<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Shutters Unpopular Alexa Site Thumbnail Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:55:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-3006865</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-3006865</guid>
		<description>I am using http://www.sitethumbshot.com/ for sometime. I guess their services are good and price is less than most of other similar thumbnail service providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using <a href="http://www.sitethumbshot.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.sitethumbshot.com/'>http://www.sitethumbshot.com/</a> for sometime. I guess their services are good and price is less than most of other similar thumbnail service providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thumber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2972217</link>
		<dc:creator>Thumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2972217</guid>
		<description>Your best alternative is screenthumbs.com! It offers so much and is very customizable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your best alternative is screenthumbs.com! It offers so much and is very customizable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Thumbnails</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2787024</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Thumbnails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2787024</guid>
		<description>I use http://snapcasa.com also.  The free service is very generous and their customer service is great. 

Alexa&#039;s service failed because it was extremely slow, snaps were rarely updated, and it did not have any features of snapcasa.  I wonder how snapcasa was able to compete with amazon with their prices being so low?

I tried shrinktheweb but they could not match the performance and snapshot accuracy of snapcasa.  They also cost twice as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use <a href="http://snapcasa.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://snapcasa.com'>http://snapcasa.com</a> also.  The free service is very generous and their customer service is great. </p>
<p>Alexa&#8217;s service failed because it was extremely slow, snaps were rarely updated, and it did not have any features of snapcasa.  I wonder how snapcasa was able to compete with amazon with their prices being so low?</p>
<p>I tried shrinktheweb but they could not match the performance and snapshot accuracy of snapcasa.  They also cost twice as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoPe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2702773</link>
		<dc:creator>CoPe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2702773</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using http://www.thumbshots.com on my http://iKr.me site and it works perfectly. Although I am now considering switching to http://www.pageglimpse.com only because of bigger sized thumbs as an added bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://www.thumbshots.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.thumbshots.com'>http://www.thumbshots.com</a> on my <a href="http://iKr.me" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://iKr.me'>http://iKr.me</a> site and it works perfectly. Although I am now considering switching to <a href="http://www.pageglimpse.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.pageglimpse.com'>http://www.pageglimpse.com</a> only because of bigger sized thumbs as an added bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webpage Thumbnails — Screenshots via Page Glimpse in JavaScript at 925 HTML</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2697559</link>
		<dc:creator>Webpage Thumbnails — Screenshots via Page Glimpse in JavaScript at 925 HTML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2697559</guid>
		<description>[...] that same day TechCrunch ran an article about this announcement and users posted alternate services in the comments, which included Page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that same day TechCrunch ran an article about this announcement and users posted alternate services in the comments, which included Page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattmcb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2673866</link>
		<dc:creator>mattmcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2673866</guid>
		<description>This stinks, but other options are thumbalizr, websnapr.com, and shrink the web.
Try the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sthrt.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;best homepage&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stinks, but other options are thumbalizr, websnapr.com, and shrink the web.<br />
Try the <a href="http://sthrt.com" rel="nofollow">best homepage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2663560</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2663560</guid>
		<description>I agree. I got turned to shrinktheweb because they really took their time to talk to me about the options they offer. That&#039;s great customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I got turned to shrinktheweb because they really took their time to talk to me about the options they offer. That&#8217;s great customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2662508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2662508</guid>
		<description>That guy who called ShrinkTheWeb a spammer clearly doesn&#039;t know his feet from his butt.  You opt in for the emails when you sign up for their service.  And nothing in the emails say &quot;Comment on us or your service will be canceled&quot;  Its not like they have a gun to your head, is it?  I like thier service, therefore im recommending them.   http://www.shrinktheweb.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That guy who called ShrinkTheWeb a spammer clearly doesn&#8217;t know his feet from his butt.  You opt in for the emails when you sign up for their service.  And nothing in the emails say &#8220;Comment on us or your service will be canceled&#8221;  Its not like they have a gun to your head, is it?  I like thier service, therefore im recommending them.   <a href="http://www.shrinktheweb.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.shrinktheweb.com'>http://www.shrinktheweb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2662127</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2662127</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems like the price was too high&quot;

I agree to an extent. I think the pricing was very reasonable, except that you had to pay for every impression and no option to download permanently. That was always my problem with using Alexa&#039;s Thumbnail service. Whenever Google/Yahoo/MSN would send a search engine spider to my site, I got charged for thousands of impressions.

However, that was my only real concern with their service. Otherwise, it was very cutting edge and someone provided some sample PHP4 code that worked well. So, it was secure and usable. It at least gave me some direction in my various web projects, until I eventually decided to start ShrinkTheWeb. I needed something more cost-effective and being able to keep a copy of the image on my own server was the key.

Cheers,

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems like the price was too high&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree to an extent. I think the pricing was very reasonable, except that you had to pay for every impression and no option to download permanently. That was always my problem with using Alexa&#8217;s Thumbnail service. Whenever Google/Yahoo/MSN would send a search engine spider to my site, I got charged for thousands of impressions.</p>
<p>However, that was my only real concern with their service. Otherwise, it was very cutting edge and someone provided some sample PHP4 code that worked well. So, it was secure and usable. It at least gave me some direction in my various web projects, until I eventually decided to start ShrinkTheWeb. I needed something more cost-effective and being able to keep a copy of the image on my own server was the key.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Brandon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lary Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661920</link>
		<dc:creator>Lary Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661920</guid>
		<description>yeah..I agree Morten...LOL...the service itself pretends to be good and great with all sorts of &quot;HUNGRY&quot; Comments..where the actual users didn&#039;t like it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah..I agree Morten&#8230;LOL&#8230;the service itself pretends to be good and great with all sorts of &#8220;HUNGRY&#8221; Comments..where the actual users didn&#8217;t like it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2661913</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661913</guid>
		<description>i consider the quality of the screenshots are much more better than Shrinkweb and girafa..isnt it? compare mate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i consider the quality of the screenshots are much more better than Shrinkweb and girafa..isnt it? compare mate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2661908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661908</guid>
		<description>The best of the lot... i tried giraffa, shrinkweb but I found Thumbhots.com service the best..its cost effective,great post sales services (within 24 hrs) and great new coding quality of thumbnails...I am content with thumbshots and i will stick to it no matter what goes off and in :D

http://www.thumbshots.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best of the lot&#8230; i tried giraffa, shrinkweb but I found Thumbhots.com service the best..its cost effective,great post sales services (within 24 hrs) and great new coding quality of thumbnails&#8230;I am content with thumbshots and i will stick to it no matter what goes off and in <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thumbshots.org" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.thumbshots.org'>http://www.thumbshots.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quickie the Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-2/#comment-2661827</link>
		<dc:creator>Quickie the Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661827</guid>
		<description>We are between Girafa and Shrinktheweb.com.

But I think Shrinktheweb will take it because of their great service and their vast selection of offerings. They are also cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are between Girafa and Shrinktheweb.com.</p>
<p>But I think Shrinktheweb will take it because of their great service and their vast selection of offerings. They are also cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="595768420">George Rodriguez</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661824</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="595768420">George Rodriguez</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661824</guid>
		<description>ShrinktheWeb all the way. They have great service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShrinktheWeb all the way. They have great service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661747</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661747</guid>
		<description>I run a few successful specialised directories and have never taken into consideration website screenshot paid services before.

In my opinion, considering the current market offering, Alexa did not reall offer a flexible (sizes, internal pages) and competitive (cost) service. 

Why to pay for a service that can be matched and/or beaten by other cheaper or free services? The only reason I can think is the Alexa brand/service long estsablished reputation and reliability.

Currently, there are many alternatives for this screenshot service.

During my personal research, I prepared and compared 5 thumbnail services in this page:
http://www.4icu.org/ws.htm

The list is not exhaustive and this techcrunch page made me aware of interesting services that I was not informed of before.

To me it is extremely important to have noninvasive error messages when thumbnail are queued or not available. I do not like cheap or invasive messages appearing in my directories from thumbnail service providers.

Currently I adopt STW free service for a directory of newspapers I have: 4imn.com

In another directory I use software that save thumbnails in my hard disk and, then upload them in the website image folder. It is however very time consuming and does not update screenshots automatically....

In my personal experience a good thumbnail service should be:

- fast
- reliable and working all the time
- able to take good screenshots of any webpage, including internal pages/subdomains and flash pages.
- easy to implement
- provide customised options such as &quot;delay time&quot; before getting the website screenshot (especially for flash pages), different sizes, refresh/update options (website screenshots do get old!)

Do your research before committing to any particular service. If possible test their free service first and then, if needed, upgrade to the best paid service which meets your needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run a few successful specialised directories and have never taken into consideration website screenshot paid services before.</p>
<p>In my opinion, considering the current market offering, Alexa did not reall offer a flexible (sizes, internal pages) and competitive (cost) service. </p>
<p>Why to pay for a service that can be matched and/or beaten by other cheaper or free services? The only reason I can think is the Alexa brand/service long estsablished reputation and reliability.</p>
<p>Currently, there are many alternatives for this screenshot service.</p>
<p>During my personal research, I prepared and compared 5 thumbnail services in this page:<br />
<a href="http://www.4icu.org/ws.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.4icu.org/ws.htm'>http://www.4icu.org/ws.htm</a></p>
<p>The list is not exhaustive and this techcrunch page made me aware of interesting services that I was not informed of before.</p>
<p>To me it is extremely important to have noninvasive error messages when thumbnail are queued or not available. I do not like cheap or invasive messages appearing in my directories from thumbnail service providers.</p>
<p>Currently I adopt STW free service for a directory of newspapers I have: 4imn.com</p>
<p>In another directory I use software that save thumbnails in my hard disk and, then upload them in the website image folder. It is however very time consuming and does not update screenshots automatically&#8230;.</p>
<p>In my personal experience a good thumbnail service should be:</p>
<p>- fast<br />
- reliable and working all the time<br />
- able to take good screenshots of any webpage, including internal pages/subdomains and flash pages.<br />
- easy to implement<br />
- provide customised options such as &#8220;delay time&#8221; before getting the website screenshot (especially for flash pages), different sizes, refresh/update options (website screenshots do get old!)</p>
<p>Do your research before committing to any particular service. If possible test their free service first and then, if needed, upgrade to the best paid service which meets your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon zavírá službu Alexa Site Thumbnail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661513</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon zavírá službu Alexa Site Thumbnail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661513</guid>
		<description>[...] zprávy pro Girafa a PageGlimpse které komentátoři na TechCrunchi uvedli jako [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zprávy pro Girafa a PageGlimpse které komentátoři na TechCrunchi uvedli jako [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661315</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661315</guid>
		<description>I am using shrinktheweb.com and i think best website screenshot service on the web.

I retrieve screenshot without problem and fast.

if you interest just go :http://www.shrinktheweb.com

Best Regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using shrinktheweb.com and i think best website screenshot service on the web.</p>
<p>I retrieve screenshot without problem and fast.</p>
<p>if you interest just go :http://www.shrinktheweb.com</p>
<p>Best Regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edoc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2661083</link>
		<dc:creator>Edoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2661083</guid>
		<description>I use ShrinkTheWeb to create site thumbnails at my company (a large travel co). Works great for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use ShrinkTheWeb to create site thumbnails at my company (a large travel co). Works great for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Sleuth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660933</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Sleuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660933</guid>
		<description>From what I heard, the service was mediocre and not advertised well, so no shock really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I heard, the service was mediocre and not advertised well, so no shock really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa Site Thumbnails wird eingestellt &#187; Webdesign . TYPO3 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660783</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa Site Thumbnails wird eingestellt &#187; Webdesign . TYPO3 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660783</guid>
		<description>[...] sind ab sofort nicht mehr m&#246;glich und laut dem Artikel bei techcrunch.com wird der laufende Betrieb nur noch bis zum 12. Juni 2009 aufrecht [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sind ab sofort nicht mehr m&#246;glich und laut dem Artikel bei techcrunch.com wird der laufende Betrieb nur noch bis zum 12. Juni 2009 aufrecht [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miroslav Suchý</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660265</link>
		<dc:creator>Miroslav Suchý</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660265</guid>
		<description>http://www.thumbnail.cz will offer API in month.
Thumbnails are updated very often. The range goes from every day update for most pages to once in week for pages that did not changed for year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thumbnail.cz" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.thumbnail.cz'>http://www.thumbnail.cz</a> will offer API in month.<br />
Thumbnails are updated very often. The range goes from every day update for most pages to once in week for pages that did not changed for year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660241</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660241</guid>
		<description>http://www.shrinktheweb.com is a great service, try it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.shrinktheweb.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.shrinktheweb.com'>http://www.shrinktheweb.com</a> is a great service, try it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten Skogly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660125</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Skogly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660125</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m testing a service called SnapCasa.com, and I&#039;ve made a simple wordpress plugin for sucking in my delicious bookmarks and presenting them as a grid of thumbnails. Works great in my opinion, see it in action and get the plugin here: 
http://pappmaskin.no/inspiration/

The speed of thumbnail generation varies alot, but it usually is pretty fast. The snapcasa website is quite lacking in documentation, so you have to poke around a little to find out how to link to the thumbs (or you can just check the properties of the images on my site).




And please stop plugging Shrink the web, one or two comments is great, but asking all your customers to come here and promote it is just bad behaviour. This is getting close to spam.

I tested shrink the web but hated the website, impossible to find info, and it seemed like it (at least the free service) wasn&#039;t able to create thumbs for pages below the front page, when I tested with my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m testing a service called SnapCasa.com, and I&#8217;ve made a simple wordpress plugin for sucking in my delicious bookmarks and presenting them as a grid of thumbnails. Works great in my opinion, see it in action and get the plugin here:<br />
<a href="http://pappmaskin.no/inspiration/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://pappmaskin.no/inspiration/'>http://pappmask...no/inspiration/</a></p>
<p>The speed of thumbnail generation varies alot, but it usually is pretty fast. The snapcasa website is quite lacking in documentation, so you have to poke around a little to find out how to link to the thumbs (or you can just check the properties of the images on my site).</p>
<p>And please stop plugging Shrink the web, one or two comments is great, but asking all your customers to come here and promote it is just bad behaviour. This is getting close to spam.</p>
<p>I tested shrink the web but hated the website, impossible to find info, and it seemed like it (at least the free service) wasn&#8217;t able to create thumbs for pages below the front page, when I tested with my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoWORX</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660112</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoWORX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660112</guid>
		<description>shrinktheweb.com is the only current alternative. Period! I have tested them all, the big expensive ones, the small unreliable ones.

STW provides for free a service that other thumbnail providers charge a lot for. So imagine what level of customization you get from when you pay for the premium service...? 

I have been happily using it for over a year. That&#039;s the best I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shrinktheweb.com is the only current alternative. Period! I have tested them all, the big expensive ones, the small unreliable ones.</p>
<p>STW provides for free a service that other thumbnail providers charge a lot for. So imagine what level of customization you get from when you pay for the premium service&#8230;? </p>
<p>I have been happily using it for over a year. That&#8217;s the best I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Belen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/18/amazon-shutters-unpopular-alexa-site-thumbnail-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2660097</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Belen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=50267#comment-2660097</guid>
		<description>Alexa we all love STW it makes me so sad that you dont love them too and think those little thumbnails on your site wont be as pretty anymore.... so I agree with all the rest amd say &quot;Raise your hand if you love ShrinkTheWeb&quot;!!!!

Hope AWS &amp; Alexa come to their senses!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa we all love STW it makes me so sad that you dont love them too and think those little thumbnails on your site wont be as pretty anymore&#8230;. so I agree with all the rest amd say &#8220;Raise your hand if you love ShrinkTheWeb&#8221;!!!!</p>
<p>Hope AWS &amp; Alexa come to their senses!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
