JPG is debating if it should start smoking again.

Right now, it’s down at the corner store, looking at all the brands of cigarettes.

The site has not closed permanently, nor contracted terminal lung cancer. We’ll be back soon, we promise. Thanks for your patience.
—- end —-

Funny!

Magazines can be granted a right to publish an image without granting a perpetual license to use that image for other purposes, or to sublicense it.

Facebook recently faced a huge backlash when they attempted to appropriate perpetual rights to the content of their users. They have since backed off.

In Santa Clara, January housing sales have started to boom, 100% increase over last night. Prices have dropped low enough to invite buyers.

There is a lot of cash in business and personal pockets. The missing ingredient is confidence to buy.

Go Obama.

flickr’s community manager and founder of JPG magazine publicly and categorically denied flickr was in talks, yet techcrunch continues to report it.

TechFilipino

http://www.teno...rt/sl/0611.html

“Once qualified, the member was issued a password which enabled access to a website page containing a notice of a private offering.”

I wish somebody would use this legal functionality to create a VC version of propser or in other words peer to peer VC.

I wish TC would explore this in an in depth article.

Isn’t that the entire purpose of JPG? You submit an image, they accept it and print it… without that in their TOS how would they operate?

By uploading (or otherwise submitting) Submission(s) to the Services, you:

* grant to 8020 a non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, limited license to use, publish, reproduce, display, distribute, use for Promotional Purposes (defined below), and sublicense for Cross-Promotional Purposes (defined below) such Submission(s), either through print, online, or other media (collectively, “Publicize”);

Kit