<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:21:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google - Cash-Bandit.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-2/#comment-2876261</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google - Cash-Bandit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2876261</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; GreyBlogs.com - Themes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-2/#comment-2810364</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; GreyBlogs.com - Themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2810364</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; rapid-DEV.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2801902</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; rapid-DEV.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2801902</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; ezBLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2733430</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; ezBLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2733430</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Townsend</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2729524</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Townsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2729524</guid>
		<description>Is Twitter a Waste of time... What&#039;s it cost to Twitter... not much...

COMPARATIVE COST FACTS

About 82% of web cost per click (cpc) advertising costs from $ 0.00 to $ 0.30 (cents cpc) and of that more than half is between $ 0.10 and  $ 0.19 (cents cpc) Say you pay an average of $0.15 cpc 1200 clicks will cost you $180.00

&quot;SEM firms typically bill monthly. They manage your PPC search advertising and paid-inclusion spend. For core professional services, which include complete SEO, expect to spend from $90,000 to $240,000 per Web site annually for a full-service SEM firm or $50,000 to $90,000 for a solo consultant or smaller SEM company.&quot; clickz.com

Advertising budget?? Take autos as an example: Cost per click for &quot;autos&quot; is $0.29 - $0.64, Clicks per day is 9,800 - 12,400, Cost per day $2,830.00k - $7,980.00 spread between a reported 4 advertisers. spyfu.com

So that&#039;s on average $10,810.00 per day / 4 = $2702.50 X 365 days = $ 986,412.50 p.a. / 12 = $82,201.04 p.month

I ask again considering the potential reach... is it worth it?

Ric lots more here: http://tr.im/kplb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Twitter a Waste of time&#8230; What&#8217;s it cost to Twitter&#8230; not much&#8230;</p>
<p>COMPARATIVE COST FACTS</p>
<p>About 82% of web cost per click (cpc) advertising costs from $ 0.00 to $ 0.30 (cents cpc) and of that more than half is between $ 0.10 and  $ 0.19 (cents cpc) Say you pay an average of $0.15 cpc 1200 clicks will cost you $180.00</p>
<p>&#8220;SEM firms typically bill monthly. They manage your PPC search advertising and paid-inclusion spend. For core professional services, which include complete SEO, expect to spend from $90,000 to $240,000 per Web site annually for a full-service SEM firm or $50,000 to $90,000 for a solo consultant or smaller SEM company.&#8221; clickz.com</p>
<p>Advertising budget?? Take autos as an example: Cost per click for &#8220;autos&#8221; is $0.29 &#8211; $0.64, Clicks per day is 9,800 &#8211; 12,400, Cost per day $2,830.00k &#8211; $7,980.00 spread between a reported 4 advertisers. spyfu.com</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s on average $10,810.00 per day / 4 = $2702.50 X 365 days = $ 986,412.50 p.a. / 12 = $82,201.04 p.month</p>
<p>I ask again considering the potential reach&#8230; is it worth it?</p>
<p>Ric lots more here: <a href="http://tr.im/kplb" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tr.im/kplb'>http://tr.im/kplb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roasted Chicken with Olives and Prunes (Chicken Marbella) &#124; Gluten Free Recipes &#124; Elana's Pantry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2683529</link>
		<dc:creator>Roasted Chicken with Olives and Prunes (Chicken Marbella) &#124; Gluten Free Recipes &#124; Elana's Pantry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2683529</guid>
		<description>[...] myself a lot lately.  After reading this article in the Atlantic and finding out about this new site that calculates the amount of time spent on twitter, I&#039;ve really been pondering this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] myself a lot lately.  After reading this article in the Atlantic and finding out about this new site that calculates the amount of time spent on twitter, I&#8217;ve really been pondering this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; SenterSoft Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2662047</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google &#124; SenterSoft Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2662047</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caturstudio :: information :: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2614456</link>
		<dc:creator>caturstudio :: information :: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2614456</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2602297</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don’t Need SEO to Rank in Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2602297</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2595817</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2595817</guid>
		<description>Interesting website .. Now let me see how much time do i waste on twitter :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting website .. Now let me see how much time do i waste on twitter <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caso de estudio: el SEO no es todo para ingresar al ranking de Google &#124; Weblog Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2590448</link>
		<dc:creator>Caso de estudio: el SEO no es todo para ingresar al ranking de Google &#124; Weblog Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2590448</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch los nombró cerca de 20.000 profiles fueron accedidos al menos 1 vez en el sistema [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch los nombró cerca de 20.000 profiles fueron accedidos al menos 1 vez en el sistema [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Don&#8217;t Need SEO to Rank in Google - Sugarrae</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2589711</link>
		<dc:creator>You Don&#8217;t Need SEO to Rank in Google - Sugarrae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2589711</guid>
		<description>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48 hours after launch, TechCrunch gave us a mention and over 20,000 profiles had been checked at least once in the system. The site had over 1000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can TwitBlog and TwitWall replace blogs ? (+ Survey Results)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2586291</link>
		<dc:creator>Can TwitBlog and TwitWall replace blogs ? (+ Survey Results)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2586291</guid>
		<description>[...] So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2573661</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2573661</guid>
		<description>twitter did 2 things for me.
it showed some people my site who are bloggers and it popped up on a few sites tracking tweets linking back to my site (SEO)
thats pretty much it until now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter did 2 things for me.<br />
it showed some people my site who are bloggers and it popped up on a few sites tracking tweets linking back to my site (SEO)<br />
thats pretty much it until now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wakoopa, Find Software You Never Knew You Needed &#124; SEO Tips Mashup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2573281</link>
		<dc:creator>Wakoopa, Find Software You Never Knew You Needed &#124; SEO Tips Mashup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2573281</guid>
		<description>[...] So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TreeWorks Blog &#187; Tweet your life away</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2571213</link>
		<dc:creator>TreeWorks Blog &#187; Tweet your life away</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2571213</guid>
		<description>[...] bine, citeam pe TechCruch zilele trecute despre un site destinat celor din tabara opusa: cei care nu se mai satura de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bine, citeam pe TechCruch zilele trecute despre un site destinat celor din tabara opusa: cei care nu se mai satura de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consejos, utilidades y curiosidades para freelances &#187; Archivo del weblog &#187; 4 aplicaciones de alta y de baja intensidad: twittadicción, decídete de una vez, vídeo en directo y el saxo de Coltrane</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2568977</link>
		<dc:creator>Consejos, utilidades y curiosidades para freelances &#187; Archivo del weblog &#187; 4 aplicaciones de alta y de baja intensidad: twittadicción, decídete de una vez, vídeo en directo y el saxo de Coltrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2568977</guid>
		<description>[...] Visto [o soñado] en Techcrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Visto [o soñado] en Techcrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Cuánto tiempo pierdes en Twitter? &#124; Noticias, novedades, tecnología, programación - Bit &#38; Bit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2568617</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Cuánto tiempo pierdes en Twitter? &#124; Noticias, novedades, tecnología, programación - Bit &#38; Bit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2568617</guid>
		<description>[...] al ver los resultados de Tweetwasters realmente me deprimí. Tweetwasters es un servicio que mide el tiempo que perdiste en Twitter y, según la aplicación web, estuve más de un día perdiendo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] al ver los resultados de Tweetwasters realmente me deprimí. Tweetwasters es un servicio que mide el tiempo que perdiste en Twitter y, según la aplicación web, estuve más de un día perdiendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567819</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567819</guid>
		<description>I swear Chris, you are such a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear Chris, you are such a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time Spent on Twitter = ? &#124; Startup Meme - Technology Startup and Latest Tech News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567679</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Spent on Twitter = ? &#124; Startup Meme - Technology Startup and Latest Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567679</guid>
		<description>[...] Tweetwasters you can calculate how much time you’re actually doing productive work, and where you need to cut down (stop posting worthless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tweetwasters you can calculate how much time you’re actually doing productive work, and where you need to cut down (stop posting worthless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Cuánto tiempo pierdes en Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567652</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Cuánto tiempo pierdes en Twitter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567652</guid>
		<description>[...] al ver los resultados de Tweetwasters realmente me deprimí. Tweetwasters es un servicio que mide el tiempo que perdiste en Twitter y, según la aplicación web, estuve más de un día perdiendo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] al ver los resultados de Tweetwasters realmente me deprimí. Tweetwasters es un servicio que mide el tiempo que perdiste en Twitter y, según la aplicación web, estuve más de un día perdiendo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon Antonio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567603</guid>
		<description>What a waste of time. Seems people in the US do not use twitter... they are so efficient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a waste of time. Seems people in the US do not use twitter&#8230; they are so efficient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liveindya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567491</link>
		<dc:creator>liveindya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567491</guid>
		<description>twitter is really a wastage of time 

www.liveindya.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter is really a wastage of time </p>
<p><a href="http://www.liveindya.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.liveindya.com'>http://www.liveindya.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aisinvon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567374</link>
		<dc:creator>aisinvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567374</guid>
		<description>I just spend 0.7hours since i had registered on twitter,so must i be happy or sad about this ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spend 0.7hours since i had registered on twitter,so must i be happy or sad about this ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? &#171; Tech Test</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/14/so-how-much-time-do-you-waste-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2567327</link>
		<dc:creator>So How Much Time Do You Waste On Twitter? &#171; Tech Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=33377#comment-2567327</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
