<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ustream Launches Watershed, A Pay-As-You-Go Live Streaming Service For Enterprises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:40:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode &#124; Design Website Easy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-2/#comment-2880982</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode &#124; Design Website Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2880982</guid>
		<description>[...] free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam&#8217;s StreamAPI and Ustream&#8217;s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam&#8217;s StreamAPI and Ustream&#8217;s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-2/#comment-2880962</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2880962</guid>
		<description>[...] the ad-supported free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam’s StreamAPI and Ustream’s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ad-supported free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam’s StreamAPI and Ustream’s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-2/#comment-2880862</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin.tv Opens Its API For Free, Hopes Live Video Will Explode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2880862</guid>
		<description>[...] free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam&#8217;s StreamAPI and Ustream&#8217;s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] free model makes it very compelling next to Stickam&#8217;s StreamAPI and Ustream&#8217;s offerings, both of which charge per view [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucio Milone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-2/#comment-2719739</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucio Milone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2719739</guid>
		<description>Have a nice day.

I&#039;m a &quot;young&quot; streaming user (from dec. 2008) and i&#039;ve tested quite every services.

Everyone has his &quot;strengths&quot; but in the dream of a user no one have all the features that we like.

I stay in europe, so the live streaming is a little bit difficult for the &quot;hop&quot; needed to reach the us servers and so need much more upload bandwidth that other us users: this is a point on which that big players have to remember for the growth of their business because Europe is not so little.

- Mogulus
I find mogulus user friendly and with a lot of features (most of all the slow but good Studio) that meet quit all the needs of my customers. The free version is (in the most of the case) sufficient for low level customers (and hope that in the future it will be deleted like options for clean the market from the milions of &quot;embedder&quot; programmer that make the customer confused). Mogulus is a business driver for a lot of little software house in my opinion, and needs multicamera live features and a transition section for to be one of the best.

- Usstream
simply and stable. this are the words that i can use for describe their services. Need to have a &quot;studio&quot; solution, multicamera and pip at least. the new business model can be interesting but is not the best (like Internap can offer)

- Make tv
This guys have the best interface of all, far milions of miles from the other and really is a totaly studio console: multi-pip, cue from unlimited remote camera, MIX between local video and remote live stream, chroma key (2 keys), alpha etc are really the best of the market. Titling is not good as the other features (not rolling or scrolling) but they are so near the &quot;goal&quot;.. Their studio application needs to be more reliable again, and their business plan are interesting.

-CDN
Yes. at least for a good business their offer the best price for the &quot;pure&quot; services. You need to do Your interface, your application, etc but they are moving for offer it (without claim) to the &quot;end business customers&quot;. From those that i Tested Velocix, SimplyCDN and Streamzilla was for my needs the best. Internap has the best business plan offer that i REALLY HOPE to find everywhere:
Pay for GB of traffic, NO MATTER of how much bandwidth do you use or need (for concurrent viewers), no mounths prefixed fee, JUST PAY for 1 user ad 300Kbits or 1000 at 1.5 Kbits traffic. I found this the &quot;peace&quot; of heart respect to the 	
waste of the costs of the other business models (for example in one mounth you can use half of your prepayed traffic/bandwidht/what_also_over and payed the mountly fee, and in another mount for just one day of peek event you have to pay the &quot;burst&quot; plus the base fees).

At moment the dream solution for me is the Make.tv interface, on the streamzilla cdn, with the stability of usstream, and some features (and the &quot;friendly&quot;) of the mogulus studio, but it is far to come.

like alway no one have the best solution for all business, every one has some &quot;strengths&quot;, BUT the business model that ALL US can ask to ALL their can be a simply PAY-AS-YOU-CONSUME model, like from years the 	
telephone companies did (and it&#039;s more simply to explain the model to OUR customers).

My 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a nice day.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a &#8220;young&#8221; streaming user (from dec. 2008) and i&#8217;ve tested quite every services.</p>
<p>Everyone has his &#8220;strengths&#8221; but in the dream of a user no one have all the features that we like.</p>
<p>I stay in europe, so the live streaming is a little bit difficult for the &#8220;hop&#8221; needed to reach the us servers and so need much more upload bandwidth that other us users: this is a point on which that big players have to remember for the growth of their business because Europe is not so little.</p>
<p>- Mogulus<br />
I find mogulus user friendly and with a lot of features (most of all the slow but good Studio) that meet quit all the needs of my customers. The free version is (in the most of the case) sufficient for low level customers (and hope that in the future it will be deleted like options for clean the market from the milions of &#8220;embedder&#8221; programmer that make the customer confused). Mogulus is a business driver for a lot of little software house in my opinion, and needs multicamera live features and a transition section for to be one of the best.</p>
<p>- Usstream<br />
simply and stable. this are the words that i can use for describe their services. Need to have a &#8220;studio&#8221; solution, multicamera and pip at least. the new business model can be interesting but is not the best (like Internap can offer)</p>
<p>- Make tv<br />
This guys have the best interface of all, far milions of miles from the other and really is a totaly studio console: multi-pip, cue from unlimited remote camera, MIX between local video and remote live stream, chroma key (2 keys), alpha etc are really the best of the market. Titling is not good as the other features (not rolling or scrolling) but they are so near the &#8220;goal&#8221;.. Their studio application needs to be more reliable again, and their business plan are interesting.</p>
<p>-CDN<br />
Yes. at least for a good business their offer the best price for the &#8220;pure&#8221; services. You need to do Your interface, your application, etc but they are moving for offer it (without claim) to the &#8220;end business customers&#8221;. From those that i Tested Velocix, SimplyCDN and Streamzilla was for my needs the best. Internap has the best business plan offer that i REALLY HOPE to find everywhere:<br />
Pay for GB of traffic, NO MATTER of how much bandwidth do you use or need (for concurrent viewers), no mounths prefixed fee, JUST PAY for 1 user ad 300Kbits or 1000 at 1.5 Kbits traffic. I found this the &#8220;peace&#8221; of heart respect to the<br />
waste of the costs of the other business models (for example in one mounth you can use half of your prepayed traffic/bandwidht/what_also_over and payed the mountly fee, and in another mount for just one day of peek event you have to pay the &#8220;burst&#8221; plus the base fees).</p>
<p>At moment the dream solution for me is the Make.tv interface, on the streamzilla cdn, with the stability of usstream, and some features (and the &#8220;friendly&#8221;) of the mogulus studio, but it is far to come.</p>
<p>like alway no one have the best solution for all business, every one has some &#8220;strengths&#8221;, BUT the business model that ALL US can ask to ALL their can be a simply PAY-AS-YOU-CONSUME model, like from years the<br />
telephone companies did (and it&#8217;s more simply to explain the model to OUR customers).</p>
<p>My 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ustream推出白标签视频播放服务Watershed - 读写网唯一官方中文站 - 搜狐IT独立群体博客</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2680945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ustream推出白标签视频播放服务Watershed - 读写网唯一官方中文站 - 搜狐IT独立群体博客</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2680945</guid>
		<description>[...] 其他白标签视频流媒体服务，如3级（ PDF格式 ）或移动网络提供类似的解决方案，但他们通常只针对大型企业和媒体公司。Watershed的定价模式看似合理，但其价格本身却相当高，尽管Ustream的首席执行官认为这与其他流媒体直播提供商的服务是相当的。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 其他白标签视频流媒体服务，如3级（ PDF格式 ）或移动网络提供类似的解决方案，但他们通常只针对大型企业和媒体公司。Watershed的定价模式看似合理，但其价格本身却相当高，尽管Ustream的首席执行官认为这与其他流媒体直播提供商的服务是相当的。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed &#171; shankarsoma; Change the View</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2666989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed &#171; shankarsoma; Change the View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2666989</guid>
		<description>[...] in February, Watershed allows organizations to broadcast live video in minutes with their own private-label [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in February, Watershed allows organizations to broadcast live video in minutes with their own private-label [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed, Streaming Service For Enterprises News on wisgon.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2666571</link>
		<dc:creator>Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed, Streaming Service For Enterprises News on wisgon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2666571</guid>
		<description>[...] in&#173; F&#173;ebr&#173;u&#173;a&#173;r&#173;y, Wa&#173;ter&#173;s&#173;h&#173;ed&#173; a&#173;llo&#173;ws&#173; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in&#173; F&#173;ebr&#173;u&#173;a&#173;r&#173;y, Wa&#173;ter&#173;s&#173;h&#173;ed&#173; a&#173;llo&#173;ws&#173; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed, Streaming Service For Enterprises</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2665776</link>
		<dc:creator>Ustream Launches Mobile Version of Watershed, Streaming Service For Enterprises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2665776</guid>
		<description>[...] in February, Watershed allows organizations to broadcast live video in minutes with their own private-label [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in February, Watershed allows organizations to broadcast live video in minutes with their own private-label [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prepaid Cell Phone Sim Card</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2653085</link>
		<dc:creator>Prepaid Cell Phone Sim Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2653085</guid>
		<description>[...]  A Pay-As-You-Go Live Streaming Service  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  A Pay-As-You-Go Live Streaming Service  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2650576</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2650576</guid>
		<description>This post said that Watershed includes &quot;polling, picture-in-picture video chat, Twitter integration&quot;.    Where is the info on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post said that Watershed includes &#8220;polling, picture-in-picture video chat, Twitter integration&#8221;.    Where is the info on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2643355</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2643355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried both and Mogulus has much more features such as VOD galleries, storyboards, auto pilot, custom widgets etc Also I put watershed to full quality and was awful! I think the ONLY thing Watershed has more features is in security/privacy. Mogulus has almost none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried both and Mogulus has much more features such as VOD galleries, storyboards, auto pilot, custom widgets etc Also I put watershed to full quality and was awful! I think the ONLY thing Watershed has more features is in security/privacy. Mogulus has almost none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill THiel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2636037</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill THiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2636037</guid>
		<description>We use the Streamn.com streaming service. It works great, is viewable using windows media player and is cheap. Great for churhces or anything with viewers less than 1000 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use the Streamn.com streaming service. It works great, is viewable using windows media player and is cheap. Great for churhces or anything with viewers less than 1000 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2635073</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2635073</guid>
		<description>You want a good service, you must pay. 
What is it with &quot;I want it for Free&quot;
Please explain why &quot;you&quot; want US to pay for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want a good service, you must pay.<br />
What is it with &#8220;I want it for Free&#8221;<br />
Please explain why &#8220;you&#8221; want US to pay for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim esposito</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2632451</link>
		<dc:creator>jim esposito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2632451</guid>
		<description>Is this a joke? CDNGuy is right on. find me 1 person excited about paying $7500 for any unnecessary service at this moment in time. this post has attracted 20? And they&#039;ve done ample research? Stberg happened to do IT dept streaming price comparisons the day this launches? Every video streaming related post on TC is filled with this astroturf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a joke? CDNGuy is right on. find me 1 person excited about paying $7500 for any unnecessary service at this moment in time. this post has attracted 20? And they&#8217;ve done ample research? Stberg happened to do IT dept streaming price comparisons the day this launches? Every video streaming related post on TC is filled with this astroturf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Rocz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2632427</link>
		<dc:creator>James Rocz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2632427</guid>
		<description>Not really.  Nobody has mentioned www.make.tv - it has more features than ustream or Mogulus and their pricing model is much more reasonable.

www.make.tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really.  Nobody has mentioned <a href="http://www.make.tv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.make.tv'>http://www.make.tv</a> &#8211; it has more features than ustream or Mogulus and their pricing model is much more reasonable.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.make.tv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.make.tv'>http://www.make.tv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmmm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2632190</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2632190</guid>
		<description>ustream would be $40, mogulus would be $350. Pay as you go &gt; subscription fee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ustream would be $40, mogulus would be $350. Pay as you go &gt; subscription fee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right wing nut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2631727</link>
		<dc:creator>right wing nut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2631727</guid>
		<description>I only see me using about 40 private viewer hours a month, who&#039;s cheapest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only see me using about 40 private viewer hours a month, who&#8217;s cheapest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mezanna</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2630365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mezanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2630365</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I would have to agree.  I have been left out in the cold several times with terrible connectivity to Mogulus servers, especially on Sundays for some strange reason.  We&#039;ve lost clients and business because of it.

Their tech support used to be quick and responsive but now is in the toilet.  We&#039;ve switched to uStream for their overall stability.  I hope they add multi-camera support (being able to cue cameras and transition between them) soon.  But for now I&#039;ll take a stable, less feature-rich platform over the anxiety of wondering &quot;Will Mogulus will work today?&quot;

(Also their studio application desparately needs an HTML/non-flash alternative as it can be terribly slow and unresponsive)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I would have to agree.  I have been left out in the cold several times with terrible connectivity to Mogulus servers, especially on Sundays for some strange reason.  We&#8217;ve lost clients and business because of it.</p>
<p>Their tech support used to be quick and responsive but now is in the toilet.  We&#8217;ve switched to uStream for their overall stability.  I hope they add multi-camera support (being able to cue cameras and transition between them) soon.  But for now I&#8217;ll take a stable, less feature-rich platform over the anxiety of wondering &#8220;Will Mogulus will work today?&#8221;</p>
<p>(Also their studio application desparately needs an HTML/non-flash alternative as it can be terribly slow and unresponsive)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="585733524">Tolmács Márk</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2630142</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="585733524">Tolmács Márk</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2630142</guid>
		<description>The statistics are in the seconds granularity. You truly pay as much as you use down to a second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statistics are in the seconds granularity. You truly pay as much as you use down to a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1422115734">Bill Smith</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629779</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1422115734">Bill Smith</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629779</guid>
		<description>geez!

After seeing Max&#039;s post, it&#039;s obvious these comments are from Max Hoat.  I&#039;ve never read comments so negative/filled with insecurity/attacking on Techcrunch kinda obvious...

LOWEST PRICE generally means CHEAPEST PRODUCT.  

Not sure I would be proud nor public about that.

glad I saw this post...some entertainment value!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geez!</p>
<p>After seeing Max&#8217;s post, it&#8217;s obvious these comments are from Max Hoat.  I&#8217;ve never read comments so negative/filled with insecurity/attacking on Techcrunch kinda obvious&#8230;</p>
<p>LOWEST PRICE generally means CHEAPEST PRODUCT.  </p>
<p>Not sure I would be proud nor public about that.</p>
<p>glad I saw this post&#8230;some entertainment value!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subhankar Mondal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629691</link>
		<dc:creator>Subhankar Mondal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629691</guid>
		<description>These products are not the same.

Mogulus is a &quot;Pro&quot; Account and basic.

Ustream is a true enterprise solution.

We aren&#039;t comparing apples to apples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These products are not the same.</p>
<p>Mogulus is a &#8220;Pro&#8221; Account and basic.</p>
<p>Ustream is a true enterprise solution.</p>
<p>We aren&#8217;t comparing apples to apples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveStreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629490</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveStreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629490</guid>
		<description>Max,

Your product is cheaper because it sucks.  Choppy and buggy.

I canceled after one month.  How do I process a return?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,</p>
<p>Your product is cheaper because it sucks.  Choppy and buggy.</p>
<p>I canceled after one month.  How do I process a return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conflict of Interest?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629337</link>
		<dc:creator>Conflict of Interest?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629337</guid>
		<description>Is it not a conflict of interest that Ustream&#039;s Watershed now has an ad at the top of the TechCrunch blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it not a conflict of interest that Ustream&#8217;s Watershed now has an ad at the top of the TechCrunch blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ustream launches pay-as-you-go Watershed - Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ustream launches pay-as-you-go Watershed - Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629263</guid>
		<description>[...] ton of management options outside the scope of the usual ustream player experience. Techcrunch has a good write up with a comparison sheet on the pricing model, noting that cloud computing model could end up being very pricey for a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ton of management options outside the scope of the usual ustream player experience. Techcrunch has a good write up with a comparison sheet on the pricing model, noting that cloud computing model could end up being very pricey for a lot of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deano</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/17/ustreamtv-launches-watershed-a-pay-as-you-go-live-streaming-service-for-enterprises/comment-page-1/#comment-2629251</link>
		<dc:creator>Deano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=44252#comment-2629251</guid>
		<description>The pricing model is fine, I&#039;d just want more details on how granular the tracking is - are they going to do a partial=full minute like the phone companies, or will we get second-based billing (which would rock)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pricing model is fine, I&#8217;d just want more details on how granular the tracking is &#8211; are they going to do a partial=full minute like the phone companies, or will we get second-based billing (which would rock)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
