<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple And IBM Resolve Employment Dispute; Papermaster Can Now Get To Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:47:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boseheadphones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2883639</link>
		<dc:creator>boseheadphones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2883639</guid>
		<description>I like very much the writings and pictures and explanations in your adress so I look forward to see your next writings.
To provide useful information, please click to view
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.headphonesky.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bose headphones&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aceghd.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ghd Hair Straightener&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.topbootsmart.com/women-s-dakota&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Women is Dakota&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.topbootsmart.com/sundance-ugg-boots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sundance UGG Boots&lt;/a&gt;

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like very much the writings and pictures and explanations in your adress so I look forward to see your next writings.<br />
To provide useful information, please click to view<br />
<a href="http://www.headphonesky.com" rel="nofollow">Bose headphones</a><br />
<a href="http://www.aceghd.com" rel="nofollow">ghd Hair Straightener</a><br />
<a href="http://www.topbootsmart.com/women-s-dakota" rel="nofollow">Women is Dakota</a><br />
<a href="http://www.topbootsmart.com/sundance-ugg-boots" rel="nofollow">Sundance UGG Boots</a></p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Once Again, The Justice Department Is Confused. Tech Companies Steal Employees From Each Other Every Day.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2780979</link>
		<dc:creator>Once Again, The Justice Department Is Confused. Tech Companies Steal Employees From Each Other Every Day.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2780979</guid>
		<description>[...] in the cabal, since Apple hired way one of its top chip designers, Mark Papermaster, and got into a big lawsuit with IBM over the incident. And Yahoo, nobody would dare steal employees away from Yahoo. That never happens [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the cabal, since Apple hired way one of its top chip designers, Mark Papermaster, and got into a big lawsuit with IBM over the incident. And Yahoo, nobody would dare steal employees away from Yahoo. That never happens [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhichDraft.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Non-Compete Battle: Apple vs. IBM. The Superhero: The Papermaster and His Origami-Mobile. TechCrunch Questions It All.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2611510</link>
		<dc:creator>WhichDraft.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Non-Compete Battle: Apple vs. IBM. The Superhero: The Papermaster and His Origami-Mobile. TechCrunch Questions It All.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2611510</guid>
		<description>[...] the leading web site for coverage on technology companies and startups, has a recent posting by Erick Schonfeld on the showdown between Apple and IBM over whether Apple can legally hire an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the leading web site for coverage on technology companies and startups, has a recent posting by Erick Schonfeld on the showdown between Apple and IBM over whether Apple can legally hire an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; i-Phones Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2609917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; i-Phones Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2609917</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; My Apple iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2609760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; My Apple iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2609760</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; Lazy Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2609521</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; Lazy Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2609521</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 - iPhone Newswire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2609247</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 - iPhone Newswire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2609247</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mark Anderman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mark Anderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608606</guid>
		<description>While some states won&#039;t enforce many non-compete provisions, they often have a strength in and of themselves regardless of what the courts might say.  When a former employee is threatened with a lawsuit by her old employer before joining a competitor, the competitor won&#039;t, in most situations, handle the cost of litigating the dispute (Mr. Papermaster excepted).  As a result, the old employer can get away with enforcing a legally dubious contract because the employee will probably be intimidated by the lawyers and the costs involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some states won&#8217;t enforce many non-compete provisions, they often have a strength in and of themselves regardless of what the courts might say.  When a former employee is threatened with a lawsuit by her old employer before joining a competitor, the competitor won&#8217;t, in most situations, handle the cost of litigating the dispute (Mr. Papermaster excepted).  As a result, the old employer can get away with enforcing a legally dubious contract because the employee will probably be intimidated by the lawyers and the costs involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608564</guid>
		<description>Oh IBM, you make me smile.  You destroy your quarter and silently layoff thousands.  Grow a pair and tell everyone the truth: You made a shit load of money, you gave a rosy guidance and now it&#039;s time to layoff in North America and move jobs to South America.  

They say the American public is morally bankrupt.. I say the American Multi-Nationals are morally bankrupt - with IBM leading the charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh IBM, you make me smile.  You destroy your quarter and silently layoff thousands.  Grow a pair and tell everyone the truth: You made a shit load of money, you gave a rosy guidance and now it&#8217;s time to layoff in North America and move jobs to South America.  </p>
<p>They say the American public is morally bankrupt.. I say the American Multi-Nationals are morally bankrupt &#8211; with IBM leading the charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; IPHONE NEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; IPHONE NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608549</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is probable to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course deciding kinda than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t earmark for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is probable to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course deciding kinda than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t earmark for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608408</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608408</guid>
		<description>Haha nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; Daily iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Papermaster Litigation Done — to Head up iPhone, iPod Hardware April 24 &#124; Daily iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608262</guid>
		<description>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [...] has been resolved&#8221; isn&#8217;t something that Apple is likely to disclose, TechCrunch reports that it was an out-of-course settlement rather than a &#8220;California doesn&#8217;t allow for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608174</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608174</guid>
		<description>This case actually involves two states that don&#039;t give much teeth to non-compete clauses - Texas (where Papermaster worked for IBM) and California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case actually involves two states that don&#8217;t give much teeth to non-compete clauses &#8211; Texas (where Papermaster worked for IBM) and California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608078</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608078</guid>
		<description>Ah, sorry, forgot to put that part in. For two years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, sorry, forgot to put that part in. For two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608076</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608076</guid>
		<description>like....forever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like&#8230;.forever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Boden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608073</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Boden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608073</guid>
		<description>I meant to say &quot;Eric is right...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say &#8220;Eric is right&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608072</guid>
		<description>Luckily in California non-competes are illegal. I would not work for a company either way that forced me to sign one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily in California non-competes are illegal. I would not work for a company either way that forced me to sign one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Boden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608070</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Boden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608070</guid>
		<description>Douglas, 

different states have different rules when it comes to this. Michael is right on the money in this case as it most likely involves California. 

The east coast on the other hand is a different story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas, </p>
<p>different states have different rules when it comes to this. Michael is right on the money in this case as it most likely involves California. </p>
<p>The east coast on the other hand is a different story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608062</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608062</guid>
		<description>Schonfeld:  How do you know &quot;they are not worth the paper they are written on&quot; if you don&#039;t know the settlement terms?  And for example, Microsoft is famous with its predatory hiring practices; why shouldn&#039;t intellectually valuable/expensive employees be guarded in such an environment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schonfeld:  How do you know &#8220;they are not worth the paper they are written on&#8221; if you don&#8217;t know the settlement terms?  And for example, Microsoft is famous with its predatory hiring practices; why shouldn&#8217;t intellectually valuable/expensive employees be guarded in such an environment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608056</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608056</guid>
		<description>how do you know it was worthless for IBM? maybe apple had to pay them off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you know it was worthless for IBM? maybe apple had to pay them off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608055</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608055</guid>
		<description>If Papermaster stayed at IBM he would have been laid off by now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Papermaster stayed at IBM he would have been laid off by now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608054</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608054</guid>
		<description>@ The Weakonomist, I even talked to some lawyers, and at least here in CT laws like that don&#039;t even have legal binding. I&#039;m not sure about other states though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ The Weakonomist, I even talked to some lawyers, and at least here in CT laws like that don&#8217;t even have legal binding. I&#8217;m not sure about other states though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608050</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608050</guid>
		<description>@timothy. I&#039;m banned from a certain industry for two years because of the same thing. The only difference for me is I&#039;m done with that industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@timothy. I&#8217;m banned from a certain industry for two years because of the same thing. The only difference for me is I&#8217;m done with that industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608043</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608043</guid>
		<description>About damn time. I wish I had two of the largest tech companies on the planet fighting over me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About damn time. I wish I had two of the largest tech companies on the planet fighting over me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/27/apple-and-ibm-resolve-employment-dispute-papermaster-can-now-get-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2608042</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=39694#comment-2608042</guid>
		<description>my comment should have a &quot;not&quot; after &quot;could&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my comment should have a &#8220;not&#8221; after &#8220;could&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
