<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go Vote For The 2008 Crunchies Finalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:45:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: توبيكات اسامي</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2841521</link>
		<dc:creator>توبيكات اسامي</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2841521</guid>
		<description>my vote is there. Last one (Best Overall) was tough. Twitter and facebook should wrap up all awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my vote is there. Last one (Best Overall) was tough. Twitter and facebook should wrap up all awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#171; ArticleSave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2583617</link>
		<dc:creator>What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#171; ArticleSave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2583617</guid>
		<description>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busdevgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2580509</link>
		<dc:creator>busdevgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2580509</guid>
		<description>@Joe Klaas: I suggest you re-read what I wrote as I certainly did not defend TC for not posting the final vote counts. I still very much believe the event organizers owe the public an explanation of why it took 2 weeks to publish the finalists. I don&#039;t believe the comments here and everywhere else on the web - Twitter, FriendFeed, Facebook etc. - would be anywhere near so bad if they&#039;d simply let their public know what exactly the hold up really was. Too many people out on holiday? Too many fraudulent votes cast via any number of ways? Some combination of the two? The bottom line is that none of us know and that&#039;s why everyone is so irritated. Customer Advocacy Rule #1: Communicate coherently and often with your customers and and make sure you let them know their concerns are being heard. I&#039;m not sure why requests for an explanation are falling on deaf ears, but I am sure it&#039;s added a lot of fuel to the fire.

The only thing I defended was the journalistic integrity of all of the participating journalists - as I&#039;ve had personal experience and dealings with all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe Klaas: I suggest you re-read what I wrote as I certainly did not defend TC for not posting the final vote counts. I still very much believe the event organizers owe the public an explanation of why it took 2 weeks to publish the finalists. I don&#8217;t believe the comments here and everywhere else on the web &#8211; Twitter, FriendFeed, Facebook etc. &#8211; would be anywhere near so bad if they&#8217;d simply let their public know what exactly the hold up really was. Too many people out on holiday? Too many fraudulent votes cast via any number of ways? Some combination of the two? The bottom line is that none of us know and that&#8217;s why everyone is so irritated. Customer Advocacy Rule #1: Communicate coherently and often with your customers and and make sure you let them know their concerns are being heard. I&#8217;m not sure why requests for an explanation are falling on deaf ears, but I am sure it&#8217;s added a lot of fuel to the fire.</p>
<p>The only thing I defended was the journalistic integrity of all of the participating journalists &#8211; as I&#8217;ve had personal experience and dealings with all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#124; Fidicaro.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2580358</link>
		<dc:creator>What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#124; Fidicaro.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2580358</guid>
		<description>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#171; Tejas123&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2580263</link>
		<dc:creator>What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The Crunchies. &#171; Tejas123&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2580263</guid>
		<description>[...] The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The&#160;Crunchies. By tejas123  Last night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We’ve set up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter’s Guide For The&nbsp;Crunchies. By tejas123  Last night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We’ve set up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Klaas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2580066</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Klaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2580066</guid>
		<description>Oh please. You can&#039;t in one breath suggest folks be &quot;graceful losers&quot; and in the other breath defend TechCrunch not posting who actually lost the popular vote.

I just see this as being a mess for TechCrunch. They seem to be deleting/ignoring any cogent criticism, and that&#039;s just making enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please. You can&#8217;t in one breath suggest folks be &#8220;graceful losers&#8221; and in the other breath defend TechCrunch not posting who actually lost the popular vote.</p>
<p>I just see this as being a mess for TechCrunch. They seem to be deleting/ignoring any cogent criticism, and that&#8217;s just making enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="18701408">fb18701408</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579736</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="18701408">fb18701408</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579736</guid>
		<description>&quot;For some reason&quot;. I know what the reason is. You&#039;re using IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For some reason&#8221;. I know what the reason is. You&#8217;re using IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-/#comment-2579713</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579713</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with you, the way the Crunchies have been run this year just smell of something going on, most likely Mike or other TechCrunch staff choosing the nominees and winners themselves because there is no way for anyone else to know. It&#039;s total bullshit. I can&#039;t imagine being a sponsor of such an event...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with you, the way the Crunchies have been run this year just smell of something going on, most likely Mike or other TechCrunch staff choosing the nominees and winners themselves because there is no way for anyone else to know. It&#8217;s total bullshit. I can&#8217;t imagine being a sponsor of such an event&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter&#8217;s Guide For The Crunchies.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579652</link>
		<dc:creator>What Was The Best Of The Web in 2008? A Voter&#8217;s Guide For The Crunchies.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579652</guid>
		<description>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night we released the finalist names for the Crunchies Awards. Vote here for who you think should win. We&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BackType &#8212; Blog Archive &#187; BackType Nominated for &#8220;Best Bootstrapped Startup&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579651</link>
		<dc:creator>BackType &#8212; Blog Archive &#187; BackType Nominated for &#8220;Best Bootstrapped Startup&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579651</guid>
		<description>[...] has been nominated in the 2008 Crunchies for &quot;Best Bootstrapped Startup&quot;: Voting will continue until end of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been nominated in the 2008 Crunchies for &quot;Best Bootstrapped Startup&quot;: Voting will continue until end of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FakeLocator.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579603</link>
		<dc:creator>FakeLocator.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579603</guid>
		<description>dont be fooled by cheap immitators,  

i know, i didnt make it.  maybe next year.   

and to all my suppporters, well wishers and drive-by hater crews i would like to say thank you.  you have helped make me who i am today.  the TC hater conditioning has made me more resilient and stronger than ever.  2009 will be a defining year in tech so lets get busy and shape it.  

GenuineLocator.com - too legit to quit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont be fooled by cheap immitators,  </p>
<p>i know, i didnt make it.  maybe next year.   </p>
<p>and to all my suppporters, well wishers and drive-by hater crews i would like to say thank you.  you have helped make me who i am today.  the TC hater conditioning has made me more resilient and stronger than ever.  2009 will be a defining year in tech so lets get busy and shape it.  </p>
<p>GenuineLocator.com &#8211; too legit to quit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busdevgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579574</link>
		<dc:creator>busdevgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579574</guid>
		<description>It states clearly on the Crunchies site that the winners were selected based on popular vote plus a select jury panel from TC, VB, GigaOm and SAI. It&#039;s pretty obvious if you know anything about some of the companies listed as finalists that they have either large communities or a highly viral, very sticky user base including Facebook, Amazon, Google, iPhone, eBuddy and meebo. It doesn&#039;t take a genius to figure out that a number of them galvanized their users and orchestrated campaigns to call for nominations. A quick search on Google with &quot;Crunchies 2008&quot; proves just how many companies actually did call on their own communities to vote. 

Yes, the naming of the finalists took a bit longer than anticipated and I think TC and the event organizers ought to at least provide some sort of explanation (aside from it being Christmas last week). However, the criticism or suggestion of ethics warrants a strong rebuttal here: this is not just a TechCrunch award - it&#039;s a culmination of 3 additional tech blogs who also play a part in the selection and decision-making process. TC, VentureBeat, GigaOm and Silicon Alley Insider are home to professional, well-respected journalists who have earned their stripes based on non-biased, ethical reporting. I personally know Matt Marshall, Om Malik and Henry Blodget and TC journalists (Mike, Erick, Jason, Mike Butcher and Robin Wauters), and not one of them would ever compromise or sacrifice editorial position for commercial gain - period. There is far too much to lose in doing so and for people to suggest otherwise shows just how little they really know about the press and about this stand-up group of editorial professionals.

There are winners and losers in every game or competition. There&#039;s a lot to be said in losing gracefully, working hard  and looking forward to a potential win next year than there is crying over spilled milk and trying to ruin things for everyone else - including a large number of the companies noted here who were very deservedly named as finalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It states clearly on the Crunchies site that the winners were selected based on popular vote plus a select jury panel from TC, VB, GigaOm and SAI. It&#8217;s pretty obvious if you know anything about some of the companies listed as finalists that they have either large communities or a highly viral, very sticky user base including Facebook, Amazon, Google, iPhone, eBuddy and meebo. It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to figure out that a number of them galvanized their users and orchestrated campaigns to call for nominations. A quick search on Google with &#8220;Crunchies 2008&#8243; proves just how many companies actually did call on their own communities to vote. </p>
<p>Yes, the naming of the finalists took a bit longer than anticipated and I think TC and the event organizers ought to at least provide some sort of explanation (aside from it being Christmas last week). However, the criticism or suggestion of ethics warrants a strong rebuttal here: this is not just a TechCrunch award &#8211; it&#8217;s a culmination of 3 additional tech blogs who also play a part in the selection and decision-making process. TC, VentureBeat, GigaOm and Silicon Alley Insider are home to professional, well-respected journalists who have earned their stripes based on non-biased, ethical reporting. I personally know Matt Marshall, Om Malik and Henry Blodget and TC journalists (Mike, Erick, Jason, Mike Butcher and Robin Wauters), and not one of them would ever compromise or sacrifice editorial position for commercial gain &#8211; period. There is far too much to lose in doing so and for people to suggest otherwise shows just how little they really know about the press and about this stand-up group of editorial professionals.</p>
<p>There are winners and losers in every game or competition. There&#8217;s a lot to be said in losing gracefully, working hard  and looking forward to a potential win next year than there is crying over spilled milk and trying to ruin things for everyone else &#8211; including a large number of the companies noted here who were very deservedly named as finalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldbrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-/#comment-2579544</link>
		<dc:creator>coldbrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579544</guid>
		<description>Total effing whiner. You have 2 diggs without the prospect for (m)any more. This is a &#039;proprietary&#039; award show that owes you nothing, nor it is mandated that you participate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total effing whiner. You have 2 diggs without the prospect for (m)any more. This is a &#8216;proprietary&#8217; award show that owes you nothing, nor it is mandated that you participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-/#comment-2579537</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579537</guid>
		<description>what a shame award....waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a shame award&#8230;.waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorge Hu - you suck</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-/#comment-2579504</link>
		<dc:creator>Gorge Hu - you suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579504</guid>
		<description>Although I have trouble believing any Chinese guy named Gorge, your plea to help poor children just really convinced me that you&#039;re a great businessman and philanthropist.  

I&#039;m super interested in your handiwork.  Please email me at gorgeisanidiot@yahoo.com and we can set up time to meet where I can bring you the luggage full of money I have for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I have trouble believing any Chinese guy named Gorge, your plea to help poor children just really convinced me that you&#8217;re a great businessman and philanthropist.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m super interested in your handiwork.  Please email me at <a href="mailto:gorgeisanidiot@yahoo.com">gorgeisanidiot@yahoo.com</a> and we can set up time to meet where I can bring you the luggage full of money I have for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579489</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579489</guid>
		<description>That would be nice as I am quite sure there are those that had more votes than the &quot;finalists&quot; selected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be nice as I am quite sure there are those that had more votes than the &#8220;finalists&#8221; selected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rom 1</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579461</link>
		<dc:creator>rom 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579461</guid>
		<description>done !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>done !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blund</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579444</guid>
		<description>and the popular vote? official or secret?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the popular vote? official or secret?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolv E. Heggenhougen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579443</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolv E. Heggenhougen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579443</guid>
		<description>As a participant we had a lot of people vote for us, I&#039;d be interested in seeing the result of the popular vote. Is this possible or will you keep it secret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a participant we had a lot of people vote for us, I&#8217;d be interested in seeing the result of the popular vote. Is this possible or will you keep it secret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579429</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579429</guid>
		<description>most awards shows may be based on trends, or who has the most friends... most serious business (forbes/fortune/business week) try to take the groupthink aspect out of it.
(even the inc 500)

like i said, have another category for companies that want to really be taken seriously. 

if i have a company that&#039;s doing well.. i might not have the widespread buzz as others, but i might be kicking their ass in terms of revs...

peace...

by the way, none of your concerns stop the ernst and young, or the inc 500 lists from being generated. and 100s of companies try to get ranked on these lists every year. get your head out of the web, and into real business and see how it actually operates...

peace again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most awards shows may be based on trends, or who has the most friends&#8230; most serious business (forbes/fortune/business week) try to take the groupthink aspect out of it.<br />
(even the inc 500)</p>
<p>like i said, have another category for companies that want to really be taken seriously. </p>
<p>if i have a company that&#8217;s doing well.. i might not have the widespread buzz as others, but i might be kicking their ass in terms of revs&#8230;</p>
<p>peace&#8230;</p>
<p>by the way, none of your concerns stop the ernst and young, or the inc 500 lists from being generated. and 100s of companies try to get ranked on these lists every year. get your head out of the web, and into real business and see how it actually operates&#8230;</p>
<p>peace again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: montres</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579390</link>
		<dc:creator>montres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579390</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s done !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s done !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="587192193">fb587192193</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579385</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="587192193">fb587192193</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579385</guid>
		<description>my vote is there. Last one (Best Overall) was tough. Twitter and facebook should wrap up all awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my vote is there. Last one (Best Overall) was tough. Twitter and facebook should wrap up all awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gebadia Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579375</link>
		<dc:creator>Gebadia Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579375</guid>
		<description>Google before it went public didn&#039;t share how much it was making because high profit creates competition.  Most of the companies mentioned are not public meaning they don&#039;t have to share that type of info and I would guess most wouldn&#039;t want to...most award shows are based on user trends..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google before it went public didn&#8217;t share how much it was making because high profit creates competition.  Most of the companies mentioned are not public meaning they don&#8217;t have to share that type of info and I would guess most wouldn&#8217;t want to&#8230;most award shows are based on user trends..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M2Mz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579362</link>
		<dc:creator>M2Mz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579362</guid>
		<description>Vote for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/28/go-vote-for-the-2008-crunchies-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-2579360</link>
		<dc:creator>blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 06:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35315#comment-2579360</guid>
		<description>No ReadWriteWeb this year? Seems that Richard paid for his mistake :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No ReadWriteWeb this year? Seems that Richard paid for his mistake <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
