Comments on: What An Antitrust Case Against Google Might Look Like http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/ Startup and Technology News Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:44:39 -0800 hourly 1 By: Bat http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-3064684 Bat Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:51:13 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-3064684 Easy to claim this now - but you're probally one of the MS haters who will be contradicting exactly this when it suits you Easy to claim this now – but you’re probally one of the MS haters who will be contradicting exactly this when it suits you

]]> By: The Case Against Google http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-3006617 The Case Against Google Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:56:20 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-3006617 [...] Professor of Operations and Information Management at the University of Pennsylvania, provides an excellent rundown at TechCrunch. As Clemons points out, DOJ must show that Google is exerting monopoly power, specifically in its [...] [...] Professor of Operations and Information Management at the University of Pennsylvania, provides an excellent rundown at TechCrunch. As Clemons points out, DOJ must show that Google is exerting monopoly power, specifically in its [...]

]]> By: McGuire on Media » McGuire’s 2009 Business and Future of Journalism syllabus http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2945042 McGuire on Media » McGuire’s 2009 Business and Future of Journalism syllabus Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:39:25 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2945042 [...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/ [...] [...] http://www.tech...ight-look-like/ [...]

]]> By: Felix http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-2836650 Felix Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:44:21 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2836650 Google is a wonderful product. this system not only helps people but creates new sciences like SEO so if it is monopoly that helps people, let it be so! Google is a wonderful product. this system not only helps people but creates new sciences like SEO so if it is monopoly that helps people, let it be so!

]]> By: Gabi http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2807112 Gabi Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:55:15 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2807112 Google's bosses act like Gods. They are so comfortable in their wealth that they are beyond law because they can buy just about any judge they like and it seems rather probable because Google doesn't care about copyright, complaints or feedback. They have removed all human contact from the Internet, they have the online complaint or feedback forms for cosmetic purposes alone and frankly I'd be happy to see Google crushed to the bits and their bosses in jail. Google’s bosses act like Gods. They are so comfortable in their wealth that they are beyond law because they can buy just about any judge they like and it seems rather probable because Google doesn’t care about copyright, complaints or feedback. They have removed all human contact from the Internet, they have the online complaint or feedback forms for cosmetic purposes alone and frankly I’d be happy to see Google crushed to the bits and their bosses in jail.

]]> By: 090303 Old-New Links | johnsumser.com: Recruiting News and Views http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2754985 090303 Old-New Links | johnsumser.com: Recruiting News and Views Tue, 19 May 2009 03:48:34 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2754985 [...] What An Antitrust Case Against Google Might Look Like   [...] [...] What An Antitrust Case Against Google Might Look Like   [...]

]]> By: Watch Out Google, Obama’s Antitrust Chief Is Looking To Make An Example Out Of You | Reviews Manual http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2743237 Watch Out Google, Obama’s Antitrust Chief Is Looking To Make An Example Out Of You | Reviews Manual Tue, 12 May 2009 09:00:27 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2743237 [...] free). There are whatever structure an just housing could be prefabricated against Google (here is one approach). While more investigating is not needs a intense abstract if it serves to ready Google honest, [...] [...] free). There are whatever structure an just housing could be prefabricated against Google (here is one approach). While more investigating is not needs a intense abstract if it serves to ready Google honest, [...]

]]> By: 気を付けろGoogle、オバマの反トラスト局長が見せしめにしようとしているぞ http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2742829 気を付けろGoogle、オバマの反トラスト局長が見せしめにしようとしているぞ Tue, 12 May 2009 00:56:19 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2742829 [...] Googleはすばらしくおいしい標的であるとともに、莫大な罰金を払える現金が手元にある数少ない企業だ。Googleは相当慎重に行動する必要がある。現在同社は、有償検索広告での圧倒的支配によって他の市場にも破壊的価格モデル（＝無料）をひっさげて自由に参入できることから、事実上独占企業として扱われている。Googleに対して反トラスト法で立権する方法はいくつもある（これが一例）。監視を強めることは、特に検索と検索広告で自然独占状態を築きつつある分野では、それでGoogleを公正でいさせることができるなら悪いことではないが、反トラスト裁判でGoogleを縛ることは益よりも害が多くなりかねない。 [...] [...] Googleはすばらしくおいしい標的であるとともに、莫大な罰金を払える現金が手元にある数少ない企業だ。Googleは相当慎重に行動する必要がある。現在同社は、有償検索広告での圧倒的支配によって他の市場にも破壊的価格モデル（＝無料）をひっさげて自由に参入できることから、事実上独占企業として扱われている。Googleに対して反トラスト法で立権する方法はいくつもある（これが一例）。監視を強めることは、特に検索と検索広告で自然独占状態を築きつつある分野では、それでGoogleを公正でいさせることができるなら悪いことではないが、反トラスト裁判でGoogleを縛ることは益よりも害が多くなりかねない。 [...]

]]> By: Watch Out Google, Obama’s Antitrust Chief Is Looking To Make A Big Case http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2742160 Watch Out Google, Obama’s Antitrust Chief Is Looking To Make A Big Case Mon, 11 May 2009 17:11:52 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2742160 [...] models (i.e. free). There are many ways an antitrust case could be made against Google (here is one approach). While more scrutiny is not necessarily a bad thing if it serves to keep Google honest, especially [...] [...] models (i.e. free). There are many ways an antitrust case could be made against Google (here is one approach). While more scrutiny is not necessarily a bad thing if it serves to keep Google honest, especially [...]

]]> By: Why You Can NOT Rely Solely on Organic Search Listings for Traffic | GROWMAP.COM http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2690460 Why You Can NOT Rely Solely on Organic Search Listings for Traffic | GROWMAP.COM Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:54:06 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2690460 [...] has even suggested What An AntiTrust Case Against Google Might Look Like. For several days now I have been searching for specific posts, forums, or pages to illustrate the [...] [...] has even suggested What An AntiTrust Case Against Google Might Look Like. For several days now I have been searching for specific posts, forums, or pages to illustrate the [...]

]]> By: InternetStrategist@GrowMap http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2689058 InternetStrategist@GrowMap Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:24:42 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2689058 The most dangerous aspect of Google's monopoly is the percentage of search traffic - both organic and paid - that they control. They are now responsible for 60-70+% of all the traffic AND SALES to most online sites and businesses. There is nothing fast or simple that any of those businesses can do about it. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what the effect of having 60-70% of your sales and traffic suddenly disappear. Google instantly drops sites out of their AdSense program for no reason and Google Dances positions in the SERPs - especially just before the holidays. They already control access to the majority of shoppers. The company that controls search controls what news we can find, what research we can access and what is considered important! This is far more dangerous than the media being owned by the same few individuals. I invite those who think they're living up to their slogan to read the post I've linked to this comment and another that I will be publishing soon about the dangers of relying on organic traffic from only one source. Those who say that we have a choice are half-right. WE as the Internet USER have a choice; however, those who rely on being FOUND on the Internet do not - until WE change our habits or something happens to reduce the monopolistic powers of Google. The most dangerous aspect of Google’s monopoly is the percentage of search traffic – both organic and paid – that they control. They are now responsible for 60-70+% of all the traffic AND SALES to most online sites and businesses.

There is nothing fast or simple that any of those businesses can do about it. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what the effect of having 60-70% of your sales and traffic suddenly disappear.

Google instantly drops sites out of their AdSense program for no reason and Google Dances positions in the SERPs – especially just before the holidays. They already control access to the majority of shoppers.

The company that controls search controls what news we can find, what research we can access and what is
considered important! This is far more dangerous than the media being owned by the same few individuals.

I invite those who think they’re living up to their slogan to read the post I’ve linked to this comment and another that I will be publishing soon about the dangers of relying on organic traffic from only one source.

Those who say that we have a choice are half-right. WE as the Internet USER have a choice; however, those who rely on being FOUND on the Internet do not – until WE change our habits or something happens to reduce the monopolistic powers of Google.

]]> By: sponsored links at top http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-2677444 sponsored links at top Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:40:39 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2677444 If googleremove sponsored links at top - that are shown as search results, their revenue is half. If googleremove sponsored links at top – that are shown as search results, their revenue is half.

]]> By: The Far Edge » Blog Archive » Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2676302 The Far Edge » Blog Archive » Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:01:34 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2676302 [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...] [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...]

]]> By: Il ReteGiornale - la Tua Voce in Rete» Libertà d'informazione » Ma la pubblicità online non fallirà http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2676104 Il ReteGiornale - la Tua Voce in Rete» Libertà d'informazione » Ma la pubblicità online non fallirà Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:41:40 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2676104 [...] Il business model di Google, invece, è quello di minacciare il dirottamento verso la ricerca sponsorizzata, ma di fatto ricorrervi il meno possibile. Se l’azienda richiesta dagli utenti (Marriott, risultati della ricerca sponsorizzata. Se non lo fa, allora Google la rimpiazza con un competitor. Ovviamente, se la ricerca sponsorizzata non rispondesse mai alle esigfenze degli utenti, allora non sarebbe utile né a loro né, in ultima isytanza, a Google. Google non pretende che i grandi marchi paghino grandi cifre, ma qualcosa devono pagare. Google sa chi mettere in cima alla lista, ma non lo farà finché queste aziende non offrano una cifra sufficientemente alta per le parole chiave inerenti. Tutto ciò è stato affrontato nel dettaglion nel mio post precedente. [...] [...] Il business model di Google, invece, è quello di minacciare il dirottamento verso la ricerca sponsorizzata, ma di fatto ricorrervi il meno possibile. Se l’azienda richiesta dagli utenti (Marriott, risultati della ricerca sponsorizzata. Se non lo fa, allora Google la rimpiazza con un competitor. Ovviamente, se la ricerca sponsorizzata non rispondesse mai alle esigfenze degli utenti, allora non sarebbe utile né a loro né, in ultima isytanza, a Google. Google non pretende che i grandi marchi paghino grandi cifre, ma qualcosa devono pagare. Google sa chi mettere in cima alla lista, ma non lo farà finché queste aziende non offrano una cifra sufficientemente alta per le parole chiave inerenti. Tutto ciò è stato affrontato nel dettaglion nel mio post precedente. [...]

]]> By: LSDI : Ma la pubblicità online non fallirà http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2675908 LSDI : Ma la pubblicità online non fallirà Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:34:08 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2675908 [...] Il business model di Google, invece, è quello di minacciare il dirottamento verso la ricerca sponsorizzata, ma di fatto ricorrervi il meno possibile. Se l’azienda richiesta dagli utenti (Marriott, risultati della ricerca sponsorizzata. Se non lo fa, allora Google la rimpiazza con un competitor. Ovviamente, se la ricerca sponsorizzata non rispondesse mai alle esigfenze degli utenti, allora non sarebbe utile né a loro né, in ultima isytanza, a Google. Google non pretende che i grandi marchi paghino grandi cifre, ma qualcosa devono pagare. Google sa chi mettere in cima alla lista, ma non lo farà finché queste aziende non offrano una cifra sufficientemente alta per le parole chiave inerenti. Tutto ciò è stato affrontato nel dettaglion nel mio post precedente. [...] [...] Il business model di Google, invece, è quello di minacciare il dirottamento verso la ricerca sponsorizzata, ma di fatto ricorrervi il meno possibile. Se l’azienda richiesta dagli utenti (Marriott, risultati della ricerca sponsorizzata. Se non lo fa, allora Google la rimpiazza con un competitor. Ovviamente, se la ricerca sponsorizzata non rispondesse mai alle esigfenze degli utenti, allora non sarebbe utile né a loro né, in ultima isytanza, a Google. Google non pretende che i grandi marchi paghino grandi cifre, ma qualcosa devono pagare. Google sa chi mettere in cima alla lista, ma non lo farà finché queste aziende non offrano una cifra sufficientemente alta per le parole chiave inerenti. Tutto ciò è stato affrontato nel dettaglion nel mio post precedente. [...]

]]> By: Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising « shankarsoma; Change the View http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2675420 Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising « shankarsoma; Change the View Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:23:03 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2675420 [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...] [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...]

]]> By: The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons | Blog YODspica Ltd http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-3/#comment-2675339 The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons | Blog YODspica Ltd Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:57:02 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2675339 [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...] [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...]

]]> By: Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons | Reviews Manual http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2675274 Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons | Reviews Manual Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:46:18 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2675274 [...] Google’s playing help is to threaten direction on sponsored search, but actually to vow in it as infrequently as possible.  If the consort consumers rattling poverty (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is traded in the crowning lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored gaming instruction never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored gaming would not impact either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not order that the crowning companies effort crowning prices, but it does order that they pay.  Google knows who to locate on top, but module not do so unless the companies actually effort sufficiently broad prices for germane keywords.  This was every aerated in goodish discourse in my previous post. [...] [...] Google’s playing help is to threaten direction on sponsored search, but actually to vow in it as infrequently as possible.  If the consort consumers rattling poverty (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is traded in the crowning lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored gaming instruction never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored gaming would not impact either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not order that the crowning companies effort crowning prices, but it does order that they pay.  Google knows who to locate on top, but module not do so unless the companies actually effort sufficiently broad prices for germane keywords.  This was every aerated in goodish discourse in my previous post. [...]

]]> By: Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2675229 Steel Cage Debate On The Future Of Online Advertising: Danny Sullivan Vs. Eric Clemons Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:45:29 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2675229 [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...] [...] Google’s business model is to threaten misdirection on sponsored search, but actually to engage in it as infrequently as possible.  If the company consumers really want (Marriott, Continental Airlines, 1-800-CONTACTS) pays enough then it is listed in the top lines of sponsored search.  If it does not, then Google places a competitor there.  Obviously, if the sponsored search links never got consumers what they wanted, sponsored search would not work either for consumers, or, ultimately, for Google.  Google does not require that the top companies bid top prices, but it does require that they pay.  Google knows who to place on top, but will not do so unless the companies actually bid sufficiently high prices for relevant keywords.  This was all treated in considerable detail in my previous post. [...]

]]> By: links for 2009-03-26 « POPMODERNE http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2672316 links for 2009-03-26 « POPMODERNE Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:32:59 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2672316 [...] What An Antitrust Case Against Google Might Look Like Even Google itself is starting to worry about the possibility that the Department of Justice may seek regulation, possibly even the break-up of Google. (tags: business google internet) [...] [...] What An Antitrust Case Against Google Might Look Like Even Google itself is starting to worry about the possibility that the Department of Justice may seek regulation, possibly even the break-up of Google. (tags: business google internet) [...]

]]> By: Why Advertising is failing on the Internet « Homes & Land Blog http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2671244 Why Advertising is failing on the Internet « Homes & Land Blog Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:30:18 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2671244 [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...] [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...]

]]> By: Summary of “Advertising is Failing” on TechCrunch http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2667544 Summary of “Advertising is Failing” on TechCrunch Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:18:31 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2667544 [...] his external sources are mostly opinion (Op Ed from the NYT, his own opinion piece on Forbes, other articles by Eric Clemons), I am surprised that such a poorly thought out and researched article could come out of Wharton [...] [...] his external sources are mostly opinion (Op Ed from the NYT, his own opinion piece on Forbes, other articles by Eric Clemons), I am surprised that such a poorly thought out and researched article could come out of Wharton [...]

]]> By: HerbSewell http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2666750 HerbSewell Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:38:24 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2666750 Oh by the way, this article was ripped to shreds by a voice of reason. http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/an-antitrust-case-against-google-a-threat-to-free-competition/#more-1177 Oh by the way, this article was ripped to shreds by a voice of reason.

http://blog.ayn...tion/#more-1177

]]> By: Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet | The Scripts Zone http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2665351 Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet | The Scripts Zone Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:01:02 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2665351 [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...] [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...]

]]> By: The Far Edge » Blog Archive » Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/01/what-an-antitrust-case-against-google-might-look-like/comment-page-2/#comment-2664805 The Far Edge » Blog Archive » Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:00:26 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=46775#comment-2664805 [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...] [...] is, regrettably, still a popular business model on the net, although for reasons I explored in an earlier TechCrunch post on Google it seems ultimately to be unsustainable. More significantly from the perspective of this [...]

]]>