<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rules Apply To Everyone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:13:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: If You&#8217;re Arrington The Rules Do Not Apply to You &#124; The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-3042195</link>
		<dc:creator>If You&#8217;re Arrington The Rules Do Not Apply to You &#124; The Blog Herald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-3042195</guid>
		<description>[...] looking at a long post about ethics and disclosure, written by Arrington more than half a year ago: The Rules Apply To Everyone. In the post the former lawyer went as far as saying that Dave Winer&#8217;s credibility was shot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking at a long post about ethics and disclosure, written by Arrington more than half a year ago: The Rules Apply To Everyone. In the post the former lawyer went as far as saying that Dave Winer&#8217;s credibility was shot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhhJohnny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-3011452</link>
		<dc:creator>OhhJohnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-3011452</guid>
		<description>Wow. My respect for you just shot up Mike. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. My respect for you just shot up Mike. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#171; Blog-Feast.com Blog Collection</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-3011045</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#171; Blog-Feast.com Blog Collection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-3011045</guid>
		<description>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogster and ICanHazCheezburger Join Ad Forces &#124; facternet:</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-3010888</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogster and ICanHazCheezburger Join Ad Forces &#124; facternet:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-3010888</guid>
		<description>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogster and ICanHazCheezburger Join Ad Forces</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-3010850</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogster and ICanHazCheezburger Join Ad Forces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-3010850</guid>
		<description>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But with the benefit of hindsight, Dogster has done two things very, very right: It never raised venture funding and never relied on an ad network for revenues.  The result is its network of sites&#8211; Dogster, Catster and Snuzzy&#8211; that focused on maximizing revenues early on instead of aiming for user growth for the sake of user growth. While many other Web 2.0 names are struggling to raise more money to stay in business, Dogster has been profitable since the second quarter of 2007 and is solidly in control of its own destiny. (Full disclosure: Michael Arrington was a very early angel investor. His statement about his investments is here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2736658</link>
		<dc:creator>tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2736658</guid>
		<description>[...] a public apology for not disclosing the paid placement: About a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a public apology for not disclosing the paid placement: About a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2736640</link>
		<dc:creator>tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2736640</guid>
		<description>[...] that was never disclosed to his users. This sparked a tempest in a TechMeme in which Mike Arrington dropped the hammer on Winer, declaring that his credibility was permanently shot by the secret deal. I am now obligated, under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that was never disclosed to his users. This sparked a tempest in a TechMeme in which Mike Arrington dropped the hammer on Winer, declaring that his credibility was permanently shot by the secret deal. I am now obligated, under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2736639</link>
		<dc:creator>tandemrandom.com &#187; Disclosing Paid Placements on a Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2736639</guid>
		<description>[...] that was never disclosed to his users. This sparked a tempest in a TechMeme in which Mike Arrington dropped the hammer on Winer, declaring that his credibility was permanently shot by the secret deal. I am now obligated, under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that was never disclosed to his users. This sparked a tempest in a TechMeme in which Mike Arrington dropped the hammer on Winer, declaring that his credibility was permanently shot by the secret deal. I am now obligated, under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conflicts of interest in tech &#124; Utku Çakır</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2733409</link>
		<dc:creator>Conflicts of interest in tech &#124; Utku Çakır</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2733409</guid>
		<description>[...] among journalists, but haven&#8217;t talked about the same thing for tech people. Mike Arrington tried to ignite a scandal around me over something that happened at UserLand in 2002, when I was on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] among journalists, but haven&#8217;t talked about the same thing for tech people. Mike Arrington tried to ignite a scandal around me over something that happened at UserLand in 2002, when I was on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGF</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2694488</link>
		<dc:creator>DGF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2694488</guid>
		<description>Michael,

In his post, Dave Winer says that you were his lawyer. Is this true? If so, and you didn&#039;t disclose it in your own post, I&#039;d say that goes way beyond anything Winer may have done wrong.

DGF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>In his post, Dave Winer says that you were his lawyer. Is this true? If so, and you didn&#8217;t disclose it in your own post, I&#8217;d say that goes way beyond anything Winer may have done wrong.</p>
<p>DGF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tools and Middleware.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An apology to Radio users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2694450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tools and Middleware.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An apology to Radio users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2694450</guid>
		<description>[...] a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dv8-designs &#187; An apology to Radio users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2693430</link>
		<dc:creator>dv8-designs &#187; An apology to Radio users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2693430</guid>
		<description>[...] a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month ago, Mike Arrington ran an article at TechCrunch about a deal we did at UserLand in 2002 with Adam Curry, to include his RSS feed in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Newspaper Industry versus the Internets at don&#8217;t explain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2692622</link>
		<dc:creator>The Newspaper Industry versus the Internets at don&#8217;t explain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2692622</guid>
		<description>[...] a post about credibility in journalism, though specifically regarding conflicts of interest) in a recent editorial, Winer took a $10,000 bribe from the owner of a blog to surreptitiously insert it into the top [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post about credibility in journalism, though specifically regarding conflicts of interest) in a recent editorial, Winer took a $10,000 bribe from the owner of a blog to surreptitiously insert it into the top [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twa-Ching - Twitters Monetization Paths - ShoeMoney&#174;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2676440</link>
		<dc:creator>Twa-Ching - Twitters Monetization Paths - ShoeMoney&#174;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2676440</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington recently wrote a great post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington recently wrote a great post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The grand discussion on the future of journalism &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2668806</link>
		<dc:creator>The grand discussion on the future of journalism &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2668806</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch honcho Michael Arrington wrote about the tangles of real and perceived bias. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch honcho Michael Arrington wrote about the tangles of real and perceived bias. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As You Show, So Shall You Reap &#124; Sulmoz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2661971</link>
		<dc:creator>As You Show, So Shall You Reap &#124; Sulmoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2661971</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington&#8217;s post The Rules Apply To Everyone and Jermian Owyang&#8217;s A Public Apology to Mzing are clear examples that admitting you&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington&#8217;s post The Rules Apply To Everyone and Jermian Owyang&#8217;s A Public Apology to Mzing are clear examples that admitting you&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Late Mike.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2659196</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Late Mike.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2659196</guid>
		<description>You spend years cashing in on &quot;Pay for Play&quot; in TC and now you want to clean up your own act, and then have the nerve to lecture your readers on ethics.

No wonder you&#039;re being sued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spend years cashing in on &#8220;Pay for Play&#8221; in TC and now you want to clean up your own act, and then have the nerve to lecture your readers on ethics.</p>
<p>No wonder you&#8217;re being sued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stewart Scaring TC Straight?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2659042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stewart Scaring TC Straight?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2659042</guid>
		<description>Schonfeld: Stay quiet. 

Morons: this is TC running scared after Jon Stewart called out CNBC for being cheerleaders for the industry they cover, rather than non-conflicted reporters.

NOW TC wants to remove its legion of conflicts? 
Because Arrington has seen the light?

Spare me. 

You guys, Venturebeat and all the other shill blogs are part of the PROBLEM, and are in no position to lecture us on what the best soluiton is.

Unbridled arrogance run amok, and enabled by weasels like Erick. 

Shhhh, Schonfeld. You&#039;re too interwined with the industry to say anything except &quot;I&#039;m sorry.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schonfeld: Stay quiet. </p>
<p>Morons: this is TC running scared after Jon Stewart called out CNBC for being cheerleaders for the industry they cover, rather than non-conflicted reporters.</p>
<p>NOW TC wants to remove its legion of conflicts?<br />
Because Arrington has seen the light?</p>
<p>Spare me. </p>
<p>You guys, Venturebeat and all the other shill blogs are part of the PROBLEM, and are in no position to lecture us on what the best soluiton is.</p>
<p>Unbridled arrogance run amok, and enabled by weasels like Erick. </p>
<p>Shhhh, Schonfeld. You&#8217;re too interwined with the industry to say anything except &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Arrington, A Man in Full &#124; Marketing Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2658622</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Arrington, A Man in Full &#124; Marketing Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2658622</guid>
		<description>[...] inspired by reminding me something that I have long been cognizant of but had simply forgotten. Mike reminded me what it&#8217;s like to be a human being who&#8217;s poured his heart into somethin.... Mike&#8217;s post, entitled &#8220;The Rules Apply To Everyone,&#8221; reads on the surface like a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inspired by reminding me something that I have long been cognizant of but had simply forgotten. Mike reminded me what it&#8217;s like to be a human being who&#8217;s poured his heart into somethin&#8230;. Mike&#8217;s post, entitled &#8220;The Rules Apply To Everyone,&#8221; reads on the surface like a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaronontheweb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2658235</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaronontheweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2658235</guid>
		<description>Uh, What? Seems to me like this Anjali person has simply replaced the Locator spammer guy in the TechCrunch comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, What? Seems to me like this Anjali person has simply replaced the Locator spammer guy in the TechCrunch comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiding up before Deposition?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2657951</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiding up before Deposition?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2657951</guid>
		<description>Remuneration still exists in your world. Indirect remuneration, perhaps, but a confluct nonetheless. 

I point to your old Law Partner Gail Husick and Her Husband Brad, whose company Webaroo you endorsed without disclosing the fact that you and Gail co-authored a book together.

And what about the buddies you co-authored a patent with, Mike?

C&#039;mon, you still aren&#039;t telling the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remuneration still exists in your world. Indirect remuneration, perhaps, but a confluct nonetheless. </p>
<p>I point to your old Law Partner Gail Husick and Her Husband Brad, whose company Webaroo you endorsed without disclosing the fact that you and Gail co-authored a book together.</p>
<p>And what about the buddies you co-authored a patent with, Mike?</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, you still aren&#8217;t telling the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.O.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2656560</link>
		<dc:creator>G.O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2656560</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-3/#comment-2656436</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2656436</guid>
		<description>Michael:  Don´t give those statements by Winer a second thought.  Don´t get rid of your hard earned assets. Just disclose them (if you feel you have to) on a different page at TC.  Your reporting, and it reflects on all of TC, is very good and in line with journalism ethics. Keep going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:  Don´t give those statements by Winer a second thought.  Don´t get rid of your hard earned assets. Just disclose them (if you feel you have to) on a different page at TC.  Your reporting, and it reflects on all of TC, is very good and in line with journalism ethics. Keep going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schmoo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2656404</link>
		<dc:creator>Schmoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2656404</guid>
		<description>James Randi has a name for those without any kind of inbuilt bullshit-filter: &#039;credophiles&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Randi has a name for those without any kind of inbuilt bullshit-filter: &#8216;credophiles&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kartikay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/13/the-rules-apply-to-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-2656392</link>
		<dc:creator>Kartikay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=49585#comment-2656392</guid>
		<description>Nice attack dude .. i mean .. you connected your points so easily

wordy + dense comments + no substance = ignorance of IT field
blog = expert in Third World countries

let me add some for you, maybe you get my drift:

Any Name with Link = SPAMMER!!
SPAMMER! = starving indian blogger = expert
expert != ignorance of IT field

Yes, I&#039;m super smart and I&#039;m the next Zuckerberg. Thanks Eric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice attack dude .. i mean .. you connected your points so easily</p>
<p>wordy + dense comments + no substance = ignorance of IT field<br />
blog = expert in Third World countries</p>
<p>let me add some for you, maybe you get my drift:</p>
<p>Any Name with Link = SPAMMER!!<br />
SPAMMER! = starving indian blogger = expert<br />
expert != ignorance of IT field</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m super smart and I&#8217;m the next Zuckerberg. Thanks Eric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
