<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Official: Twitter Is More Popular Than Britney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:13:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twittering Me Crazy &#171; Three Screens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-3031822</link>
		<dc:creator>Twittering Me Crazy &#171; Three Screens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-3031822</guid>
		<description>[...] I found the following two articles to be interesting. One deals with how Twitter is now fully more popular than Britney Spears (although I thought less and less people like her every day). The other article discusses how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found the following two articles to be interesting. One deals with how Twitter is now fully more popular than Britney Spears (although I thought less and less people like her every day). The other article discusses how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am surrounded by Social Media &#8211; The NSI Partners Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2734343</link>
		<dc:creator>I am surrounded by Social Media &#8211; The NSI Partners Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2734343</guid>
		<description>[...] I become more aware of these systems,  I am noticing that the world is all a-Twitter; I can&#8217;t believe how many times I hear people talking about Twitter or read articles about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I become more aware of these systems,  I am noticing that the world is all a-Twitter; I can&#8217;t believe how many times I hear people talking about Twitter or read articles about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: West Karana » Weblog 4/17</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2702831</link>
		<dc:creator>West Karana » Weblog 4/17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2702831</guid>
		<description>[...] trying to figure out how to use Twitter to extract money from you, the casual Twitter user. Why is Twitter suddenly more in the news than Facebook or MySpace (anyone remember [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trying to figure out how to use Twitter to extract money from you, the casual Twitter user. Why is Twitter suddenly more in the news than Facebook or MySpace (anyone remember [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After 30 Days of Blogging, How Useful is Twitter for Attracting Readers? - Free Pursuits</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2701182</link>
		<dc:creator>After 30 Days of Blogging, How Useful is Twitter for Attracting Readers? - Free Pursuits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2701182</guid>
		<description>[...] that Twitter has become a wildly popular service. It&#8217;s now a more popular search term on Google than Britney Spears. For all its popularity though, people still constantly ask me what Twitter is useful for, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Twitter has become a wildly popular service. It&#8217;s now a more popular search term on Google than Britney Spears. For all its popularity though, people still constantly ask me what Twitter is useful for, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jardenberg kommenterar - 2009-04-16 — jardenberg unedited</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2700373</link>
		<dc:creator>jardenberg kommenterar - 2009-04-16 — jardenberg unedited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2700373</guid>
		<description>[...] It’s Official: Twitter Is More Popular Than Britney [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It’s Official: Twitter Is More Popular Than Britney [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699849</link>
		<dc:creator>ONLINE SERVICES/INTERACTIVE MEDIA &#171; Daily Marauder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699849</guid>
		<description>[...] grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March &#124; Reviews Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699824</link>
		<dc:creator>Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March &#124; Reviews Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699824</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems aforementioned Twitter is ontogeny faster and faster apiece day, that is because it is. ComScore has free its March drawing for the U.S., and it estimates that unequalled visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 proportionality between Feb and March to 9.3 meg visitors. No astonishment Twitter is more favourite than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems aforementioned Twitter is ontogeny faster and faster apiece day, that is because it is. ComScore has free its March drawing for the U.S., and it estimates that unequalled visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 proportionality between Feb and March to 9.3 meg visitors. No astonishment Twitter is more favourite than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699510</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699510</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699509</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699509</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Now More Popular Than Britney Spears &#124; Blippitt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699496</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Now More Popular Than Britney Spears &#124; Blippitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699496</guid>
		<description>[...] has surpassed &#8220;Britney&#8221;, and has even caught up to &#8220;Obama&#8221; according to Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has surpassed &#8220;Britney&#8221;, and has even caught up to &#8220;Obama&#8221; according to Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March &#124; The Good NET Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699474</link>
		<dc:creator>Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March &#124; The Good NET Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699474</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Television Spy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699333</link>
		<dc:creator>Television Spy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699333</guid>
		<description>I think the little blue magpie already has the media coverage to rival her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the little blue magpie already has the media coverage to rival her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 &#124; ProvoBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699219</link>
		<dc:creator>Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 &#124; ProvoBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699219</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699209</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique U.S. Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699209</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699181</link>
		<dc:creator>Boom! Twitter More Than Doubles Unique Visitors To 9.3 Million In March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699181</guid>
		<description>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If it seems like Twitter is growing faster and faster each day, that is because it is. ComScore has released its March numbers for the U.S., and it estimates that unique visitors to Twitter.com grew 131 percent between February and March to 9.3 million visitors. No wonder Twitter is more popular than Britney. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleksander M. Stensby</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2699161</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleksander M. Stensby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2699161</guid>
		<description>I agree that some of the search traffic may be the result of people being lazy and using firefox etc., but when we did a brief analysis of discussions occuring online during the same time period, we see the exact same trends :)

We did a short blog entry inspired by the google trends here:
http://bit.ly/2hCn3v</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that some of the search traffic may be the result of people being lazy and using firefox etc., but when we did a brief analysis of discussions occuring online during the same time period, we see the exact same trends <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We did a short blog entry inspired by the google trends here:<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/2hCn3v" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/2hCn3v'>http://bit.ly/2hCn3v</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698903</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698903</guid>
		<description>Well I am not that surprised...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am not that surprised&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698901</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698901</guid>
		<description>If you abandon or boycott Twitter you&#039;ll simply take yourself from the loop. What were you saying about SMS when it came out? Twitter&#039;s simply SMS internet-style, but much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you abandon or boycott Twitter you&#8217;ll simply take yourself from the loop. What were you saying about SMS when it came out? Twitter&#8217;s simply SMS internet-style, but much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Licencia Creativa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter es más popular que Britney</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698830</link>
		<dc:creator>Licencia Creativa &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter es más popular que Britney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698830</guid>
		<description>[...] Visto en: TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visto en: TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fun watching the chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698751</link>
		<dc:creator>fun watching the chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698751</guid>
		<description>More functional? QUE?

For a 40 year old concept to it&#039;s release to y&#039;all in the eighties or so...looks fine to me.

What do you expect? A huge accounting site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More functional? QUE?</p>
<p>For a 40 year old concept to it&#8217;s release to y&#8217;all in the eighties or so&#8230;looks fine to me.</p>
<p>What do you expect? A huge accounting site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="529135704">Ramzi Yakob</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698559</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="529135704">Ramzi Yakob</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698559</guid>
		<description>Traffic figures will become increasingly less important as the web takes on more functional role.

Transaction figures will be king. As a previous commenter has mentioned, the reason traffic figures will dwindle is because experienced Twitterers use 3rd party apps such as Twhirl or Destroy Twitter.

Twitter isn&#039;t a destination - its a platform. Talking about Twitter in traffic figures rather than actual users is like talking about the number of visitors to the Android website as opposed to the number of people who use it on their handsets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic figures will become increasingly less important as the web takes on more functional role.</p>
<p>Transaction figures will be king. As a previous commenter has mentioned, the reason traffic figures will dwindle is because experienced Twitterers use 3rd party apps such as Twhirl or Destroy Twitter.</p>
<p>Twitter isn&#8217;t a destination &#8211; its a platform. Talking about Twitter in traffic figures rather than actual users is like talking about the number of visitors to the Android website as opposed to the number of people who use it on their handsets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698514</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698514</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a lot of hype remember when google bought their rival jaiku in 2007 or 2006 because they had better technology you wonder why google doesnt need to buy twitter because the member base is nothing they need they already get 500,000,000 hits a month assuming they put jaiku on their homepage for a day it would be the same as twitter. There is really no point to twitter. Text your friends you dont need to let them all know your in the mall shopping at Victorias Secret for your wife do you? I dont know maybe you do. For me its a obvious no brainer. NO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a lot of hype remember when google bought their rival jaiku in 2007 or 2006 because they had better technology you wonder why google doesnt need to buy twitter because the member base is nothing they need they already get 500,000,000 hits a month assuming they put jaiku on their homepage for a day it would be the same as twitter. There is really no point to twitter. Text your friends you dont need to let them all know your in the mall shopping at Victorias Secret for your wife do you? I dont know maybe you do. For me its a obvious no brainer. NO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fun watching the chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698307</link>
		<dc:creator>fun watching the chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698307</guid>
		<description>twiter is QUAD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twiter is QUAD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fun watching the chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698305</link>
		<dc:creator>fun watching the chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698305</guid>
		<description>dude!

Album: Circus

Big single last year: Womanizer

Is the food good on the starbase :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude!</p>
<p>Album: Circus</p>
<p>Big single last year: Womanizer</p>
<p>Is the food good on the starbase <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fun watching the chaos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/14/its-official-twitter-is-more-popular-than-britney/comment-page-1/#comment-2698302</link>
		<dc:creator>fun watching the chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=56246#comment-2698302</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t try Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t try Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
