		<dc:creator>FTC Going After Bloggers = Epic Fail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2815520</guid>
		<description>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yet, Google&#8217;s automated ad networks are responsible for monetizing nearly 70% of online copyright violations.  These networks go so far as monetizing warez websites, and Google doesn&#8217;t always disclose [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams &#171; Site Seo Doctor Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2764559</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams &#171; Site Seo Doctor Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2764559</guid>
		<description>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCommerce Share &#187; Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-2/#comment-2760638</link>
		<dc:creator>eCommerce Share &#187; Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2760638</guid>
		<description>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2760611</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2760611</guid>
		<description>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2753412</link>
		<dc:creator>Amr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2753412</guid>
		<description>I think , many sites will lose 
But uniq content is the king</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think , many sites will lose<br />
But uniq content is the king</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webanalysebuch - Webanalyse, SEO, SEM und SMO &#187; Google ist evil :)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2751368</link>
		<dc:creator>Webanalysebuch - Webanalyse, SEO, SEM und SMO &#187; Google ist evil :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2751368</guid>
		<description>[...] Google verdient Millionen von $ jedes Jahr von Publishern mit geklautem Content. Ist es wirklich so schwer geklauten Content auseinanderzuhalten, wenn man doch angeblich alle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google verdient Millionen von $ jedes Jahr von Publishern mit geklautem Content. Ist es wirklich so schwer geklauten Content auseinanderzuhalten, wenn man doch angeblich alle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next09 Video Interview: What Would Jeff Jarvis Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2734199</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next09 Video Interview: What Would Jeff Jarvis Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2734199</guid>
		<description>[...] We talked about his new book and why it is titled the way it is, if he’s really the Google fanboy people make him out to be, and what he thinks about the whole Google vs. the newspaper industry situation. He says the latter is being suicidal by not understanding what he refers to as the ‘link economy’, and I don’t think he’s far off there. (see our earlier posts about this here and here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We talked about his new book and why it is titled the way it is, if he’s really the Google fanboy people make him out to be, and what he thinks about the whole Google vs. the newspaper industry situation. He says the latter is being suicidal by not understanding what he refers to as the ‘link economy’, and I don’t think he’s far off there. (see our earlier posts about this here and here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next09 Video Interview: What Would Jeff Jarvis Do?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2733962</link>
		<dc:creator>Next09 Video Interview: What Would Jeff Jarvis Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2733962</guid>
		<description>[...] We talked about his new book and why it is titled the way it is, if he&#8217;s really the Google fanboy people make him out to be, and what he thinks about the whole Google vs. the newspaper industry situation. He says the latter is being suicidal by not understanding what he refers to as the &#8216;link economy&#8217;, and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s far off there. (see our earlier posts about this here and here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We talked about his new book and why it is titled the way it is, if he&#8217;s really the Google fanboy people make him out to be, and what he thinks about the whole Google vs. the newspaper industry situation. He says the latter is being suicidal by not understanding what he refers to as the &#8216;link economy&#8217;, and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s far off there. (see our earlier posts about this here and here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Econs.net Blog &#187; Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2716734</link>
		<dc:creator>Econs.net Blog &#187; Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2716734</guid>
		<description>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams &#124; Search Engine Optimization for better search rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2714081</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Links vs Buying Rankings vs Stealing Content vs Selling Scams &#124; Search Engine Optimization for better search rankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2714081</guid>
		<description>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google was concerned with what was &#8220;fair&#8221; they wouldn&#8217;t wrap nearly 70% of the stolen content on the web in their ads. Google knows about that stat, but since it makes them money they look the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair Syndication Consortium To Fight Splogs &#124; Kikabink News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2713081</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair Syndication Consortium To Fight Splogs &#124; Kikabink News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2713081</guid>
		<description>[...] Erick Schonfeld, &#8220;Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication C...   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Erick Schonfeld, &#8220;Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication C&#8230;   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing, Strategy &#38; Technology Links - Apr 23, 2009 &#171; Sazbean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2712070</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing, Strategy &#38; Technology Links - Apr 23, 2009 &#171; Sazbean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2712070</guid>
		<description>[...] Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. (TechCrunch) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. (TechCrunch) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Year of Original Content: Make Money From Copyright Thieves &#124; BLOGCHINA.ME</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2711684</link>
		<dc:creator>Year of Original Content: Make Money From Copyright Thieves &#124; BLOGCHINA.ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2711684</guid>
		<description>[...] an article called &#8220;Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.&#8221; on TechCrunch, Erick Schonfeld talks about the Fair Syndication Consortium, a project by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article called &#8220;Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.&#8221; on TechCrunch, Erick Schonfeld talks about the Fair Syndication Consortium, a project by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stealing content from bloggers &#171; Lance Wiggs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2711080</link>
		<dc:creator>Stealing content from bloggers &#171; Lance Wiggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2711080</guid>
		<description>[...] talks about in her post on Changememe. She links to an article on Techcrunch which talks about sharing the joy. Perhaps it would be ok for ad-laden sites to grab content if they do so with permission pay the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talks about in her post on Changememe. She links to an article on Techcrunch which talks about sharing the joy. Perhaps it would be ok for ad-laden sites to grab content if they do so with permission pay the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/should-ad-networks-pay-publishers-for-stolen-content-the-fair-syndication-consortium-thinks-so/comment-page-1/#comment-2710877</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=58261#comment-2710877</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s your content, you have every right to be paid for it.  TechCrunch hasn&#039;t put up any barriers to general access and distribution of its content online, so the spam blogs are not providing consumers with any meaningful service.  You should join the network and collect payments for those who steal your IP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s your content, you have every right to be paid for it.  TechCrunch hasn&#8217;t put up any barriers to general access and distribution of its content online, so the spam blogs are not providing consumers with any meaningful service.  You should join the network and collect payments for those who steal your IP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
