YouTube Takes Aim At Hulu With “Party Of Five”
by Jason Kincaid on April 16, 2009

YouTube announced today new measures it is taking to more prominently feature and broaden the range of content available on the site from studios including Crackle/Sony Pictures, CBS, MGM, Lionsgate, Starz, the BBC, Anime Network, Cinetic Rights Management, Current TV, Discovery, Documentary Channel, First Look Studios, IndieFlix, National Geographic. The site will now feature a new ‘Shows’ tab in the YouTube masthead, which will allow users to browse through television content by genre, network, title, and popularity (sounds like Hulu, doesn’t it?). The site now features thousands of full TV episodes, as well as hundreds of movies. Some videos will be available in HD.

At this point the majority of content will come from older TV shows and movies – series like ‘Party of Five’ and ‘Married With Children’, not the current seasons we’ve been seeing on Hulu. But more deals are in the works, and I suspect that barring a disastrous response to YouTube’s premium content we’ll be seeing newer show in the next few months. The site is also refining its search options, making it easier to separate the new premium content from the user-generate videos the site has become famous for.

Finally, the site is announcing a new advertising product called “Google TV Ads Online”. The product allows advertisers to place TV-like commercials within the new premium content offerings on the site. This is a significant addition, because it gives advertisers who are used to traditional TV advertising through Google’s TV Ads product a way to easily post the same ads online – they effectively just have to click a box saying they’d like to distribute their ads across all forms of a television program, included those streamed in YouTube. From the press release:

We’re excited to announce the beta launch of Google TV Ads Online. This is a new feature of Google TV Ads that lets advertisers place commercials into the ad breaks of TV programs watched online. It works in the same way as Google TV Ads: advertisers can target specific programs and select their cost-per-thousand (CPM) bid. Based on their targets, budget and bid, ads are inserted in the same program breaks that were designed for advertising when the programs first aired. (Ads may also be shown “pre-roll”, before the program begins, or after the online presentation of the program “post-roll.”) And like Google TV ads, we provide advertisers with measurement tools that give greater insight into how their ads perform with users.

Advertisement

Responses

Comments rss icon

  • Heard it here first: YouTube is now and will forever be a stupid joke site! Google — you will NEVER get me to think about YouTube as a serious property.

  • Good because Hulu don’t work north of the 49th parallel.

  • Advertising on Web 2.0 sites is normally not positive news for the community and the users of the sites.

    Especially, because users don’t need advertising!

    What YouTube should really do is to apply more “twitter like” features and put pictures next to the comments etc

    Also they should open new categories like “business” etc

    The great news is that YouTube will get more content and therefore attract even more visitors and momentum

    Lasse

    • “Especially, because users don’t need advertising!”..

      Yeah right. Speak for yourself. I will gladly sit through some commercials if it is going to bring me the movie for free. It is better than no movie at all. Hope you realize that advertisements keep a lot of stuff free for the end users. Learn to be a bit annoyed for free stuff.

  • founder.umoja.com - April 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pm PDT

    hmm. So basically Hulu is ahead in content that advertisers are actually interested in?

    • not for long.

      • founder.umoja.com - April 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pm PDT

        Who knows? Hulu is really phenomenal when it comes to the included content. Techcrunch and Google mocked Hulu incessentantly as “clown co,” but now, as you stipulate Hulu has a strong advantage.

        My guess is Google can continue to buy their way into the market, but I’m sure Microsoft will begin to bid these contracts up in value as well — both for a video site and for silverlight plug-ins.

        In other words, this shows it is back about content and not so much about technology (and current audience) — and that is not good for Youtube.

  • I think it’s nice that YouTube is trying something different, but it shouldn’t forget that UGC is what made YouTube what it is today.

    I think they should separate off in to three differently branded sections to satisfy everyone;

    1. YouTube (Regular UGC, links at the top prominently feature the other two YouTube sites as tabs to switch between)

    2. YouTube:Vevo (Features Music)

    3. YouTube:Hulu (Obviously not hulu, but whatever they want to call it. This would have videos)

    The three sites should also be coloured differently. YouTube – the usual grey; YouTube: Vevo – Red; YouTube:Hulu – Green or other.

    Just a thought…

  • I don’t think Youtube can be better than Hulu for this.

  • This was just bound to happen. Maybe YouTube might gain some revenue through this avenue.

    *shrugs*

  • of course, having them cut into 10 minute sections will be annoying (j/k)

  • Do you know if it will be available to watch in U.S. only?

  • youtube is a pain with all the cr@p on the page, hulu is cleaner. youtube content is poor quality.

  • You guys can say what you want, but I think YouTube will always be bigger and more popular than Hulu. It’s YOUTUBE!

    Just wait, after a few months You Tube will be the video site of choice. It’s not even a match in my opinion.

  • I can not see that in the UK
    ””’???

  • I don’t understand why it’s called “Party of five”. Every damn episode somebody was crying…what kind of party is that?

  • Last Boss of the Internet - April 16th, 2009 at 4:23 pm PDT

    youtube needs a deal like this since it is very hard and risky to try to monetize user generated content.

    Partnering with content providers is a good way to bring in some revenue. I believe youtube makes most of its money through advertisements along partnered content and this deal will expand it.

    Hulu is only available to US because hulu and the content providers want to give advertisers a more focused target market. These media companies will more than likely ask youtube to do the same thing.

  • I just dont get Google these days

  • Well, they are not doing a good job of it. Gives me an HTTP 500!

  • Good design very clean, no significant change in turms of the business model, still hamstrung by licensing walled gardens, but a step in the right direction should see YT positioned well in the entertainment flux of things, to take advantage of change as it unfolds.

    It keeps coming back to that word,…Monetization!

  • When I go to “shows” it says:
    500 Internal Server Error

    Sorry, something went wrong.

    A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.
    Also, please include the following information in your error report:

  • YouTube is not Hulu - April 16th, 2009 at 6:24 pm PDT

    YouTube was supposed to be about YOU not the corporations.

    User submitted content, though it may be crap, is what made YouTube what it is. Illegal uploaded content made YouTube what it is.

    YouTube is not Hulu.

    That said, YouTube could become more like Hulu but there will be consequences..

    Oh well…

  • youtube has really crossed the line

    http://www.youtube.com/bbc

    more than a quarter of the videos on this channel
    are this video is not available in your country
    the United States of America, americans are being censored out of youtube content, on our website
    now this, BBC???
    I don’t look at youtube anymore, cause if it goes all tv shit there will be more videos not available to americans , it is censoring, americans have a
    right to view all content on an american website
    has youtube google moved?

  • It doesn’t work on Apple TV.
    Shows are not showed as part of the search results.

  • I’m trying it out right now, but the video is choppy.

  • that’s a great news, very usefull for people leaving in europe or just out if the US, can’t watch hulu from the old world, and it’s just too slow with a proxy.

  • Just found out, it doesn’t work yet for Germany, but from what I’ve read they made the promise to give access to international Users!

  • If YouTube gets all the old stuff and Hulu only has new episodes (like they have done in the past), I’d say YouTUbe might win this war. I love catching up on stuff I missed more than watching new stuff just coming out. No cliff hangers that way. No waiting for the new season at all. FTR-The BBC channel works fine for me and I’m from America too.

    • Hello Mark :)

      http://www.yout...bbcteethgrinder

      this can be added to the list of video content
      that’s not available to Americans, on a American website no doubt
      There are more channels to come
      And so ya know, if you looked and clicked and got
      this video is not available in your country

      You are now a censored american
      Welcome to the club :)

      • Chill, man. Websites and businesses like YouTube are not nation bound. Some content is. So far.

        • http://www.aclu.org/

          wrong, I live in America, which means I can see ALL, no matter what the content is
          It is a bonehead messege it gives off in the first place – this video is not available in your country – I can see a thumbnail, I can the the view count, it is there, no?
          Secondly, the bbc says it is to poor to provide all video content? Then it should not be there until the broke bbc can afford to

          What’s the excuse here

          http://www.yout...bbcteethgrinder

          it’s the internet, and I know I have a right to see
          everything…
          so this where it begins, where does it end up?
          More to follow, it’s wrong to be censored out of content on an American website, there are all kinds, freedom of speech, freedom of expression,
          Americans cannot post a comment to these videos
          either, it’s just a matter of time
          bbc will have to either make these videos available or remove them, youtube should suspend the account, breaking federall laws

          http://www.yout...com/beijing2008

          enjoy :)

          more to follow

        • Search the Web on Snap.com - April 22nd, 2009 at 7:16 am PDT

          LOL

          Law enforcement, the military, the cia
          I know maybe this stuff should be shared with
          the president and his family, oop
          if his ass is in America, they can’t see
          I’m not getting in this, I know it’s wrong
          I just don’t do youtube or google for that matter
          I don’t wanna see, keep it

        • http://www.aclu.org

          wrong, it’s the internet, and I know I have a right to see everything

          http://www.yout...com/beijing2008

          my other post was deleted I wonder why

          enjoy :)

  • Michael,

    You should really address the threat posed by common carriers to the video dreams of Hulu and YouTube.

    ISPs (many of whom are cable providers) can refuse to carry this programming. And they’re doing so by throttling bandwidth and experimenting with metered charges for video consumers.

    Cable providers are not going to allow sites like Hulu to make it possible for people to cancel their cable television, and this threat will hobble anything that Hulu and YouTube attempt.

  • so let me get this straight….one simple question.

    does this mean that the every day ‘joe the plumbers’ can upload they’re recorded video content w/out yougootube getting their panties in a bunch and removing the videos?

    or does it mean that YouGooTube will be the ones uploaded the video content and banking big time?

    video sharing…bad if the public does it

    not so bad if google does it….

  • a comment about cable (pssst cable companies….listen up….you might wanna read this) you might think you’re losing business because of sites like hulu…but your wrong.

    i do not have cable…. no… i subscribe to the dish network instead.

    so do about 60% percent of the residents of my apartment complex…..well, they don’t ALL have dish network….some have dish and others have direct tv…

    why?

    interesting question.

    about 4 years ago, i called my cable company and asked them why they #1 didn’t offer more programming and #2 why they didn’t offer more international channels (besides the 500 spanish channels the currently have)…

    you see, companies like dish network provide international programming for folks like me who happen to speak more than one langauge. for example, i happen to speak arabic…. the dish network has about 10+ channels from the middle east. They also offer french programming, asian programming, you name it.

    well, i called my cable company and asked the simple question….’if the dish network can offer this service to me, why can’t you’…

    do you know what happened? I got the rudest son of a bitch on the line to say, ‘well….we don’t have many people that request this kind of service, so if you’re unhappy with us, you can just leave’

    well…i did leave… and now some 4 years later hundreds of other unhappy customers have left cable as well…. i think back then, cable was king of the hill….so satisfying one customer didn’t mean much at the time….but 1, 10, 100, 1000, 100000 unhappy customers? well….now you’ve got a problem…

    my point is this…..sites like hulu and the net isn’t killing cable…. cable is killing cable…

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

Trackback URL
Short URL
bugbugbugbug
Techcrunch on Facebook