<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Developers Getting Antsy Over Verified Apps Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:25:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2842526</link>
		<dc:creator>ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2842526</guid>
		<description>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Fused &#187; So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2842090</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Fused &#187; So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2842090</guid>
		<description>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative &#124; Stoth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2842083</link>
		<dc:creator>So Much For That Idea. Facebook Has Killed Off Its Great Apps Initiative &#124; Stoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2842083</guid>
		<description>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guidelines, and wouldn&#8217;t spam users. Verified Apps finally launched in May after lengthy delays, with around 120 apps in the inaugural class. But the program was only meant to serve as the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Platform Grows Up: Verified Apps Soon Going Live</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2748988</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Platform Grows Up: Verified Apps Soon Going Live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2748988</guid>
		<description>[...] news has been a long time coming. Developers have been growing antsy since paying the program&#8217;s $375 annual fee without any indication as to when it would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news has been a long time coming. Developers have been growing antsy since paying the program&#8217;s $375 annual fee without any indication as to when it would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2740076</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 01:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2740076</guid>
		<description>Facebook is asleep at the wheel.  They have zero integrity.  They allow anyone to have an application, even offensive ones and Facebook will do anything for money.  They are shameless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook is asleep at the wheel.  They have zero integrity.  They allow anyone to have an application, even offensive ones and Facebook will do anything for money.  They are shameless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irony of Facebook (aka Verified Apps Program FAIL) &#124; StyleFeeder Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2703638</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irony of Facebook (aka Verified Apps Program FAIL) &#124; StyleFeeder Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2703638</guid>
		<description>[...] weeks (possibly months?) ago, which Facebook kindly sat on for an extended period of time (but this is normal, apparently). Basically, this program is supposed to give your app extra visibility and a good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weeks (possibly months?) ago, which Facebook kindly sat on for an extended period of time (but this is normal, apparently). Basically, this program is supposed to give your app extra visibility and a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2697810</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2697810</guid>
		<description>[...] We’re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply - a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch ‘early this year’), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We’re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply &#8211; a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch ‘early this year’), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2697809</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2697809</guid>
		<description>[...] We’re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply - a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch ‘early this year’), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We’re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply &#8211; a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch ‘early this year’), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week @ Technology Tricks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2696819</link>
		<dc:creator>MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week @ Technology Tricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2696819</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a 5 fee for developers to apply - a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a 5 fee for developers to apply &#8211; a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infoyourway.com &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2695471</link>
		<dc:creator>infoyourway.com &#187; MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2695471</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply - a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply &#8211; a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week &#124; Reviews Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2695440</link>
		<dc:creator>MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week &#124; Reviews Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2695440</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re ease waiting. In Nov Facebook announced that it would calculate a $375 gift for developers to administer - a gift that we likened to a protection racket. To attain matters worse, Facebook is streaming behindhand on the information (which was questionable to start &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are effort antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re ease waiting. In Nov Facebook announced that it would calculate a $375 gift for developers to administer &#8211; a gift that we likened to a protection racket. To attain matters worse, Facebook is streaming behindhand on the information (which was questionable to start &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are effort antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2695431</link>
		<dc:creator>MySpace To Launch Featured Apps Directory Next Week &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2695431</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply - a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re still waiting. In November Facebook announced that it would charge a $375 fee for developers to apply &#8211; a fee that we likened to a protection racket. To make matters worse, Facebook is running behind on the program (which was supposed to launch &#8216;early this year&#8217;), and developers are getting antsy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2656077</link>
		<dc:creator>H.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2656077</guid>
		<description>I feel for those who dumped almost 400$ for basically nothing (as it seems to be in many [most?] cases)?  I also don&#039;t necessarily have a great quantity of confidence in fb&#039;s ability to evaluate all the developers.  I&#039;d rather use an independent source for my digital security needs like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justaskgemalto.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;justaskgemato&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for those who dumped almost 400$ for basically nothing (as it seems to be in many [most?] cases)?  I also don&#8217;t necessarily have a great quantity of confidence in fb&#8217;s ability to evaluate all the developers.  I&#8217;d rather use an independent source for my digital security needs like <a href="http://www.justaskgemalto.com/" rel="nofollow">justaskgemato</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Developers Getting Antsy Over Verified Apps Program &#171; I Am Rajendra - Watch The World With Me&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2652311</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Developers Getting Antsy Over Verified Apps Program &#171; I Am Rajendra - Watch The World With Me&#8230;..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2652311</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted on March 12, 2009. Filed under: Facebook News &#124; Tags: Facebook, Verified Apps Program &#124;  By Michael Arrington [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted on March 12, 2009. Filed under: Facebook News | Tags: Facebook, Verified Apps Program |  By Michael Arrington [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjali sen is retard BABE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2652297</link>
		<dc:creator>anjali sen is retard BABE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2652297</guid>
		<description>RETARD BABE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RETARD BABE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2652080</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2652080</guid>
		<description>Wait, let me get this straight. When facebook apps first launched, being approved meant your application would show up in the apps search results. This was back when the application link was easily accessible, and generally all applications were treated like first class citizens. 

Forward to the present and you&#039;ll see 50,000+ apps in the repository. Most of the top performing developers have been screwed by facebook providing their own version of the popular apps. Other apps are carefully hidden as far away from the users as far as possible. 

They now want developers to pay $350 for a more prestigious status in the catalog. Most fb applications don&#039;t make that much in a year and those that do risk being killed by fb. Plus fb has been notorious for introducing drastic changes to the platform with little regard for developers or their business.

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, let me get this straight. When facebook apps first launched, being approved meant your application would show up in the apps search results. This was back when the application link was easily accessible, and generally all applications were treated like first class citizens. </p>
<p>Forward to the present and you&#8217;ll see 50,000+ apps in the repository. Most of the top performing developers have been screwed by facebook providing their own version of the popular apps. Other apps are carefully hidden as far away from the users as far as possible. </p>
<p>They now want developers to pay $350 for a more prestigious status in the catalog. Most fb applications don&#8217;t make that much in a year and those that do risk being killed by fb. Plus fb has been notorious for introducing drastic changes to the platform with little regard for developers or their business.</p>
<p>Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike H</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651999</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t too different from paying to be included in Yahoo&#039;s directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t too different from paying to be included in Yahoo&#8217;s directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ξεκίνησαν από σήμερα οι αλλαγές στην αρχική σελίδα του Facebook, αναμένοντας και στην Ελλάδα! - jooblers.gr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ξεκίνησαν από σήμερα οι αλλαγές στην αρχική σελίδα του Facebook, αναμένοντας και στην Ελλάδα! - jooblers.gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651890</guid>
		<description>[...] via] Tags: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via] Tags: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Fryxell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Fryxell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651729</guid>
		<description>Nice article! Check out my site too at http://macmaniapodcast.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article! Check out my site too at <a href="http://macmaniapodcast.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://macmaniapodcast.com'>http://macmaniapodcast.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Ackles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651659</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Ackles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651659</guid>
		<description>@coldbrew *typo. i missed the &#039;.&#039; in $1.8M... Nonetheless it&#039;s hard to believe. 

What do you get for $375 per year?

How will existing apps be treated? 

What criteria does Facebook use to judge whether an app is verifiable? 

At this point Facebook apps are nothing but spam. It&#039;s going to be hard to reverse that image. This seems to be the problem Facebook needs to address before charging developers a gatekeeping fee for &#039;success&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@coldbrew *typo. i missed the &#8216;.&#8217; in $1.8M&#8230; Nonetheless it&#8217;s hard to believe. </p>
<p>What do you get for $375 per year?</p>
<p>How will existing apps be treated? </p>
<p>What criteria does Facebook use to judge whether an app is verifiable? </p>
<p>At this point Facebook apps are nothing but spam. It&#8217;s going to be hard to reverse that image. This seems to be the problem Facebook needs to address before charging developers a gatekeeping fee for &#8217;success&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClubKX - chat rooms</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651655</link>
		<dc:creator>ClubKX - chat rooms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651655</guid>
		<description>The early days of Facebook of app program were the golden era for app developers, there was little competition and you could spam users freely and many pointless apps quickly grew to millions of users this way.  Now there are thousands of apps + they&#039;ve tightened things up, so the actual benefits of creating a Facebook app are much smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early days of Facebook of app program were the golden era for app developers, there was little competition and you could spam users freely and many pointless apps quickly grew to millions of users this way.  Now there are thousands of apps + they&#8217;ve tightened things up, so the actual benefits of creating a Facebook app are much smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571148335">Mike Kerns</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651640</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571148335">Mike Kerns</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651640</guid>
		<description>We are in touch with facebook about the communication standards/differences between app developers and &quot;pages&quot; creators/administrators.  Until that conversation is completed, we want to communicate that our intetrepretation of the changes may be incorrect.

thanks,

mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are in touch with facebook about the communication standards/differences between app developers and &#8220;pages&#8221; creators/administrators.  Until that conversation is completed, we want to communicate that our intetrepretation of the changes may be incorrect.</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecessionMeansHotterStrippersBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651622</link>
		<dc:creator>RecessionMeansHotterStrippersBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651622</guid>
		<description>they&#039;re trying to be profitable, simply. ad revenues have tanked so they can&#039;t be successful that way. $375 is about the cost of a day of good developer time and that&#039;s probably what the review takes.

And unlike apple, facebook doesn&#039;t have a high-markup hardware business to subsidize this cost. 

stop thinking in web2.0 business terms when 2.1 is in beta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re trying to be profitable, simply. ad revenues have tanked so they can&#8217;t be successful that way. $375 is about the cost of a day of good developer time and that&#8217;s probably what the review takes.</p>
<p>And unlike apple, facebook doesn&#8217;t have a high-markup hardware business to subsidize this cost. </p>
<p>stop thinking in web2.0 business terms when 2.1 is in beta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571148335">Mike Kerns</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651534</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571148335">Mike Kerns</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651534</guid>
		<description>As a developer who is trying to build world class experiences that increase the utility of sports fans on the facebook platform, I think the bigger concern should be about changes around &quot;pages&quot; and &quot;apps&quot; and user relationships between both.  I know it&#039;s a mouthful, but at some point last night app powered feed stories were removed from the Live Feed.   What&#039;s interesting is that the &quot;new changes&quot; announced last week are supposed to enhance real time status/communication, and also improve fan/brand page functionality.  But, by limiting app powered stories the feed is limiting the value of real time status/social interactions.  And, by increasing the capacity for &quot;pages&quot; to power feed stories they are creating a double standard between apps and &quot;pages&quot;...stay tuned, but thought i would point this out to tc community.  Clear direction as to how apps and users of apps can be communicated to and with versus fans of pages is a big issue for developers right now...much bigger issue than verified apps program imo

thanks,

mike kerns
citizen sports</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a developer who is trying to build world class experiences that increase the utility of sports fans on the facebook platform, I think the bigger concern should be about changes around &#8220;pages&#8221; and &#8220;apps&#8221; and user relationships between both.  I know it&#8217;s a mouthful, but at some point last night app powered feed stories were removed from the Live Feed.   What&#8217;s interesting is that the &#8220;new changes&#8221; announced last week are supposed to enhance real time status/communication, and also improve fan/brand page functionality.  But, by limiting app powered stories the feed is limiting the value of real time status/social interactions.  And, by increasing the capacity for &#8220;pages&#8221; to power feed stories they are creating a double standard between apps and &#8220;pages&#8221;&#8230;stay tuned, but thought i would point this out to tc community.  Clear direction as to how apps and users of apps can be communicated to and with versus fans of pages is a big issue for developers right now&#8230;much bigger issue than verified apps program imo</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>mike kerns<br />
citizen sports</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/11/facebook-developers-getting-antsy-over-verified-apps-program/comment-page-1/#comment-2651435</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=48960#comment-2651435</guid>
		<description>Anyone who paid $375, you just got Rich Dad Academy&#039;d ! !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who paid $375, you just got Rich Dad Academy&#8217;d ! !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
