<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:40:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The World is Flat: Take 2 &#171; Local Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2923173</link>
		<dc:creator>The World is Flat: Take 2 &#171; Local Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2923173</guid>
		<description>[...] Venture Capital funding is still majorly dominated by U.S. (US$28.8bn invested in over 2,550 deals in 2008), compared to International fund investments (US$13.4bn invested elsewhere). [See also TechCrunch 2008 Year-in-Review.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Venture Capital funding is still majorly dominated by U.S. (US$28.8bn invested in over 2,550 deals in 2008), compared to International fund investments (US$13.4bn invested elsewhere). [See also TechCrunch 2008 Year-in-Review.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; The Scripts Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2755403</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; The Scripts Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 09:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2755403</guid>
		<description>[...] own reports and slice-and-dice the data for their own use. It&#8217;s a big improvement to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also welcome to grab data free of charge through our CrunchBase open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] own reports and slice-and-dice the data for their own use. It&#8217;s a big improvement to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also welcome to grab data free of charge through our CrunchBase open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; Reviews Manual</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2754979</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; Reviews Manual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2754979</guid>
		<description>[...] slice-and-dice the accumulation for their possess use. It&#8217;s a bounteous transformation to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also recognize to clutch accumulation liberated of calculate finished our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slice-and-dice the accumulation for their possess use. It&#8217;s a bounteous transformation to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also recognize to clutch accumulation liberated of calculate finished our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2754815</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchBase Data Rocks. Too Bad The Q1 Numbers Suck. Our Report &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2754815</guid>
		<description>[...] own reports and slice-and-dice the data for their own use. It&#8217;s a big improvement to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also welcome to grab data free of charge through our CrunchBase open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] own reports and slice-and-dice the data for their own use. It&#8217;s a big improvement to our 2008 Year In Review. Of course, you&#8217;re also welcome to grab data free of charge through our CrunchBase open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gif animashki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2713113</link>
		<dc:creator>Gif animashki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2713113</guid>
		<description>We are working on two startups in Russia. )) hehe ))
And actually things go pretty bad because many investors believe in the second wave of Crisis.
And they really stay away from new projects I see that from inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are working on two startups in Russia. )) hehe ))<br />
And actually things go pretty bad because many investors believe in the second wave of Crisis.<br />
And they really stay away from new projects I see that from inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review &#171; HENQ News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-2/#comment-2710485</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review &#171; HENQ News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2710485</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch 2008 Year in&#160;Review  22 04 2009   The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch 2008 Year in&nbsp;Review  22 04 2009   The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2697972</link>
		<dc:creator>Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2697972</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Crisis does affect startups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Crisis does affect startups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissStartups.com - &#187; War 2008 ein be***is***es Start-up Jahr?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2643009</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissStartups.com - &#187; War 2008 ein be***is***es Start-up Jahr?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2643009</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch 2008: Year in Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch 2008: Year in Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2642536</link>
		<dc:creator>Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2642536</guid>
		<description>really good.. but how about how much revenue these startup make? Raising money is fine and dandy, but not if you&#039;re not earning revenue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really good.. but how about how much revenue these startup make? Raising money is fine and dandy, but not if you&#8217;re not earning revenue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 2</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2637823</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Numbers, Volume 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2637823</guid>
		<description>[...] Cashing Out  CrunchBase counted 284 exits in 2008, exceeding $41B (nearly 200 transactions had undisclosed purchase prices.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cashing Out  CrunchBase counted 284 exits in 2008, exceeding $41B (nearly 200 transactions had undisclosed purchase prices.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuiasLocal.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2634306</link>
		<dc:creator>GuiasLocal.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2634306</guid>
		<description>Nice article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samajit Das</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2633974</link>
		<dc:creator>Samajit Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2633974</guid>
		<description>hi,
This posted from techcrunch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
This posted from techcrunch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="664224601">Cash Coleman</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2633487</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="664224601">Cash Coleman</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2633487</guid>
		<description>Something that TC has going for it is polarization - they definitely have people who love it, and those who hate it. I&#039;m personally just trying to find a way to get my idea out there. I honestly didn&#039;t think that it would fall on so many deaf ears. Will that stop me? Nah, I don&#039;t think so. People who have tried it really like using it - I&#039;ll believe them first :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that TC has going for it is polarization &#8211; they definitely have people who love it, and those who hate it. I&#8217;m personally just trying to find a way to get my idea out there. I honestly didn&#8217;t think that it would fall on so many deaf ears. Will that stop me? Nah, I don&#8217;t think so. People who have tried it really like using it &#8211; I&#8217;ll believe them first <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh please.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2633258</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh please.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2633258</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You are hijacking this comment thread because I chose not to write about your startup.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I find it incredibly sad and immature that this is the only way you know how to deal with criticism, Erick.

You didn&#039;t refute a single point in the argument and somehow made it revolve around your ass. 

So basically, anyone who disagrees with you is disagreeing simply because you didn&#039;t write about their startups. What is this, elementary school? Grow up.

By the way, I&#039;ve been a reader here for years, and I say when it comes to poor reporting you definitely take the cake. I would like Robin and the others to be more active so that your posts keep sinking into the ether. Your posts are always amongst the worst here. Go find yourself a real job and let the informed adults handle this blog and its readership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You are hijacking this comment thread because I chose not to write about your startup.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find it incredibly sad and immature that this is the only way you know how to deal with criticism, Erick.</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t refute a single point in the argument and somehow made it revolve around your ass. </p>
<p>So basically, anyone who disagrees with you is disagreeing simply because you didn&#8217;t write about their startups. What is this, elementary school? Grow up.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;ve been a reader here for years, and I say when it comes to poor reporting you definitely take the cake. I would like Robin and the others to be more active so that your posts keep sinking into the ether. Your posts are always amongst the worst here. Go find yourself a real job and let the informed adults handle this blog and its readership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2632359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2632359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just read the report (thanks for letting me review) here&#039;s my take

http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2009/02/21/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just read the report (thanks for letting me review) here&#8217;s my take</p>
<p><a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2009/02/21/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2009/02/21/review-techcrunchs-year-in-review-report/'>http://www.web-...-review-report/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: Techcrunch&#8217;s Year in Review Report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2632345</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Techcrunch&#8217;s Year in Review Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2632345</guid>
		<description>[...] just finished reading (some parts skimming, like the data tables) Techcrunch&#8217;s 2008 Year In Review report they recently published at a fee. Techcrunch is monetizing Crunchbase, and is now offering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just finished reading (some parts skimming, like the data tables) Techcrunch&#8217;s 2008 Year In Review report they recently published at a fee. Techcrunch is monetizing Crunchbase, and is now offering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vijay chattha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2632159</link>
		<dc:creator>vijay chattha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2632159</guid>
		<description>good idea gents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good idea gents!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology news - Techvibes Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2632131</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology news - Techvibes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2632131</guid>
		<description>[...] drawing on data from Crunchbase which now includes more than 15,000 companies. Check it out at The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review.    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] drawing on data from Crunchbase which now includes more than 15,000 companies. Check it out at The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review.    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631826</link>
		<dc:creator>castle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631826</guid>
		<description>guy guys done bother, ive just downloaded this doc from bit torrent. i found the torrent on mininova and believe me its not worth the 10 dollars they are charging .... oh wait</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guy guys done bother, ive just downloaded this doc from bit torrent. i found the torrent on mininova and believe me its not worth the 10 dollars they are charging &#8230;. oh wait</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631822</link>
		<dc:creator>castle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631822</guid>
		<description>hang on.. you are seriouly tring to charge for this? you guys are nuts, its a joke right?? please say so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hang on.. you are seriouly tring to charge for this? you guys are nuts, its a joke right?? please say so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: castle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631821</link>
		<dc:creator>castle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631821</guid>
		<description>blah blah blah blah.. i hope the 2009 review recounts the story of sissy boy being gobbed at cos he is such a arrogant twat. Oh and can you make a graph as well? thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah blah blah blah.. i hope the 2009 review recounts the story of sissy boy being gobbed at cos he is such a arrogant twat. Oh and can you make a graph as well? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: velioncho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631720</link>
		<dc:creator>velioncho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631720</guid>
		<description>Everybody knows the trend. If you want the exact trend, take S&amp;P chart, you will get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows the trend. If you want the exact trend, take S&amp;P chart, you will get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: startupi &#187; Sinais da crise</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631311</link>
		<dc:creator>startupi &#187; Sinais da crise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631311</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch lançou ontem uma análise do mercado de startups do ano de 2008 e fez um post com alguns dos pontos principais. O primeiro gráfico me chamou muito a atenção. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch lançou ontem uma análise do mercado de startups do ano de 2008 e fez um post com alguns dos pontos principais. O primeiro gráfico me chamou muito a atenção. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkwertig: Webtraffic, Investitionen, Unabomber » netzwertig.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2631126</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkwertig: Webtraffic, Investitionen, Unabomber » netzwertig.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2631126</guid>
		<description>[...] » The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] » The TechCrunch 2008 Year in Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chee Ming</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/19/the-techcrunch-2008-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2630909</link>
		<dc:creator>Chee Ming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44069#comment-2630909</guid>
		<description>I think the data would be even more interesting next year when you can compare two years full of data. Also it would be nice to get a bit more coverage on the startup scene in Asia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the data would be even more interesting next year when you can compare two years full of data. Also it would be nice to get a bit more coverage on the startup scene in Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
