<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death To The Embargo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:32:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Study Explains Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3112441</link>
		<dc:creator>New Study Explains Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3112441</guid>
		<description>[...] research may focus on how excessive arrogance can consistently alienate one&#8217;s peers without necessarily pissing off the general public. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] research may focus on how excessive arrogance can consistently alienate one&#8217;s peers without necessarily pissing off the general public. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evolving PR Crisis: The Future of the Embargo &#124; Brian Solis - PR 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3073384</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evolving PR Crisis: The Future of the Embargo &#124; Brian Solis - PR 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3073384</guid>
		<description>[...] never enough. Nonetheless, PR in many cases ,works against itself.Michael Arrington, publisher of TechCrunch, one of the world’s leading and most influential blogs, has publicly decried embargoes claiming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never enough. Nonetheless, PR in many cases ,works against itself.Michael Arrington, publisher of TechCrunch, one of the world’s leading and most influential blogs, has publicly decried embargoes claiming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech journalists question future of embargoes : Covering Health</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3071520</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech journalists question future of embargoes : Covering Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3071520</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion seems to have been spurred by the anti-embargo grandstanding of TechCrunch founder and editor Michael Arrington, who canceled a planned appearance on the panel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion seems to have been spurred by the anti-embargo grandstanding of TechCrunch founder and editor Michael Arrington, who canceled a planned appearance on the panel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Chandler - Arrington &#8216;no show&#8217; at Embargo 2010 panel. Does it really matter?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3065556</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chandler - Arrington &#8216;no show&#8217; at Embargo 2010 panel. Does it really matter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3065556</guid>
		<description>[...] So, before I go ahead with the post, let&#8217;s quickly sum up Michael Arrington&#8217;s opinion on the matter.  &#8221;Break every embargo&#8221;, three magic words written by Arrington himself in an article at Techcrunch.com in December 2008. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, before I go ahead with the post, let&#8217;s quickly sum up Michael Arrington&#8217;s opinion on the matter.  &#8221;Break every embargo&#8221;, three magic words written by Arrington himself in an article at Techcrunch.com in December 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A two-sided tale for ResponsibleTravel and its axing of online carbon offsetting &#124; Tnooz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3039045</link>
		<dc:creator>A two-sided tale for ResponsibleTravel and its axing of online carbon offsetting &#124; Tnooz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3039045</guid>
		<description>[...] For more debate on this particular issue, read this treatise by TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more debate on this particular issue, read this treatise by TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Yang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3030243</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3030243</guid>
		<description>Embargoes are so yesterday. For smaller tech companies, just skip the whole embargo and work closely with focused industry magazines or websites that you know and trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embargoes are so yesterday. For smaller tech companies, just skip the whole embargo and work closely with focused industry magazines or websites that you know and trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Exclusive, The Embargo and The Arrington &#124; CenterNetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3006566</link>
		<dc:creator>The Exclusive, The Embargo and The Arrington &#124; CenterNetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3006566</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch editor Michael Arrington has a rant about embargoes and how they are always broken. I agree they are always broken. I see them broken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch editor Michael Arrington has a rant about embargoes and how they are always broken. I agree they are always broken. I see them broken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Has Fallen. The Embargo Is Dead.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-3000718</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Has Fallen. The Embargo Is Dead.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-3000718</guid>
		<description>[...] last year I announced a new policy at TechCrunch &#8211; we don&#8217;t do embargoes. Well, it was a little more complicated than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last year I announced a new policy at TechCrunch &#8211; we don&#8217;t do embargoes. Well, it was a little more complicated than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Inspires?? Really&#8230; yep (for a moment)! : Matt Browne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2992112</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Inspires?? Really&#8230; yep (for a moment)! : Matt Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2992112</guid>
		<description>[...] and snarky posts often get under my skin. Not to mention @Arrington&#8217;s liberal use of sources, not respecting press embargoes, and posting confidential Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and snarky posts often get under my skin. Not to mention @Arrington&#8217;s liberal use of sources, not respecting press embargoes, and posting confidential Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobsessed @ Media Week: Death of the embargo &#124; Wadds' PR Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2974174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobsessed @ Media Week: Death of the embargo &#124; Wadds' PR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2974174</guid>
		<description>[...] a PR tactic embargos are broken and has been for the last 12 months. Publications from Techcrunch to the Wall Street Journal no longer respect the tactic as a means of managing the release of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a PR tactic embargos are broken and has been for the last 12 months. Publications from Techcrunch to the Wall Street Journal no longer respect the tactic as a means of managing the release of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking the Embargo &#187; pr-media-blog.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2965850</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking the Embargo &#187; pr-media-blog.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2965850</guid>
		<description>[...] and journalists that they won&#8217;t publish until a given hour, if it no one else does.  Social media has essentially seen the death of the embargo but some PR people seem to want to dig it up, rebury it and dance upon its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and journalists that they won&#8217;t publish until a given hour, if it no one else does.  Social media has essentially seen the death of the embargo but some PR people seem to want to dig it up, rebury it and dance upon its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballmer’s CES Keynote Promises To Be A Snoozer (Non-Announcements Revealed!) &#124; Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2958600</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballmer’s CES Keynote Promises To Be A Snoozer (Non-Announcements Revealed!) &#124; Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2958600</guid>
		<description>[...] is what Microsoft is briefing reporters on as news. Under embargo, no less. (We don&#8217;t do embargoes anymore, and didn&#8217;t get briefed in this case). Maybe Ballmer will surprise us with a Zune [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is what Microsoft is briefing reporters on as news. Under embargo, no less. (We don&#8217;t do embargoes anymore, and didn&#8217;t get briefed in this case). Maybe Ballmer will surprise us with a Zune [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Mavens &#187; TechCrunch and the New New Journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2932522</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Mavens &#187; TechCrunch and the New New Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2932522</guid>
		<description>[...] December 2008, Arrington declared — in a post titled “Death to the Embargo” — that he would no longer honor non-exclusive news embargoes: We’ve never broken an embargo at TechCrunch. Not once. Today that ends. From now our new policy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 2008, Arrington declared — in a post titled “Death to the Embargo” — that he would no longer honor non-exclusive news embargoes: We’ve never broken an embargo at TechCrunch. Not once. Today that ends. From now our new policy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Did The Embargo Go? &#171; BluePoint of View</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2931675</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Did The Embargo Go? &#171; BluePoint of View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2931675</guid>
		<description>[...] a&#160;Comment       Rather quietly (certainly without the fanfare of TechCrunch making the same decision several months back), the “old gray lady” of the business press, the Wall Street Journal, has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a&nbsp;Comment       Rather quietly (certainly without the fanfare of TechCrunch making the same decision several months back), the “old gray lady” of the business press, the Wall Street Journal, has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitis PR, CentraStage @ AMITPRO &#171; AMITPRO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2919959</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitis PR, CentraStage @ AMITPRO &#171; AMITPRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2919959</guid>
		<description>[...] expect Techcrunch to uphold an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expect Techcrunch to uphold an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Carlton PR and Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Cares What TechCrunch Thinks About Embargoes?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2919438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Carlton PR and Marketing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Cares What TechCrunch Thinks About Embargoes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2919438</guid>
		<description>[...] you probably remember, the PR world was abuzz late last year when TechCrunch announced it would no longer honor embargoes.  (And, I am being polite. TechCrunch was more in-your-face about it.)  Matthew Mamet, the host [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you probably remember, the PR world was abuzz late last year when TechCrunch announced it would no longer honor embargoes.  (And, I am being polite. TechCrunch was more in-your-face about it.)  Matthew Mamet, the host [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-8/#comment-2917059</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2917059</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RIP The Press Embargo...&lt;/strong&gt;


So the Wall Street Journal has said it will no longer adhere to press release embargoes.  So what?  This really shouldn&#8217;t come as any shock to PR folk; it’s nothing new.
Back in 2008 TechCrunch, one of the most popular and influential IT blo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RIP The Press Embargo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So the Wall Street Journal has said it will no longer adhere to press release embargoes.  So what?  This really shouldn&#8217;t come as any shock to PR folk; it’s nothing new.<br />
Back in 2008 TechCrunch, one of the most popular and influential IT blo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embargoes: Bloggers say WSJ policy has changed : Covering Health</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2906155</link>
		<dc:creator>Embargoes: Bloggers say WSJ policy has changed : Covering Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2906155</guid>
		<description>[...] revolves around technology news, with some writers saying the WSJ is following in the footsteps of TechCrunch, but health journalists have to be wondering what this means for the paper&#8217;s coverage of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revolves around technology news, with some writers saying the WSJ is following in the footsteps of TechCrunch, but health journalists have to be wondering what this means for the paper&#8217;s coverage of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s New Embargo Policy &#124; racetalkblog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2902310</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s New Embargo Policy &#124; racetalkblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2902310</guid>
		<description>[...] reference to the controversy that TechCrunch caused throughout the media and PR world after instituting their own embargo policy back in December 2008.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reference to the controversy that TechCrunch caused throughout the media and PR world after instituting their own embargo policy back in December 2008.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishmael&#8217;s Corner &#187; The News Embargo: Much Ado About Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2901691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishmael&#8217;s Corner &#187; The News Embargo: Much Ado About Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2901691</guid>
		<description>[...] companies still have the heft to bully publications ranging from the Journal to TechCrunch (which repented on embargoes last year) to accept embargoes. And the media properties with juice can still force the lesser names to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] companies still have the heft to bully publications ranging from the Journal to TechCrunch (which repented on embargoes last year) to accept embargoes. And the media properties with juice can still force the lesser names to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases - Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2895365</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases - Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2895365</guid>
		<description>[...] When media distribution and usage was less fragmented than it is now, I guess it made sense for PR firms or consultants to write press releases using a given &#8216;best practice&#8217; and pushing it out to a list of contacts in the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry - and some of its proponents - in today&#8217;s world, and in particular our stance towards embargoes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When media distribution and usage was less fragmented than it is now, I guess it made sense for PR firms or consultants to write press releases using a given &#8216;best practice&#8217; and pushing it out to a list of contacts in the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry &#8211; and some of its proponents &#8211; in today&#8217;s world, and in particular our stance towards embargoes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2894549</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Words I Would Love To See Banned From Press Releases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2894549</guid>
		<description>[...] When media distribution and usage was less fragmented than it is now, I guess it made sense for PR firms or consultants to write press releases using a given &#8216;best practice&#8217; and pushing it out to a list of contacts in the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry in today&#8217;s world, and in particular our stance towards embargoes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When media distribution and usage was less fragmented than it is now, I guess it made sense for PR firms or consultants to write press releases using a given &#8216;best practice&#8217; and pushing it out to a list of contacts in the publishing industry, hoping for as much coverage as possible. Regular TechCrunch readers know how we think about the PR industry in today&#8217;s world, and in particular our stance towards embargoes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; &#8220;There&#8217;s a cloud for that.&#8221; - IT Management &#38; Cloud Podcast #49</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2890834</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; &#8220;There&#8217;s a cloud for that.&#8221; - IT Management &#38; Cloud Podcast #49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2890834</guid>
		<description>[...] Dealing with PR email, embargo&#8217;s, etc. For bed time reading, see the infamous TechCrunch take on embargoes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dealing with PR email, embargo&#8217;s, etc. For bed time reading, see the infamous TechCrunch take on embargoes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch&#8217;s Dilemma: To Publish Or Not? - Undercurrents</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2861490</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch&#8217;s Dilemma: To Publish Or Not? - Undercurrents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2861490</guid>
		<description>[...] likes to play on the edges - I realize that. (See its statement last year that it would no longer honor embargoes.) But it is worth it? I&#8217;d have to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] likes to play on the edges &#8211; I realize that. (See its statement last year that it would no longer honor embargoes.) But it is worth it? I&#8217;d have to say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda MacArthur</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/comment-page-7/#comment-2861051</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda MacArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=34112#comment-2861051</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny reading this now, because didn&#039;t you recently do the &quot;annoying&quot; thing and bust out the news of Alice.com an hour early before they&#039;d even launched their site? Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny reading this now, because didn&#8217;t you recently do the &#8220;annoying&#8221; thing and bust out the news of Alice.com an hour early before they&#8217;d even launched their site? Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
