<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy Moves To Close Shady Standard Tactics Subsidiary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:13:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Current Employee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-3040196</link>
		<dc:creator>Current Employee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-3040196</guid>
		<description>Great news!  Rod Dirty Browning was canned last week for &quot;defaming&quot; Adam Not-so-Honest Dicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!  Rod Dirty Browning was canned last week for &#8220;defaming&#8221; Adam Not-so-Honest Dicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2632965</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2632965</guid>
		<description>Yep, it looks like a hide and seek game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it looks like a hide and seek game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572621</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572621</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why would someone do that? Well, the executive account reps are compensated when their accounts bid and win TDNAM domains. Rod Browning is compensated when TDNAM brings in big numbers. And Adam Not-Honest Dicker gets compensated when TDNAM does well.&quot;

Sounds like a serious conflict of interest issue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why would someone do that? Well, the executive account reps are compensated when their accounts bid and win TDNAM domains. Rod Browning is compensated when TDNAM brings in big numbers. And Adam Not-Honest Dicker gets compensated when TDNAM does well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like a serious conflict of interest issue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572418</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572418</guid>
		<description>I have my domains with Godaddy. 

I&#039;ll admit the email expiration notifications are reliable and often: 90 days, 60 days, 30 days, 10 days, 5 days, 3 days, day before, same day, the day after, and two days after. They also send the same email to my alternate email address. A couple of times I renewed the domain two days after it expired with no problem. I&#039;ll also admit that I have never experienced them mysteriously registering domains after I&#039;ve searched for them. Most of them are still available.

HOWEVER.... My gut feeling, especially after watching his videos, is that he&#039;s a shady bastard. I think he will absolutely without a doubt start up some other version of Standard Tactics and this time keep it totally under wraps. The only reason I don&#039;t move my domains somewhere else is because I&#039;ve heard that Godaddy is like the roach motel (or is it Hotel California?). I don&#039;t want to mess with that. I just point the DNS elsewhere and leave it at that. BTW: one way to tell if you&#039;re dealing with a Godaddy affiliate (besides having the same exact site with a different color scheme and a different name) is to mouse over the links and look for gdshop or secureserver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my domains with Godaddy. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit the email expiration notifications are reliable and often: 90 days, 60 days, 30 days, 10 days, 5 days, 3 days, day before, same day, the day after, and two days after. They also send the same email to my alternate email address. A couple of times I renewed the domain two days after it expired with no problem. I&#8217;ll also admit that I have never experienced them mysteriously registering domains after I&#8217;ve searched for them. Most of them are still available.</p>
<p>HOWEVER&#8230;. My gut feeling, especially after watching his videos, is that he&#8217;s a shady bastard. I think he will absolutely without a doubt start up some other version of Standard Tactics and this time keep it totally under wraps. The only reason I don&#8217;t move my domains somewhere else is because I&#8217;ve heard that Godaddy is like the roach motel (or is it Hotel California?). I don&#8217;t want to mess with that. I just point the DNS elsewhere and leave it at that. BTW: one way to tell if you&#8217;re dealing with a Godaddy affiliate (besides having the same exact site with a different color scheme and a different name) is to mouse over the links and look for gdshop or secureserver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572213</link>
		<dc:creator>wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572213</guid>
		<description>I missed this a couple of weeks ago. Good to know what is up with godaddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed this a couple of weeks ago. Good to know what is up with godaddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572167</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572167</guid>
		<description>Want the real story www.nodaddy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want the real story <a href="http://www.nodaddy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nodaddy.com'>http://www.nodaddy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572165</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572165</guid>
		<description>Here is the  real dirt from employees and former employees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the  real dirt from employees and former employees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572163</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572163</guid>
		<description>Help us put Scumbob down    www.nodaddy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help us put Scumbob down    <a href="http://www.nodaddy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nodaddy.com'>http://www.nodaddy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572159</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572159</guid>
		<description>Come on over and help us put Scumbob down    www.nodaddy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on over and help us put Scumbob down    <a href="http://www.nodaddy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nodaddy.com'>http://www.nodaddy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtdaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572156</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtdaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572156</guid>
		<description>Come on over and  help us put this Scumbob down  at www.nodaddy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on over and  help us put this Scumbob down  at <a href="http://www.nodaddy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nodaddy.com'>http://www.nodaddy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572045</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572045</guid>
		<description>Let me give you a warning.  If you use Go Daddy executive accounts department, it is in their best interests to let your domains expire.  Why, you may ask.  

If it is a good domain name, then they will tell the other executive account reps about it so when it gets to the auction those reps can have their customers bid on it.

Why would someone do that?  Well, the executive account reps are compensated when their accounts bid and win TDNAM domains.  Rod Browning is compensated when TDNAM brings in big numbers.  And Adam Not-Honest Dicker gets compensated when TDNAM does well.

For example, an expired domain recently was at TDNAM for a large amount of money and an executive account customer was about to finalize the sale.  It was common knowledge the the original owner would not be happy that this name was almost gone, gone, gone.  

Fortunately, the original registrant, who still had a day left in the redemption period, called his executive account rep and was able to pay an $80 redemption fee and retrieve the domain.  Read that sentence again . . . the customer called the executive account rep.  Why didn&#039;t Marcus, Rod, and any of the other reps contact this guy.  It was heady gossip for a day or two -- everyone knew what was happening.  

&quot;I am not a babysitter&quot; is a common phrase around that department.   I guess if it&#039;s in your best interest to allow domains to &quot;accidentally&quot; expire, then I can understand why you may not care if you piss off  your customer and forget to renew his domains OR decide not to call him at crucial times.

So, you see if a valuable domain goes to auction, everyone wins far more than the $7.49 renewal fee.  

TDNAM, the first rep gets kudos, the new rep get compensated, and the new owner gets a great name.  

Can you say insider information?   

Go Daddy&#039;s aftermarket department is full of self-serving thieves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me give you a warning.  If you use Go Daddy executive accounts department, it is in their best interests to let your domains expire.  Why, you may ask.  </p>
<p>If it is a good domain name, then they will tell the other executive account reps about it so when it gets to the auction those reps can have their customers bid on it.</p>
<p>Why would someone do that?  Well, the executive account reps are compensated when their accounts bid and win TDNAM domains.  Rod Browning is compensated when TDNAM brings in big numbers.  And Adam Not-Honest Dicker gets compensated when TDNAM does well.</p>
<p>For example, an expired domain recently was at TDNAM for a large amount of money and an executive account customer was about to finalize the sale.  It was common knowledge the the original owner would not be happy that this name was almost gone, gone, gone.  </p>
<p>Fortunately, the original registrant, who still had a day left in the redemption period, called his executive account rep and was able to pay an $80 redemption fee and retrieve the domain.  Read that sentence again . . . the customer called the executive account rep.  Why didn&#8217;t Marcus, Rod, and any of the other reps contact this guy.  It was heady gossip for a day or two &#8212; everyone knew what was happening.  </p>
<p>&#8220;I am not a babysitter&#8221; is a common phrase around that department.   I guess if it&#8217;s in your best interest to allow domains to &#8220;accidentally&#8221; expire, then I can understand why you may not care if you piss off  your customer and forget to renew his domains OR decide not to call him at crucial times.</p>
<p>So, you see if a valuable domain goes to auction, everyone wins far more than the $7.49 renewal fee.  </p>
<p>TDNAM, the first rep gets kudos, the new rep get compensated, and the new owner gets a great name.  </p>
<p>Can you say insider information?   </p>
<p>Go Daddy&#8217;s aftermarket department is full of self-serving thieves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: couch potato</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572042</link>
		<dc:creator>couch potato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572042</guid>
		<description>Conspiracy theorists, disgruntled employees, wannabe journalists. Geesh! I need to find a better class of blogs and forums to haunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspiracy theorists, disgruntled employees, wannabe journalists. Geesh! I need to find a better class of blogs and forums to haunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="505689060">Mark Mayhew</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572025</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="505689060">Mark Mayhew</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572025</guid>
		<description>I have a domain currently being held for ransom ($80) by GoDaddy...they suck, 4 sure =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a domain currently being held for ransom ($80) by GoDaddy&#8230;they suck, 4 sure =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current Employee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2572015</link>
		<dc:creator>Current Employee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2572015</guid>
		<description>Are you from Go Daddy&#039;s infamous PR department or just an idiot?

Bob Parsons is probably the most self-centered, egotistical guy around.  He does nothing but seek publicity and money.

Bob Parsons IS THE GoDaddy Group!

Everything he said on the interview was a lie.  I know for a fact that Standard Tactics was NOT created for research and made FAR MORE money than $40,000 a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you from Go Daddy&#8217;s infamous PR department or just an idiot?</p>
<p>Bob Parsons is probably the most self-centered, egotistical guy around.  He does nothing but seek publicity and money.</p>
<p>Bob Parsons IS THE GoDaddy Group!</p>
<p>Everything he said on the interview was a lie.  I know for a fact that Standard Tactics was NOT created for research and made FAR MORE money than $40,000 a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1439252123">Dean Blackburn</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571975</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1439252123">Dean Blackburn</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571975</guid>
		<description>Um... If you&#039;re a company, here&#039;s what you care about around domain names: 

1) No issues registering/keeping the name
2) Lowest possible cost

GoDaddy is, in my experience, really good about repeated renewal notifications, using email, postal mail, and even phone to let you know time is running out. For, what, $7/year from me per domain? 

Really easy domain management tools, and a humans-free process to consolidate renewal dates. 

I&#039;m not sure who out there does a better job as a REGISTRY, aside from perhaps a few who simply do less upselling/offer fewer options. 

If there&#039;s a cheaper, more reliable solution, though, just let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; If you&#8217;re a company, here&#8217;s what you care about around domain names: </p>
<p>1) No issues registering/keeping the name<br />
2) Lowest possible cost</p>
<p>GoDaddy is, in my experience, really good about repeated renewal notifications, using email, postal mail, and even phone to let you know time is running out. For, what, $7/year from me per domain? </p>
<p>Really easy domain management tools, and a humans-free process to consolidate renewal dates. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure who out there does a better job as a REGISTRY, aside from perhaps a few who simply do less upselling/offer fewer options. </p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a cheaper, more reliable solution, though, just let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571663</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571663</guid>
		<description>Try http://www.domaincheap.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try <a href="http://www.domaincheap.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.domaincheap.com'>http://www.domaincheap.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571618</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571618</guid>
		<description>I use GoDaddy for my domains but only because they have the best admin not for their business ethitcs.
They have repeatedly tried to take money from me using dubious and obscure commercial practices.
My impression is that Bob Parsons is the sharky kind of guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use GoDaddy for my domains but only because they have the best admin not for their business ethitcs.<br />
They have repeatedly tried to take money from me using dubious and obscure commercial practices.<br />
My impression is that Bob Parsons is the sharky kind of guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain name I found was registered a day later... - Page 2</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571616</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain name I found was registered a day later... - Page 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571616</guid>
		<description>[...] money2spare   I will not and cannot believe such stories.    Then maybe you should to read this...  GoDaddy Moves To Close Shady Standard Tactics Subsidiary  It looks like the &quot;conspiracy theories&quot; are more than theories. Read the comments on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] money2spare   I will not and cannot believe such stories.    Then maybe you should to read this&#8230;  GoDaddy Moves To Close Shady Standard Tactics Subsidiary  It looks like the &quot;conspiracy theories&quot; are more than theories. Read the comments on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Que</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571603</link>
		<dc:creator>Que</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571603</guid>
		<description>So did Godaddy open any new companies over the past week ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did Godaddy open any new companies over the past week ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571556</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571556</guid>
		<description>Try http://www.registrarjudge.com for registrar reviews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try <a href="http://www.registrarjudge.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.registrarjudge.com'>http://www.registrarjudge.com</a> for registrar reviews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571555</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571555</guid>
		<description>EH - I&#039;m not new, I&#039;m the guy who rights Domain Name Wire.  I&#039;m well aware of what front running is, it&#039;s just that no one has ever shown me any sort of compelling proof that it happens at GoDaddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EH &#8211; I&#8217;m not new, I&#8217;m the guy who rights Domain Name Wire.  I&#8217;m well aware of what front running is, it&#8217;s just that no one has ever shown me any sort of compelling proof that it happens at GoDaddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571542</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571542</guid>
		<description>Shut down one company and start another. . . this time we do it better. Damn those bloggers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shut down one company and start another. . . this time we do it better. Damn those bloggers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One more reason to hate GoDaddy &#124; redPear</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571535</link>
		<dc:creator>One more reason to hate GoDaddy &#124; redPear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571535</guid>
		<description>[...] weren&#8217;t enough to dissuade us from recommending their service to our clients, this article (TechCrunch) has reminded me once again that GoDaddy is truly the company that I always thought they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weren&#8217;t enough to dissuade us from recommending their service to our clients, this article (TechCrunch) has reminded me once again that GoDaddy is truly the company that I always thought they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewbert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571499</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571499</guid>
		<description>Try http://dynadot.com

Their user interface ROCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try <a href="http://dynadot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://dynadot.com'>http://dynadot.com</a></p>
<p>Their user interface ROCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewbert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/18/godaddy-moves-to-close-shady-standard-tactics-subsidiary/comment-page-1/#comment-2571495</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34219#comment-2571495</guid>
		<description>Notice that he&#039;s taking one last unethical profit from these domain that used to be owned by his customers by AUCTIONING them off at GoDaddy instead of the ETHICAL &quot;instant deletion&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that he&#8217;s taking one last unethical profit from these domain that used to be owned by his customers by AUCTIONING them off at GoDaddy instead of the ETHICAL &#8220;instant deletion&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
