<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model &#8212; If You Hate Selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:36:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hongkie Town &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sigh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-3105994</link>
		<dc:creator>Hongkie Town &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-3105994</guid>
		<description>[...] Hollywood Has a Great Online Distribution Model &#8211; If You Hate Selection The fact that online distribution has to play in this foolish game of broadcast rights tennis, is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hollywood Has a Great Online Distribution Model &#8211; If You Hate Selection The fact that online distribution has to play in this foolish game of broadcast rights tennis, is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywood’s Distribution Model &#124; Thought Clusters</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2808543</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollywood’s Distribution Model &#124; Thought Clusters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2808543</guid>
		<description>[...] retorts: how can anyone really expect any of the online movie services to flourish under such restrictions? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retorts: how can anyone really expect any of the online movie services to flourish under such restrictions? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generate Weekly Insider - 4/20/09 &#124; Generate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2720588</link>
		<dc:creator>Generate Weekly Insider - 4/20/09 &#124; Generate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2720588</guid>
		<description>[...]  (Jordan) Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model- If You Hate Selection http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-sel...  (Daniel W)The New York Times on the Precipice: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  (Jordan) Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model- If You Hate Selection <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-sel.." rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-sel'>http://www.tech...if-you-hate-sel</a>...  (Daniel W)The New York Times on the Precipice: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Head-Start [Software Business Links] &#171; OMS SafeHarbor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2717971</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Head-Start [Software Business Links] &#171; OMS SafeHarbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2717971</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. Distributing Movies Online - Or Not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. Distributing Movies Online &#8211; Or Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links de la semana 13 &#124; El Blog de Gaston Bercun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2714922</link>
		<dc:creator>Links de la semana 13 &#124; El Blog de Gaston Bercun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2714922</guid>
		<description>[...] Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model — If You Hate Selection, más alrededor del tema de los derechos intelectuales y los desafíos que las nuevas tecnologías plantean a sus modelos de negocio históricos. Mas si empiezan a tomar en cuenta que Los “downloaders” son los que más música compran. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model — If You Hate Selection, más alrededor del tema de los derechos intelectuales y los desafíos que las nuevas tecnologías plantean a sus modelos de negocio históricos. Mas si empiezan a tomar en cuenta que Los “downloaders” son los que más música compran. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2712703</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2712703</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoGoodTargets-yet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2710918</link>
		<dc:creator>NoGoodTargets-yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2710918</guid>
		<description>1.  Big media will make as much money from us for as long as it can - until there is a countervailing force. 
2.  Big media isn&#039;t stupid.  
3.  It&#039;s unlikely to be leaving money on the table, because if there was money on the table, media would be adept enough to take it.    See #2
4.  Piracy it pecking away at the empire, but alone will not be enough.  However, it is hastening change.
5.  In the next 2-4 years market changes + piracy + alternative online sources will precipitate quicker change.
6.  Big media will make available movies online - when the money is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Big media will make as much money from us for as long as it can &#8211; until there is a countervailing force.<br />
2.  Big media isn&#8217;t stupid.<br />
3.  It&#8217;s unlikely to be leaving money on the table, because if there was money on the table, media would be adept enough to take it.    See #2<br />
4.  Piracy it pecking away at the empire, but alone will not be enough.  However, it is hastening change.<br />
5.  In the next 2-4 years market changes + piracy + alternative online sources will precipitate quicker change.<br />
6.  Big media will make available movies online &#8211; when the money is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2709240</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2709240</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infoyourway.com &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2709190</link>
		<dc:creator>infoyourway.com &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2709190</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techeroid &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2709097</link>
		<dc:creator>Techeroid &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn’t Really Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2709097</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Fails To Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2709034</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Fails To Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2709034</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn&#8217;t Really Make A Splash.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2709015</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Jumps Into The HD Stream As Well. Doesn&#8217;t Really Make A Splash.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2709015</guid>
		<description>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all of the online video services now offering much of the same (sometimes lousy) content, the new differentiating factor seems to be high definition quality. Microsoft has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2708433</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2708433</guid>
		<description>The other problem on the horizon is with Netflix.  I&#039;ve just dropped my monthly rate to one DVD a month plus unlimited streaming.  I wonder how much this is happened and is Netflix cannabilizing themselves?  Also, since distributors also want to be retailers (Hulu and TV.com), a battle looms.  Ultimately the studios make money off of exclusive control of content and if Netflix gets too successful they will shut them off (which they are already doing apparently).  Netflix&#039;s only alternative will be to take the risky step of financing their own content (i.e. Red Envelope).  Either Netflix is going to be studios out of business or vice versa.  My guess is Netflix should restart Red Envelope.  They were only 2 years ahead of their time.  Indie films have completely died at studios so the opening is there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other problem on the horizon is with Netflix.  I&#8217;ve just dropped my monthly rate to one DVD a month plus unlimited streaming.  I wonder how much this is happened and is Netflix cannabilizing themselves?  Also, since distributors also want to be retailers (Hulu and TV.com), a battle looms.  Ultimately the studios make money off of exclusive control of content and if Netflix gets too successful they will shut them off (which they are already doing apparently).  Netflix&#8217;s only alternative will be to take the risky step of financing their own content (i.e. Red Envelope).  Either Netflix is going to be studios out of business or vice versa.  My guess is Netflix should restart Red Envelope.  They were only 2 years ahead of their time.  Indie films have completely died at studios so the opening is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2708420</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2708420</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re exactly right.  Hollywood is falling right into the same trap the music industry did.  The music industry had a value to price problem that they just couldn&#039;t let go of in time, the entertainment industry is doing the exact same thing.  In this recession that&#039;s why Netflix kicked Blockbusters ass.  If they think I won&#039;t use bittorrent which I can now stream over my Tivo box onto my flat screen tv in my surround sound room, they are crazy!  That&#039;s why the Indie market is dying a rapid death.  I&#039;m not going to pay $12 to see an Indie movie that I could enjoy more in my living room but have to wait 2 months to be able to rent it.  I&#039;ll just download the damn thing and see it before it even comes out in the theatres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re exactly right.  Hollywood is falling right into the same trap the music industry did.  The music industry had a value to price problem that they just couldn&#8217;t let go of in time, the entertainment industry is doing the exact same thing.  In this recession that&#8217;s why Netflix kicked Blockbusters ass.  If they think I won&#8217;t use bittorrent which I can now stream over my Tivo box onto my flat screen tv in my surround sound room, they are crazy!  That&#8217;s why the Indie market is dying a rapid death.  I&#8217;m not going to pay $12 to see an Indie movie that I could enjoy more in my living room but have to wait 2 months to be able to rent it.  I&#8217;ll just download the damn thing and see it before it even comes out in the theatres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2708407</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2708407</guid>
		<description>Chris,

You&#039;re an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Congratulations - you just wet your pants</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2708187</link>
		<dc:creator>Congratulations - you just wet your pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2708187</guid>
		<description>[...] see TechCrunchs &#8220;Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model — If You Hate Selection&#8221;. Lots of excellent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see TechCrunchs &#8220;Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model — If You Hate Selection&#8221;. Lots of excellent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2706931</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2706931</guid>
		<description>I experience this almost daily on my VUDU Box. It really is terrible.

Digital distribution is not the same as pay-per-view and should be treated as such. 

Studios are missing out I think on more profits if they would allow digital movie rental and download than by keeping the existing model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I experience this almost daily on my VUDU Box. It really is terrible.</p>
<p>Digital distribution is not the same as pay-per-view and should be treated as such. </p>
<p>Studios are missing out I think on more profits if they would allow digital movie rental and download than by keeping the existing model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2706544</link>
		<dc:creator>Vid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2706544</guid>
		<description>The real issue is the media company. DVDs are a big part of the monetization of movies, yet movies are only a small part of media company profitability. Most of the media company profits are from cable channels. 

The second you start distributing movies and TV content freely online, consumers move away from cable. Once that happens, media company profits dry up.  

Unlike the recording industry, the media company&#039;s don&#039;t have all of their eggs in the CD (or in this case DVD) basket. Therefore, they can fully resist online distribution. They really just need to keep the Internet-to-TV link fully DRM protected (read: block Hulu to Boxee).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue is the media company. DVDs are a big part of the monetization of movies, yet movies are only a small part of media company profitability. Most of the media company profits are from cable channels. </p>
<p>The second you start distributing movies and TV content freely online, consumers move away from cable. Once that happens, media company profits dry up.  </p>
<p>Unlike the recording industry, the media company&#8217;s don&#8217;t have all of their eggs in the CD (or in this case DVD) basket. Therefore, they can fully resist online distribution. They really just need to keep the Internet-to-TV link fully DRM protected (read: block Hulu to Boxee).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2706523</link>
		<dc:creator>cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2706523</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand is what makes it more profitable to make/distribute DVD&#039;s when you only have to make 1 copy of a movie digitally and then distribute electronically millions of times? If you have to make a million DVD&#039;s doesn&#039;t that cost more? 

I understand there are streaming cost, but isn&#039;t that cost shared buy the consumer? And wouldn&#039;t that cost be the similar to shipping all the DVD&#039;s to Netfilx, Blockbuster, Wal-Mart, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is what makes it more profitable to make/distribute DVD&#8217;s when you only have to make 1 copy of a movie digitally and then distribute electronically millions of times? If you have to make a million DVD&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t that cost more? </p>
<p>I understand there are streaming cost, but isn&#8217;t that cost shared buy the consumer? And wouldn&#8217;t that cost be the similar to shipping all the DVD&#8217;s to Netfilx, Blockbuster, Wal-Mart, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Media Buzz - Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model &#124; Digital Media Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2706283</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Media Buzz - Hollywood Has A Great Online Distribution Model &#124; Digital Media Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2706283</guid>
		<description>[...] On the surface, it seems like Hollywood is doing a better job of getting consumers to use their approved methods for transferring content over the web — but the reality is that it’s a mess. And the only reason piracy isn’t so rampant in the US is that our broadband speeds, for the most part, suck&#8230;&#8230;..[read entire article] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the surface, it seems like Hollywood is doing a better job of getting consumers to use their approved methods for transferring content over the web — but the reality is that it’s a mess. And the only reason piracy isn’t so rampant in the US is that our broadband speeds, for the most part, suck&#8230;&#8230;..[read entire article] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2705832</link>
		<dc:creator>patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2705832</guid>
		<description>heli4all.com is really use to snack traffic to our site 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heli4all.com is really use to snack traffic to our site </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollywoods Content Dilemma: Warum Film-Dienste im Netz nicht funktionieren &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2705802</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollywoods Content Dilemma: Warum Film-Dienste im Netz nicht funktionieren &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2705802</guid>
		<description>[...] ist selbst schuld an seiner Misere im Netz, so das Fazit eines lesenswerten Artikel von MG Siegler: Die Studios sind nach wie vor zu restriktiv mit ihrem Content. Mittlerweile gibt es verschiedene [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ist selbst schuld an seiner Misere im Netz, so das Fazit eines lesenswerten Artikel von MG Siegler: Die Studios sind nach wie vor zu restriktiv mit ihrem Content. Mittlerweile gibt es verschiedene [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2705794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2705794</guid>
		<description>that last sentence was not finished. 

If you could download a movie at $2.99 like we do Rogers/AT&amp;T, and Quebecor could no longer force you to buy their preconfigured DVRs or use their on demand movie services, they would lose money. A lot of money. The same money that keeps them in those cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that last sentence was not finished. </p>
<p>If you could download a movie at $2.99 like we do Rogers/AT&amp;T, and Quebecor could no longer force you to buy their preconfigured DVRs or use their on demand movie services, they would lose money. A lot of money. The same money that keeps them in those cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2705790</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2705790</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon Techcrunch style for you. The CEO of the parent company of Videotron, QuebecOr&#039;s son is the Tyler Cavell of mediascrape. The same Tyler that threatened to sue TechCrunch and failed. The same Tyler&#039;s who&#039;s best friend Conrad Black is sitting in a federal penitentiary in Florida.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourview/2007/03/conrad_black_trial_set_to_open.html#78519

Why wasn&#039;t Conrad sought after in Canada? Because of their cars. Those nice cars all the low pay public servants in Gatineau and Ottawa drive.

So Tyler&#039;s dad is directly responsible for Canadians not being able to stream movies or use TiVo. Him and a few select others including your ministers. If you could download a movie at $2.99 like we do Rogers/AT&amp;T, and Quebecor could no longer force you to buy their preconfigured DVRs or use their on demand movie services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon Techcrunch style for you. The CEO of the parent company of Videotron, QuebecOr&#8217;s son is the Tyler Cavell of mediascrape. The same Tyler that threatened to sue TechCrunch and failed. The same Tyler&#8217;s who&#8217;s best friend Conrad Black is sitting in a federal penitentiary in Florida.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourview/2007/03/conrad_black_trial_set_to_open.html#78519" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourview/2007/03/conrad_black_trial_set_to_open.html#78519'>http://www.cbc....open.html#78519</a></p>
<p>Why wasn&#8217;t Conrad sought after in Canada? Because of their cars. Those nice cars all the low pay public servants in Gatineau and Ottawa drive.</p>
<p>So Tyler&#8217;s dad is directly responsible for Canadians not being able to stream movies or use TiVo. Him and a few select others including your ministers. If you could download a movie at $2.99 like we do Rogers/AT&amp;T, and Quebecor could no longer force you to buy their preconfigured DVRs or use their on demand movie services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/18/hollywood-has-a-great-online-distribution-model-if-you-hate-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-2705741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=57555#comment-2705741</guid>
		<description>http://www.videotron.com/services/en/internet/comparer-ihv.jsp

&quot;high speed&quot; internet

30 GB   
combined*
By combined they mean upload and download

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Hi-Speed_Internet

Rogers &quot;Express&quot; high speed internet

Express 	7.0 Mbit/s 	512 kbit/s 	60 GB 	$44.95

Both of these have port 80 blocked so that people have to sign up to $200 + &quot;business&quot; services to run as little as a home WAMP(Windows/Apache) server to have their website run off of a home PC

Let&#039;s go to mobile now:

thomaspurves.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/

Canada Worse than 3rd World Countries when it comes to Mobile Data Access

Movies on the G1 ???

Oh yeah, that&#039;s right, you can&#039;t have a Google Android phone can you? 

Apple has an exclusive contract with AT&amp;T/Rogers, and they have the only 3G network thanks to ITAC, the government of Canada, and the fact that the minister of public works was a geniune Mafia gang boss, Namely A. Gagliano from Ontario and Montreal.

That&#039;s who was dishing out the IT contracts with YOUR money Canadian dumbasses. I was in Ottawa and I sat in on their board meeting where they discussed illegal trust activity. I asked for documents from the public works department and was denied because they didn&#039;t want me to make them public. They would NEVER speak on the record.

And they drive VERY, VERY NICE CARS for people on a public servant salary. VERY NICE CARS. Cars that are far beyond their means.

That is your government of Canada.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_affair
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsorship_scandal
citynews.ca/news/news_20128.aspx

Want to know who BDC invests in or EDC??

Oh, you&#039;re Canadian, you simply blindly trust the italians, uneducated, and idiot franch, and first nation indians that run your life. 

Burn down Ottawa. Do it. That&#039;s the only way you can possibly make your pathetic country any different. When we threw tea in the harbor, you sat there picking your noses, wanking off wondering when you were going to get more &quot;rights&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.videotron.com/services/en/internet/comparer-ihv.jsp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.videotron.com/services/en/internet/comparer-ihv.jsp'>http://www.vide...omparer-ihv.jsp</a></p>
<p>&#8220;high speed&#8221; internet</p>
<p>30 GB<br />
combined*<br />
By combined they mean upload and download</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Hi-Speed_Internet</p>
<p>Rogers &#8220;Express&#8221; high speed internet</p>
<p>Express 	7.0 Mbit/s 	512 kbit/s 	60 GB 	$44.95</p>
<p>Both of these have port 80 blocked so that people have to sign up to $200 + &#8220;business&#8221; services to run as little as a home WAMP(Windows/Apache) server to have their website run off of a home PC</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go to mobile now:</p>
<p>thomaspurves.com/2007/04/09/canada-worse-than-3rd-world-countries-when-it-comes-to-mobile-data-access/</p>
<p>Canada Worse than 3rd World Countries when it comes to Mobile Data Access</p>
<p>Movies on the G1 ???</p>
<p>Oh yeah, that&#8217;s right, you can&#8217;t have a Google Android phone can you? </p>
<p>Apple has an exclusive contract with AT&amp;T/Rogers, and they have the only 3G network thanks to ITAC, the government of Canada, and the fact that the minister of public works was a geniune Mafia gang boss, Namely A. Gagliano from Ontario and Montreal.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s who was dishing out the IT contracts with YOUR money Canadian dumbasses. I was in Ottawa and I sat in on their board meeting where they discussed illegal trust activity. I asked for documents from the public works department and was denied because they didn&#8217;t want me to make them public. They would NEVER speak on the record.</p>
<p>And they drive VERY, VERY NICE CARS for people on a public servant salary. VERY NICE CARS. Cars that are far beyond their means.</p>
<p>That is your government of Canada.</p>
<p>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_affair<br />
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsorship_scandal<br />
citynews.ca/news/news_20128.aspx</p>
<p>Want to know who BDC invests in or EDC??</p>
<p>Oh, you&#8217;re Canadian, you simply blindly trust the italians, uneducated, and idiot franch, and first nation indians that run your life. </p>
<p>Burn down Ottawa. Do it. That&#8217;s the only way you can possibly make your pathetic country any different. When we threw tea in the harbor, you sat there picking your noses, wanking off wondering when you were going to get more &#8220;rights&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
