Comments on: Welcome, Sarah Lacy

By: cheap aion kinah

cheap aion kinah — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:50:54 +0000

As I say, we are lucky to have her. Please give her a hearty TechCrunch welcome.

By: jack rabbit vibrator

jack rabbit vibrator — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:31:50 +0000

Just read her first article. Maybe she will be better at other things.

By: jack rabbit vibrator

jack rabbit vibrator — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000

, that’s at least my self-serving prediction. As a remote remote geek who relies on Sarah to tell me how tenaciously little Max Levchin showers or sleeps…I think this can only be a good and interesting addition.

By: Thenolife.com » Blog Archive » Les investissements en Capital risque en chute de 50% et ce n’est pas juste la crise

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:48:05 +0000

[...] d’Alain: Ce billet est une adaptation d’une longue analyse de Sarah Lacy qui a rejoint l’équipe de TechCrunch il y a un mois. J’ai tenté de présenter ses principaux [...]

By: Les investissements en Capital risque en chute de 50% et ce n’est pas juste la crise

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:12:03 +0000

[...] billet est une adaptation d’une longue analyse de Sarah Lacy qui a rejoint l’équipe de Techcrunch il un mois. J’ai tente de présenter ses principaux [...]

By: Sarah Lacy vs. Journalism « chcameron.com

Sarah Lacy vs. Journalism « chcameron.com — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:29:55 +0000

[...] head in jealously and amazement. I first heard of the tech/business writer a few months ago when TechCrunch welcomed her as a guest blogger and then later hired her on as a regular [...]

By: Dr. Quinlan, Medicine Woman

Dr. Quinlan, Medicine Woman — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:15:54 +0000

Attention everyone:

Matthew Quinlan is concerned that he’s been wasting his time seeking coverage on TC.

He’s very busy curing cancer, negotiating peace in the Middle East, and buying and selling real estate with no money down to be bothered with the quips from TC’s readership.

Please improve your commentary. I will start.

Matthew Qunlan humps cattle.

Thank you.

By: Haters are lame: Corbett's Hairpiece is Lamer

Haters are lame: Corbett's Hairpiece is Lamer — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0000

Dude:

Staple down the hairpiece. I think it’s moving…

By: Jason

Jason — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:03:45 +0000

good luck Sarah. all the best

By: Mister DNA

Mister DNA — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:24:01 +0000

Sarah was a total fail at SXSW — to hear the bloggeratti blame it on Zuckerberg reveals how few have actually watched her juvenile and coquettish pseudo journalism. I can’t blame them though, it was incredibly painful.

In any case, I dig Andrew’s video comment — one of the more interesting social apps of video I’ve seen.

By: Jeff Slobotski

Jeff Slobotski — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:04:32 +0000

Sarah Lacy + Techcrunch = good reading!

Looking forward to following the stories Sarah and talk with you soon!

Don’t forget—we’re still hoping you come in for http://www.BIGOmaha.com!

By: LyQuSay Facebook App

LyQuSay Facebook App — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:05:06 +0000

Finally techcrunch has added some hot-ness with Sarah involved

By: How do you improve a bad blog? Hire Bad Reporter.

How do you improve a bad blog? Hire Bad Reporter. — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:53:35 +0000

Is she going to be paid in ice cream?

By: TC Officially Jumps the Shark

TC Officially Jumps the Shark — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:51:47 +0000

Ted McGinley unavailable?

By: Abs

Abs — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:58:24 +0000

What a clown.

Its not like Sarah is going to pole dance. We are looking forward to what she writes about and how.

WELCOME SARAH…I am a bit late but still…welcome!

By: cheezespread

cheezespread — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:30:33 +0000

” a hearty TechCrunch welcome. “.. You asked for it !

By: kevin

kevin — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:19:19 +0000

She looks sexy. I want to kiss her.

By: valleymonger

valleymonger — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:39:23 +0000

“She sounded great on KQED’s Forum a couple of weeks back”…

are you serious? she was horrible! she did not add anything new or interesting, and even less, intelligent, to the discussion. She just sticked to her point of “this time of crisis is also probably a great time for entrepreneurs” and shit. I wanted to kick the radio, shake it asking for some, any comment from someone that actually knew what they were talking about…

she is an amateur journalist, and a bad one.

By: Kel Kelly

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:17:36 +0000

congrats sarah! i think you will bring a fresh perspective to tc. enjoy your gig and be sure to let your skin get thicker. this is one of the toughest crowds on the net. haha! give ‘em hell!

By: peterk

peterk — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:15:21 +0000

Why the haterade?

Welcoming her this way makes these boards look like 4chan, which they aren’t, so let’s see what she brings to the table.

She sounded great on KQED’s Forum a couple of weeks back, and she’s been in the game a long time.

So best of luck to her, and Mike

By: jimbo bagggins

jimbo bagggins — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:57:56 +0000

boooooooo. send her away

By: Micah Baldwin

Micah Baldwin — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:52:46 +0000

Im excited for you Sarah! Its a great forum for you to express your (often controversial) ideas. I look forward to your posts and the interesting discussions that I am sure will follow…

By: Matthew Quinlan

Matthew Quinlan — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:09 +0000

If these comments are indicative of the quality of the TechCrunch readership, then I have been wasting my time seeking coverage here.

Welcome Lacey.

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:20:27 +0000

Perhaps Michael’s vacation will convince prospective buyers / publishers that TC really can be a standalone going concern without his direct involvement.

By: WulfCry

WulfCry — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:09:22 +0000

You go get to it tech is a girl thing to.