<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:15:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another Dry Quarter For Venture Exits &#124; Recopylator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2680365</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Dry Quarter For Venture Exits &#124; Recopylator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2680365</guid>
		<description>[...] $4.5 billion a year ago. That amount is also down from the $2.4 billion in M&amp;A deals in the fourth quarter of 2008, when there were 61 deals. The average deal size has dropped dramatically from $140 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $4.5 billion a year ago. That amount is also down from the $2.4 billion in M&amp;A deals in the fourth quarter of 2008, when there were 61 deals. The average deal size has dropped dramatically from $140 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Dry Quarter For Venture Exits</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2680263</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Dry Quarter For Venture Exits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2680263</guid>
		<description>[...] $4.5 billion a year ago. That amount is also down from the $2.4 billion in M&amp;A deals in the fourth quarter of 2008, when there were 61 deals. The average deal size has dropped dramatically from $140 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $4.5 billion a year ago. That amount is also down from the $2.4 billion in M&amp;A deals in the fourth quarter of 2008, when there were 61 deals. The average deal size has dropped dramatically from $140 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2619477</link>
		<dc:creator>The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2619477</guid>
		<description>[...] reports The financial meltdown of 2008 all but shut down venture-backed exits, as we all know. The National [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reports The financial meltdown of 2008 all but shut down venture-backed exits, as we all know. The National [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Dollars Dropped 33 Percent In The Fourth Quarter, Down 8 Percent For All 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2604342</link>
		<dc:creator>VC Dollars Dropped 33 Percent In The Fourth Quarter, Down 8 Percent For All 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2604342</guid>
		<description>[...] decline in investing mapped the decrease in exit options, even though VCs are supposed to have a 5 to 7 year investment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decline in investing mapped the decrease in exit options, even though VCs are supposed to have a 5 to 7 year investment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mottau</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2599288</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mottau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2599288</guid>
		<description>Maybe if VC firms focused on innovating rather than just collecting their management fees the whole game would change. VCs tend to push too hard for unnatural things to happen (big liquidity events) because of the pressure they feel from their investors to see large returns. I would argue that Angels are going to be the ones who will live up to their heavenly names and become increasingly important to the fostering of early-stage innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if VC firms focused on innovating rather than just collecting their management fees the whole game would change. VCs tend to push too hard for unnatural things to happen (big liquidity events) because of the pressure they feel from their investors to see large returns. I would argue that Angels are going to be the ones who will live up to their heavenly names and become increasingly important to the fostering of early-stage innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Want To See Where Media Is Going? Follow The Money.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588807</link>
		<dc:creator>Want To See Where Media Is Going? Follow The Money.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588807</guid>
		<description>[...] a year when the value of venture-backed mergers and acquisitions were down 51 percent, M&amp;A activity in the publishing industry was down even more. Jordan, Edmiston counts a 68 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a year when the value of venture-backed mergers and acquisitions were down 51 percent, M&amp;A activity in the publishing industry was down even more. Jordan, Edmiston counts a 68 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-01-07 &#171; Brain Music &#8211;Gadgets, Neuroscience, Music, Social Media, Health 2.0 &#38; More</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588291</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-01-07 &#171; Brain Music &#8211;Gadgets, Neuroscience, Music, Social Media, Health 2.0 &#38; More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588291</guid>
		<description>[...] The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts (tags: vc) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts (tags: vc) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit Gupta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588282</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t you realize the risk you&#039;re taking when you make the agreements in the beginning? Why is it an issue worth discussing now and not in the beginning?

I&#039;m not saying I disagree, I&#039;m just saying that this isn&#039;t the time to blame others. There is risk involved with these things and if you believe in what they&#039;re doing, maybe it&#039;s time to roll up your sleeves and get involved to make sure that things succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t you realize the risk you&#8217;re taking when you make the agreements in the beginning? Why is it an issue worth discussing now and not in the beginning?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I disagree, I&#8217;m just saying that this isn&#8217;t the time to blame others. There is risk involved with these things and if you believe in what they&#8217;re doing, maybe it&#8217;s time to roll up your sleeves and get involved to make sure that things succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InnovationLocator.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588211</link>
		<dc:creator>InnovationLocator.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588211</guid>
		<description>location is everything in cyberspace as it is on earth.  there is only one master creator.

GodLocator.com - peace yourself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>location is everything in cyberspace as it is on earth.  there is only one master creator.</p>
<p>GodLocator.com &#8211; peace yourself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="901300653">Navin Bathija</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588209</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="901300653">Navin Bathija</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588209</guid>
		<description>Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonimoos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588204</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonimoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588204</guid>
		<description>As a private investor in two almost dead VC funds I think some of the funds shuld seriosly start paying back the management fees to the Investors or to the fund. 

Whatever the excuse is they clearly failed and clearly draged some startups with them. I suggest that the managers start working for free as they often request startup management to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a private investor in two almost dead VC funds I think some of the funds shuld seriosly start paying back the management fees to the Investors or to the fund. </p>
<p>Whatever the excuse is they clearly failed and clearly draged some startups with them. I suggest that the managers start working for free as they often request startup management to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588092</link>
		<dc:creator>weatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588092</guid>
		<description>Good analysis. Thanks Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis. Thanks Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-01-07 &#124; Brian Magierski</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2588083</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-01-07 &#124; Brian Magierski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2588083</guid>
		<description>[...] The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts (tags: VC IPO CapitalMarkets M&amp;A)     Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 2008 VC Liquidity Drought In Charts (tags: VC IPO CapitalMarkets M&amp;A)     Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BubbleDude is Right</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587966</link>
		<dc:creator>BubbleDude is Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587966</guid>
		<description>I know that you have warned us many times. You seemed like you knew things, so I paid attention and stayed out of web 2.0 as a direct result of your warnings. This idea of roosting chickens, do you think that is a good business idea. What do you think I should do; what sector is hot. Where is there money to be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that you have warned us many times. You seemed like you knew things, so I paid attention and stayed out of web 2.0 as a direct result of your warnings. This idea of roosting chickens, do you think that is a good business idea. What do you think I should do; what sector is hot. Where is there money to be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: グラフで見る2008年VCの資金流動性低下状況</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587952</link>
		<dc:creator>グラフで見る2008年VCの資金流動性低下状況</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587952</guid>
		<description>[...] ［原文へ］ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ［原文へ］ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587899</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Bubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587899</guid>
		<description>I have warned many times over last year about no exits for Web 2.0 Bubble companies, mostly &quot;me-too&quot; and duplicates that have no viable business models- such as social networking sites, mobile locators and other B.S. ideas. Now, the chickens have come home to roost ............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have warned many times over last year about no exits for Web 2.0 Bubble companies, mostly &#8220;me-too&#8221; and duplicates that have no viable business models- such as social networking sites, mobile locators and other B.S. ideas. Now, the chickens have come home to roost &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587857</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587857</guid>
		<description>This is certainly not the prime time to execute any type of exit strategy, especially if the exit is an IPO


http://www.jugargame.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly not the prime time to execute any type of exit strategy, especially if the exit is an IPO</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jugargame.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.jugargame.com/'>http://www.jugargame.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="500404806">Banks Wilson</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587834</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="500404806">Banks Wilson</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587834</guid>
		<description>blah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalJobSource</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587819</link>
		<dc:creator>CalJobSource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587819</guid>
		<description>No IPOs means really bad news for Silicon Valley. These IPOs bring in big dollars and also employ many people when they go through, plus enriching VC firms and founders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No IPOs means really bad news for Silicon Valley. These IPOs bring in big dollars and also employ many people when they go through, plus enriching VC firms and founders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cail</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587768</link>
		<dc:creator>Cail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587768</guid>
		<description>Who would have expected that none of the gazillions of Facebook clones were going public?

Turns out all these presumably gold shitting donkeys are... well, just donkeys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would have expected that none of the gazillions of Facebook clones were going public?</p>
<p>Turns out all these presumably gold shitting donkeys are&#8230; well, just donkeys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="721164376">Romain Follet</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587764</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="721164376">Romain Follet</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587764</guid>
		<description>no thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANTISPAM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-/#comment-2587749</link>
		<dc:creator>ANTISPAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587749</guid>
		<description>@gorgehu1 - this is comment spam.  Go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gorgehu1 &#8211; this is comment spam.  Go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetaJob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587742</link>
		<dc:creator>GetaJob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587742</guid>
		<description>oh now! 3 whole years of work. how do you do it?
(sarcasm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh now! 3 whole years of work. how do you do it?<br />
(sarcasm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinablows</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-/#comment-2587740</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinablows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587740</guid>
		<description>Is that with or with lead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that with or with lead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="623650381">David Frame</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/the-2008-vc-liquidity-drought-in-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-2587733</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="623650381">David Frame</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=36509#comment-2587733</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t tell my wife... 3 years of blood sweat and tears and now 2 more?  Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t tell my wife&#8230; 3 years of blood sweat and tears and now 2 more?  Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
