<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Deletes Reply-To-All Button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:44:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infoglut &#171; Finger On The Pulse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2997365</link>
		<dc:creator>Infoglut &#171; Finger On The Pulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2997365</guid>
		<description>[...] made to solve these issues, the most radical of which is Nielsen Media Research&#8217;s decision to disable the reply-all button in Outlook to try and eliminate unnecessary cc-ing of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made to solve these issues, the most radical of which is Nielsen Media Research&#8217;s decision to disable the reply-all button in Outlook to try and eliminate unnecessary cc-ing of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: مركز تحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2957159</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز تحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2957159</guid>
		<description>I watched him tryo to commandeer a bus during a company trip because people weren’t loading fast enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched him tryo to commandeer a bus during a company trip because people weren’t loading fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: منتديات</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2957155</link>
		<dc:creator>منتديات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2957155</guid>
		<description>Awful idea. Their goal here is to eliminate inefficiencies, and a 1-second delay for each recipient really doesn’t help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful idea. Their goal here is to eliminate inefficiencies, and a 1-second delay for each recipient really doesn’t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Nielsen Deletes Reply-To-All Button&#8221; &#171; iOrganized Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2897361</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Nielsen Deletes Reply-To-All Button&#8221; &#171; iOrganized Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2897361</guid>
		<description>[...] Read it and tell me what you think!    This entry was written by Elizabeth Bowman, posted on August 3, 2009 at 6:16 am, filed under Business Organizing, Electronic Information Management, Fun Stories and tagged electronic clutter, Electronic Organizing, Elizabeth Bowman, email, Email Organizing, Innovatively Organized, office, organize, Removing the Reply-To-All Button. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.    &#171; Recipe Relish: Cool new&#160;product [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read it and tell me what you think!    This entry was written by Elizabeth Bowman, posted on August 3, 2009 at 6:16 am, filed under Business Organizing, Electronic Information Management, Fun Stories and tagged electronic clutter, Electronic Organizing, Elizabeth Bowman, email, Email Organizing, Innovatively Organized, office, organize, Removing the Reply-To-All Button. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.    &laquo; Recipe Relish: Cool new&nbsp;product [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email Etiquette: Let&#8217;s Address Addressing &#171; SureFire IT Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2855999</link>
		<dc:creator>Email Etiquette: Let&#8217;s Address Addressing &#171; SureFire IT Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2855999</guid>
		<description>[...] going to.  You may have to choose this option.  This has become so extreme that the company NEC disabled the Reply to All functionality on their Outlook across the entire staff.  They claim it is due to staff inefficiency and inbox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to.  You may have to choose this option.  This has become so extreme that the company NEC disabled the Reply to All functionality on their Outlook across the entire staff.  They claim it is due to staff inefficiency and inbox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creacrold</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2802700</link>
		<dc:creator>creacrold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2802700</guid>
		<description>Добрый день! Так приятно оказаться на стоящем проекте. Всем кто его создал огромное спасибо за ваши труды!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Добрый день! Так приятно оказаться на стоящем проекте. Всем кто его создал огромное спасибо за ваши труды!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milipiskin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2780252</link>
		<dc:creator>milipiskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2780252</guid>
		<description>Как всегда познавательно и интересно. Если бы все такие посты были то можно было переплюнуть отметку в 500 подписчиков гораздо быстрее!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Как всегда познавательно и интересно. Если бы все такие посты были то можно было переплюнуть отметку в 500 подписчиков гораздо быстрее!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porosenochek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2769306</link>
		<dc:creator>porosenochek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2769306</guid>
		<description>Ну вот, дожился... Скоро за монитором буду проводить больше времени, чем с девушкой ((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ну вот, дожился&#8230; Скоро за монитором буду проводить больше времени, чем с девушкой ((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamont</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2692764</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2692764</guid>
		<description>Only those who have worked for an IT organization led by Mitchell Habib can truly understand the ridiculousness of the request.  It is widely know within his former company, Citi, that his keyboard was frequently replaced.  The funny part was, there was always a new dent in the wall which looked strangely like a keyboard as well.  He has a little man complex.  I watched him tryo to commandeer a bus during a company trip because people weren&#039;t loading fast enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only those who have worked for an IT organization led by Mitchell Habib can truly understand the ridiculousness of the request.  It is widely know within his former company, Citi, that his keyboard was frequently replaced.  The funny part was, there was always a new dent in the wall which looked strangely like a keyboard as well.  He has a little man complex.  I watched him tryo to commandeer a bus during a company trip because people weren&#8217;t loading fast enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-1/#comment-2675392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2675392</guid>
		<description>gahhh!

freefreebiefinder.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gahhh!</p>
<p>freefreebiefinder.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salvarse de esos emails enviados por equivocaci&#243;n &#124; arturogoga</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2662129</link>
		<dc:creator>Salvarse de esos emails enviados por equivocaci&#243;n &#124; arturogoga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2662129</guid>
		<description>[...] lugar del simple responder, y no nos damos cuenta hasta que lo enviamos (Por algo Nielsen terminó por desactivarlo en las PCs de la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lugar del simple responder, y no nos damos cuenta hasta que lo enviamos (Por algo Nielsen terminó por desactivarlo en las PCs de la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Reply-to-all verboten at Nielsen&#160;&#8212;&#160;All Appropriate Technologies Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2642525</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Reply-to-all verboten at Nielsen&#160;&#8212;&#160;All Appropriate Technologies Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2642525</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch has an article that talks about a new policy at Nielsen corporate:  The Reply-to-all function on their email is disabled. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch has an article that talks about a new policy at Nielsen corporate:  The Reply-to-all function on their email is disabled. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too much of a good thing &#171; The Sharing Cyclone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2634674</link>
		<dc:creator>Too much of a good thing &#171; The Sharing Cyclone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2634674</guid>
		<description>[...] Some disagree with the severity of this outcome; others have done the math to prove its value. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some disagree with the severity of this outcome; others have done the math to prove its value. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch: Nielsen Deletes Reply-To-All Button &#124; Dave Crenshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2631527</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch: Nielsen Deletes Reply-To-All Button &#124; Dave Crenshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2631527</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/'>http://www.tech...-to-all-button/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillC</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2630495</link>
		<dc:creator>BillC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2630495</guid>
		<description>There is a simpler solution. As most of the Reply All problem has to do with corporate mailings that go to all employess, rather then project related distribution lists, the EASIEST solution would be to have the SENDER put all the recipients (distribution list names) in the BCC field. Then, nobody can reply all. Only to the sender. I looked this up and found Microsoft actually recommends this procedure.

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA012002371033.aspx

Just another knee-jerk reaction and a classic example of treating the symptom and not the disease!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a simpler solution. As most of the Reply All problem has to do with corporate mailings that go to all employess, rather then project related distribution lists, the EASIEST solution would be to have the SENDER put all the recipients (distribution list names) in the BCC field. Then, nobody can reply all. Only to the sender. I looked this up and found Microsoft actually recommends this procedure.</p>
<p><a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA012002371033.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA012002371033.aspx'>http://office.m...2002371033.aspx</a></p>
<p>Just another knee-jerk reaction and a classic example of treating the symptom and not the disease!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email dysfunctional</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2626222</link>
		<dc:creator>Email dysfunctional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2626222</guid>
		<description>[...] of people. It is not an effective tool for discussion or debate within large groups. Indeed, one company recently removed the reply-to-all button from their email program, in order to &#8216;reduce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of people. It is not an effective tool for discussion or debate within large groups. Indeed, one company recently removed the reply-to-all button from their email program, in order to &#8216;reduce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nielsenemployee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-1/#comment-2622648</link>
		<dc:creator>nielsenemployee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2622648</guid>
		<description>look at my above comment it doesn&#039;t work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at my above comment it doesn&#8217;t work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nielsenemployee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-1/#comment-2622647</link>
		<dc:creator>nielsenemployee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2622647</guid>
		<description>We have already figured out how to work around the reply all button being removed....

ctrl
shift
R


They can take the button away but they can&#039;t take the functionaility out of the app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have already figured out how to work around the reply all button being removed&#8230;.</p>
<p>ctrl<br />
shift<br />
R</p>
<p>They can take the button away but they can&#8217;t take the functionaility out of the app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichalT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2622589</link>
		<dc:creator>MichalT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2622589</guid>
		<description>I think Gmail does reply-all very well:

1) It&#039;s a two click operation (a regular reply is a one click operation) which prevents incidental use.

2) You can &quot;mute&quot; an entire conversation (including all future replies) which moves it out of your Inbox.

While I don&#039;t use Outlook myself, I do think it&#039;s a nice tool for people who do a lot of e-mail, especially in a corporate environment. Reply-all is actually something I use myself from time to time, and while I could certainly live without it, there might be people who&#039;d rather not.

I think it&#039;s an interesting experiment. Even if they do bring back the functionality in the future (as I think they will), maybe the whole thing will make their employees more aware of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gmail does reply-all very well:</p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s a two click operation (a regular reply is a one click operation) which prevents incidental use.</p>
<p>2) You can &#8220;mute&#8221; an entire conversation (including all future replies) which moves it out of your Inbox.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t use Outlook myself, I do think it&#8217;s a nice tool for people who do a lot of e-mail, especially in a corporate environment. Reply-all is actually something I use myself from time to time, and while I could certainly live without it, there might be people who&#8217;d rather not.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an interesting experiment. Even if they do bring back the functionality in the future (as I think they will), maybe the whole thing will make their employees more aware of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichalT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-1/#comment-2622568</link>
		<dc:creator>MichalT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2622568</guid>
		<description>Cool :) Seems like a nice way to solve that problem, though this kind of thing requires the company to have a culture, which is something that from my (admittedly limited) experience, companies like Nielsen lack.

By companies like Nielsen I mean big, fat and made entirely out of paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Seems like a nice way to solve that problem, though this kind of thing requires the company to have a culture, which is something that from my (admittedly limited) experience, companies like Nielsen lack.</p>
<p>By companies like Nielsen I mean big, fat and made entirely out of paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2621434</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2621434</guid>
		<description>Hate to break it to Nielsen, you can forward a message to 30000 internal users, only one copy is stored in exchange, the rest are pointers. oops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to break it to Nielsen, you can forward a message to 30000 internal users, only one copy is stored in exchange, the rest are pointers. oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2620893</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2620893</guid>
		<description>Anyone heard of rights management or the bcc field ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone heard of rights management or the bcc field ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidbit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2620360</link>
		<dc:creator>tidbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2620360</guid>
		<description>well they did remove the button but not the fuctionality.  Ctrl+shift+r = reply all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well they did remove the button but not the fuctionality.  Ctrl+shift+r = reply all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Product Idea: Stop Employee Spam &#124; Elegant Technologies Rising</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2619390</link>
		<dc:creator>Product Idea: Stop Employee Spam &#124; Elegant Technologies Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2619390</guid>
		<description>[...] [Update: 2/2009 - Neilson solved this quite nicely by just programatically removing the Reply All button] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Update: 2/2009 - Neilson solved this quite nicely by just programatically removing the Reply All button] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erika</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/comment-page-2/#comment-2618245</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40520#comment-2618245</guid>
		<description>and imagine how many CEO&#039;s flew out and got hotels in NYC for this meeting. Cut costs on bullshitting and save jobs. 

FUCKING GREEDY MORONS- a.k.a The Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co., Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P., Blackstone Group L.P., Carlyle Group, Hellman &amp; Friedman LLC and AlpInvest Partners.[13]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and imagine how many CEO&#8217;s flew out and got hotels in NYC for this meeting. Cut costs on bullshitting and save jobs. </p>
<p>FUCKING GREEDY MORONS- a.k.a The Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co., Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P., Blackstone Group L.P., Carlyle Group, Hellman &amp; Friedman LLC and AlpInvest Partners.[13]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
