<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decision Time For Facebook: Term Sheet Received At $2 Billion Valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:07:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: von der kunst der beschränkung - qrios is it</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-3/#comment-2826461</link>
		<dc:creator>von der kunst der beschränkung - qrios is it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2826461</guid>
		<description>[...] Unabhängige Berechnungen gehen momentan davon aus, dass für jeden neuen Benutzer einen Dollar allein in Hardware investieren muss. Zusammen mit allen anderen laufenden Kosten summiert sich der monatliche Verlust bei mehr als 600.000 neuen Usern pro Monat auf etwa 20 Mio Dollar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unabhängige Berechnungen gehen momentan davon aus, dass für jeden neuen Benutzer einen Dollar allein in Hardware investieren muss. Zusammen mit allen anderen laufenden Kosten summiert sich der monatliche Verlust bei mehr als 600.000 neuen Usern pro Monat auf etwa 20 Mio Dollar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeSeeThroughIt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-2760084</link>
		<dc:creator>WeSeeThroughIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2760084</guid>
		<description>Microsoft never valued Facebook at $15bn - it was a con of numbers:
http://weseethroughit.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/the-facebook-microsoft-valuation-con/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft never valued Facebook at $15bn &#8211; it was a con of numbers:<br />
<a href="http://weseethroughit.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/the-facebook-microsoft-valuation-con/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://weseethroughit.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/the-facebook-microsoft-valuation-con/'>http://weseethr...-valuation-con/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would you pay $1 a month for Facebook? &#171; UW- Software Training for Students</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-3/#comment-2757917</link>
		<dc:creator>Would you pay $1 a month for Facebook? &#171; UW- Software Training for Students</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2757917</guid>
		<description>[...] this year, it&#8217;s burning through millions of dollars a month (some claim it&#8217;s as high as $20 million), with no magic levers to reverse the trend in the short [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, it&#8217;s burning through millions of dollars a month (some claim it&#8217;s as high as $20 million), with no magic levers to reverse the trend in the short [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-3/#comment-2755493</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Facebook Turns Down $8 billion Valuation Term Sheet, Claims 2009 Revenues Will Be $550 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2755493</guid>
		<description>[...] that Facebook was looking to raise 0 million in debt. We reported on early term sheets in the  billion range. Even Google was sniffing around the company to see if they could buy it on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Facebook was looking to raise 0 million in debt. We reported on early term sheets in the  billion range. Even Google was sniffing around the company to see if they could buy it on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Should Facebook charge app developers rent?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-3/#comment-2751189</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Should Facebook charge app developers rent?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2751189</guid>
		<description>[...] scrutinised, and Twitter is under fire for lacking a business model. Reports put Facebook&#8217;s burn rate as high as m a month as it pays for its massive growth. Yet Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg says the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scrutinised, and Twitter is under fire for lacking a business model. Reports put Facebook&#8217;s burn rate as high as m a month as it pays for its massive growth. Yet Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg says the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 意思決定を求められるFacebook：$2Bの評価額によるタームシートを受け取り</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-3/#comment-2724862</link>
		<dc:creator>意思決定を求められるFacebook：$2Bの評価額によるタームシートを受け取り</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2724862</guid>
		<description>[...] ［原文へ］ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ［原文へ］ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2724711</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2724711</guid>
		<description>[...] range. This is almost exactly what we reported earlier when we learned that Facebook may have received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation from General Atlantic. The New York Post, however, claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] range. This is almost exactly what we reported earlier when we learned that Facebook may have received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation from General Atlantic. The New York Post, however, claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2723744</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2723744</guid>
		<description>[...] in the company in the $2 billion to $3 billion valuation range. We earlier reported that Facebook received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation, but the New York Post claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the company in the $2 billion to $3 billion valuation range. We earlier reported that Facebook received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation, but the New York Post claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2723675</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Rumored To Be Looking For Funding At $5-6 Billion Valuation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2723675</guid>
		<description>[...] in the company in the $2 billion to $3 billion valuation range. We earlier reported that Facebook received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation, but the New York Post claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the company in the $2 billion to $3 billion valuation range. We earlier reported that Facebook received a term sheet for an investment at a $2 billion valuation, but the New York Post claims no term sheets have been drawn up to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirtualDeity &#187; Where Does Your Data Go When Part of the Cloud Evaporates?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2714302</link>
		<dc:creator>VirtualDeity &#187; Where Does Your Data Go When Part of the Cloud Evaporates?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2714302</guid>
		<description>[...] now; but Google&#8217;s down, Microsoft&#8217;s down, Yahoo&#8217;s down (clearly), and Facebook has valuation problems of its own.  Old-timers (early adopters) have years of their history stored in the Twitter data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now; but Google&#8217;s down, Microsoft&#8217;s down, Yahoo&#8217;s down (clearly), and Facebook has valuation problems of its own.  Old-timers (early adopters) have years of their history stored in the Twitter data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-2712755</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2712755</guid>
		<description>WOW: 


Facebook Stock Traded Down To $3 Billion 

http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-stock-down-to-3-billion-2009-4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW: </p>
<p>Facebook Stock Traded Down To $3 Billion </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-stock-down-to-3-billion-2009-4" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-stock-down-to-3-billion-2009-4'>http://www.busi...-billion-2009-4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Facebook Stock Down To $3 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2712024</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Facebook Stock Down To $3 Billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2712024</guid>
		<description>[...] week Mike Arrington wrote a post on Facebook turning down an offer to invest at a $2bn valuation. I left a comment on that post saying that I thought that $2bn price was low given the prices being [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week Mike Arrington wrote a post on Facebook turning down an offer to invest at a $2bn valuation. I left a comment on that post saying that I thought that $2bn price was low given the prices being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La publicitat al Facebook &#124; OUIEA.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2708087</link>
		<dc:creator>La publicitat al Facebook &#124; OUIEA.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2708087</guid>
		<description>[...] apuntar bé en la publicitat, ja que acostuma a ser bona part dels beneficis de la pàgina. Segons diuen a TechCrunch, Facebook paga 20 milions de dòlars de manteniment mensualment. Déu n&#8217;hi dó, no? Potser [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] apuntar bé en la publicitat, ja que acostuma a ser bona part dels beneficis de la pàgina. Segons diuen a TechCrunch, Facebook paga 20 milions de dòlars de manteniment mensualment. Déu n&#8217;hi dó, no? Potser [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Football Match News &#124; What&#8217;s Going on with Facebook&#8217;s Valuation?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2707037</link>
		<dc:creator>Football Match News &#124; What&#8217;s Going on with Facebook&#8217;s Valuation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2707037</guid>
		<description>[...] none confirmed, are circulating today about Facebook&#8217;s latest attempts at raising funding. TechCrunch says that Facebook has been shopping itself around at a $4 billion valuation somewhat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] none confirmed, are circulating today about Facebook&rsquo;s latest attempts at raising funding. TechCrunch says that Facebook has been shopping itself around at a $4 billion valuation somewhat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Going on with Facebook&#8217;s Valuation? &#124; GoSocial.us : Building Brands in Social Media and Online Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2706357</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Going on with Facebook&#8217;s Valuation? &#124; GoSocial.us : Building Brands in Social Media and Online Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2706357</guid>
		<description>[...] none confirmed, are circulating today about Facebook&#8217;s latest attempts at raising funding. TechCrunch says that Facebook has been shopping itself around at a $4 billion valuation somewhat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] none confirmed, are circulating today about Facebook&rsquo;s latest attempts at raising funding. TechCrunch says that Facebook has been shopping itself around at a $4 billion valuation somewhat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Would you pay to use Facebook? &#124; Web Design Blog by Union Room Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2706264</link>
		<dc:creator>Would you pay to use Facebook? &#124; Web Design Blog by Union Room Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2706264</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft acquired a $240million stake in Facebook in late 2007, that stake valued the company at approximately $15billion.  However after trouble finding ways to make money through the service, chief executive and creator of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg has found the valuation of the company declining alarmingly.  It&#8217;s reported that Zuckerberg recently turned down funding which valued the company at $4billion, and that a possible new investor has gone in at an even lower $2billion valuation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft acquired a $240million stake in Facebook in late 2007, that stake valued the company at approximately $15billion.  However after trouble finding ways to make money through the service, chief executive and creator of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg has found the valuation of the company declining alarmingly.  It&#8217;s reported that Zuckerberg recently turned down funding which valued the company at $4billion, and that a possible new investor has gone in at an even lower $2billion valuation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew S</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2705549</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2705549</guid>
		<description>I have a simple plan which will guarantee Facebook a $100 billion valuation.

Here&#039;s how it will work:
1. Given that there are about 800M shares, I will offer $125 US for one share in this new offering.
2. Your new valuation will be $125 x 800 M, or $100 billion.
3. You will pay me a nominal 0.1% commission on the increase in valuation my plan has given you: [$100 billion (new valuation) - $3 billion (current valuation) ] * .01 = $97 M

I look forward to doing business with you, Facebook.

Andrew (Nigerian Prince)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a simple plan which will guarantee Facebook a $100 billion valuation.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it will work:<br />
1. Given that there are about 800M shares, I will offer $125 US for one share in this new offering.<br />
2. Your new valuation will be $125 x 800 M, or $100 billion.<br />
3. You will pay me a nominal 0.1% commission on the increase in valuation my plan has given you: [$100 billion (new valuation) - $3 billion (current valuation) ] * .01 = $97 M</p>
<p>I look forward to doing business with you, Facebook.</p>
<p>Andrew (Nigerian Prince)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-2705525</link>
		<dc:creator>William Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2705525</guid>
		<description>@Zach Weisman

Blu-ray uses MPEG-2, an older codec at bit rate up to 35MBPS.

Newer codecs like VC-1 (WMV AP) can achieve similar results at only 1/10 of the bit rate
You can however stream 35MBPS but all of your customers would need powerful computers with at least a 50MBPS fiber connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zach Weisman</p>
<p>Blu-ray uses MPEG-2, an older codec at bit rate up to 35MBPS.</p>
<p>Newer codecs like VC-1 (WMV AP) can achieve similar results at only 1/10 of the bit rate<br />
You can however stream 35MBPS but all of your customers would need powerful computers with at least a 50MBPS fiber connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garc&#237;a Carmona weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2705516</link>
		<dc:creator>Garc&#237;a Carmona weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2705516</guid>
		<description>[...] negocios de las comunidades 2.0. La publicidad para serlo pero aun el camino no esta claro. En este articulo Techcrunch nos dice que Facebook va por su nueva ronda de financiacion a pesar de su crecimiento geometrico y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] negocios de las comunidades 2.0. La publicidad para serlo pero aun el camino no esta claro. En este articulo Techcrunch nos dice que Facebook va por su nueva ronda de financiacion a pesar de su crecimiento geometrico y [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muuvii</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2704897</link>
		<dc:creator>Muuvii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2704897</guid>
		<description>If I read the plug above correctly, muuvii is a facebook-digital playground mashup. Social Pornetworking. Not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I read the plug above correctly, muuvii is a facebook-digital playground mashup. Social Pornetworking. Not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-1/#comment-2704365</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2704365</guid>
		<description>Yes, but how many millions of facebook users would have to get mommy or daddy&#039;s credit card to continue in the game? Moreover, how many users don&#039;t have a credit card? Not only are many users overseas where payment processing hasn&#039;t been fully adapted, its very expensive to process trans where available. Also, studies have shown the avg. FB user isn&#039;t -- how to best say this -- affluent at all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but how many millions of facebook users would have to get mommy or daddy&#8217;s credit card to continue in the game? Moreover, how many users don&#8217;t have a credit card? Not only are many users overseas where payment processing hasn&#8217;t been fully adapted, its very expensive to process trans where available. Also, studies have shown the avg. FB user isn&#8217;t &#8212; how to best say this &#8212; affluent at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2704260</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2704260</guid>
		<description>What is the question? IPO already - I and citizens of Earth will easily buy up to 2B market cap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the question? IPO already &#8211; I and citizens of Earth will easily buy up to 2B market cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not so mighty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2704157</link>
		<dc:creator>Not so mighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2704157</guid>
		<description>So muuvii is basically a Facebook-Digital Playground mashup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So muuvii is basically a Facebook-Digital Playground mashup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not so mighty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2704155</link>
		<dc:creator>Not so mighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2704155</guid>
		<description>Facebook will never be in the same league as Google because you must be both registered and logged in to use its features, and it&#039;s about only one thing--social relationships. 

Google requires nothing other than a query (no login or registration), and it&#039;s about everything. Any one of these issues is at least one order of magnitude as far as broad appeal and usefulness. Combine them all and Google eats Facebook for lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook will never be in the same league as Google because you must be both registered and logged in to use its features, and it&#8217;s about only one thing&#8211;social relationships. </p>
<p>Google requires nothing other than a query (no login or registration), and it&#8217;s about everything. Any one of these issues is at least one order of magnitude as far as broad appeal and usefulness. Combine them all and Google eats Facebook for lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/decision-time-for-facebook-term-sheets-received-at-2-billion-valuation/comment-page-2/#comment-2703925</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56872#comment-2703925</guid>
		<description>Will, cant agree with everything althought you pointing out good points, bro.

I cant agree with your opinion that&quot;you dont create something that a mass over 200 million users [...] because you just lucky&quot;. Well, it is honestly 80% of luck, the rest is application itself. When you start designing any application you never set the goal whether for 1,000 users or for one million, or for 500 millions. You just go with the flow. There are other applications out there similar worse or better than facebook in functionality, but in IT like anywhere else popularity waightes alot. Facebook got lucky with good name and clean outlook. But thats not because there are bunch of geniouses working behind it, nope. If that would be true, you could always take 50 nerds put them in a box and came up with a multi-billion company. Unfortunately, it does not work this way and this world proved you got people not-too-smart getting ideas and technology in place and walking away as million- or billionares, yet you got smart people with great experience going nowhere, shutting down their ideas.. 
You may want to pay for facebook even $500 a month if you feel so. Me and bunch of my friends will NEVER pay for that kind of application. And neither EVER we would have to. There are other fish swimming in this pond and once Facebook will limit itself to some kind of fees, other will jump on subject and create new, (who knows?) maybe better application again being free of charge. Thats simple. As of email I totally dont need another email address, no thank you sir enough options around the net.
You cant anyhow anyway compare students social platform where people go to chat and exchange some info with LinkedIn which is focused on business and workers profiles. They can charge even $50 a month and I WOULD PAY because I know how much advantage I get all the time from being visible online thorugh that application so my business credit can stay high. Nowhere to compare with FB.
It is indeed VERY HARD for facebook start the money flow. If it wouldnt, dont you think all VC and owners would jump on that horse long time ago?? Nope. They all can imagine users decline going sharp up versus myspace going down because guess what again other fish in pond, and FB will never be paid platform until others do so. The moment they start charging for content YOU and other users PROVIDE, thats their end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, cant agree with everything althought you pointing out good points, bro.</p>
<p>I cant agree with your opinion that&#8221;you dont create something that a mass over 200 million users [...] because you just lucky&#8221;. Well, it is honestly 80% of luck, the rest is application itself. When you start designing any application you never set the goal whether for 1,000 users or for one million, or for 500 millions. You just go with the flow. There are other applications out there similar worse or better than facebook in functionality, but in IT like anywhere else popularity waightes alot. Facebook got lucky with good name and clean outlook. But thats not because there are bunch of geniouses working behind it, nope. If that would be true, you could always take 50 nerds put them in a box and came up with a multi-billion company. Unfortunately, it does not work this way and this world proved you got people not-too-smart getting ideas and technology in place and walking away as million- or billionares, yet you got smart people with great experience going nowhere, shutting down their ideas..<br />
You may want to pay for facebook even $500 a month if you feel so. Me and bunch of my friends will NEVER pay for that kind of application. And neither EVER we would have to. There are other fish swimming in this pond and once Facebook will limit itself to some kind of fees, other will jump on subject and create new, (who knows?) maybe better application again being free of charge. Thats simple. As of email I totally dont need another email address, no thank you sir enough options around the net.<br />
You cant anyhow anyway compare students social platform where people go to chat and exchange some info with LinkedIn which is focused on business and workers profiles. They can charge even $50 a month and I WOULD PAY because I know how much advantage I get all the time from being visible online thorugh that application so my business credit can stay high. Nowhere to compare with FB.<br />
It is indeed VERY HARD for facebook start the money flow. If it wouldnt, dont you think all VC and owners would jump on that horse long time ago?? Nope. They all can imagine users decline going sharp up versus myspace going down because guess what again other fish in pond, and FB will never be paid platform until others do so. The moment they start charging for content YOU and other users PROVIDE, thats their end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
