<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Extraordinary Happenings At BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:57:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; Techdare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964975</link>
		<dc:creator>The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; Techdare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964975</guid>
		<description>[...] of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964760</link>
		<dc:creator>The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964760</guid>
		<description>[...] bastion of old media - investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bastion of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; ScooperNews.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964701</link>
		<dc:creator>The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; ScooperNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964701</guid>
		<description>[...] of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964677</link>
		<dc:creator>The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964677</guid>
		<description>[...] bastion of old media - investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bastion of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964631</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964631</guid>
		<description>[...] last bastion of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that’s “too hard” for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can’t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer investigative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last bastion of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that’s “too hard” for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can’t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer investigative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2964556</link>
		<dc:creator>The Onion Beats Investigative Journalism On Google News &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2964556</guid>
		<description>[...] bastion of old media - investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bastion of old media &#8211; investigative journalism. The stuff that&#8217;s &#8220;too hard&#8221; for blogs to do. But in a world where old media can&#8217;t keep up with breaking news, presumably longer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Capitalists V. Founders: Battle At Mochi Media : BizzRoot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2830042</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Capitalists V. Founders: Battle At Mochi Media : BizzRoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2830042</guid>
		<description>[...] the extraordinary undoing of a $17 million round of financing for BitTorrent last year &#8211; we questioned whether Li violated his fiduciary duty to the company in closing that deal at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the extraordinary undoing of a $17 million round of financing for BitTorrent last year &#8211; we questioned whether Li violated his fiduciary duty to the company in closing that deal at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2582644</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 04:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2582644</guid>
		<description>bram runs around the office complaining about his 2 houses being in foreclosure..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bram runs around the office complaining about his 2 houses being in foreclosure..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacchione</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2569802</link>
		<dc:creator>cacchione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2569802</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really Bram&#039;s selling tv because he need money? Please somebody tell me that isn&#039;t true :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really Bram&#8217;s selling tv because he need money? Please somebody tell me that isn&#8217;t true <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jame cheng</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2569256</link>
		<dc:creator>jame cheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2569256</guid>
		<description>adsf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adsf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568893</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568893</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t Bram&#039;s website bitconjurer.org

look who&#039;s selling their TV
http://tinyurl.com/6x65fv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t Bram&#8217;s website bitconjurer.org</p>
<p>look who&#8217;s selling their TV<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6x65fv" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/6&#215;65fv'>http://tinyurl.com/6&#215;65fv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason M. Lemkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Lemkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568863</guid>
		<description>This is a good story but we probably don&#039;t have 100% of the facts ... obviously whatever happened, the Board reviewed it with their corporate counsel (mentioned in last article) and got their blessing one way or another.

I suspect at the end of the day it was just a tough choice between liquidation to return cash (something the VCs probably have a right to do), or restructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good story but we probably don&#8217;t have 100% of the facts &#8230; obviously whatever happened, the Board reviewed it with their corporate counsel (mentioned in last article) and got their blessing one way or another.</p>
<p>I suspect at the end of the day it was just a tough choice between liquidation to return cash (something the VCs probably have a right to do), or restructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Chris Perrson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568858</link>
		<dc:creator>@Chris Perrson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568858</guid>
		<description>Consider that Bram&#039;s been told his company is worth $100MM+ and expected to be much more in the future and assume he owns a significant chunk of the common (which is 50%+ of total shares). Given those expectations, isnt it reasonable that he&#039;s been spending some of those expected dollars, so that now when they&#039;ve been sizably reduced he&#039;d  be feeling a little less than secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider that Bram&#8217;s been told his company is worth $100MM+ and expected to be much more in the future and assume he owns a significant chunk of the common (which is 50%+ of total shares). Given those expectations, isnt it reasonable that he&#8217;s been spending some of those expected dollars, so that now when they&#8217;ve been sizably reduced he&#8217;d  be feeling a little less than secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: Apple sales slow?, IE security flaw, and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568806</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: Apple sales slow?, IE security flaw, and more &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568806</guid>
		<description>[...] the company&#8217;s bank account and cut the valuation from $177 million to $35 million, TechCrunch reports.         SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Roundup: Apple sales slow?, IE security flaw, and more&quot;, url: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company&#8217;s bank account and cut the valuation from $177 million to $35 million, TechCrunch reports.         SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Roundup: Apple sales slow?, IE security flaw, and more&#8221;, url: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568796</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568796</guid>
		<description>I would also like to know about this, first I heard of it was in this article.. anyone have a link? there should have been a reference link in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to know about this, first I heard of it was in this article.. anyone have a link? there should have been a reference link in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568733</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568733</guid>
		<description>yeah, that comment is just complete bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that comment is just complete bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="739260453">Álvaro Ortiz</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568732</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="739260453">Álvaro Ortiz</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568732</guid>
		<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Persson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568723</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Persson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568723</guid>
		<description>I want to know the same how could Bram Cohen possibly be in financial trouble. I mean he hasn&#039;t been investing his own money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know the same how could Bram Cohen possibly be in financial trouble. I mean he hasn&#8217;t been investing his own money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568678</link>
		<dc:creator>glah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568678</guid>
		<description>michael, to be honest, if all your site does is to give us the &quot;latest startup&quot; then it&#039;s really no different from many others.

&amp; we&#039;ll tend to skim over the article to just get the names we need to follow. if even that. we&#039;ll just as likely go elsewhere.

this was a great article and really kept my attention from start to finish. i haven&#039;t done that in months here. 

need more of these -- and the excellent Swisscom article yesterday (though some thought it was about LeWeb).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael, to be honest, if all your site does is to give us the &#8220;latest startup&#8221; then it&#8217;s really no different from many others.</p>
<p>&amp; we&#8217;ll tend to skim over the article to just get the names we need to follow. if even that. we&#8217;ll just as likely go elsewhere.</p>
<p>this was a great article and really kept my attention from start to finish. i haven&#8217;t done that in months here. </p>
<p>need more of these &#8212; and the excellent Swisscom article yesterday (though some thought it was about LeWeb).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568676</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568676</guid>
		<description>Agreed. First article in a long time that I read all the way through.

Nice. More! 

You guys know where we can find more VC inside stories &amp; goodies?

We need VC&#039;s to scale but we really don&#039;t need to be abused by them either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. First article in a long time that I read all the way through.</p>
<p>Nice. More! </p>
<p>You guys know where we can find more VC inside stories &amp; goodies?</p>
<p>We need VC&#8217;s to scale but we really don&#8217;t need to be abused by them either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosey Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568416</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosey Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568416</guid>
		<description>The article mentions &quot;highly publicized financial troubles&quot;. Where were they publicized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article mentions &#8220;highly publicized financial troubles&#8221;. Where were they publicized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: next up</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568410</link>
		<dc:creator>next up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568410</guid>
		<description>i wonder who&#039;s going to be ratcheted to death next. anyone knows who  raised a round with Accel &amp; DAG except bittorrent?

probably any company losing a lot of $$ + raising a round right now is prime for this sort of thing..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder who&#8217;s going to be ratcheted to death next. anyone knows who  raised a round with Accel &amp; DAG except bittorrent?</p>
<p>probably any company losing a lot of $$ + raising a round right now is prime for this sort of thing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568397</link>
		<dc:creator>Janko Roettgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568397</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think five million annual revenue is unrealistic for Bittorrent at all. They do have a huge install base, thanks to uTorrent, and probably make some good money with browser toolbars.

Just as a quick comparison: DivX networks made 14 million distributing the Yahoo toolbar in the first nine months of 08 alone, according to SEC filings. Of course that deal just fell apart, ending in a lawsuit and a bunch of lay-offs, but that&#039;s a different story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think five million annual revenue is unrealistic for Bittorrent at all. They do have a huge install base, thanks to uTorrent, and probably make some good money with browser toolbars.</p>
<p>Just as a quick comparison: DivX networks made 14 million distributing the Yahoo toolbar in the first nine months of 08 alone, according to SEC filings. Of course that deal just fell apart, ending in a lawsuit and a bunch of lay-offs, but that&#8217;s a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568393</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568393</guid>
		<description>I say it again:

Why would you agree to a rescindable deal? Yes, I know, “you had to,” because you’re investors, who probably called themselves your “partners” when they were wooing you, saw your weakness and forced you into the bathroom stall, bent you over, and showed you who they really were.

Why did your lawyer not demand whatever clause let this happen be removed, even if you had to trade something for that to happen? Because they are conflicted too. You can bring them one deal, but the VC can bring them many. Who do they want to please? Right.

Yes, I’m over-simplifying, exaggerating, and possibly mischaracterizing, but this story is yet another lesson for entrepreneurs, yet another reason why you should bootstrap if you can. Otherwise, most of the time, you’re just asking to be taken advantage of.

Sure, sometimes you get some benefit from taking VC money before you have revenue and positive margins, just like sometimes you get some benefit (at least it looks that way for a while) from taking the devil’s money. In the end, though, most of the time, you will get screwed (sometimes justifiably so, maybe, such as if it was your own greed that drove you to the deal). Why? I leave you with my favorite version of a famous fable:

Once upon a time, a woman was picking up firewood. She came upon a poisonous snake frozen in the snow. She took the snake home and nursed it back to health. One day the snake bit her on the cheek. As she lay dying, she asked the snake, “Why have you done this to me?” And the snake answered, “Look, bitch, you knew I was a snake.” -NBK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say it again:</p>
<p>Why would you agree to a rescindable deal? Yes, I know, “you had to,” because you’re investors, who probably called themselves your “partners” when they were wooing you, saw your weakness and forced you into the bathroom stall, bent you over, and showed you who they really were.</p>
<p>Why did your lawyer not demand whatever clause let this happen be removed, even if you had to trade something for that to happen? Because they are conflicted too. You can bring them one deal, but the VC can bring them many. Who do they want to please? Right.</p>
<p>Yes, I’m over-simplifying, exaggerating, and possibly mischaracterizing, but this story is yet another lesson for entrepreneurs, yet another reason why you should bootstrap if you can. Otherwise, most of the time, you’re just asking to be taken advantage of.</p>
<p>Sure, sometimes you get some benefit from taking VC money before you have revenue and positive margins, just like sometimes you get some benefit (at least it looks that way for a while) from taking the devil’s money. In the end, though, most of the time, you will get screwed (sometimes justifiably so, maybe, such as if it was your own greed that drove you to the deal). Why? I leave you with my favorite version of a famous fable:</p>
<p>Once upon a time, a woman was picking up firewood. She came upon a poisonous snake frozen in the snow. She took the snake home and nursed it back to health. One day the snake bit her on the cheek. As she lay dying, she asked the snake, “Why have you done this to me?” And the snake answered, “Look, bitch, you knew I was a snake.” -NBK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael s</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/15/the-extraordinary-happenings-at-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2568365</link>
		<dc:creator>michael s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33567#comment-2568365</guid>
		<description>fascinating stuff --- this is where mike really shines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating stuff &#8212; this is where mike really shines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
