<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle To Buy Sun For Approximately $7.4 Billion &#8211; Hold On To Your Hats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:24:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free Ticket Giveaway To See Larry Ellison Speak At The Churchill Club &#124; Macarne`s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2995566</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Ticket Giveaway To See Larry Ellison Speak At The Churchill Club &#124; Macarne`s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2995566</guid>
		<description>[...] to Ed Zander, former CEO of Motorola, and former President of Sun Microsystems, which Oracle acquired earlier this year, beating out rival IBM. It should be an interesting conversation considering the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Ed Zander, former CEO of Motorola, and former President of Sun Microsystems, which Oracle acquired earlier this year, beating out rival IBM. It should be an interesting conversation considering the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Ticket Giveaway To See Larry Ellison Speak At The Churchill Club</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2993999</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Ticket Giveaway To See Larry Ellison Speak At The Churchill Club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2993999</guid>
		<description>[...] to Ed Zander, former CEO of Motorola, and former President of Sun Microsystems, which Oracle acquired earlier this year, beating out rival IBM. It should be an interesting conversation considering the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Ed Zander, former CEO of Motorola, and former President of Sun Microsystems, which Oracle acquired earlier this year, beating out rival IBM. It should be an interesting conversation considering the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle To Sun Customers (And IBM): “We’re In It To Win It” &#124; ScooperNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2975873</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle To Sun Customers (And IBM): “We’re In It To Win It” &#124; ScooperNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2975873</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsystems customers (and now rival IBM), stating its intentions with SPARC and Solaris before the monster acquisition is even a done deal. It&#8217;s a full-page ad that appeared in the European edition of the Wall [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsystems customers (and now rival IBM), stating its intentions with SPARC and Solaris before the monster acquisition is even a done deal. It&#8217;s a full-page ad that appeared in the European edition of the Wall [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle To Sun Customers (And IBM): &#8220;We&#8217;re In It To Win It&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2975824</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle To Sun Customers (And IBM): &#8220;We&#8217;re In It To Win It&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2975824</guid>
		<description>[...] customers (and now rival IBM), stating its intentions with SPARC and Solaris even before the monster acquisition is even a done deal. It&#8217;s a full-page ad that appeared in the European edition of the Wall [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] customers (and now rival IBM), stating its intentions with SPARC and Solaris even before the monster acquisition is even a done deal. It&#8217;s a full-page ad that appeared in the European edition of the Wall [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet marketing &#124; Bisnis internet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2801233</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet marketing &#124; Bisnis internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2801233</guid>
		<description>Tactics is very telling in determining the purchase. Thanks for share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tactics is very telling in determining the purchase. Thanks for share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seun Lawal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2717194</link>
		<dc:creator>Seun Lawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2717194</guid>
		<description>Seems everyone is worried about mySQL, no one is worried about the future of JAVA. This will definitely affect JAVA in some way.
I could be happy about JAVA slipping into the abyss with  IBM than for the worse to happen to it with Oracle. 
Yet I hope this turns out good. Whew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems everyone is worried about mySQL, no one is worried about the future of JAVA. This will definitely affect JAVA in some way.<br />
I could be happy about JAVA slipping into the abyss with  IBM than for the worse to happen to it with Oracle.<br />
Yet I hope this turns out good. Whew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 小隔間裡的人生</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-3/#comment-2716578</link>
		<dc:creator>小隔間裡的人生</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2716578</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Oracle 購併 Sun...&lt;/strong&gt;

一開始很震驚，不過後來想想其實也不太意外&#8230;

前不久才傳出 IBM 併購 Sun 破局，那時候我的想法是這兩家的合併應該是蠻有可看性的，兩家都是從硬體起家再做到軟體及服務業，旗下產.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Oracle 購併 Sun&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>一開始很震驚，不過後來想想其實也不太意外&#8230;</p>
<p>前不久才傳出 IBM 併購 Sun 破局，那時候我的想法是這兩家的合併應該是蠻有可看性的，兩家都是從硬體起家再做到軟體及服務業，旗下產&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikiÅ�</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2710617</link>
		<dc:creator>sikiÅ�</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2710617</guid>
		<description>i am now in oracle working ;=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am now in oracle working ;=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 甲骨文整合SUN诞生“企业版苹果” 市场格局难撼动 &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2710274</link>
		<dc:creator>甲骨文整合SUN诞生“企业版苹果” 市场格局难撼动 &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2710274</guid>
		<description>[...] $7.4 Billion Oracle To Buy Sun For Approximately $7.4 Billion - Hold On To Your Hats [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $7.4 Billion Oracle To Buy Sun For Approximately $7.4 Billion &#8211; Hold On To Your Hats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MenKat Asamm - geodesy students &#187; Future of Java</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2709708</link>
		<dc:creator>MenKat Asamm - geodesy students &#187; Future of Java</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2709708</guid>
		<description>[...] done. Oravle corporation bought Sun for unimaginable price. More info find on these Sun pages or on TechCrunch. I hope very much that most of Java language will remaind and will be still developed. The users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done. Oravle corporation bought Sun for unimaginable price. More info find on these Sun pages or on TechCrunch. I hope very much that most of Java language will remaind and will be still developed. The users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live wire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2709032</link>
		<dc:creator>live wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2709032</guid>
		<description>whoa, how I wish i had was on the board for Sun... that&#039;s a lot of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoa, how I wish i had was on the board for Sun&#8230; that&#8217;s a lot of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nottoworry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-1/#comment-2708704</link>
		<dc:creator>nottoworry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708704</guid>
		<description>The world isn&#039;t ending. There&#039;s a reason those opensource licenses are called what they are. You should read them once in a while.
Monty knows the value of open source software - a billion bucks or more! So also many other rock star programmers. There are people and there are companies that cannot thrive without a free/cheap fast db of that quality. Jon&#039;s blog highlighted that throughout last 12-18 months. So Larry is not going to butcher his potential market - that&#039;s like shooing your customer away on day 1. He can&#039;t do that. He&#039;ll start slowly, after 3 months, maybe 6. By then, we&#039;ll already have either an official open source Oracle-sponsored branch or a community-driven database equally good or better. With more players in the market you might see better variety and innovation. 
Oracle will have to sorrow much if it does what it did to Peoplesoft. Larry is too wise (not cunning/intelligent, just wise) to butcher Oracle&#039;s image in this day and age. He can see the world has changed. He just needs to be in this race too - it&#039;s too big to miss.
As for SUN, well, I don&#039;t really know what got into them to allow this despite the fact that they have always had even &lt;b&gt;engineers&lt;/b&gt; who could do business better. Austerity looks very cool, but this is funny. Someday, I hope, we&#039;ll all know what actually went on behind the closed doors.
It&#039;s not just two options - either Oracle burying SUN or SUN transforming Oracle from an open source point of view. I think what will happen is something in between - some money, some goodies, some deals and some freebies. Oh, by the way, you can&#039;t violate the GPL, thank the FSF for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world isn&#8217;t ending. There&#8217;s a reason those opensource licenses are called what they are. You should read them once in a while.<br />
Monty knows the value of open source software &#8211; a billion bucks or more! So also many other rock star programmers. There are people and there are companies that cannot thrive without a free/cheap fast db of that quality. Jon&#8217;s blog highlighted that throughout last 12-18 months. So Larry is not going to butcher his potential market &#8211; that&#8217;s like shooing your customer away on day 1. He can&#8217;t do that. He&#8217;ll start slowly, after 3 months, maybe 6. By then, we&#8217;ll already have either an official open source Oracle-sponsored branch or a community-driven database equally good or better. With more players in the market you might see better variety and innovation.<br />
Oracle will have to sorrow much if it does what it did to Peoplesoft. Larry is too wise (not cunning/intelligent, just wise) to butcher Oracle&#8217;s image in this day and age. He can see the world has changed. He just needs to be in this race too &#8211; it&#8217;s too big to miss.<br />
As for SUN, well, I don&#8217;t really know what got into them to allow this despite the fact that they have always had even <b>engineers</b> who could do business better. Austerity looks very cool, but this is funny. Someday, I hope, we&#8217;ll all know what actually went on behind the closed doors.<br />
It&#8217;s not just two options &#8211; either Oracle burying SUN or SUN transforming Oracle from an open source point of view. I think what will happen is something in between &#8211; some money, some goodies, some deals and some freebies. Oh, by the way, you can&#8217;t violate the GPL, thank the FSF for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysql sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708509</link>
		<dc:creator>mysql sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708509</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be nice to have some adult supervision for mysql, the worst database money can&#039;t buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be nice to have some adult supervision for mysql, the worst database money can&#8217;t buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iseries</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708439</link>
		<dc:creator>iseries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708439</guid>
		<description>Oracle will not kill off MySQL.....but, dont expect to see any more major leaps in functionality. I think MySQL will become a support only product, and will not progress any further.  It will stay as the number 1 db backend for websites, but I think everywhere else it will slowly disappear, and be replaced by OracleDB

If Oracle get behind OpenOffice, then Microsoft will also be very worried. 

Also Sybase must be wetting themselves at this point, especially if Oracle start bundling OracleDB with Solaris.

The big question is why the IBM deal didnt go through. This was a purchase that IBM had to make, if only to stop Oracle getting their hands on all this stuff. From that point of view this deal would have been a bargain for Oracle or IBM.

The next 2 years are going to be very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle will not kill off MySQL&#8230;..but, dont expect to see any more major leaps in functionality. I think MySQL will become a support only product, and will not progress any further.  It will stay as the number 1 db backend for websites, but I think everywhere else it will slowly disappear, and be replaced by OracleDB</p>
<p>If Oracle get behind OpenOffice, then Microsoft will also be very worried. </p>
<p>Also Sybase must be wetting themselves at this point, especially if Oracle start bundling OracleDB with Solaris.</p>
<p>The big question is why the IBM deal didnt go through. This was a purchase that IBM had to make, if only to stop Oracle getting their hands on all this stuff. From that point of view this deal would have been a bargain for Oracle or IBM.</p>
<p>The next 2 years are going to be very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle to buy Sun! - kBLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708322</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle to buy Sun! - kBLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708322</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone heared about the new acquisition of oracle, this gonna be a big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone heared about the new acquisition of oracle, this gonna be a big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708294</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708294</guid>
		<description>Sun was anyway so stupid to pay 1 billion for mySQL. That money should have been better used to market their own Java tools...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun was anyway so stupid to pay 1 billion for mySQL. That money should have been better used to market their own Java tools&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708146</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708146</guid>
		<description>Intersting.
Oracle is into Furniture Business i think. And Sun just wants to get out of Leather manufacturing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intersting.<br />
Oracle is into Furniture Business i think. And Sun just wants to get out of Leather manufacturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingoratti</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708145</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingoratti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708145</guid>
		<description>Anyone knows what Sun does? Do they sell Coffee?

And Oracle, is it a fruit company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone knows what Sun does? Do they sell Coffee?</p>
<p>And Oracle, is it a fruit company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingoratti</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingoratti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708122</guid>
		<description>Please excuse my ignorance. 

What does Oracle do? Is it a fruit company?

What does Sun do? And what is this thing called Java. Are they Coffee Makers and compete with StarBucks?

MySQL - now what on earth is it? I dont care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please excuse my ignorance. </p>
<p>What does Oracle do? Is it a fruit company?</p>
<p>What does Sun do? And what is this thing called Java. Are they Coffee Makers and compete with StarBucks?</p>
<p>MySQL &#8211; now what on earth is it? I dont care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2708118</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2708118</guid>
		<description>Not Open Office... but StarOffice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Open Office&#8230; but StarOffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engago team</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2707991</link>
		<dc:creator>Engago team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2707991</guid>
		<description>When the world is turning to cloud computing (AWS with S3 and EC2), why buy a server company (&quot;the network is the computer&quot;) as a software/data base company?

Is java still so powerful seen the ever increasing number of Ruby on Rails applications (Twitter, 37 Signals, ...)

Oracle has the policy of making you pay for any software.
SUN had the policy of giving away free a lot of software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the world is turning to cloud computing (AWS with S3 and EC2), why buy a server company (&#8221;the network is the computer&#8221;) as a software/data base company?</p>
<p>Is java still so powerful seen the ever increasing number of Ruby on Rails applications (Twitter, 37 Signals, &#8230;)</p>
<p>Oracle has the policy of making you pay for any software.<br />
SUN had the policy of giving away free a lot of software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oracle kauft Sun - und damit auch MySQL - OpenSource Blog / Open Source Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2707967</link>
		<dc:creator>Oracle kauft Sun - und damit auch MySQL - OpenSource Blog / Open Source Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2707967</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Volk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-2/#comment-2707756</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Volk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2707756</guid>
		<description>Noone is commenting on the massive overlap between Oracle and Sun identity management product portfolios? That&#039;ll be one area where things will get interesting for sure. Our take at http://tinyurl.com/cnjc6 (part 1 of 3)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noone is commenting on the massive overlap between Oracle and Sun identity management product portfolios? That&#8217;ll be one area where things will get interesting for sure. Our take at <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cnjc6" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/cnjc6'>http://tinyurl.com/cnjc6</a> (part 1 of 3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vengu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-1/#comment-2707738</link>
		<dc:creator>Vengu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2707738</guid>
		<description>Only thoughtful comment in this post. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only thoughtful comment in this post. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/20/oracle-to-buy-sun-hold-on-to-your-hats/comment-page-1/#comment-2707449</link>
		<dc:creator>William Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57756#comment-2707449</guid>
		<description>BlogReader = Oracle or Sun Employee (possibly boss)

Give your real credentials in your link and stop being a coward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlogReader = Oracle or Sun Employee (possibly boss)</p>
<p>Give your real credentials in your link and stop being a coward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
