<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenTable Files For IPO, And Reveals Its Finances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:48:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yelp vs OpenTable reviews &#187; Hraba Hospitality Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-3075593</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp vs OpenTable reviews &#187; Hraba Hospitality Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-3075593</guid>
		<description>[...] far beyond the Bay Area, and 3) they have a less shaky business model.  The margins are somewhat slim, and I am not sure I can do the overall math&#8230; but if you compare their user base to how many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far beyond the Bay Area, and 3) they have a less shaky business model.  The margins are somewhat slim, and I am not sure I can do the overall math&#8230; but if you compare their user base to how many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Sarah Lacy sell out during her interview with OpenTable CEO Jeff Jordan? &#171; Dinner Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2967782</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Sarah Lacy sell out during her interview with OpenTable CEO Jeff Jordan? &#171; Dinner Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2967782</guid>
		<description>[...] the Internet doesn&#8217;t particularly make easier.&#8221;  Her third reason is that OpenTable isn&#8217;t very profitable selling software-as-a-service.  Her fourth is dead on as she states that &#8220;Restaurants are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Internet doesn&#8217;t particularly make easier.&#8221;  Her third reason is that OpenTable isn&#8217;t very profitable selling software-as-a-service.  Her fourth is dead on as she states that &#8220;Restaurants are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: منتديات</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2957179</link>
		<dc:creator>منتديات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2957179</guid>
		<description>Online restaurant reservation!!!
It’s a great idea; I will definitely try to do something of this kind India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online restaurant reservation!!!<br />
It’s a great idea; I will definitely try to do something of this kind India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: مركز تحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2957171</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز تحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2957171</guid>
		<description>I have zero affiliation with the company but I think you are suppose to extrapolate from the “sales and marketing” line. I’m guessing they easily cut operation expense to be profitable but right now reinvesting back into growth. Just my analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have zero affiliation with the company but I think you are suppose to extrapolate from the “sales and marketing” line. I’m guessing they easily cut operation expense to be profitable but right now reinvesting back into growth. Just my analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is The Winter of Tech Liquidity Event Discontent Over? &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2768317</link>
		<dc:creator>Is The Winter of Tech Liquidity Event Discontent Over? &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2768317</guid>
		<description>[...] The door to the tech IPO market has cracked open a little bit with the recent IPO of OpenTable.  OpenTable delivers reservation management software to restaurants through a Web browser and collects monthly subscription revenues.  As TechCrunch&#8217;s Eric Schonfeld noted &#8220;This is an extremely healthy IPO. OpenTable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The door to the tech IPO market has cracked open a little bit with the recent IPO of OpenTable.  OpenTable delivers reservation management software to restaurants through a Web browser and collects monthly subscription revenues.  As TechCrunch&#8217;s Eric Schonfeld noted &#8220;This is an extremely healthy IPO. OpenTable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: news.mussedigital.com &#187; OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2759908</link>
		<dc:creator>news.mussedigital.com &#187; OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2759908</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2759772</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2759772</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in .8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of 6,000 on revenues of million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in .8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of 6,000 on revenues of million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million. &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2759749</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Passes $600 Million. &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2759749</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenTable IPO opens strong &#171; Raja Jasti&#8217;s Blog - Renaissance Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2759746</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenTable IPO opens strong &#171; Raja Jasti&#8217;s Blog - Renaissance Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2759746</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Hits $600 Million.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2759722</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenTable Has A Healthy IPO. Shares Shoot Up 40 Percent, Market Cap Hits $600 Million.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2759722</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an extremely healthy IPO. Opentable is not a blowout Internet company. But it is a solid Internet company that matters. It pulled in $55.8 million in revenues last year and a net loss of $1 million (largely due to expansion-related costs). In the first quarter of 2009, it managed to turn a net profit of $366,000 on revenues of $16 million. (For a deeper financial analysis, see this earlier post). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Mushahwar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2753984</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Mushahwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2753984</guid>
		<description>Shit happens buddy. Build a bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit happens buddy. Build a bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number$</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2735032</link>
		<dc:creator>Number$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2735032</guid>
		<description>Sad, just plain sad, VC wanting to cash out.  OpenTable&#039;s invested a lot in their reservation system, but MS Dynamics GP their accounting system will not get them to the next level... $13/share forgetta about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, just plain sad, VC wanting to cash out.  OpenTable&#8217;s invested a lot in their reservation system, but MS Dynamics GP their accounting system will not get them to the next level&#8230; $13/share forgetta about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Registration for Streamyx Broadband &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2730326</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Registration for Streamyx Broadband &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2730326</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate streamyx web a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate streamyx web a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; The Good NET Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728934</link>
		<dc:creator>How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; The Good NET Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728934</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728909</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728909</guid>
		<description>What a terrible homepage.  It looks like a parked domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a terrible homepage.  It looks like a parked domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728878</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728878</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728799</link>
		<dc:creator>How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728799</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; Whaza.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728767</link>
		<dc:creator>How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124; Whaza.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728767</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-2/#comment-2728760</link>
		<dc:creator>How OpenTable Could Actually Matter &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728760</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2728733</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728733</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2728710</link>
		<dc:creator>How OpenTable Could Actually Matter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2728710</guid>
		<description>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company OpenTable had been a rumored IPO candidate for a while. Still, it shocked many when it finally filed its intention to debut on the Nasdaq back in January. What? Does this company just have a thing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Agra Indian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2715892</link>
		<dc:creator>The Agra Indian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2715892</guid>
		<description>Online restaurant reservation!!!
It’s a great idea; I will definitely try to do something of this kind India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online restaurant reservation!!!<br />
It’s a great idea; I will definitely try to do something of this kind India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2675398</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2675398</guid>
		<description>what I need

freefreebiefinder.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what I need</p>
<p>freefreebiefinder.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2622796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2622796</guid>
		<description>This &quot;comprehensive CRM component&quot; is not a unique selling point.  Many other software solutions for the restaurant reservation market includes integrated CRM and e-marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;comprehensive CRM component&#8221; is not a unique selling point.  Many other software solutions for the restaurant reservation market includes integrated CRM and e-marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lone Voice in the Wild: OpenTable Files for IPO &#124; Rfidststemsonline</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/30/opentable-files-for-ipo-and-reveals-its-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-2620803</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lone Voice in the Wild: OpenTable Files for IPO &#124; Rfidststemsonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=40457#comment-2620803</guid>
		<description>[...] covers the filing here. I&#8217;ve embedded the S-1 below:Sec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covers the filing here. I&#8217;ve embedded the S-1 below:Sec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
