<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil Fail: Traffic Nearly Hits Rock Bottom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:06:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bali on web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2886884</link>
		<dc:creator>Bali on web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2886884</guid>
		<description>[...] another so-called Google killer, is at its last gasp. I just knew it. I am not predicting present. Cuil is not the first one, and apparently not the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another so-called Google killer, is at its last gasp. I just knew it. I am not predicting present. Cuil is not the first one, and apparently not the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: اغتصاب</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2844781</link>
		<dc:creator>اغتصاب</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2844781</guid>
		<description>33 million USD? Would somebody please throw that amount towards me? How about 3.3 million? Man, I could make my venture fly with that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>33 million USD? Would somebody please throw that amount towards me? How about 3.3 million? Man, I could make my venture fly with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: توبيكات 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2841580</link>
		<dc:creator>توبيكات 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2841580</guid>
		<description>It was obvious CUIL would fail, who would really use a clone of a monster with dreams of beating the monster :) Investors lost the money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was obvious CUIL would fail, who would really use a clone of a monster with dreams of beating the monster <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Investors lost the money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil Fail &#124; Library Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2826645</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil Fail &#124; Library Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2826645</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch &#8211; &#8220;Rival, it never did. The launch of the search engine was nothing but a classic PR trainwreck, with much hype and little to show for. Cuil failed to deliver good enough results to drive anyone to change their search behavior, and quickly became the subject of backlash and criticism because of their poor performance and indexing methods that actually took websites down in the process. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch &#8211; &#8220;Rival, it never did. The launch of the search engine was nothing but a classic PR trainwreck, with much hype and little to show for. Cuil failed to deliver good enough results to drive anyone to change their search behavior, and quickly became the subject of backlash and criticism because of their poor performance and indexing methods that actually took websites down in the process. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Comes in at Number 2! &#124; Keystone Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2785368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Comes in at Number 2! &#124; Keystone Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2785368</guid>
		<description>[...] peak in popularity does raise a few questions of whether or not Bing will actually last. Like the reportedly &#8216;huge&#8217; search engine &#8220;Cuil&#8221; whose status lasted no more than three months [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] peak in popularity does raise a few questions of whether or not Bing will actually last. Like the reportedly &#8216;huge&#8217; search engine &#8220;Cuil&#8221; whose status lasted no more than three months [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Bing Just Leapfrog Yahoo Search?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2784674</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Bing Just Leapfrog Yahoo Search?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2784674</guid>
		<description>[...] Are we witnessing the birth of the first true Google challenger or is this nothing but launch momentum bound to fade away? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are we witnessing the birth of the first true Google challenger or is this nothing but launch momentum bound to fade away? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: india rock image - i am searching</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2777745</link>
		<dc:creator>india rock image - i am searching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2777745</guid>
		<description>yep, not a big deal anymore, nobody pays attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, not a big deal anymore, nobody pays attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blekko - Another Google Killer ? &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2775036</link>
		<dc:creator>Blekko - Another Google Killer ? &#124; Blog YODspica Ltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2775036</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuil is walking dead, for example, and Wikia Search is just dead. Other ambitious projects like SearchMe are dealing with tepid user enthusiasm, and Wolfram Alpha’s over-hype has cost it credibility.Any search engine startup with a shred of common sense wouldn’t want to create a lot of hype about itself before launching. There are too many dead bodies lying around to prove how badly that strategy works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuil is walking dead, for example, and Wikia Search is just dead. Other ambitious projects like SearchMe are dealing with tepid user enthusiasm, and Wolfram Alpha’s over-hype has cost it credibility.Any search engine startup with a shred of common sense wouldn’t want to create a lot of hype about itself before launching. There are too many dead bodies lying around to prove how badly that strategy works. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shhh. Blekko Is Still In The Oven. Do Not Disturb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2774825</link>
		<dc:creator>Shhh. Blekko Is Still In The Oven. Do Not Disturb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2774825</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuil is walking dead, for example, and Wikia Search is just dead. Other ambitious projects like SearchMe are dealing with tepid user enthusiasm, and Wolfram Alpha&#8217;s over-hype has cost it credibility. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuil is walking dead, for example, and Wikia Search is just dead. Other ambitious projects like SearchMe are dealing with tepid user enthusiasm, and Wolfram Alpha&#8217;s over-hype has cost it credibility. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHIFT: How alternative search engines like Wolfram Alpha and Cuil can succeed &#124; Coded Ink,Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2771720</link>
		<dc:creator>SHIFT: How alternative search engines like Wolfram Alpha and Cuil can succeed &#124; Coded Ink,Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2771720</guid>
		<description>[...] than Google, was widely panned (read my review here) when it debuted last July and was declared all but dead by the end of the year. But the current cycle of hype and subsequent disappointment about Wolfram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than Google, was widely panned (read my review here) when it debuted last July and was declared all but dead by the end of the year. But the current cycle of hype and subsequent disappointment about Wolfram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHIFT: How alternative search engines like Wolfram Alpha and Cuil can succeed &#124; Geek toys</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2771609</link>
		<dc:creator>SHIFT: How alternative search engines like Wolfram Alpha and Cuil can succeed &#124; Geek toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2771609</guid>
		<description>[...] than Google, was widely panned (read my review here) when it debuted last July and was declared all but dead by the end of the year. But the current cycle of hype and subsequent disappointment about Wolfram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than Google, was widely panned (read my review here) when it debuted last July and was declared all but dead by the end of the year. But the current cycle of hype and subsequent disappointment about Wolfram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinomics&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s new algorithm: Will it help engage employees?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2757812</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinomics&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s new algorithm: Will it help engage employees?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2757812</guid>
		<description>[...] Despite placing #1 on BusinessWeek&#8217;s annual ranking of &#8220;The Top 25 Ideal Employers&#8221; for the third year in a row, Google is facing its fair share of talent challenges. At 22,000 employees, it can no longer provide the start-up appeal it once did to its entreprenurial work force. Over the past few months, industry analysts and recruiters alike have watched as a number of Google employees have left the company to join other hot startups, including Facebook and Twitter. Other Google employees have gone on to start ventures of their own, some more successful than others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Despite placing #1 on BusinessWeek&#8217;s annual ranking of &#8220;The Top 25 Ideal Employers&#8221; for the third year in a row, Google is facing its fair share of talent challenges. At 22,000 employees, it can no longer provide the start-up appeal it once did to its entreprenurial work force. Over the past few months, industry analysts and recruiters alike have watched as a number of Google employees have left the company to join other hot startups, including Facebook and Twitter. Other Google employees have gone on to start ventures of their own, some more successful than others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything You Need To Know About Wolfram &#124; Web Design Blog by Union Room Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2753497</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything You Need To Know About Wolfram &#124; Web Design Blog by Union Room Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2753497</guid>
		<description>[...] and rarely has any service came within touching distance of doing so.  One just has to look at the failed launch of Cuil (pronounced cool) which was massively hyped and has failed to grab a noticeable chunk of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and rarely has any service came within touching distance of doing so.  One just has to look at the failed launch of Cuil (pronounced cool) which was massively hyped and has failed to grab a noticeable chunk of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfram Alpha - Exploring the Computational Universe &#124; Internet Strategist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2752821</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfram Alpha - Exploring the Computational Universe &#124; Internet Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2752821</guid>
		<description>[...] the ill fated search engine Cuil that released July last year - Wolfram Alpha is definitly here to stay. My initial thoughts are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ill fated search engine Cuil that released July last year &#8211; Wolfram Alpha is definitly here to stay. My initial thoughts are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Exactly is Wolfram Alpha?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2751740</link>
		<dc:creator>What Exactly is Wolfram Alpha?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2751740</guid>
		<description>[...] very close attention - Google meets most of my search engine needs, the last big launch (Cuil) failed to make a dent, and Mr. Wolfram isn&#8217;t the most dynamic spokesperson. So, I was pretty surprised test driving [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very close attention &#8211; Google meets most of my search engine needs, the last big launch (Cuil) failed to make a dent, and Mr. Wolfram isn&#8217;t the most dynamic spokesperson. So, I was pretty surprised test driving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Killer Killed - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2678126</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Killer Killed - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2678126</guid>
		<description>[...] Search a healthy dose of credibility. But the project now joins other notable disappointments, like Cuil, which was started by a high-powered group of Google alumni. (My colleague Saul Hansell did a nice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search a healthy dose of credibility. But the project now joins other notable disappointments, like Cuil, which was started by a high-powered group of Google alumni. (My colleague Saul Hansell did a nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davai Blog &#187; How Great Minds Can Lead To Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2660490</link>
		<dc:creator>Davai Blog &#187; How Great Minds Can Lead To Failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2660490</guid>
		<description>[...] a good example of that is Cuil, the &#8220;next Google&#8221; of last year. After recently hitting rock bottom, Cuil is quickly becoming a classic example of catastrophic failure that will be examined in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a good example of that is Cuil, the &#8220;next Google&#8221; of last year. After recently hitting rock bottom, Cuil is quickly becoming a classic example of catastrophic failure that will be examined in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Quantum Porn Engine - incub3.org</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2622167</link>
		<dc:creator>The Quantum Porn Engine - incub3.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2622167</guid>
		<description>[...] Cuil started with a bang, attracting heavy media attention from the start. It helps if your own grandiose press release blatantly plays up your clear superiority at every single opportunity This media goodwill quickly evaporated though as journ0-bloggers and users alike discovered its shortcomings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cuil started with a bang, attracting heavy media attention from the start. It helps if your own grandiose press release blatantly plays up your clear superiority at every single opportunity This media goodwill quickly evaporated though as journ0-bloggers and users alike discovered its shortcomings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erolkavas.com &#187; Google&#8217;ı devirmeye ömrü vefa etmedi!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2590958</link>
		<dc:creator>erolkavas.com &#187; Google&#8217;ı devirmeye ömrü vefa etmedi!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2590958</guid>
		<description>[...] Kaynak: TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kaynak: TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil - a case of what not to do. &#124; Our Start Up Story</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2585205</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil - a case of what not to do. &#124; Our Start Up Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2585205</guid>
		<description>[...] has a good write up on Cuil&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has a good write up on Cuil&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Links - 2009-01-03 &#171; The Great Pumpkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2584370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Links - 2009-01-03 &#171; The Great Pumpkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2584370</guid>
		<description>[...] in Uncategorized    http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/ - a story about the Cuil search engine.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Uncategorized    <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/'>http://www.tech...ts-rock-bottom/</a> &#8211; a story about the Cuil search engine.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2583347</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2583347</guid>
		<description>Well, I will let you what turned me off right off the bat: They used my copyrighted/watermarked images that I paid thousands of dollars to create (off-site photoshoot) to index and promote other websites that sell products almost identical to mine. Where was I the day after I found out which was August&#039;08? My lawyer&#039;s office. Today: They are still using my images :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I will let you what turned me off right off the bat: They used my copyrighted/watermarked images that I paid thousands of dollars to create (off-site photoshoot) to index and promote other websites that sell products almost identical to mine. Where was I the day after I found out which was August&#8217;08? My lawyer&#8217;s office. Today: They are still using my images <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year &#124; Seo Services, LLC - Indiana based search engine optimization consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2582730</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year &#124; Seo Services, LLC - Indiana based search engine optimization consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2582730</guid>
		<description>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year &#124; Media News: Internet Marketing &#38; Online Advertisng</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2582294</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year &#124; Media News: Internet Marketing &#38; Online Advertisng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2582294</guid>
		<description>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/27/cuil-fail-traffic-nearly-hits-rock-bottom/comment-page-3/#comment-2581988</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Cuil May Sound Cool But Did Not Kill Google This Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=35225#comment-2581988</guid>
		<description>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Traffic numbers reflect the company&#8217;s lack of stickiness following its launch. TechCrunch sees it as flat lining. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
