<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joost Just Gives Up On P2P Altogether</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:34:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Volpi&#8217;s Joost Tenure Key to Understanding Skype Saga &#171; Twilight in the Valley of the Nerds</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-3002616</link>
		<dc:creator>Volpi&#8217;s Joost Tenure Key to Understanding Skype Saga &#171; Twilight in the Valley of the Nerds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-3002616</guid>
		<description>[...] the current context, what’s important about Volpi’s reign at Joost is that it coincided with an architectural change in how the company delivered video over the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the current context, what’s important about Volpi’s reign at Joost is that it coincided with an architectural change in how the company delivered video over the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.digiwu.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joost Continues Fight For Relevancy, Teams Up With Social Network Netlog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2644794</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.digiwu.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joost Continues Fight For Relevancy, Teams Up With Social Network Netlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2644794</guid>
		<description>[...] the power of the web for watching videos. They finally switched to Flash late last year, giving up on P2P, and introduced some social networking features around the video viewing experience to battle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the power of the web for watching videos. They finally switched to Flash late last year, giving up on P2P, and introduced some social networking features around the video viewing experience to battle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Continues Fight For Relevancy, Teams Up With Social Network Netlog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2644681</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Continues Fight For Relevancy, Teams Up With Social Network Netlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2644681</guid>
		<description>[...] the power of the web for watching videos. They finally switched to Flash late last year, giving up on P2P, and introduced some social networking features around the video viewing experience to battle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the power of the web for watching videos. They finally switched to Flash late last year, giving up on P2P, and introduced some social networking features around the video viewing experience to battle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC SBS Review Discussion Paper: The Geek Eye – Part 1 at Fragmental.tw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2607271</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC SBS Review Discussion Paper: The Geek Eye – Part 1 at Fragmental.tw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2607271</guid>
		<description>[...] As an example, Joost used P2P and required a client application. To increase the user base they migrated to as a Firefox plug-in, but even that wasn’t enough and they gave up on P2P streaming. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an example, Joost used P2P and required a client application. To increase the user base they migrated to as a Firefox plug-in, but even that wasn’t enough and they gave up on P2P streaming. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2604953</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2604953</guid>
		<description>This is a real shame, I liked the way that Joost strayed from the ordinary. Although I personally fell they provide a better service currently than Hulu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a real shame, I liked the way that Joost strayed from the ordinary. Although I personally fell they provide a better service currently than Hulu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Just Gives Up On P2P Altogether &#124; Content Delivery Network Blog &#124; CDN Evangelist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2573521</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Just Gives Up On P2P Altogether &#124; Content Delivery Network Blog &#124; CDN Evangelist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2573521</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/  This entry was posted on Saturday, December 20th, 2008 at 11:51 am and is filed under CDN. You can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/'>http://www.tech...ives-up-on-p2p/</a>  This entry was posted on Saturday, December 20th, 2008 at 11:51 am and is filed under CDN. You can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cxthom &#187; Joost Loses Client</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2572284</link>
		<dc:creator>cxthom &#187; Joost Loses Client</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2572284</guid>
		<description>[...] bittersweet feelings about this - it wasn&#8217;t much more than a year ago we launched the client. Very happy with our new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bittersweet feelings about this &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t much more than a year ago we launched the client. Very happy with our new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sakai</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2572032</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sakai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2572032</guid>
		<description>Joost had a nice user interface, but it was rather bulksome and memory hogging to actually use. The overall scheme and content wasn&#039;t worth the install and also concerns over p2p bandwidth problems were another reason to not use it.

I was one of the few that had the initial alpha invite and can admit the system was nice, but even I was hesitant to use it. WIth sites like Hulu, there&#039;s no reason to waste our limited bandwidth in helping stream that content to others. Joost was a good idea, that failed in execution. The web videos isn&#039;t all that great either, but it&#039;s a definite step up.

Right now I&#039;m using a mixture of Hulu + Surf the Channel (http://www.surfthechannel.com) and Free tube (http://www.freetube.us.tc) to solve my whoes. I&#039;m more into webisodes and unique content like that then commercial tv shows which let&#039;s face it are on the decline, I don&#039;t think CBS/NBC will be happy considering that they just can&#039;t profit off that stuff since it beats out their content, regardless of what celebrities they troll out on their shows.

Also check out http://www.joost.uni.cc for a summary of the hype and workings of the Joost p2p program. Very interesting stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joost had a nice user interface, but it was rather bulksome and memory hogging to actually use. The overall scheme and content wasn&#8217;t worth the install and also concerns over p2p bandwidth problems were another reason to not use it.</p>
<p>I was one of the few that had the initial alpha invite and can admit the system was nice, but even I was hesitant to use it. WIth sites like Hulu, there&#8217;s no reason to waste our limited bandwidth in helping stream that content to others. Joost was a good idea, that failed in execution. The web videos isn&#8217;t all that great either, but it&#8217;s a definite step up.</p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m using a mixture of Hulu + Surf the Channel (<a href="http://www.surfthechannel.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.surfthechannel.com'>http://www.surfthechannel.com</a>) and Free tube (<a href="http://www.freetube.us.tc" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.freetube.us.tc'>http://www.freetube.us.tc</a>) to solve my whoes. I&#8217;m more into webisodes and unique content like that then commercial tv shows which let&#8217;s face it are on the decline, I don&#8217;t think CBS/NBC will be happy considering that they just can&#8217;t profit off that stuff since it beats out their content, regardless of what celebrities they troll out on their shows.</p>
<p>Also check out <a href="http://www.joost.uni.cc" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.joost.uni.cc'>http://www.joost.uni.cc</a> for a summary of the hype and workings of the Joost p2p program. Very interesting stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571994</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571994</guid>
		<description>Ah, but BitTorrent also started a content portal and it, uh, lasted almost a year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but BitTorrent also started a content portal and it, uh, lasted almost a year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571814</link>
		<dc:creator>COP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571814</guid>
		<description>ROTFL..  Michael. do u ever listen??  seriously.

@Kate,  I completely empathize with you. Here you have this idiot but famous blogger with equally stupid blog following (which includes me). The problem with Michael is that he simply doesn&#039;t think twice before posting. I mean no-client doesn&#039;t mean NO P2P.. you *can* have P2P on flash as other posters have mentioned.. But then its too much to except from a &quot;tech blogger&quot; like Michael who spends most of his time dog-fighting with his equally stupid french buddy.

Seriously Michael, these are bad signs. I follow you coz you were the first.. Stop the stupidity or else u ll go into oblivion. Trust me on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROTFL..  Michael. do u ever listen??  seriously.</p>
<p>@Kate,  I completely empathize with you. Here you have this idiot but famous blogger with equally stupid blog following (which includes me). The problem with Michael is that he simply doesn&#8217;t think twice before posting. I mean no-client doesn&#8217;t mean NO P2P.. you *can* have P2P on flash as other posters have mentioned.. But then its too much to except from a &#8220;tech blogger&#8221; like Michael who spends most of his time dog-fighting with his equally stupid french buddy.</p>
<p>Seriously Michael, these are bad signs. I follow you coz you were the first.. Stop the stupidity or else u ll go into oblivion. Trust me on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Joost p2p was *never* going to work &#171; Swooshing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571720</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Joost p2p was *never* going to work &#171; Swooshing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571720</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P. And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the strategy.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P. And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the strategy.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Joost p2p would *never* work &#171; Swooshing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571716</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Joost p2p would *never* work &#171; Swooshing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571716</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P. And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the strategy.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P. And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the strategy.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Joost P2P was *never* going to work &#171; Swooshing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571667</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Joost P2P was *never* going to work &#171; Swooshing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571667</guid>
		<description>[...] yesterday, Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P today.   And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yesterday, Techcrunch covered the  final and formal demise of Joost P2P today.   And although Arrington gushed over Joost at the beginning, I just never did get the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Kalanick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571622</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Kalanick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571622</guid>
		<description>Creating a p2p infrastructure company, and building a content distribution portal, are 2 ENTIRELY different businesses.

It is the equivalent of a Television network building out a Tier-1 backbone infrastructure.

If Joost were to succeed at a content distribution portal--which requires expertise in content licensing, user acquisition, branding, playback/navigation experience-- they would simply go to a vendor for the best p2p infrastructure.  Furthermore, why should Joost spend all of their $$, focus, resources on building out the infrastructure, if they don&#039;t have the content or the users that can use it??!!

Bottom line is that start-ups have a tough enough time getting one business right.  It made no sense (even at the beginning) for Joost to go after two businesses, especially with all of the barriers that P2P presents (like having to get users to install a client vs. just simply clicking and streaming).

I&#039;m pretty surprised that Niklaus Zenstrom went down this path.  He&#039;s an entrepreneur I respect and who typically doesn&#039;t make these kinds of mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating a p2p infrastructure company, and building a content distribution portal, are 2 ENTIRELY different businesses.</p>
<p>It is the equivalent of a Television network building out a Tier-1 backbone infrastructure.</p>
<p>If Joost were to succeed at a content distribution portal&#8211;which requires expertise in content licensing, user acquisition, branding, playback/navigation experience&#8211; they would simply go to a vendor for the best p2p infrastructure.  Furthermore, why should Joost spend all of their $$, focus, resources on building out the infrastructure, if they don&#8217;t have the content or the users that can use it??!!</p>
<p>Bottom line is that start-ups have a tough enough time getting one business right.  It made no sense (even at the beginning) for Joost to go after two businesses, especially with all of the barriers that P2P presents (like having to get users to install a client vs. just simply clicking and streaming).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty surprised that Niklaus Zenstrom went down this path.  He&#8217;s an entrepreneur I respect and who typically doesn&#8217;t make these kinds of mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571614</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Ustream founder Brad was right:

(saw this in a portfolio.com article a year ago:

Previously, all Joost users had to download and install special software. &quot;The download may seem like a small barrier,&quot; says Brad Hunstable, co-founder of user-generated video site Ustream, &quot;but it&#039;s a huge mental barrier.&quot;

http://www.portfolio.com/culture-lifestyle/goods/gadgets/2008/03/17/Joost-Disappoints-as-Next-YouTube#page2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Ustream founder Brad was right:</p>
<p>(saw this in a portfolio.com article a year ago:</p>
<p>Previously, all Joost users had to download and install special software. &#8220;The download may seem like a small barrier,&#8221; says Brad Hunstable, co-founder of user-generated video site Ustream, &#8220;but it&#8217;s a huge mental barrier.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/culture-lifestyle/goods/gadgets/2008/03/17/Joost-Disappoints-as-Next-YouTube#page2" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.portfolio.com/culture-lifestyle/goods/gadgets/2008/03/17/Joost-Disappoints-as-Next-YouTube#page2'>http://www.port...t-YouTube#page2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost give up on their desktop application &#124; TechJuicer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571509</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost give up on their desktop application &#124; TechJuicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571509</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch  Thursday, December 18th, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch  Thursday, December 18th, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571505</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571505</guid>
		<description>Just to repeat and emphasize:

Hulu is great, but it&#039;s U.S. only.

Just because most readers of techcrunch live in the U.S., don&#039;t let the echo chamber replace awareness of the world beyond your borders.

We would love to see Hulu in Canada, but no dice.  So, we use Joost...and we are just a tiny little segment of non-Hulu viewing eyeballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to repeat and emphasize:</p>
<p>Hulu is great, but it&#8217;s U.S. only.</p>
<p>Just because most readers of techcrunch live in the U.S., don&#8217;t let the echo chamber replace awareness of the world beyond your borders.</p>
<p>We would love to see Hulu in Canada, but no dice.  So, we use Joost&#8230;and we are just a tiny little segment of non-Hulu viewing eyeballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bomber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571426</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bomber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571426</guid>
		<description>@Previous comments,

It&#039;s impossible for an 3rd party developer to do it in actionscript is what I meant to say. Yes, Adobe can do whatever the hell it wants with their platform, and yes, Stratus allows *one* form of P2P. But if you look closer, it&#039;s only for 1:1 p2p and is designed for collaboration-type applications. To do anything beyond this, you&#039;d have to modify the flash engine, which defeats the purpose of using flash as you would then have a branched distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Previous comments,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s impossible for an 3rd party developer to do it in actionscript is what I meant to say. Yes, Adobe can do whatever the hell it wants with their platform, and yes, Stratus allows *one* form of P2P. But if you look closer, it&#8217;s only for 1:1 p2p and is designed for collaboration-type applications. To do anything beyond this, you&#8217;d have to modify the flash engine, which defeats the purpose of using flash as you would then have a branched distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="224730">Rokas Salasevicius</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571411</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="224730">Rokas Salasevicius</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571411</guid>
		<description>Not good news to Joost founders. They say that the next startup after the first successful one usually results in a failure. It just happened to Joost after Skype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not good news to Joost founders. They say that the next startup after the first successful one usually results in a failure. It just happened to Joost after Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="224730">Rokas Salasevicius</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571409</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="224730">Rokas Salasevicius</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571409</guid>
		<description>Not good news to Joost founders. They say that the next startup after the first successful one, results in a big failure. It just happened to Joost after Skype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not good news to Joost founders. They say that the next startup after the first successful one, results in a big failure. It just happened to Joost after Skype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disruption Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Video Gets the Headlines, IPTV the Revenue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571337</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruption Matters &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Video Gets the Headlines, IPTV the Revenue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571337</guid>
		<description>[...] online video joint venture).  But, in a crowded market, also others are getting weaker, like Joost giving up their P2P model and with few options to survive only as one more flash video site. Despite Joost&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online video joint venture).  But, in a crowded market, also others are getting weaker, like Joost giving up their P2P model and with few options to survive only as one more flash video site. Despite Joost&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571318</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571318</guid>
		<description>HA!

I knew it! :D

Anyway, burning a large part on those $45M on specific P2P client, then plug-in research &amp; optimization is a total waste of money.

In less than 2 years, Adobe will have come up with P2P ability in its Flash plug-in. More than 99% computers shipped with Flash.

Why would you bother of even think of it? Let it happen and optimize the way it will work. In the meantime, go for streaming/prog. download and tweak things to make them less costly.

That&#039;s for sure what Google/YouTube has been doing (even if they still could push things a lil more)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA!</p>
<p>I knew it! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, burning a large part on those $45M on specific P2P client, then plug-in research &amp; optimization is a total waste of money.</p>
<p>In less than 2 years, Adobe will have come up with P2P ability in its Flash plug-in. More than 99% computers shipped with Flash.</p>
<p>Why would you bother of even think of it? Let it happen and optimize the way it will work. In the meantime, go for streaming/prog. download and tweak things to make them less costly.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s for sure what Google/YouTube has been doing (even if they still could push things a lil more)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Gives Up P2P : Jochen Toppe&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571312</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Gives Up P2P : Jochen Toppe&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571312</guid>
		<description>[...] reports that Joost is finally giving up their peer-to-peer model. Joost switched to a flash site a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reports that Joost is finally giving up their peer-to-peer model. Joost switched to a flash site a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aartha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571299</link>
		<dc:creator>aartha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571299</guid>
		<description>the answer is obvious tat Youtube and hulu works with a flash player tat can play instantly any type of video and now the whole market of videos is grabbed by youtube ,it is very difficult for any of its competietor to defend itself against them.changes shud be made and shud act according to the changing environment

regards
aarthabenn
&lt;a href=&quot;http://truehotdeals.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Truehotdeals-Deals you cant resist &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the answer is obvious tat Youtube and hulu works with a flash player tat can play instantly any type of video and now the whole market of videos is grabbed by youtube ,it is very difficult for any of its competietor to defend itself against them.changes shud be made and shud act according to the changing environment</p>
<p>regards<br />
aarthabenn<br />
<a href="http://truehotdeals.com" rel="nofollow">Truehotdeals-Deals you cant resist </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: man</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/joost-just-gives-up-on-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-2571291</link>
		<dc:creator>man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34199#comment-2571291</guid>
		<description>Joost are real pioneers in online media, they are really the first to convince a studio to put much of their stuff online and introduce major advertisers to the online video space. The thing is that they hoped that joost as an app will be as strong as skype. Well, there are many reasons why even at the time it didn&#039;t make sense. When Hulu came it was very easy to see the faults of joost and just make sure they don&#039;t fail in the same hols. Any way, it seem now that there is lack of content both at Joost and even hulu and Networks and studios need to make a major decision whether the online video model work for them and they make all their content avalible online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joost are real pioneers in online media, they are really the first to convince a studio to put much of their stuff online and introduce major advertisers to the online video space. The thing is that they hoped that joost as an app will be as strong as skype. Well, there are many reasons why even at the time it didn&#8217;t make sense. When Hulu came it was very easy to see the faults of joost and just make sure they don&#8217;t fail in the same hols. Any way, it seem now that there is lack of content both at Joost and even hulu and Networks and studios need to make a major decision whether the online video model work for them and they make all their content avalible online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
