<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People Paying Good Money To Cheat Pointless Twitter Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:59:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: articlesatrandom.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3 Lonely Planet Nominations!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2656137</link>
		<dc:creator>articlesatrandom.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3 Lonely Planet Nominations!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2656137</guid>
		<description>[...] I was very disappointed in the cheating and buying votes that was reported on the wildly popular Techcrunch and Pistachio .Nevertheless, the press had a hey&#160; day with it , including our local home&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was very disappointed in the cheating and buying votes that was reported on the wildly popular Techcrunch and Pistachio .Nevertheless, the press had a hey&nbsp; day with it , including our local home&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soultravelers3</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2603874</link>
		<dc:creator>soultravelers3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2603874</guid>
		<description>It is about time someone started talking about all the cheating and begging going on in the shorty awards!! Thank you! 

Despite being voted as #3 in Travel ( and it happens I am the only nominee in the finals who is actually traveling!!) I find I am thoroughly disgusted with this and EVERY contest &amp; link bate list in cyberspace. They ALL seem to be filled with cheating &amp; wasting peoples time ( and getting email addresses etc). 

Yeah, you get the award &amp; bragging rites, but then everyone with a brain knows it is worth bupkis! I guess it is like having a million followers, it fools some people.

I have tweeted about this &amp; found many agree.

I was nominated in travel &amp; found the only way to really get lots of votes was to ask for them, regularly. I never even learned how to make it a 1-click item that would go directly into your followers reply place with the &quot;reasons&quot; you would like me, like all of the top people did. Jeesh!

 Very soon I realized that was a total waste of my time. I also noticed the heavy cheating going on in almost EVERY category.

I and others reported this to the people at shortyawards but nothing was done. The bot also made tons of stupid mistakes that were never corrected.

If you look at the top person in travel ( just as @cruisesource mentions above) you will see that most of those votes come from brand new accts with no picture who only have a few tweets and all about voting for 1 person. Duh!

That said, I am VERY appreciative to the kind people who said such generous things about us, voted for us in both nominating &amp; voting ( most with never being asked &amp; with no fancy 1click link). They also had to give up their email address &amp; twitter password to vote. Some heard about it in facebook &amp; joined twitter just to vote for us!  Kudos to THEM! I am amazed.

If you must do a contest, try not to alienate everyone, condone cheating and go on for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about time someone started talking about all the cheating and begging going on in the shorty awards!! Thank you! </p>
<p>Despite being voted as #3 in Travel ( and it happens I am the only nominee in the finals who is actually traveling!!) I find I am thoroughly disgusted with this and EVERY contest &amp; link bate list in cyberspace. They ALL seem to be filled with cheating &amp; wasting peoples time ( and getting email addresses etc). </p>
<p>Yeah, you get the award &amp; bragging rites, but then everyone with a brain knows it is worth bupkis! I guess it is like having a million followers, it fools some people.</p>
<p>I have tweeted about this &amp; found many agree.</p>
<p>I was nominated in travel &amp; found the only way to really get lots of votes was to ask for them, regularly. I never even learned how to make it a 1-click item that would go directly into your followers reply place with the &#8220;reasons&#8221; you would like me, like all of the top people did. Jeesh!</p>
<p> Very soon I realized that was a total waste of my time. I also noticed the heavy cheating going on in almost EVERY category.</p>
<p>I and others reported this to the people at shortyawards but nothing was done. The bot also made tons of stupid mistakes that were never corrected.</p>
<p>If you look at the top person in travel ( just as @cruisesource mentions above) you will see that most of those votes come from brand new accts with no picture who only have a few tweets and all about voting for 1 person. Duh!</p>
<p>That said, I am VERY appreciative to the kind people who said such generous things about us, voted for us in both nominating &amp; voting ( most with never being asked &amp; with no fancy 1click link). They also had to give up their email address &amp; twitter password to vote. Some heard about it in facebook &amp; joined twitter just to vote for us!  Kudos to THEM! I am amazed.</p>
<p>If you must do a contest, try not to alienate everyone, condone cheating and go on for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2603796</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2603796</guid>
		<description>@ZaraGreen — Your vote wasn&#039;t counted and you don&#039;t want to revote so that it IS counted? While I&#039;m sure @BarackObama isn&#039;t listening, that seems counterintuitive. There are more worthy things to do with your time for sure, but still, making your vote count…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ZaraGreen — Your vote wasn&#8217;t counted and you don&#8217;t want to revote so that it IS counted? While I&#8217;m sure @BarackObama isn&#8217;t listening, that seems counterintuitive. There are more worthy things to do with your time for sure, but still, making your vote count…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shorty Awards - As últimas horas!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2603751</link>
		<dc:creator>Shorty Awards - As últimas horas!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2603751</guid>
		<description>[...] de cerca de um mês de votações, nomeações, polémicas e campanhas está na hora de descobrir quem mais tem entusiasmado os utilizadores [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de cerca de um mês de votações, nomeações, polémicas e campanhas está na hora de descobrir quem mais tem entusiasmado os utilizadores [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belkin puts a price on its Customer Experience: 65 Cents &#124; Standing Out From The Crowd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2603134</link>
		<dc:creator>Belkin puts a price on its Customer Experience: 65 Cents &#124; Standing Out From The Crowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2603134</guid>
		<description>[...] one to try to leverage Mechanical Turk&#8217;s services to unethically increase scores. There are people paying good money to cheat a Twitter competition, the Shorty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one to try to leverage Mechanical Turk&#8217;s services to unethically increase scores. There are people paying good money to cheat a Twitter competition, the Shorty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shorty Awards: Helping Make Twitter Even More Useless&#160;&#124;&#160;lalawag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-2/#comment-2602981</link>
		<dc:creator>Shorty Awards: Helping Make Twitter Even More Useless&#160;&#124;&#160;lalawag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602981</guid>
		<description>[...] is the Shorty Awards, a way to recognize and reward 140 digit content creators who can harass (or pay) for enough @ based votes from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the Shorty Awards, a way to recognize and reward 140 digit content creators who can harass (or pay) for enough @ based votes from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter is da Bomb - Not &#124; Dan Wilson's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2602977</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter is da Bomb - Not &#124; Dan Wilson's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602977</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch can&#8217;t stop raving about every single little service and startup that is built around Twitter, the service&#8217;s downtime proves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch can&#8217;t stop raving about every single little service and startup that is built around Twitter, the service&#8217;s downtime proves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zara Green</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2602857</link>
		<dc:creator>Zara Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602857</guid>
		<description>Many people asked for votes and the first time, I gave it, some came back and asked again with a story of being a &quot;finalist&quot; if I really knew them I voted again, otherwise ignored.

Of those ignored, one came back (if you got this solicitation, you know who it was) saying that the votes had been mistakenly &quot;deleted&quot; and I needed to cast my vote again - providing the link, of course...are you kidding me?

Come on tweople...come on...stop the madness!
@ZaraGreen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people asked for votes and the first time, I gave it, some came back and asked again with a story of being a &#8220;finalist&#8221; if I really knew them I voted again, otherwise ignored.</p>
<p>Of those ignored, one came back (if you got this solicitation, you know who it was) saying that the votes had been mistakenly &#8220;deleted&#8221; and I needed to cast my vote again &#8211; providing the link, of course&#8230;are you kidding me?</p>
<p>Come on tweople&#8230;come on&#8230;stop the madness!<br />
@ZaraGreen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2602536</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602536</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a finalist in the &quot;Design&quot; category.

Day 1: Funny idea. Think I&#039;ll get someone to nominate me.
Day 2-20: Wow! This is kinda cool. Finding some great people to follow in the Design category.
Day 21-35: Okay, I&#039;m taking time off for the holidays, spending more of it online, think I&#039;ll try to improve my ranking in the Shorty Awards.
Day 36-42: I&#039;m neck and neck with Zeldman, and he&#039;s, like, a major design/web guy out there! If I could get ahead of him...hmmmm.
Day 43: Yiying Lu totally deserves to win this. She&#039;s so cute and does such great work, c&#039;mon.
Day 44-Present: This was such a great way to find interesting follows AND introduce myself to people that might want to follow me. Thanks Shorty people (wait, is that politically incorrect?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a finalist in the &#8220;Design&#8221; category.</p>
<p>Day 1: Funny idea. Think I&#8217;ll get someone to nominate me.<br />
Day 2-20: Wow! This is kinda cool. Finding some great people to follow in the Design category.<br />
Day 21-35: Okay, I&#8217;m taking time off for the holidays, spending more of it online, think I&#8217;ll try to improve my ranking in the Shorty Awards.<br />
Day 36-42: I&#8217;m neck and neck with Zeldman, and he&#8217;s, like, a major design/web guy out there! If I could get ahead of him&#8230;hmmmm.<br />
Day 43: Yiying Lu totally deserves to win this. She&#8217;s so cute and does such great work, c&#8217;mon.<br />
Day 44-Present: This was such a great way to find interesting follows AND introduce myself to people that might want to follow me. Thanks Shorty people (wait, is that politically incorrect?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kerpen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2602414</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kerpen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602414</guid>
		<description>This is so sad. Thanks @marismith for bringing this to my attention.What could have been fun and meaningful has been tainted by greed, ego and dishonesty. I guess I shouldn&#039;t be surprised, but I am. And saddened. @davekerpen Peace out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so sad. Thanks @marismith for bringing this to my attention.What could have been fun and meaningful has been tainted by greed, ego and dishonesty. I guess I shouldn&#8217;t be surprised, but I am. And saddened. @davekerpen Peace out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2602084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2602084</guid>
		<description>and I gladly got my 48 cents, and then deleted my post. :) I was going to do a follow up &#039;oh by the way&#039; but it already got taken care of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I gladly got my 48 cents, and then deleted my post. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I was going to do a follow up &#8216;oh by the way&#8217; but it already got taken care of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601992</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601992</guid>
		<description>Kinda like the Crunchies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda like the Crunchies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldbrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601940</link>
		<dc:creator>coldbrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601940</guid>
		<description>Someone will be banned from Twitter for trying to game a separate media company&#039;s contest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone will be banned from Twitter for trying to game a separate media company&#8217;s contest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Marvin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Marvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601791</guid>
		<description>Wait, I can get votes by paying for them? What&#039;s the going rate? Can I get a bulk discount?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, I can get votes by paying for them? What&#8217;s the going rate? Can I get a bulk discount?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601762</guid>
		<description>The Shorty Awards were meant to be fun and entertaining. It&#039;s quite a shame when people take something like The Shorty Awards and turn it into a big brewhaha! Come on!

However, that being said, I adore many of the finalists in many of the categories. Sham or not...there are some incredibly powerful people that were nominated for the SA&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shorty Awards were meant to be fun and entertaining. It&#8217;s quite a shame when people take something like The Shorty Awards and turn it into a big brewhaha! Come on!</p>
<p>However, that being said, I adore many of the finalists in many of the categories. Sham or not&#8230;there are some incredibly powerful people that were nominated for the SA&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601727</guid>
		<description>Shorty Awards is the most worthless thing to come to Twitter in a long time. Seriously - just because it&#039;s a fancy design, people feel the urge to whore themselves out? Gimme a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorty Awards is the most worthless thing to come to Twitter in a long time. Seriously &#8211; just because it&#8217;s a fancy design, people feel the urge to whore themselves out? Gimme a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601716</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601716</guid>
		<description>Does Rod Blagojevich Tweet?  Can I follow him?

Seems to me, the Shorty Awards are a good example of the &quot;Pay to Play&quot; mentality on some level.

It&#039;s politics.  This shouldn&#039;t be too shocking to anybody that people would do whatever it takes...

Pay people--&gt; I vote for you if you vote for me.  Of course, all passed off as a healthy spirit of competition and/or winning.

There&#039;s a fine line between a crook and an entrepreneur.  Sometimes I think the only difference is one gets caught.

Apparently real life mimics itself even inside a Twitterverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Rod Blagojevich Tweet?  Can I follow him?</p>
<p>Seems to me, the Shorty Awards are a good example of the &#8220;Pay to Play&#8221; mentality on some level.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s politics.  This shouldn&#8217;t be too shocking to anybody that people would do whatever it takes&#8230;</p>
<p>Pay people&#8211;&gt; I vote for you if you vote for me.  Of course, all passed off as a healthy spirit of competition and/or winning.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a fine line between a crook and an entrepreneur.  Sometimes I think the only difference is one gets caught.</p>
<p>Apparently real life mimics itself even inside a Twitterverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601695</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601695</guid>
		<description>weep- dee-doo

http://thecashcratescam.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>weep- dee-doo</p>
<p><a href="http://thecashcratescam.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://thecashcratescam.blogspot.com'>http://thecashc...am.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheating the Shorty Awards, Cerberus&#8217; Layoffs, &#38; Obama&#8217;s Gatling Gun Suburban &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601670</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheating the Shorty Awards, Cerberus&#8217; Layoffs, &#38; Obama&#8217;s Gatling Gun Suburban &#124; DevelopmentCorporate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601670</guid>
		<description>[...] People Paying Good Money To Cheat Pointless Twitter Competition - TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People Paying Good Money To Cheat Pointless Twitter Competition &#8211; TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601610</link>
		<dc:creator>red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601610</guid>
		<description>Ask the people at common craft about dan hollings and their twitter video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask the people at common craft about dan hollings and their twitter video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Schleber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601510</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Schleber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601510</guid>
		<description>This is about as wrong-headed of a violation of social context/social trust as can be imagined, proving how little some people still get social media (doubly ironic when they are nominated in a &quot;social media&quot; category).

Not to speak of the fact that it must have occurred to certain parties, that the speed and ubiquity of such news spreading on Twitter, etc. is so much greater than it has ever been before in history. And the level of the negative response tends to be magnified in perceived violations of social trust anyway.

@Scobleizer recently found this out with his own little Amazon affiliate link brouhaha (his protestations that many others are worse, because they send people to their Adsense, etc. monetized blogposts, appeared somewhat ineffectual in quelling the &quot;unrest&quot;), as have others recently involving Mechanical Turk (Belkin, ironically using Amazon&#039;s own MT service to game Amazon reviews of its products...).

Bottom line: Violate social trust at your own peril, this stuff is very deeply embedded in people&#039;s psyches, it is VERY MUCH real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about as wrong-headed of a violation of social context/social trust as can be imagined, proving how little some people still get social media (doubly ironic when they are nominated in a &#8220;social media&#8221; category).</p>
<p>Not to speak of the fact that it must have occurred to certain parties, that the speed and ubiquity of such news spreading on Twitter, etc. is so much greater than it has ever been before in history. And the level of the negative response tends to be magnified in perceived violations of social trust anyway.</p>
<p>@Scobleizer recently found this out with his own little Amazon affiliate link brouhaha (his protestations that many others are worse, because they send people to their Adsense, etc. monetized blogposts, appeared somewhat ineffectual in quelling the &#8220;unrest&#8221;), as have others recently involving Mechanical Turk (Belkin, ironically using Amazon&#8217;s own MT service to game Amazon reviews of its products&#8230;).</p>
<p>Bottom line: Violate social trust at your own peril, this stuff is very deeply embedded in people&#8217;s psyches, it is VERY MUCH real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601439</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601439</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get too worked about about who&#039;s winnig and/or who got votes taken away (sorry).  but it is interesting that the big winner in all these is probably Amazon&#039;s Mechanical Turk... maybe they&#039;re behind it all. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get too worked about about who&#8217;s winnig and/or who got votes taken away (sorry).  but it is interesting that the big winner in all these is probably Amazon&#8217;s Mechanical Turk&#8230; maybe they&#8217;re behind it all. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Wilkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601425</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Wilkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601425</guid>
		<description>I agree with @ChrisBrogan - I am running a business (several in fact)

I adore social media and the connections.

Being recognized as a leader in #business content is flattering and AFFIRMING...however - 

I am measuring the &#039;votes&#039; from my list in the form of response to conversations, coaching clients, purchases and continued follows.

I will not campaign for shorty again - what could&#039;ve been just fun and a cool social media experiment has been cheapened by the ultra-competitiveness.

Carrie Wilkerson, The Barefoot Executive
http://TwitterBarefoot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with @ChrisBrogan &#8211; I am running a business (several in fact)</p>
<p>I adore social media and the connections.</p>
<p>Being recognized as a leader in #business content is flattering and AFFIRMING&#8230;however &#8211; </p>
<p>I am measuring the &#8216;votes&#8217; from my list in the form of response to conversations, coaching clients, purchases and continued follows.</p>
<p>I will not campaign for shorty again &#8211; what could&#8217;ve been just fun and a cool social media experiment has been cheapened by the ultra-competitiveness.</p>
<p>Carrie Wilkerson, The Barefoot Executive<br />
<a href="http://TwitterBarefoot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://TwitterBarefoot.com'>http://TwitterBarefoot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayanne Langdon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayanne Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601409</guid>
		<description>I can hear it now. &quot;You know, Dan Hollings! The guy who won the Short Award for Social Media!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can hear it now. &#8220;You know, Dan Hollings! The guy who won the Short Award for Social Media!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="566610867">Mari Smith</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/20/people-paying-good-money-to-cheat-pointless-twitter-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-2601316</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="566610867">Mari Smith</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=38655#comment-2601316</guid>
		<description>After reading Dan Zarrella&#039;s post on @pistachio&#039;s blog and now here on @techcrunch - I feel the entire Shorty Awards contest, sadly, has been tainted. 

I&#039;m clear the intent of the Shorty Awards creators is honorable - certainly $1000 grant x 26 categories x 5 finalists in each category is not an insignificant amount of money to be involved. It&#039;s just a shame to see such shenanigans... both in the nomination round and now the voting round.

Last month, I kept wondering whether to take the Shorties seriously or not; I read all the small print and decided to go for it anyway when my votes started increasing.

So, sure, I was pleasantly surprised to win the #socialmedia category in the nomination round by a landslide and also overall nominations. Yes, I do have a large following and am most grateful to all my peeps who voted.

But to have to encourage my friends, followers and fans to vote again in this next round just doesn&#039;t seem worth the bother. Frankly there are people at the top of their industry in many of the 26 categories who are not even one of the five finalists.

I&#039;m with Chris Brogan&#039;s comment above. Chris is one of my favorite social media specialists - someone I&#039;ve interviewed before, met in person and have great admiration and respect for. 

I appreciate @danzarrella for bringing the gaming to light. I don&#039;t know him personally - but wish him best of luck in the awards if it&#039;s important.

...meantime, back to running my business.

Cheers,
@marismith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading Dan Zarrella&#8217;s post on @pistachio&#8217;s blog and now here on @techcrunch &#8211; I feel the entire Shorty Awards contest, sadly, has been tainted. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m clear the intent of the Shorty Awards creators is honorable &#8211; certainly $1000 grant x 26 categories x 5 finalists in each category is not an insignificant amount of money to be involved. It&#8217;s just a shame to see such shenanigans&#8230; both in the nomination round and now the voting round.</p>
<p>Last month, I kept wondering whether to take the Shorties seriously or not; I read all the small print and decided to go for it anyway when my votes started increasing.</p>
<p>So, sure, I was pleasantly surprised to win the #socialmedia category in the nomination round by a landslide and also overall nominations. Yes, I do have a large following and am most grateful to all my peeps who voted.</p>
<p>But to have to encourage my friends, followers and fans to vote again in this next round just doesn&#8217;t seem worth the bother. Frankly there are people at the top of their industry in many of the 26 categories who are not even one of the five finalists.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Chris Brogan&#8217;s comment above. Chris is one of my favorite social media specialists &#8211; someone I&#8217;ve interviewed before, met in person and have great admiration and respect for. </p>
<p>I appreciate @danzarrella for bringing the gaming to light. I don&#8217;t know him personally &#8211; but wish him best of luck in the awards if it&#8217;s important.</p>
<p>&#8230;meantime, back to running my business.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
@marismith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
