<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Ready To Renew Acquisition Talks With IBM, If They Promise To Walk The Walk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:04:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tahir Akram</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2704197</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahir Akram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2704197</guid>
		<description>MaggieL, I was saying this because Microsoft PDC also held in Pakistan. O yeah I am collecting $ if I can fly to SF for JavaOne :) but it require huge....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MaggieL, I was saying this because Microsoft PDC also held in Pakistan. O yeah I am collecting $ if I can fly to SF for JavaOne <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but it require huge&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2703633</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2703633</guid>
		<description>The problem is Sun doesn&#039;t realize that Open source supports communism not capitalism. No wonder they are begging to be bought out by IBM. Lack of coherent business model anyone? EPIC FAIL...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is Sun doesn&#8217;t realize that Open source supports communism not capitalism. No wonder they are begging to be bought out by IBM. Lack of coherent business model anyone? EPIC FAIL&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2702784</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2702784</guid>
		<description>Note to Sun executives:
Reality check, Sun&#039;s business model has not worked since the dot com bust. Stop living in a bubble and trying to take the easy way out by selling to IBM.

3 ways to save Sun:
1. new disruptive technology: I don&#039;t see anything earth shattering on this front.

2. shed LOBs that are sucking $$: shed unprofitable HW lines and shift to providing more services.

3. chop off the head of the beast: GET RID OF ALL EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT! The have failed miserably for 8 years.

Sun can survive if they&#039;re forced to choose option 3 and implement parts of 2. A new executive management, with a solid business background and a much smaller, leaner company can get thru tough times and stickaround for when the economy improves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Sun executives:<br />
Reality check, Sun&#8217;s business model has not worked since the dot com bust. Stop living in a bubble and trying to take the easy way out by selling to IBM.</p>
<p>3 ways to save Sun:<br />
1. new disruptive technology: I don&#8217;t see anything earth shattering on this front.</p>
<p>2. shed LOBs that are sucking $$: shed unprofitable HW lines and shift to providing more services.</p>
<p>3. chop off the head of the beast: GET RID OF ALL EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT! The have failed miserably for 8 years.</p>
<p>Sun can survive if they&#8217;re forced to choose option 3 and implement parts of 2. A new executive management, with a solid business background and a much smaller, leaner company can get thru tough times and stickaround for when the economy improves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verschobene Elefantenhochzeit: Sun und IBM nach wie vor Gesprächsbereit &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2702471</link>
		<dc:creator>Verschobene Elefantenhochzeit: Sun und IBM nach wie vor Gesprächsbereit &#124; TechFieber &#124; Hot Gadget Blog. Smart Tech News.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2702471</guid>
		<description>[...] Sun Ready To Renew Acquisition Talks With IBM, If They Promise To Walk The Walk   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sun Ready To Renew Acquisition Talks With IBM, If They Promise To Walk The Walk   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2702404</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2702404</guid>
		<description>No one is mentioning StorageTek, which was acquired by Sun for $4Bn a while back.  I don&#039;t know what StorageTek is worth these days, but they are one of IBM&#039;s big competitors in storage, especially in tape robotics.  

I think besides Java and ZFS  Sun may have some hardware technology IBM would like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is mentioning StorageTek, which was acquired by Sun for $4Bn a while back.  I don&#8217;t know what StorageTek is worth these days, but they are one of IBM&#8217;s big competitors in storage, especially in tape robotics.  </p>
<p>I think besides Java and ZFS  Sun may have some hardware technology IBM would like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun、IBMとの買収交渉再開へ、ただし有言実行が条件</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2702312</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun、IBMとの買収交渉再開へ、ただし有言実行が条件</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2702312</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TECHNOLOGY &#171; Daily Marauder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2702128</link>
		<dc:creator>TECHNOLOGY &#171; Daily Marauder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2702128</guid>
		<description>[...] latter makes a stronger commitment to actually closing the deal, according to Bloomberg sources. (http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-t... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latter makes a stronger commitment to actually closing the deal, according to Bloomberg sources. (<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-t.." rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-t'>http://www.tech...-they-promise-t</a>... [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2701436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2701436</guid>
		<description>Sun has done a ton for the industry and continues to innovate. NFS, Java, Solaris/Opensolaris, VirtualBox and ZFS. Not to mention they now own MySQL which runs the majority of your silly startups. They need to stick around and not get run into the ground by IBM, like everything else they take on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun has done a ton for the industry and continues to innovate. NFS, Java, Solaris/Opensolaris, VirtualBox and ZFS. Not to mention they now own MySQL which runs the majority of your silly startups. They need to stick around and not get run into the ground by IBM, like everything else they take on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falafulu  Fisi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2701431</link>
		<dc:creator>Falafulu  Fisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2701431</guid>
		<description>CNCB said...
&lt;i&gt;IBM doesn’t want Sun at any price. IBM is concerned over a anti-trust review by the Justice dept.&lt;/i&gt;

This is why the anti-trust law is an a$$hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNCB said&#8230;<br />
<i>IBM doesn’t want Sun at any price. IBM is concerned over a anti-trust review by the Justice dept.</i></p>
<p>This is why the anti-trust law is an a$$hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2701141</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Sleuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2701141</guid>
		<description>Sun needs this to stay alive at this point, as its been a struggling company for years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun needs this to stay alive at this point, as its been a struggling company for years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNBC Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2701129</link>
		<dc:creator>CNBC Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2701129</guid>
		<description>CNBC said this morning the deal was dead. 

IBM doesn&#039;t want Sun at any price. IBM is concerned over a anti-trust review by the Justice dept.

IBM got a chance to look under the hood, didn&#039;t like what they saw and walked.

Maybe Sun will get a chance to put the dot in the dot com again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC said this morning the deal was dead. </p>
<p>IBM doesn&#8217;t want Sun at any price. IBM is concerned over a anti-trust review by the Justice dept.</p>
<p>IBM got a chance to look under the hood, didn&#8217;t like what they saw and walked.</p>
<p>Maybe Sun will get a chance to put the dot in the dot com again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2701026</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2701026</guid>
		<description>You mean Sun&#039;s people are so smart and experienced that they can&#039;t convince customers to pay diddly-squat for their products? Yes, Sun would make quite a unique service company - one that can&#039;t even charge for its services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean Sun&#8217;s people are so smart and experienced that they can&#8217;t convince customers to pay diddly-squat for their products? Yes, Sun would make quite a unique service company &#8211; one that can&#8217;t even charge for its services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaggieL</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700993</link>
		<dc:creator>MaggieL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700993</guid>
		<description>Tahir, would you just buy a ticket to SF like everybody else does and quit whining all over the intarweb that JavaOne should be moved to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tahir, would you just buy a ticket to SF like everybody else does and quit whining all over the intarweb that JavaOne should be moved to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700957</link>
		<dc:creator>eCurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700957</guid>
		<description>Rather than selling Sun off to IBM, I&#039;d rather see an acknowledgment that Sun&#039;s outlived whatever usefulness it may have once had and instead shut down in an orderly manner.

Sell off the technology bits that may still have value in the market (Java to IBM or Oracle, parts of Solaris to Apple, other software to Red Hat, etc.), open-source the remaining unsold/unsellable bits, liquidate the assets, pay off the stockholders and call it a day.

This would also have the advantage of releasing a talented pool of developers and engineers out into the wild to spawn a new generation of start-ups, not unlike what happened when Netscape and Silicon Graphics imploded.

While we&#039;re at it, can we do the same thing for Yahoo as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than selling Sun off to IBM, I&#8217;d rather see an acknowledgment that Sun&#8217;s outlived whatever usefulness it may have once had and instead shut down in an orderly manner.</p>
<p>Sell off the technology bits that may still have value in the market (Java to IBM or Oracle, parts of Solaris to Apple, other software to Red Hat, etc.), open-source the remaining unsold/unsellable bits, liquidate the assets, pay off the stockholders and call it a day.</p>
<p>This would also have the advantage of releasing a talented pool of developers and engineers out into the wild to spawn a new generation of start-ups, not unlike what happened when Netscape and Silicon Graphics imploded.</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re at it, can we do the same thing for Yahoo as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter Twitterer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700909</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter Twitterer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700909</guid>
		<description>This is a bad deal for IBM, if they get tied into a commitment to purchase even if the regulators force tough terms or divestiture of business as part of the deal.

If I were Sam, I would cool my jets for 6-9 months - Sun isn&#039;t going anywhere soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bad deal for IBM, if they get tied into a commitment to purchase even if the regulators force tough terms or divestiture of business as part of the deal.</p>
<p>If I were Sam, I would cool my jets for 6-9 months &#8211; Sun isn&#8217;t going anywhere soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700903</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700903</guid>
		<description>Sun is a unique position to be a service company: they&#039;re not trying to sell software licenses and can freely recommend non-free software. Even with hardware they make, half their line is generic x86 servers. Plus, they have a large group of very smart and experienced people to build on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun is a unique position to be a service company: they&#8217;re not trying to sell software licenses and can freely recommend non-free software. Even with hardware they make, half their line is generic x86 servers. Plus, they have a large group of very smart and experienced people to build on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700884</link>
		<dc:creator>James Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700884</guid>
		<description>No Robin,

What Sun is saying is we tried the Jerry Yang tactic for holding out for a better offer.  Unfortunately IBM called us on ou bluff.  Now our stock is in freefall.  Save our asses, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Robin,</p>
<p>What Sun is saying is we tried the Jerry Yang tactic for holding out for a better offer.  Unfortunately IBM called us on ou bluff.  Now our stock is in freefall.  Save our asses, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tahir Akram</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700882</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahir Akram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700882</guid>
		<description>I read in some news that SUN CEO Jonathan Shwartz wants this acquisition to be happen where as SUN&#039;s open source division head is against it. SUN really needs brand promotion and more industry participation programs. JavaOne conference should be localized to other countries. And SUN should launch developer recognition programs. There are hell of things to do first before going towards this silly acquisition stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read in some news that SUN CEO Jonathan Shwartz wants this acquisition to be happen where as SUN&#8217;s open source division head is against it. SUN really needs brand promotion and more industry participation programs. JavaOne conference should be localized to other countries. And SUN should launch developer recognition programs. There are hell of things to do first before going towards this silly acquisition stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vengu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700870</link>
		<dc:creator>Vengu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700870</guid>
		<description>Haiyoooo Haiyooo.... Another no from IBM is gona push sun stock to go down to 0$ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haiyoooo Haiyooo&#8230;. Another no from IBM is gona push sun stock to go down to 0$ .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/16/sun-ready-to-renew-acquisition-talks-with-ibm-if-they-promise-to-walk-the-walk/comment-page-1/#comment-2700869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56961#comment-2700869</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not welcoming this purchase, it can only end badly for Solaris and MySQL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not welcoming this purchase, it can only end badly for Solaris and MySQL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
